Skip to main content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering 1/2012

01.02.2012 | Catchword

Software Ecosystems

verfasst von: Dipl.-Wirtsch.-Inform. Christoph Burkard, Dr. Thomas Widjaja, Prof. Dr. Peter Buxmann

Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

In the software industry, more and more products are offered as systems that are composed of complementary components. Certain components constitute the core product which is the center of a so-called “Software Ecosystem” (SECO). In addition, complementary components are offered by independent vendors (Bosch 2009, p. 1). SECOs are generally defined as “a set of actors functioning as a unit and interacting with a shared market for software and services, together with the relationships among them. These relationships are frequently underpinned by a common technological platform or market and operate through the exchange of information, resources and artifacts” (Jansen et al. 2009, p. 35). The idea to offer software systems based on core products combined with complementary solutions from an ecosystem is applied in both the business-to-business (B2B) and the business-to-consumer (B2C) sector. Examples in the B2C sector are Apple with its App Store, Google with its Android Marketplace and Microsoft with its Windows Phone Marketplace. The App Store is the biggest SECO of these examples having sold 160 million consumer devices (so-called iOS devices; as of December 2010) and with 70.000 independent vendors participating in the US App Store. 1 In the B2B sector, several providers pursue similar approaches. Companies like salesforce.com with AppExchange, SugarCRM with SugarExchange, NetSuite with SuiteApp.com, Google with the Google Apps Marketplace and Microsoft with Pinpoint run marketplaces to supplement their products with complementary applications. These applications are either offered by the respective company itself or by independent vendors. …

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe



 


Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Fußnoten
1
Determined by means of the “Framework for automated Data Collection in Online Marketplaces” (FaDOM) as of beginning of March 2011.
 
2
Evans et al. (2006, p. vii) describe a software platform as “a software program that makes services available to other software programs through Application Programming Interfaces (APIs).”
 
3
The data are collected weekly by FaDOM since 2010. For every marketplace only Software as a Service products are considered (e.g., the category “Online Application”) for reasons of comparability. The data for Pinpoint refer to the US version. The gap at AppExchange results from a deficient data collection on 2010-11-15 which was not included in the evaluation.
 
4
The mapping of dependent vendors was conducted by name of the vendor. The three vendors “Force.com Labs” (246 niche solutions), “salesforce.com” (10 niche solutions) and “Salesforce.com Foundation” (5 niche solutions) could be identified as dependent niche vendors.
 
5
The bigger, the more niche solutions; the size of the biggest, checked circle – Force.com Labs – was reduced due to the large number of niche solutions. Note that the positions of the circles in the figure have no meaning.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. Rand J Econ 37(3):668–691 CrossRef Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. Rand J Econ 37(3):668–691 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bosch J (2009) From software product lines to software ecosystems. In: Proc 13th international software product line conference, San Francisco Bosch J (2009) From software product lines to software ecosystems. In: Proc 13th international software product line conference, San Francisco
Zurück zum Zitat Buxmann P, Diefenbach H, Hess T (2011) Die Softwareindustrie. Ökonomische Prinzipien, Strategien, Perspektiven, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Buxmann P, Diefenbach H, Hess T (2011) Die Softwareindustrie. Ökonomische Prinzipien, Strategien, Perspektiven, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Cusumano MA, Gawer A (2002) The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 43(3):51–58 Cusumano MA, Gawer A (2002) The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 43(3):51–58
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Alstyne MV (2009) Opening platforms: how, when and why. In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Alstyne MV (2009) Opening platforms: how, when and why. In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Zurück zum Zitat Evans DS, Hagiu A, Schmalensee R (2006) Invisible engines: how software platforms drive innovation and transform Industries. MIT Press, Cambridge Evans DS, Hagiu A, Schmalensee R (2006) Invisible engines: how software platforms drive innovation and transform Industries. MIT Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Hilkert D, Benlian A, Hess T (2010) Motivational drivers to develop apps for social software-platforms: the example of Facebook. In: Proc 16th Americas conference on information systems, Lima Hilkert D, Benlian A, Hess T (2010) Motivational drivers to develop apps for social software-platforms: the example of Facebook. In: Proc 16th Americas conference on information systems, Lima
Zurück zum Zitat Iansiti M, Levien R (2004) Strategy as ecology. Harv Bus Rev 82(3):68–81 Iansiti M, Levien R (2004) Strategy as ecology. Harv Bus Rev 82(3):68–81
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen S, Brinkkemper S, Finkelstein A (2009) Business network management as a survival strategy: a tale of two software ecosystems. In: Proc first workshop on software ecosystems, Virginia Jansen S, Brinkkemper S, Finkelstein A (2009) Business network management as a survival strategy: a tale of two software ecosystems. In: Proc first workshop on software ecosystems, Virginia
Zurück zum Zitat Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am Econ Rev 75(3):424–440 Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am Econ Rev 75(3):424–440
Zurück zum Zitat Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J Econ Perspect 8(2):93–115 CrossRef Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J Econ Perspect 8(2):93–115 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann S, Buxmann P (2009) Pricing strategies of software vendors. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(6):452–462 CrossRef Lehmann S, Buxmann P (2009) Pricing strategies of software vendors. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(6):452–462 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029 CrossRef Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roson R (2005) Two-sided markets: a tentative survey. Rev Network Econom 4(2):142–160 Roson R (2005) Two-sided markets: a tentative survey. Rev Network Econom 4(2):142–160
Zurück zum Zitat Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J Econ Perspect 23(3):125–143 CrossRef Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J Econ Perspect 23(3):125–143 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yoffie DB, Kwak M (2006) With friends like these. Harv Bus Rev 84(9):88–98 Yoffie DB, Kwak M (2006) With friends like these. Harv Bus Rev 84(9):88–98
Metadaten
Titel
Software Ecosystems
verfasst von
Dipl.-Wirtsch.-Inform. Christoph Burkard
Dr. Thomas Widjaja
Prof. Dr. Peter Buxmann
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2012
Verlag
SP Gabler Verlag
Erschienen in
Business & Information Systems Engineering / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 2363-7005
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-0202
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-011-0199-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Business & Information Systems Engineering 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner