Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
The purpose of this study is to determine if “environmental inequity” can be associated with the spatial distribution of Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) facilities in the Chicago area. The chapter examines whether neighborhoods with minority concentrations or lower-income residents experience disproportionate exposure to facilities that release toxic emissions into the environment. Demographic information is extracted from 2000 Census data, and facility data are based on the 2004 Environmental Protection Agency’s Toxic Release Inventory. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is used to create “buffers” of various spatial extent around the facilities. Statistical analysis (including t-tests and regressions) is conducted to examine whether areas within the buffers are significantly more likely to consist of minority and low-income residents and households than areas outside the buffers. Results indicate that at both the census tract and block group levels, Hispanic and non-white classes as well as low-income residents are more likely to be located within the buffers. Therefore, this study corroborates earlier research findings that minority and low-income groups are disproportionately exposed to environmental hazards.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Anderton, D.L., Anderson, A.B., Oakes, J.M., and Fraser, M.R. (1994). Environmental equity: The demographics of dumping. Demography 31: 229–248. CrossRef
Arora, S. and Cason, N. (1999). Do community characteristics influence environmental outcomes? Evidence from the toxics release inventory. Southern Economic Journal 65: 691–716. CrossRef
Baden, B.M., and Coursey, D.L. (2002). The locality of waste sites within the City of Chicago: A demographic, social, and economic analysis. Resource and Energy Economics 24: 53–93. CrossRef
Black, S.A., Eichenthal, D.R., Espinosa, R., Heidinger, T.E., Hogan III, W.C., Levin, M.R., Maude, J.L., Niemi, P., O’Donnell, M., and Wolfberg, M.L. (1983). Latinos in Metropolitan Chicago: A Study of Housing and Employment. Chicago: Latino Institute.
Bolin, B, Matranga, E., Hackett, E.J. Sadalla, E.K., Pijawka, K.D., Brewer, D., and Sicotte, D. (2000). Environmental equity in a sunbelt city: The spatial distribution of toxic hazards in Phoenix, Arizona. Environmental Hazards 2: 11–24. CrossRef
Boone, C.G. and Modarres, A. (1999). Creating a toxic neighborhood in Los Angeles county: A historical examination of environmental inequity. Urban Affairs Review 35: 163–187. CrossRef
Bowen, W.A., Salling, M.J., Haynes, K.E. and Cyran, EJ. (1995). Toward environmental justice: Spatial equity in Ohio and Cleveland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85: 641–663. CrossRef
Bowen, W.M. and Wells, M.V. (2002). The politics and reality of environmental justice: A history and considerations for public administrators and policy makers. Public Administration Review: 62: 688–698. CrossRef
Bullard, R.D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
Bullard, R.D. and Johnson, G.S. (2000). Environmental justice: Grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 56: 555–578. CrossRef
Cole, L.W. and Foster, S.R. (2001). From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement. New York: New York University Press.
Colten, C.E. (1985). Industrial wastes in the Calumet area, 1869 – 1970: An historical geography. Champaign, IL: Hazardous Waste Research and Information Center.
Committee on Environmental Justice, Institute of Medicine (CEJ). (1999). Toward Environmental Justice: Research, Education, and Health Policy Needs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Cronon, W. (1991). Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Dolinoy, D.C. and Miranda, M.L. (2004). GIS modeling of air toxics releases from TRI reporting and non-TRI-reporting facilities: Impacts for environmental justice. Environmental Health Perspectives 112: 1717–1724. CrossRef
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2008a. “What is the Origin of Environmental Justice at EPA?” Environmental Justice: Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/faqs/ej/index.html, last updated February 5. Accessed September 6, 2008.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2008b. “How Does EPA Define Environmental Justice?” Environmental Justice: Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/faqs/ej/index.html, last updated February 5. Accessed September 6, 2008.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2008c. TRI Explorer. Chemical Report. http://www.epa.gov/triexplorer/, last updated July 23. Accessed September 6, 2008.
