Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Many scholars have argued that primary elections are an important factor in the polarization of the American Congress. Yet little research measures change in the policy preferences of primary electorates to evaluate the connection directly. We create the first explicit measures of the preferences of primary voters over the last 60 years using a Bayesian item-response theory model. Although the overall distribution of population preferences has changed little, the preferences of primary voters are now much more related to the party of the primary that they attend. We show that liberals are much more likely to turn out in Democratic primaries and conservatives are much more likely to turn out in Republican primaries. We estimate that the divergence of primary from general electorates is six times larger in 2012 than in 1958 owing to this “primary sorting”. This trend began with the emergence of the Southern Republicans. As the Republican party became viable, conservative Southerners switched to Republican primaries leading to a leftward shift in Democratic primary electorates. Nationwide, primary sorting began sometime after it began in the South. We speculate that Southern realignment played a clarifying role that contributed to subsequent sorting of primary electorates nationwide.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
American National Election Studies. (2014). The American National Election Studies ( www.electionstudies.org) Time Series Cumulative Data File [dataset]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University and the University of Michigan [producers and distributors].
Aranson, P. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1972). Spatial strategies for sequential elections. In R. G. Niemi & H. F. Weisberg (Eds.), Probability models of collective decision making. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.
Black, E., & Black, M. (2009). The rise of southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Black, M. (1978). Racial composition of congressional districts and support for federalvoting rights In the American south. Social Science Quarterly, 59(3), 435–450.
Brady, D. W., Han, H., & Pope, J. C. (2007). Primary elections and candidate ideology: Out of step with the primary electorate? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32(1), 79–105. CrossRef
Bullock, W., & Clinton, J. D. (2011). More a molehill than a mountain: The effects of the blanket primary on elected officials behavior from California. The Journal of Politics, 73(03), 915–930. CrossRef
Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74(01), 78–91. CrossRef
Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98(02), 355–370. CrossRef
Coleman, J. S. (1971). Internal processes governing party positions in elections. Public Choice, 11, 35–60. CrossRef
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588. CrossRef
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2012). Disconnect: The breakdown of representation in American politics. Julian J. Rothbaum Distinguished Lecture Series. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. A., & Pope, J. C. (2008). Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings. The Journal of Politics, 70(02), 556–560. CrossRef
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. (2005). Culture war?. New York: Pearson Longman.
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., & Washington, E. (2010). Party affiliation, partisanship, and political beliefs: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 720–744. CrossRef
Han, H., & Brady, D. W. (2007). A delayed return to historical norms: Congressional party polarization after the Second World War. British Journal of Political Science, 37(03), 505–531. CrossRef
Hetherington, M. J. (2009). Review article: Putting polarization in perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 39(02), 413–448. CrossRef
Hill, S. J. (2015). Institution of nomination and the policy ideology of primary electorates. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 461–487. CrossRef
Hill, S. J., & Tausanovitch, C. (2015). A disconnect in representation? Comparison of trends in congressional and public polarization. The Journal of Politics, 77(4), 1058–1075. CrossRef
Hirano, S., Snyder, J. M, Jr., Ansolabehere, S., & Hansen, J. M. (2010). Primary elections and partisan polarization in the US Congress. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 5, 169–191. CrossRef
Hood, M. V., Kidd, Q., & Morris, I. L. (2001). The key issue: Constituency effects and southern senators’ roll-call voting on civil rights. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26(4), 599–621.
Jacobson, G. C. (2003). Partisan polarization in presidential support: The electoral connection. Congress & the Presidency: A Journal of Capital Studies, 30(1), 1–36. CrossRef
Jacobson, G. C. (2012). The electoral origins of polarized politics evidence from the 2010 cooperative congressional election study. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(12), 1612–1630. CrossRef
Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Knopf.
Levendusky, M. (2009a). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Levendusky, M. S. (2009b). The microfoundations of mass polarization. Political Analysis, 17(2), 162–176. CrossRef
Levendusky, M. S. (2010). Clearer cues, more consistent voters: A benefit of elite polarization. Political Behavior, 32(1), 111–131. CrossRef
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2009). Does gerrymandering cause polarization? American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 666–680. CrossRef
McCarty, N. M., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McGhee, E., Masket, S., Shor, B., Rogers, S., & McCarty, N. (2014). A primary cause of partisanship? Nomination systems and legislator ideology. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 337–351. CrossRef
McKee, S. C., & Hayes, D. (2009). Polls and elections: Dixie’s Kingmakers: Stability and change in southern presidential primary electorates. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39(2), 400–417. CrossRef
Nivola, P. S., & Brady, D. W. (2007). Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America’s polarized politics (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Norrander, B., & Wendland, J. (2016). Open versus closed primaries and the ideological composition of presidential primary electorates. Electoral Studies, 42, 229–236. CrossRef
Polsby, N. W. (2005). How Congress evolves: Social bases of institutional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2000). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Reiter, H. L., & Stonecash, J. M. (2011). Counter realignment: Political change in the northeastern United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Schickler, E. (2016). Racial realignment: the transformation of American liberalism, 1932–1965. Princeton studies in American politics: Historical, international, and comparative perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shafer, B. E., & Johnston, R. (2009). The end of Southern exceptionalism: Class, race, and partisan change in the postwar South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sides, J. M., Tausanovitch, C., Warshaw, C., & Vavreck, L. (2014). On the representativeness of primary voters. In The Annual Midwestern Political Science Association Conference.
Theriault, S. M. (2006). Party polarization in the US Congress member replacement and member adaptation. Party Politics, 12(4), 483–503. CrossRef
Thomsen, D. M. (2014). Ideological moderates won’t run: How party fit matters for partisan polarization in Congress. The Journal of Politics, 76(03), 786–797. CrossRef
Vavreck, L. (2007). The exaggerated effects of advertising on turnout: The dangers of self-reports. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(4), 325–343. CrossRef
Voteview Blog, The. (2015). Polarization continues through 2015. (December 28).
- Southern realignment, party sorting, and the polarization of American primary electorates, 1958–2012
Seth J. Hill
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia