Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Scope of Pedometrics Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Soil Material Classes

verfasst von : Nathan P. Odgers, Alex. B. McBratney

Erschienen in: Pedometrics

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Soil classification is really about answering the question what makes a soil? Or, perhaps, what makes one soil different from another? To answer questions like these, soil classifiers create taxonomic rules to separate one kind of soil from another and categorise and make sense of the diverse pattern of the soil continuum. Traditionally a great deal of consideration has been given to characterising and classifying the whole soil profile in a top-down fashion. Pedometric methods allow us to answer the same questions in a bottom-up trajectory. Thus, the starting point is not the whole soil profile or even its major constituents, the soil horizons. Rather we start by classifying the actual, tangible, skeleton of soil itself: the soil material.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Pedotransfer Functions and Soil Inference Systems
Nächstes Kapitel Soil Profile Classes
Literatur
Anderson AJB (1971) Numeric examination of multivariate soil samples. Math Geol 3:1–14CrossRef
Bezdek JC (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms, advanced applications in pattern recognition. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRef
Bidwell OW, Hole FD (1964a) Numerical taxonomy and soil classification. Soil Sci 97:58–62CrossRef
Bidwell OW, Hole FD (1964b) An experiment in the numerical classification of some Kansas soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 28:263–268CrossRef
Blackith RE, Reyment RA (1971) Multivariate morphometrics. Academic Press, London
Bolliger J, Mladenoff DJ (2005) Quantifying spatial classification uncertainties of the historical Wisconsin landscape (USA). Ecography 28:141–156CrossRef
Bouma J (1985) Soil variability and soil survey. In: Nielsen DR, Bouma J (eds) Soil spatial variability: proceedings of a Workshop of the ISSS and SSSA, Las Vegas, USA, 30 November–1 December 1984. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 130–149
Bridges EM (1990) Soil horizon designations (No. Technical Report 19). International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen
Brus, D.J., de Gruijter, J.J., van Groenigen, J.W., 2006. Designing spatial coverage samples using the k-means clustering algorithm, in: Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A.B., Voltz, M. (Eds.), Digital soil mapping—an introductory perspective, developments in soil science. Elsevier, pp. 183–192
Buol, S.W., 2003. Philosophies of soil classifications: from is to does, in: Eswaran, H., Rice, T., Ahrens, R., Stewart, B.A. (Eds.), Soil classification: a global desk reference. CRC Press LLC, pp. 3–10CrossRef
Burrough PA, Wilson JP, van Gaans PFM, Hansen AJ (2001) Fuzzy k-means classification of topo-climatic data as an aid to forest mapping in the greater Yellowstone area, USA. Landsc Ecol 16:523–546. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1013167712622 CrossRef
Campbell JB (1996) Introduction to remote sensing, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, New York
Campbell NA, Mulcahy MJ, McArthur WM (1970) Numerical classification of soil profiles on the basis of field morphological properties. Aust J Soil Res 8:43–58. doi:10.​1071/​SR9700043 CrossRef
Clifford HT, Williams WT (1976) Similarity measures. In: Williams WT (ed) Pattern analysis in agricultural science. CSIRO, East Melbourne, pp 37–46
Cline MG (1949) Basic principles of soil classification. Soil Sci 67:81–92CrossRef
Cox GM, Martin WP (1937) Use of a discriminant function for differentiating soils with different Azotobacter populations. Iowa State Coll J Sci 11:323–331
de Gruijter JJ, McBratney AB (1988) A modified fuzzy k-means method for predictive classification. In: Bock HH (ed) Classification and related methods of data analysis. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam, pp 97–104
de Gruijter JJ, Walvoort DJJ, van Gaans PFM (1997) Continuous soil maps—a fuzzy set approach to bridge the gap between aggregation levels of process and distribution models. Geoderma 77:169–195. doi:10.​1016/​S0016-7061(97)00021-9 CrossRef
Dobermann A, Witt C, Abdulrachman S, Gines HC, Nagarajan R, Son TT, Tan PS, Wang GH, Chien NV, Thoa VTK, Phung CV, Stalin P, Muthukrishnan P, Ravi V, Babu M, Simbahan GC, Adviento MAA (2003) Soil fertility and indigenous nutrient supply in irrigated rice domains of Asia. Agron J 95:913–923. doi:10.​2134/​agronj2003.​9130 CrossRef
Falkenauer, E., Marchand, A., 2001. Using k-means? Consider ArrayMiner. Presented at the International Conference on Mathematics and Engineering Techniques in Medicine and Biological Sciences, Las Vegas
FAO (2014) World reference base for soil resources (No. 106), World soil resources reports. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome
Fidêncio PH, Ruisánchez I, Poppi RJ (2001) Application of artificial neural networks to the classification of soils from São Paulo state using near-infrared spectroscopy. Analyst 126:2194–2200. doi:10.​1039/​B107533K CrossRef
Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugenics 7:179–188CrossRef
FitzPatrick EA (1967) Soil nomenclature and classification. Geoderma 1:91–105CrossRef
FitzPatrick EA (1976) Soil horizons and homology. Classif Soc Bull 3:68–89
FitzPatrick EA (1988) Soil horizon designation and classification (Technical Paper No. 17), Technical paper. International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen
Gibbons, F.R., 1968. Limitations to the usefulness of soil classification. Presented at the 9th International Congress of Soil Science, Adelaide, South Australia, pp. 159–167
Goodenough, D., Shlien, S., 1974. Results of cover-type classification by maximum likelihood and parallelepiped methods, in: Proceedings of the Second Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing. Presented at the Second Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, Canadian Remote Sensing Society, University of Guelph, pp. 136–164
Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857–874CrossRef
Hartigan JA (1975) Clustering algorithms, probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York
Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) Algorithm AS 136: a k-means clustering algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 28:100–108
Healy, M.J.R., 1965. Descriptive uses of discriminant functions. In: Mathematics and computer science in biology and medicine: Proceedings of a Conference Held by Medical Research Council in Association with the Health Departments, Oxford, July 1964. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 93–102
Hole FD, Hironaka M (1960) An experiment in ordination of some soil profiles. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 24:309–312CrossRef
Holmgren, G.G.S., 1986. The soil individual. Presented at the Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of Soil Science, Hamburg, pp. 1146–1147
Holmgren GGS (1988) The point representation of soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:712–716CrossRef
Kantardzic, M., 2011. Preparing the data, data mining: concepts, models, methods, and algorithms. Wiley, Hoboken, 26–52
Knox EG (1965) Soil individuals and soil classification. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 29:79–84CrossRef
Leone AP, Sommer S (2000) Multivariate analysis of laboratory spectra for the assessment of soil development and soil degradation in the southern Apennines (Italy). Remote Sens Environ 72:346–359. doi:10.​1016/​S0034-4257(99)00110-8 CrossRef
Liu M, Samal A (2002b) Cluster validation using legacy delineations. Image Vis Comput 20:459–467CrossRef
Mahalanobis PC (1936) On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc Natl Inst Sci India 2:49–55
Mallavan, B.P., Minasny, B., McBratney, A.B., 2010. Homosoil, a methodology for quantitative extrapolation of soil information across the globe, In: Boettinger, J.L., Howell, D.W., Moore, A.C., Hartemink, A.E., Kienast-Brown, S., McBratney, A.B. (Eds.), Digital soil mapping: bridging research, environmental application, and operation, progress in soil science. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., pp. 137–149. doi:10.​1007/​978-90-481-8863-5_​12 CrossRef
Marbut, C.F., 1920. The contribution of soil surveys to soil science, In: Proceedings of the Forty-First Annual Meeting of the Society for the Promotion of Agricultural Science. Presented at the Forty-First Annual Meeting of the Society for the Promotion of Agricultural Science, Springfield, Massachusetts, pp. 116–142
Mather PM, Koch M (2011) Computer processing of remotely-sensed images: an introduction, 4th edn. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
Mazaheri SA, Koppi AJ, McBratney AB (1995) A fuzzy allocation scheme for the Australian great soil groups classification system. Eur J Soil Sci 46:601–612CrossRef
Metternicht GI (2003) Categorical fuzziness: a comparison between crisp and fuzzy class boundary modelling for mapping salt-affected soils using Landsat TM data and a classification based on anion ratios. Ecol Model 168:371–389. doi:10.​1016/​S0304-3800(03)00147-9 CrossRef
Moore, A.W., Isbell, R.F., Northcote, K.H., 1983. Classification of Australian soils, In: Soils: an Australian viewpoint. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp. 253–266
Nikiforoff CC (1931) History of A, B, C. Bull Am Soil Surv Assoc 12:67–70
Rao CR (1948) The utilization of multiple measurements in problems of biological classification. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 10:159–193
Ribeiro MV, Cunha LMS, Camargo HA, Rodrigues LHA (2014) Applying a fuzzy decision tree approach to soil classification. In: Laurent A, Strauss O, Bouchon-Meunier B, Yager RR (eds) Information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems, communications in computer and information science. Springer, Cham, pp 87–96
Robinove, C.J., 1979. Integrated terrain mapping with digital landsat images in Queensland, Australia (Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 1102). United States Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Roudier, P., Manderson, A., Hedley, C., 2016. Advances towards quantitative assessments of soil profile properties, In: Hartemink, A.E., Minasny, B. (Eds.), Digital soil Morphometrics, progress in soil science. Springer International, pp. 113–132. doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-28295-4_​8 CrossRef
Schulz K, Huwe B (1999) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of water transport modelling in a layered soil profile using fuzzy set theory. J Hydroinf 1:127–138
Simonson, R.W., Gardiner, D.R., 1960. Concept and functions of the pedon. Presented at the 7th International Congress of Soil Science, pp. 127–131
Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification, A series of books in biology. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco
Soil Survey Staff (1993) Soil Survey Manual, U. S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service
Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, 2nd ed. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service
Sokal RR (1961) Distance as a measure of taxonomic similarity. Syst Zool 10:70–79CrossRef
Sokal RR (1963) The principles and practice of numerical taxonomy. Taxon 12:190–199CrossRef
Sokal RR, Michener CD (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 38:1409–1438
Sokal RR, Sneath PHA (1963) Principles of numerical taxonomy, A series of books in biology. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco
Stace HCT, Hubble GD, Brewer R, Northcote KH, Sleeman JR, Mulcahy MJ, Hallsworth EG (1968) A handbook of Australian soils. Rellim Technical Publications, Glenside
Triantafilis J, Ward WT, Odeh IOA, McBratney AB (2001) Creation and interpolation of continuous soil layer classes in the lower Namoi valley. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:403–413CrossRef
Triantafilis J, Odeh IOA, Minasny B, McBratney AB (2003) Elucidation of physiographic and hydrogeological features of the lower Namoi valley using fuzzy k-means classification of EM34 data. Environ Model Softw 18:667–680. doi:10.​1016/​S1364-8152(03)00053-7 CrossRef
Verma P, Singh P, George KV, Singh HV, Devotta S, Singh RN (2009) Uncertainty analysis of transport of water and pesticide in an unsaturated layered soil profile using fuzzy set theory. Appl Math Model 33:770–782. doi:10.​1016/​j.​apm.​2007.​12.​004 CrossRef
Webster R (1977) Quantitative and numerical methods in soil classification and survey. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Webster R, Oliver MA (1990) Statistical methods in soil and land resource survey, spatial information systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Williams WT (1976a) Attributes. In: Williams WT (ed) Pattern analysis in agricultural science. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 31–36
Williams WT (1976b) Types of classification. In: Williams WT (ed) Pattern analysis in agricultural science. CSIRO, East Melbourne, pp 76–83
Metadaten
Titel
Soil Material Classes
verfasst von
Nathan P. Odgers
Alex. B. McBratney
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Pedometrics

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63437-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-63439-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63439-5_8