Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3/2018

20.02.2016 | SOCIAL LCA IN PROGRESS

Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany

verfasst von: Anke Siebert, Alberto Bezama, Sinéad O’Keeffe, Daniela Thrän

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

With many policies in Germany steering towards a bioeconomy, there is a need for analytical tools that assess not only the environmental and economic implications but also the social implications of a transition to a bioeconomy. Wood is expected to become a major biomass resource in bioeconomy regions. Therefore, this paper develops a social life cycle assessment (sLCA) framework that can be applied specifically to a wood-based production system in one of Germany’s bioeconomy regions.

Methods

This paper reviews and analyses existing sLCA approaches, in terms of how applicable they are for assessing a wood-based production system in a German bioeconomy regional context. The analysis is structured according to the standard phases of environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). However, we use the term social effects rather than social impacts, to acknowledge the unknown cause–effect relationship between an organisation’s activities and its social impacts. We also consider the establishment of regional system boundaries, as well as the relationship between the social effects and the product being assessed. Additionally, an approach for the development and selection of social indicators and indices is outlined. Furthermore, we discuss data requirements and present an approach for a social life cycle impact assessment method.

Results and discussion

A new conceptual framework for a context-specific sLCA to assess wood-based products manufactured in a bioeconomy region was developed. It enables sLCA practitioners to identify “social hotspots” and “social opportunities” from a regional perspective. The location and characteristics of these social hotspots and opportunities can be analysed, in particular, for major production activities in a bioeconomy region in Germany. Therefore, according to this framework, the development of social indices and indicators, the collection of data and the approach used for characterising social effects need to relate to the geographical context of the product being assessed. The proposed framework can, thus, help to identify, monitor and evaluate the social sustainability of wood-based bioeconomy chains in a regional context.

Conclusions

This framework requires a high level of detail in the social inventory and impact assessment phase, in order to assess the regional foreground activities in a German wood-based bioeconomy region. It enables sLCA studies to identify which social hotspots and social opportunities occur and where they are located in the wood-based production system of a regional bioeconomy.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
A forest cluster encompasses raw timber-producing forestry enterprises, processing industries of semi-finished wood, pulp and paper products, and downstream manufacturing industries that provide end consumers with various finished wood and paper products (Kies et al. 2010).
 
2
Most social life cycle assessment (sLCA) studies refer to the assessment of impact categories and thus potential social impacts. However, we use the terminology of Macombe et al. (2013) who suggest using the term “social effects” in order to take into account the insufficiently modelled relationships between activities and impacts.
 
