Skip to main content

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Solving Design Problems: A Blended Learning Approach Based on Design Thinking Features

verfasst von : Khe Foon Hew, Wing Sum Cheung

Erschienen in: Using Blended Learning

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Individuals encounter various problems every day in their workplaces. The problems might involve decision-making (e.g., Should I use a bell to help my trainees settle down quickly lunch?), trouble-shooting (e.g. How do I get this printer to work with the computer?), or design (e.g. How can I design a weather forecasting lesson activity for a 40-min class period?). One particular concern of many teacher trainees is solving design related problems. Design problems are the most complex and ill-structured type of problem. In this chapter, we first describe the characteristics of ill-structured problems and later discuss how people design, including design thinking. We then describe some limitations of the traditional classroom environment to support design problem solving, and propose a blended learning approach which incorporates design thinking features. We subsequently describe an empirical study that tested this blended learning approach to help students, who took an education elective course, design instructional programs such as web-based learning material and computer-based multimedia learning packages. Overall, we found significantly better students’ performance in their final design projects (M = 18.5, SD = 2.21) compared to previous students (M = 14.9, SD = 3.50), (t = −3.525, df = 33, p < 0.01) who did not utilize the blended learning approach based on design thinking features. We discuss several important lessons learned that could inform the design of future instructional strategies in implementing blended learning for the purpose of helping students solve design problems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Zurück zum Zitat Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper’s World 3. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 21–23.CrossRef Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper’s World 3. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 21–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review (June}, 1–9. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review (June}, 1–9.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: HarperBusiness. Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: HarperBusiness.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 31–35. Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 31–35.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2011). Design and evaluation of two blended learning approaches: Lessons learned. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1319–1337. Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2011). Design and evaluation of two blended learning approaches: Lessons learned. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1319–1337.
Zurück zum Zitat Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. New York: Berg Publishers. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. New York: Berg Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey Model: Will it survive the decade? Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55–63.CrossRef Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey Model: Will it survive the decade? Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32, 521–532.CrossRef Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32, 521–532.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.CrossRef Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dym, C. L., & Little, L. (2004). Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction (2nd ed.)., New York: Wiley. Dym, C. L., & Little, L. (2004). Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction (2nd ed.)., New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training (April), 43–52. Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training (April), 43–52.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
Zurück zum Zitat Hekkert, P., & van Dijk, M. B. (2011). Vision in design: a guidebook for innovators. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers. Hekkert, P., & van Dijk, M. B. (2011). Vision in design: a guidebook for innovators. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2012). Student participation in online discussions: Challenges, solutions, and future research. New York: Springer.CrossRef Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2012). Student participation in online discussions: Challenges, solutions, and future research. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.CrossRef Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.CrossRef Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). UK: Elsevier, Oxford. Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). UK: Elsevier, Oxford.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim, S. H. S. (2011). Case studies of pupil designing. Unpublished master dissertation. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Lim, S. H. S. (2011). Case studies of pupil designing. Unpublished master dissertation. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Zurück zum Zitat McManus, I. C., Jones, A. L., & Cottrell, J. (1981). The aesthetics of colour. Perception, 10, 651–666. McManus, I. C., Jones, A. L., & Cottrell, J. (1981). The aesthetics of colour. Perception, 10, 651–666.
Zurück zum Zitat Meacham, J. A., & Emont, N. C. (1989). The interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications (pp. 7–23). New York: Praeger. Meacham, J. A., & Emont, N. C. (1989). The interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications (pp. 7–23). New York: Praeger.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Zurück zum Zitat Mostow, J. (1985). Toward better models of the design process. AI Magazine, 6(1), 44–66. Mostow, J. (1985). Toward better models of the design process. AI Magazine, 6(1), 44–66.
Zurück zum Zitat Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: Notes on its nature and uses. Design Research Quarterly, 2, 16–27. Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: Notes on its nature and uses. Design Research Quarterly, 2, 16–27.
Zurück zum Zitat Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.CrossRef Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaggs, P., Fry, R., & Howell, B. (2009, March 19–21). Thinking about design thinking. Paper presented at the NCIIA 13th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. Skaggs, P., Fry, R., & Howell, B. (2009, March 19–21). Thinking about design thinking. Paper presented at the NCIIA 13th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Zurück zum Zitat Yau C-M., & Ong. C. C. (2005). Pupils’ views towards design and technology in Singapore. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 10(3), 37–49. Yau C-M., & Ong. C. C. (2005). Pupils’ views towards design and technology in Singapore. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 10(3), 37–49.
Metadaten
Titel
Solving Design Problems: A Blended Learning Approach Based on Design Thinking Features
verfasst von
Khe Foon Hew
Wing Sum Cheung
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-089-6_3