Faber, D. and McCarthy, D. (2001). The evolving structure of the environmental justice movement in the United States: New models for democratic decision-making. Social Justice Research 14: 405–421. CrossRef
Fotheringham, A.S. and Wong, D.W.S. (1991). The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A 23: 1025–1044. CrossRef
Fricker, Jr., R.D. and Hengartner, N.W. (2001). Environmental equity and the distribution of toxic release inventory and other environmentally undesirable sites in metropolitan New York City. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 8: 33–52. CrossRef
Glasmeier, A.K. and Farrigan, T.L. (November 2003). Poverty, sustainability, and the culture of despair: Can sustainable development strategies support poverty alleviation in America’s most environmentally challenged communities? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 590: 131–149. CrossRef
Glickman, T.S. (2004). Evaluating equity in Alleghany County. New York: Program for the Human Environment, Rockefeller University. Available at http://phe.rockefeller.edu/comm_risk/commrsk3.html [accessed May 2, 2007]
Harner, J., Warner, K., Pierce, J., and Huber, T. (2002). Urban environmental justice indices. The Professional Geographer 54: 318–331. CrossRef
Hite, D. (2000). A random utility model of environmental equity. Growth and Change 31: 40–58. CrossRef
Hoyt, H. (1933). One Hundred Years of Land Values in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hunter, L.M. (2000). The spatial association between US immigrant residential concentration and environmental hazards. International Migration Review 34: 460–488. CrossRef
Kellogg, W.A. and Mathur, A. (2003). Environmental justice and information technologies: Overcoming the information-access paradox in urban communities. Public Administration Review 63: 573–585. CrossRef
Lavelle, M. and Coyle, M. (1992). Unequal protection: The racial divide in environmental law. National Law Journal 15: S1–S12.
Laurian, L. (2003). A prerequisite for participation: Environmental knowledge and what residents know about local toxic sites. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22: 257–269. CrossRef
Mennis, J. (2002). Using geographic information systems to create and analyze statistical surfaces of population and risk for environmental justice analysis. Social Science Quarterly 83: 281–297. CrossRef
Pastor, Jr., M., Sadd, J., and Hipp, J. (2001). Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move-in, and environmental justice. Journal of Urban Affairs 23: 1–21. CrossRef
Pastor, Jr., M., Sadd, J.L., and Morello-Frosch, R. (2004). Waiting to exhale: The demographics of toxic air release facilities in 21st century California. Social Science Quarterly 85: 420–440. CrossRef
Pellow, D.N. (2004). The politics of illegal dumping: An environmental justice framework. Qualitative Sociology 27: 511–525. CrossRef
Pellow, D.N., Weinberg, A., and Schnaiberg, A. (2001). The environmental justice movement: Equitable allocation of the costs and benefits of environmental management outcomes. Social Justice Research 14: 423–439. CrossRef
Pinderhughes, R. (1996). The Impact of Race on Environmental Quality: An Empirical and Theoretical Discussion. Sociological Perspectives 39: 231–248.
Rast, J. (2006). Environmental justice and the new regionalism. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25: 249–263. CrossRef
Ross, C.L. and Leigh, N.G. (2000). Planning, urban revitalization, and the inner city: An exploration of structural racism. Journal of Planning Literature 14: 367–380. CrossRef
Scott, M., Cutter, S.L., Menzel, C., and Ji, M. (1997). Spatial accuracy of the EPA’s environmental hazards databases and their use in environmental equity analysis. Applied Geographic Studies 1: 45–61. CrossRef
Talih, M. and Fricker, Jr., R.D. (2002). Effects of neighborhood demographic shifts on findings of environmental injustice: A New York City case study. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 165: 375–397. CrossRef
Towers, G. (2000). Applying the political geography of scale: Grassroots strategies and environmental justice. Professional Geographer 52: 23–36. CrossRef
United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice (UCCCRJ). (1987). Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites. New York: United Church of Christ.
US Census Bureau (2008a). Race Data. Recommendations from the Interagency Committee for the Review of the Racial and Ethnic Standards to the Office of Management and Budget Concerning Changes to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/race/Directive_15.html, last updated April 10. Accessed March 24, 2008.
US Census Bureau (2008b). United States Census 2000. Your Gateway to Census 2000. http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html, last updated April 24. Accessed September 6, 2008.
US General Accounting Office (USGAO). (1983). Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and Their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities. Washington, DC: GAO/RCED.
Wu, S-S. 2006. Incorporating GIS and Remote Sensing for Census Population Disaggregation. ETD Collection for Texas State University. Paper AAI3221522. http://ecommons.txstate.edu/dissertations/AAI3221522
- Spatial Distribution of Toxic Release Inventory Sites in Chicago Area: Is There Environmental Inequity?
Yvette C. Feliberty
- Springer Netherlands
- Chapter 8
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Best Practices für die Mitarbeiter-Partizipation in der Produktentwicklung/© astrosystem | stock.adobe.com