Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Industrie 4.0 und Digitale Transformation als unternehmerische Gestaltungsaufgabe Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Zur Bedeutung von Solows Paradoxon: Empirische Evidenz und ihre Übertragbarkeit auf Digitalisierungsinvestitionen in einer Industrie 4.0

verfasst von : Robert Obermaier, Stefan Schweikl

Erschienen in: Handbuch Industrie 4.0 und Digitale Transformation

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Die Industrie 4.0 verspricht Anwendern enormes Potenzial zur Steigerung der Prozesseffizienz sowie eine Erhöhung der Produktinnovationen. Viele Unternehmen befürchten daher, ohne umfassende Investitionen in digitale Technologien den Anschluss zu verlieren und am Ende als Verlierer der digitalen Transformation zu gelten. Um dies zu vermeiden, wollen deutsche Industrieunternehmen beispielsweise bis 2020 jährlich rund 40 Mrd. EUR in Industrie 4.0-Anwendungen investieren.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Künstliche Intelligenz: Strategische Herausforderungen für etablierte Unternehmen
Nächstes Kapitel Organisationaler Wandel und Mitarbeiterakzeptanz. Vorgehen und Handlungsempfehlungen
Fußnoten
1
Folgende Journale wurden für die Schlüsselwortsuche ausgewählt: Academy of Management Journal, American Economic Review, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Canadian Journal of Economics, Decision Support Systems, Econometrica, Economic Inquiry, Economic Journal, Economic Policy, Economica, Economics of Innovation & New Technology, Empirical Economics, German Economic Review, Information & Management, Industrial & Corporate Change, Information Systems Research, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Journal of Business, Journal of Econometrics, Journal of Economic Growth, Journal of Economic Literature, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Journal of Industrial Economics, Journal of Labor Economics, Journal of Management Information Systems, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Journal of Political Economy, Management Science, MIS Quarterly, Organization Science, Production & Operations Management, Quarterly Journal of Economics, RAND Journal of Economics, Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economics & Statistics, Review of Income and Wealth, Telecommunications Policy und Strategic Management Journal.
 
2
Basierend auf den genannten Einschränkungen wurde folgende Suchformel generiert: (computer OR IT investment OR IT expenses OR IT expenditure OR IT capital OR IT spending OR IT stock OR IT purchases OR information technology OR information technologies OR information and communication technology OR Information & communication technology OR information and communication technologies OR information & communication technologies OR ict) AND (productivity OR output OR value added).
 