3
Performance reference points (e.g. average German working week) indicates thresholds, benchmarks or objectives (UNEP-SETAC 2009) developed with regard to a production site’s geographic location and its corresponding industrial sector. (Please see Sect. 4, where we discuss the social life cycle impact assessment, for more details on the suggested PRPs.)
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat (GRI) Global Reporting Initiative (2011) Sustainability reporting guidelines (GRI) Global Reporting Initiative (2011) Sustainability reporting guidelines
Zurück zum Zitat (SAI) SAI SA8000 (2008) Social accountability 8000 (SAI) SAI SA8000 (2008) Social accountability 8000
Zurück zum Zitat (SMUL) Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft (2013) Sachsen hat Zukunft: Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie für den Freistaat Sachsen. https://www.smul.sachsen.de/smul/download/. Accessed 10 December 2014 (SMUL) Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft (2013) Sachsen hat Zukunft: Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie für den Freistaat Sachsen. https://​www.​smul.​sachsen.​de/​smul/​download/​.​ Accessed 10 December 2014
Zurück zum Zitat Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):156–163CrossRef Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):156–163CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benoît-Norris C, Norris GA, Aulisio D (2014) Efficient assessment of social hotspots in the supply chains of 100 product categories using the social hotspots database. Sustainability 6(10):6973–6984CrossRef Benoît-Norris C, Norris GA, Aulisio D (2014) Efficient assessment of social hotspots in the supply chains of 100 product categories using the social hotspots database. Sustainability 6(10):6973–6984CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brent A, Labuschagne C (2006) Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):3–15CrossRef Brent A, Labuschagne C (2006) Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):3–15CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chang Y, Sproesser G, Neugebauer S, Wolf K, Scheumann R, Pittner A, Rethmeier M, Finkbeiner M (2015) Environmental and social life cycle assessment of welding technologies. Procedia CIRP 26:293–298CrossRef Chang Y, Sproesser G, Neugebauer S, Wolf K, Scheumann R, Pittner A, Rethmeier M, Finkbeiner M (2015) Environmental and social life cycle assessment of welding technologies. Procedia CIRP 26:293–298CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabeled notebook: consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. GreenDeltaTC GmbH, Berlin Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabeled notebook: consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. GreenDeltaTC GmbH, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat DIN ISO 26000 (2010) Guidance on social responsibility DIN ISO 26000 (2010) Guidance on social responsibility
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRef Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010a) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):247–259CrossRef Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010a) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):247–259CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010b) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 2: implementation in six company case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(4):385–402CrossRef Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010b) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 2: implementation in six company case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(4):385–402CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA – part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143CrossRef Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA – part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F (2012) Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 30(1):34–42CrossRef Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F (2012) Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 30(1):34–42CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feschet P, Garrabé M (2013) Social LCA and sustainable development. In: Macombe C (ed) Social LCAs: socio-economic effects in value chains. FruiTrop, Montpellier Feschet P, Garrabé M (2013) Social LCA and sustainable development. In: Macombe C (ed) Social LCAs: socio-economic effects in value chains. FruiTrop, Montpellier
Zurück zum Zitat Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):155–171CrossRef Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):155–171CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379CrossRef Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fuchs M, Rauscher C, Weyh A (2014) Die regionalen Unterschiede in Deutschland sind groß. IAB-Kurzbericht Fuchs M, Rauscher C, Weyh A (2014) Die regionalen Unterschiede in Deutschland sind groß. IAB-Kurzbericht
Zurück zum Zitat Halog A, Manik Y (2011) Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 3(12):469–499CrossRef Halog A, Manik Y (2011) Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 3(12):469–499CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hauschild MZ, Dreyer LC, Jørgensen A (2008) Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective—lessons learned. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):21–24CrossRef Hauschild MZ, Dreyer LC, Jørgensen A (2008) Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective—lessons learned. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):21–24CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heijungs R, Suh S (2002) The computational structure of life cycle assessment. Eco-efficiency in industry and science, vol 11. Kluwer Acad. Publ, DordrechtCrossRef Heijungs R, Suh S (2002) The computational structure of life cycle assessment. Eco-efficiency in industry and science, vol 11. Kluwer Acad. Publ, DordrechtCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):620–645CrossRef Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):620–645CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382CrossRef Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103CrossRef Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kies U, Klein D, Schulte A (2010) Germany's forest cluster: exploratory spatial data analysis of regional agglomerations and structural change in wood-based employment- primary wood processing. Forstarchiv 81(6):233–272 Kies U, Klein D, Schulte A (2010) Germany's forest cluster: exploratory spatial data analysis of regional agglomerations and structural change in wood-based employment- primary wood processing. Forstarchiv 81(6):233–272
Zurück zum Zitat Kircher M (2012) The transition to a bio-economy: national perspectives. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 6(3):240–245CrossRef Kircher M (2012) The transition to a bio-economy: national perspectives. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 6(3):240–245CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klöpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95CrossRef Klöpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3(12):562–577CrossRef Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3(12):562–577CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Macombe C (ed) (2013) Social LCAs: socio-economic effects in value chains. FruiTrop, Montpellier Macombe C (ed) (2013) Social LCAs: socio-economic effects in value chains. FruiTrop, Montpellier
Zurück zum Zitat Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216CrossRef Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social life cycle assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48CrossRef Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social life cycle assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mathe S (2014) Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1506–1514CrossRef Mathe S (2014) Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1506–1514CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Müller K, Knierim A (2012) Bioökonomie und der Mensch. Biol Unserer Zeit 42(2):123–128CrossRef Müller K, Knierim A (2012) Bioökonomie und der Mensch. Biol Unserer Zeit 42(2):123–128CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Keeffe S, Majer S, Bezama A, Thrän D (2016) When considering no man is an Island - assessing bioenergy systems in a regional and LCA context: a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1057-1 O’Keeffe S, Majer S, Bezama A, Thrän D (2016) When considering no man is an Island - assessing bioenergy systems in a regional and LCA context: a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.​1007/​s11367-016-1057-1
Zurück zum Zitat Paragahawewa U, Blackett P, Bruce S (2009) Social life cycle analysis (S-LCA). Some methodological issues and potential application to cheese production in New Zealand Paragahawewa U, Blackett P, Bruce S (2009) Social life cycle analysis (S-LCA). Some methodological issues and potential application to cheese production in New Zealand
Zurück zum Zitat Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J (2013) Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1642–1652CrossRef Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J (2013) Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1642–1652CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Petti L, Lie Ugaya CM, Di Cesare S (2014) Systematic review of social-life cycle assessment (S-LCA) case studies. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Social LCA in progress. FruiTrop, Montpellier Petti L, Lie Ugaya CM, Di Cesare S (2014) Systematic review of social-life cycle assessment (S-LCA) case studies. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Social LCA in progress. FruiTrop, Montpellier
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez PKS, Petti L, Haberland NT, Ugaya CML (2014) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1515–1523CrossRef Ramirez PKS, Petti L, Haberland NT, Ugaya CML (2014) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1515–1523CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raschka A, Carus M (2012) Stoffliche Nutzung von Biomasse: Basisdaten für Deutschland. Europa und die Welt, Hürth Raschka A, Carus M (2012) Stoffliche Nutzung von Biomasse: Basisdaten für Deutschland. Europa und die Welt, Hürth
Zurück zum Zitat Reitinger C, Dumke M, Barosevcic M, Hillerbrand R (2011) A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):380–388 Reitinger C, Dumke M, Barosevcic M, Hillerbrand R (2011) A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):380–388
Zurück zum Zitat Revéret J, Couture J, Parent J (2015) Socioeconomic LCA of milk production in Canada. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment: an insight. Springer, Singapore Revéret J, Couture J, Parent J (2015) Socioeconomic LCA of milk production in Canada. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment: an insight. Springer, Singapore
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt I, Meurer M, Saling P, Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch C (2004) SEEbalance - managing sustainability of products and processes with the socio-eco-efficiency analysis by BASF, 45th edn Schmidt I, Meurer M, Saling P, Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch C (2004) SEEbalance - managing sustainability of products and processes with the socio-eco-efficiency analysis by BASF, 45th edn
Zurück zum Zitat Swarr TE (2009) Societal life cycle assessment—could you repeat the question? Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(4):285–289CrossRef Swarr TE (2009) Societal life cycle assessment—could you repeat the question? Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(4):285–289CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat UNEP-SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme, Paris UNEP-SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Zamagni A, Amerighi O, Buttol P (2011) Strengths or bias in social LCA? Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):596–598CrossRef Zamagni A, Amerighi O, Buttol P (2011) Strengths or bias in social LCA? Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):596–598CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany
verfasst von
Anke Siebert
Alberto Bezama
Sinéad O’Keeffe
Daniela Thrän
Publikationsdatum
20.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe