Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Einleitung Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Behavior Patterns: Fundamente unserer Entscheidungen

verfasst von : Philipp Spreer

Erschienen in: PsyConversion

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Behavior Patterns sind standardisierte Verhaltensmuster, die der Mehrheit unserer Entscheidungen zugrunde liegen. Sie können in den Bereich der „persuasive communication“ eingeordnet werden, zählen also zu den kommunikativen Überzeugungsinstrumenten. Ihr Einsatz im E-Commerce bringt einerseits Verbesserungen der User Experience mit sich, steigert aber auch und insbesondere die Conversion-Rate (sowie andere relevante Erfolgsindikatoren). Voraussetzungen auf Unternehmensseite sind ein markt- und wettbewerbsfähiges Produkt sowie eine funktionierende technische Infrastruktur. Ist dies gegeben, können Behavior Patterns für die Neukonzeption oder die Optimierung von Digital-Projekten eingesetzt werden. Ihre Wirkung darf zugleich nicht überschätzt werden, den „Kauf-Knopf“ im Gehirn als E-Commerce-Mythos stellen sie sicherlich nicht dar. Die grundsätzliche Wirksamkeit ist zwar weitgehend universell, die Wirkungsstärke ist es aber nicht. Daraus folgt: Je besser ein Unternehmen seine Nutzer kennt und klassifizieren kann, desto passgenauer kann die Auswahl der Behavior Patterns sein. In diesem Zusammenhang bietet die Echtzeit-Dynamisierung bzw. Personalisierung der Website entlang der identifizierten Nutzergruppen weiteres Conversion-Potenzial. Zur Identifikation passender Patterns liefert das Buch mehrere Frameworks. Zudem empfiehlt sich in vielen Fällen der Einsatz sich gegenseitig verstärkender Patterns im Verbund.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Grundlagen der Entscheidungsfindung
Nächstes Kapitel Library von Behavior Patterns
Literatur
Fogg BJ (2009) A behavior model for persuasive design. In: Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology, ACM, Art. 40
Krug S (2014) Don't make me think!: Web Usability: Das intuitive Web, mitp Business, Frechen
Miller GR (1980) On being persuaded: Some basic distinctions. In: Roloff M, Miller GR (Hrsg) Persuasion: New directions in theory and research. Sage, Beverly Hills, S 11–28
Nahai N (2017) Webs of influence: The Psychology of Online Persuasion. Pearson, Harlow
Thaler RM, Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: Wie man kluge Entscheidungen anstößt. Econ, Berlin
Ariely D (2016) Payoff: the hidden logic that shapes our motivations. Simon & Schuster, New York
Asch SE (1946) Forming impressions of personality. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 41(3):258–290CrossRef
Atkinson RC, Shiffrin RM (1968) Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. Psychol Learn Motiv 2:189–195
Bader L, Weinland JD (1932) Do odd prices earn money? J Retail 8:102–114
Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215CrossRef
Bar-Eli M, Azar OH, Ritov I, Keidar-Levin Y, Schein G (2007) Action bias among elite soccer goalkeepers: the case of penalty kicks. J Econ Psychol 28(5):606–621CrossRef
Beck H (2014) Behavioral Economics: eine Einführung. Springer-Gabler, WiesbadenCrossRef
Bem DJ (1967) Self-perception. An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychol Rev 74:536–537CrossRef
Blattberg RC, Neslin SA (1990) Sales promotion: concepts, methods and strategies. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, S 349–350
Brehm JW (1966) A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press, Oxford
Brewer MB (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: a cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychol Bull 86(2):307–324CrossRef
Burger JM (1986) Increasing compliance by improving the deal: the that’s-not-all technique. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(2):277–283CrossRef
Carmon Z, Kahneman D (1995) The experienced utility of queuing: experience profiles and retrospective evaluations of simulated queues. Duke University working paper, Durham
Carpenter CJ, Boster FJ (2009) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the disrupt-then-reframe compliance gaining technique. Commun Rep 22(2):55–62CrossRef
Chapman GB, Johnson EJ (2002) Incorporating the irrelevant: anchors in judgments of belief and value. In: Gilovich T, Griffin DW, Kahneman D (Hrsg) The psychology of intuitive judgment: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New York
Cherubini P, Mazzocco K, Rumiati R (2003) Rethinking the focusing effect in decision-making. Acta Psychol 113(1):67–81CrossRef
Chitturi R (2015) Good aesthetics is great business: do we know why? In: Batra R, Seifert CM, Brei DE (Hrsg) The psychology of design: creating consumer appeal. Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge, S 252–262
Cialdini R (2016) Pre-Suasion: a revolutionary way to influence and persuade. Simon & Schuster, New York
Cialdini RB (1984) Influence: the psychology of persuasion. Harper Collins, New York
Cialdini RB, Vincent JE, Lewis SK, Catalan J, Wheeler D, Darby BL (1975) Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: the door-in-the-face technique. J Pers Soc Psychol 31(2):206–215CrossRef
Cialdini RB, Cacioppo JT, Bassett R, Miller JA (1978) Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: commitment then cost. J Pers Soc Psychol 36(5):463–476CrossRef
Cohen JB, Goldberg ME (1970) The dissonance model in post-decision product evaluation. J Mark Res 7(3):315–321CrossRef
Coulter KS, Choi P, Monroe KB (2012) Comma N’cents in pricing: the effects of auditory representation encoding on price magnitude perceptions. J Consum Psychol 22(3):395–407CrossRef
Dahlén M, Rosengren S, Törn F, Öhman N (2008) Could placing ads wrong be right? Advertising effects of thematic incongruence. J Advert 37(3):57–67CrossRef
Darley JM, Latane B (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. J Pers Soc Psychol 8(4, Pt. 1):377–383CrossRef
Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull 125(6):627–668CrossRef
DeSteno D, Petty RE, Rucker DD, Wegener DT, Braverman J (2004) Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies. J Pers Soc Psychol 86(1):43–56CrossRef
Dobelli R (2011) Die Kunst des klaren Denkens: 52 Denkfehler, die Sie besser anderen überlassen. Hanser, MünchenCrossRef
Dolinski D (2011) A rock or a hard place: the foot-in-the-face technique for inducing compliance without pressure. J Appl Soc Psychol 41(6):1514–1537CrossRef
Dolinski D, Nawrat M, Rudak I (2001) Dialogue involvement as a social influence technique. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27(11):1395–1406CrossRef
Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Q J Econ 75(4):643–669CrossRef
Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114(3):817–868CrossRef
Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Festinger L (1962) A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford university press, Palo Alto
Fico F, Richardson JD, Edwards SM (2004) Influence of story structure on perceived story bias and news organization credibility. Mass Commun Soc 7(3):301–318CrossRef
Filkuková P, Klempe SH (2013) Rhyme as reason in commercial and social advertising. Scand J Psychol 54(5):423–431CrossRef
Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J Behav Decis Making 13(1):1–17CrossRef
Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1977) Knowing with certainty: the appropriateness of extreme confidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3(4):552–564CrossRef
Forer BR (1949) The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom demonstration of gullibility. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 44:118–123CrossRef
Freedman JL, Fraser SC (1966) Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. J Pers Soc Psychol 4(2):195–202CrossRef
Friesen CK, Kingstone A (1998) The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychon Bull Rev 5(3):490–495CrossRef
Frischen A, Bayliss AP, Tipper SP (2007) Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychol Bull 133(4):694–724CrossRef
Gamer R (2005) What’s in a name? Persuasion perhaps. J Consum Psychol 15(2):108–116CrossRef
Gilovich T, Griffin DW, Kahneman D (Hrsg) (2002) Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press, New York, S 120–138
Godden D, Baddeley A (1975) Context dependent memory in two natural environments. Br J Psychol 66(3):325–331CrossRef
Goodman JK, Irmak C (2013) Having versus consuming: failure to estimate usage frequency makes consumers prefer multifeature products. J Mark Res 50(1):44–54CrossRef
Goodwin DW, Powell B, Bremer D, Hoine H, Stern J (1969) Alcohol and recall: state-dependent effects in man. Science 163(3873):1358–1360CrossRef
Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev 25:161–178CrossRef
Gueguen N, Pascual A (2000) Evocation of freedom and compliance: the ‚but you are free of…‘ technique. Curr Res Soc Psychol 5(18):264–270
Guéguen N, Joule RV, Halimi-Falkowicz S, Pascual A, Fischer-Lokou J, Dufourcq-Brana M (2013) I’m free but I’ll comply with your request: generalization and multidimensional effects of the “evoking freedom” technique. J Appl Soc Psychol 43(1):116–137CrossRef
Helson H (1964) Adaptation-level theory: an experimental and systematic approach to behavior. Harper & Row, New York
Hertwig R, Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U (1997) The reiteration effect in hindsight bias. Psychol Rev 104(1):194–202CrossRef
Heyman J, Ariely D (2004) Effort for payment: a tale of two markets. Psychol Sci 15(11):787–793CrossRef
Hick WE (1952) On the rate of gain of information. Q J Exp Psychol 4(1):11–26CrossRef
Huber J, Payne JW, Puto C (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J Consum Res 9(1):90–98CrossRef
Jenni K, Loewenstein G (1997) Explaining the identifiable victim effect. J Risk Uncertainty 14(3):235–257CrossRef
Kahneman D (2011) Schnelles Denken, Langsames Denken. Siedler, München
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291CrossRef
Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J Polit Econ 98(6):1325–1348CrossRef
Katz R, Allen TJ (1982) Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&D Manage 12(1):7–20CrossRef
Kent M (1998) Wörterbuch der Sportwissenschaft und Sportmedizin. UTB & Limpert, Wiebelsheim
Key MS, Edlund JE, Sagarin BJ, Bizer GY (2009) Individual differences in susceptibility to mindlessness. Pers Individ Differ 46(3):261–264CrossRef
Kouchaki M, Smith-Crowe K, Brief AP, Sousa C (2013) Seeing green: mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 121(1):53–61CrossRef
Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q J Econ 112(2):443–478CrossRef
Langer EJ (1975) The illusion of control. J Pers Soc Psychol 32(2):311–328CrossRef
Langer EJ, Blank A, Chanowitz B (1978) The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: the role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 36(6):635–642CrossRef
Langlois JH, Roggman LA (1990) Attractive faces are only average. Psychol Sci 1(2):115–121CrossRef
Leibenstein H (1950) Bandwagon, snob, and veblen effects in the theory of Consumers’ Demand. Q J Econ 64(2):183–207CrossRef
Lewis IM, Watson B, White KM (2010) Response efficacy: the key to minimizing rejection and maximizing acceptance of emotion-based anti-speeding messages. Accid Anal Prev 42(2):459–467CrossRef
Liu C, Arnett KP (2000) Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Inf Manage 38(1):23–33CrossRef
Loewenstein G (1994) The psychology of curiosity: a review and reinterpretation. Psychol Bull 116(1):75–98CrossRef
McCornack SA, Parks MR (1986) Deception detection and relationship development: the other side of trust. Ann Int Commun Ass 9(1):377–389
McCracken F (1988) Diderot unities and the Diderot effect. In: McCracken G (Hrsg) Culture and consumption: new approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, S 118–129
McGlone MS, Tofighbakhsh J (2000) Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychol Sci 11(5):424–428CrossRef
Meehl PE (1956) Wanted–a good cook-book. Am Psychol 11(6):263–272CrossRef
Milgram S (1963) Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 67(4):371–378CrossRef
Mischel W, Ebbesen EB, Zeiss AR (1972) Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. J Pers Soc Psychol 21(2):204–218CrossRef
Mogilner C, Aaker J (2009) The time vs. money effect: shifting product attitudes and decisions through personal connection. J Consum Res 36(2):277–291CrossRef
Moon JW, Kim YG (2001) Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Inf Manage 38(4):217–230CrossRef
Murdock BB Jr (1962) The serial position effect of free recall. J Exp Psychol 64(5):482–488CrossRef
Nunes JC, Drèze X (2006) The endowed progress effect: how artificial advancement increases effort. J Consum Res 32(4):504–512CrossRef
Oppenheimer DM, LeBoeuf RA, Brewer NT (2008) Anchors aweigh: a demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming. Cognition 106(1):13–26CrossRef
Oskamp S (1965) Overconfidence in case-study judgments. J consult psychol 29(3):261–265CrossRef
Paivio A (1990) Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef
Pandelaere M, Briers B, Dewitte S, Warlop L (2010) Better think before agreeing twice: mere agreement: a similarity-based persuasion mechanism. Int J Res Mark 27(2):133–141CrossRef
Pfrang T (2015) Das Potenzial von Eigennutzen und sozialen Normen nutzen. Mark Rev St. Gallen 32(5):77–89CrossRef
Plassmann H, O’Doherty J, Shiv B, Rangel A (2008) Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105(3):1050–1054CrossRef
Pohl RF (2004) Hindsight bias. In: Pohl RF (Hrsg) Cognitive illusions: a handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory. Psychology Press, Hove, S 363–378
Prelec D, Loewenstein G (1998) The red and the black: mental accounting of savings and debt. Mark Sci 17(1):4–28CrossRef
Reiss S (2004) Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: the theory of 16 basic desires. Rev Gen Psychol 8(3):179–193CrossRef
Rosburg T, Mecklinger A, Frings C (2011) When the brain decides: a familiarity-based approach to the recognition heuristic as evidenced by event-related brain potentials. Psychol Sci 22(12):1527–1534CrossRef
Ross L, Greene D, House P (1977) The “false consensus effect”: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 13(3):279–301CrossRef
Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7–59CrossRef
Schkade DA, Kahneman D (1998) Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychol Sci 9(5):340–346CrossRef
Schulz von Thun F (1998) Miteinander reden 3 – Das ‚innere Team‘ und situationsgerechte Kommunikation. Rowohlt, Reinbek
Schwartz B (2004a) The paradox of choice: why less is more. Ecco, New York
Seyama JI, Nagayama RS (2007) The uncanny valley: effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Pres Teleop Virtual Environ 16(4):337–351CrossRef
Shafir E, Diamond P, Tversky A (1997) Money illusion. Q J Econ 112(2):341–374CrossRef
Shen L, Fishbach A, Hsee CK (2014) The motivating-uncertainty effect: uncertainty increases resource investment in the process of reward pursuit. J Consum Res 41(5):1301–1315CrossRef
Sherif M (1935) The psychology of social norms. Harper & Row, New York
Simon HA (1986) Rationality in psychology and economics. J Bus 59(4):209–224CrossRef
Simons DJ, Chabris CF (1999) Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28(9):1059–1074CrossRef
Simons DJ, Levin DT (1997) Change blindness. Trends Cogn Sci 1(7):261–267CrossRef
Simonson I, Tversky A (1992) Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J Mark Res 29(3):281–295CrossRef
Solove DJ (2011) Nothing to hide: the false tradeoff between privacy and security. Yale University Press, New Haven
Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S (Hrsg) The social psychology of intergroup relations, Brooks/Cole, Monterrey, S 33–47
Taylor C (1992) The ethics of authenticity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Thaler R (1981) Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econ Lett 8(3):201–207CrossRef
Thaler RH (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J Econ Behav Organ 1(1):39–60CrossRef
Thaler RH (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Mark Sci 4(3):199–214CrossRef
Thaler RH (1999) Mental accounting matters. J Behav decis making 12(3):183–206CrossRef
Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Manage Sci 36(6):643–660CrossRef
Thomas M, Morwitz V (2005) Penny wise and pound foolish: the left-digit effect in price cognition. J Consum Res 32(1):54–64CrossRef
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn Psychol 5(2):207–232CrossRef
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131CrossRef
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1982) Evidential impact of base rates. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (Hrsg) Judgment under uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, S 153–160
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1983) Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychol Rev 90(4):293–315CrossRef
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1986) Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J Bus 59(4):251–278CrossRef
Ueberweg F (1868) System der Logik und Geschichte der logischen Lehren (3. Aufl.). Adolph Marcus, Bonn
Van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q 28(4):695–704CrossRef
Veryzer RW Jr, Hutchinson JW (1998) The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs. J Consum Res 24(4):374–394CrossRef
Vohs KD, Mead NL, Goode MR (2006) The psychological consequences of money. Science 314(5802):1154–1156CrossRef
Von Restorff H (1933) Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychol Forsch 18:299–334CrossRef
Wadhwa M, Zhang K (2015) This number just feels right: the impact of roundedness of price numbers on product evaluations. J Consum Res 41(5):1172–1185CrossRef
Walker D, Vul E (2014) Hierarchical encoding makes individuals in a group seem more attractive. Psychol Sci 25(1):230–235CrossRef
Wertenbroch K, Soman D, Chattopadhyay A (2007) On the perceived value of money: the reference dependence of currency numerosity effects. J Consum Res 34(1):1–10CrossRef
Wilkins MC (1928) The effect of changed material on ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning. Arch Psychol 16(102):83 (J. Winawer [Hrsg])
Worchel S, Lee J, Adewole A (1975) Effects of supply and demand on ratings of object value. J Pers Soc Psychol 32(5):906–914CrossRef
Zajonc RB (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J Pers Soc Psychol 9(2, Pt.2):1–27CrossRef
Zeigarnik B (1938) On finished and unfinished tasks. Source B Gestalt Psychol 1:300–314CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Behavior Patterns: Fundamente unserer Entscheidungen
verfasst von
Philipp Spreer
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
PsyConversion

Print ISBN: 978-3-658-21725-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-21726-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21726-6_3