Literatur
Aboal, D., & Tacsir, E. (2017). Innovation and productivity in services and manufacturing: The role of ICT. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(2), 221–241.CrossRef
Acemoglu, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G. H., & Price, B. (2014). Return of the Solow paradox? IT, productivity, and employment in US manufacturing. American Economic Review, 104(5), 394–399.CrossRef
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018a). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. NBER Working Paper No. 24196.
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018b). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488–1542.
Alpar, P., & Kim, M. (1990). A microeconomic approach to the measurement of information technology value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(2), 55–69.CrossRef
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Ravindran, S. (2003). The new productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM, 46(3), 91–94.CrossRef
Aral, S., & Weill, P. (2007). IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science, 18(5), 763–780.CrossRef
Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.CrossRef
Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333.CrossRef
Badescu, M., & Garcés-Ayerbe, C. (2009). The impact of information technologies on firm productivity: Empirical evidence from Spain. Technovation, 29(2), 122–129.CrossRef
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRef
Barua, A., & Lee, B. (1997). An economic analysis of the introduction of an electronic data interchange system. Information Systems Research, 8(4), 398–422.CrossRef
Becchetti, L., Bedoya, D., & Paganetto, L. (2003). ICT investment, productivity and efficiency: Evidence at firm level using a stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20(2), 143–167.CrossRef
Bertschek, I., & Kaiser, U. (2004). Productivity effects of organizational change: Microeconometric evidence. Management Science, 50(3), 394–404.CrossRef
Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Konsynski, B. R. (1999). Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science, 45(7), 1008–1024.CrossRef
Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. M. (2001). How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 434–445.CrossRef
Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & van Reenen, J. (2012). Americans Do IT Better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. American Economic Review, 102(1), 167–201.CrossRef
Brasini, S., & Freo, M. (2012). The impact of information and communication technologies: An insight at micro-level on one Italian region. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(2), 107–123.CrossRef
Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339–376.CrossRef
Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies ‚Engines of growth’? Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 83–108.CrossRef
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 66–77.CrossRef
Brynjolfsson, E. (2003). ROI valuation: The IT productivity gap. Optimize magazine, 21, 1–4.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1995). Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(3–4), 183–200.CrossRef
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42(4), 541–558.CrossRef
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49–55.CrossRef
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23–48.CrossRef
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2003). Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 793–808.CrossRef
Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M., & Yang, S. (2002). Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (1), 137–181.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine. Shibuya: Digital Frontier.
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics. NBER Working Paper No. 24001.
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2018). The productivity J-Curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. NBER Working Paper No. 25148.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Yang, S. (1996). Information technology and productivity: A review of the literature. Advances in Computers, 43,179–214.CrossRef
Byrd, T. A., & Marshall, T. E. (1997). Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: A causal model analysis. Omega, 25(1), 43–56.CrossRef
Byrne, D. M., Fernald, J. G., & Reinsdorf, M. B. (2016). Does the United States have a productivity slowdown or a measurement problem? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (1), 109–182.
Cardona, M., Kretschmer, T., & Strobel, T. (2013). ICT and productivity: Conclusions from the empirical literature. Information Economics and Policy, 25(3), 109–125.CrossRef
Castiglione, C., & Infante, D. (2014). ICTs and time-span in technical efficiency gains. A stochastic frontier approach over a panel of Italian manufacturing firms. Economic Modelling, 41, 55–65.CrossRef
Chang, Y. B., & Gurbaxani, V. (2012). The impact of IT-related spillovers on long – Run productivity: An empirical analysis. Information Systems Research, 23(3), 868–886.CrossRef
Chang, Y. B., & Gurbaxani, V. (2013). An empirical analysis of technical efficiency: The role of IT intensity and competition. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 561–578.CrossRef
Chowdhury, S. K. (2006). Investments in ICT-capital and economic performance of small and medium scale enterprises in East Africa. Journal of International Development, 18(4), 533–552.CrossRef
Chwelos, P., Ramirez, R., Kraemer, K. L., & Melville, N. P. (2010). Research note – Does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 392–408.CrossRef
Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1991). Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 275–292.CrossRef
Commander, S., Harrison, R., & Menezes-Filho, N. (2011). ICT and productivity in developing countries: New firm-level evidence from Brazil and India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 528–541.CrossRef
Crafts, N. (2018). The productivity slowdown: Is it the ‚new normal’? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(3), 443–460.CrossRef
David, P. A. (1990). The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review, 80(2), 355–361.
Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. L. (2003). Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(1), 1–28.CrossRef
Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2000). information technology payoff in the health-care industry: A longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 41–67.CrossRef
Dewan, S., & Min, C. (1997). The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Science, 43(12), 1660–1675.CrossRef
Dewan, S., Shi, C., & Gurbaxani, V. (2007). Investigating the risk-return relationship of information technology investment: Firm-level empirical analysis. Management Science, 53(12), 1829–1842.CrossRef
Doms, M. E., Jarmin, R. S., & Klimek, S. D. (2004). Information technology investment and firm performance in US retail trade. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(7), 595–613.CrossRef
Dunne, T., Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Troske, K. R. (2004). Wage and productivity dispersion in United States manufacturing: The role of computer investment. Journal of Labor Economics, 22(2), 397–429.CrossRef
Francalanci, C., & Galal, H. (1998). Aligning IT investments and workforce composition: The impact of diversification in life insurance companies. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(3), 175–184.CrossRef
Gargallo-Castel, A., & Galve-Górriz, C. (2007). Information technology, complementarities and three measures of organizational performance: Empirical evidence from Spain. Journal of Information Technology Impact, 7(1), 43–58.
Giuri, P., Torrisi, S., & Zinovyeva, N. (2008). ICT, skills, and organizational change: Evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(1), 29–64.CrossRef
Gordon, R. J. (2016). The rise and fall of American growth: The US standard of living since the civil war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Hall, B. H., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2013). Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(3), 300–328.CrossRef
Hartmann, P. M., Zaki, M., Feldmann, N., & Neely, A. (2016). Capturing value from big data – A taxonomy of data-driven business models used by start-up firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(10), 1382–1406.CrossRef
Hempell, T. (2005a). Does experience matter? Innovations and the productivity of information and communication technologies in German services. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(4), 277–303.CrossRef
Hempell, T. (2005b). What’s spurious, what’s real? Measuring the productivity impacts of ICT at the firm-level. Empirical Economics, 30(2), 427–464.CrossRef
Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly, 121–142.
Hitt, L. M., Wu, D. J., & Zhou, X. (2002). Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 71–98.CrossRef
Hu, Q., & Plant, R. (2001). An empirical study of the casual relationship between IT investment and firm performance. Information Resources Management Journal, 14(3), 15–26.CrossRef
Huang, C. J., Fu, T.-T., Lai, H.-P., & Yang, Y.-L. (2017). Semiparametric smooth coefficient quantile estimation of the production profile. Empirical Economics, 52(1), 373–392.CrossRef
Huang, T.-H. (2005). A study on the productivities of IT capital and computer labor: Firm-level evidence from Taiwan’s banking industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24(3), 241–257.CrossRef
Kılıçaslan, Y., Sickles, R. C., Atay Kayış, A., & Üçdoğruk Gürel, Y. (2017). Impact of ICT on the productivity of the firm: Evidence from Turkish manufacturing. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 47(3), 277–289.CrossRef
Ko, M., & Osei-Bryson, K.-M. (2004). Using regression splines to assess the impact of information technology investments on productivity in the health care industry. Information Systems Journal, 14(1), 43–63.CrossRef
Ko, M., & Osei-Bryson, K.-M. (2008). Reexamining the impact of information technology investment on productivity using regression tree and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). Information Technology Management, 9(4), 285–299.CrossRef
Kudyba, S., & Diwan, R. (2002). Research Report: Increasing Returns to Information Technology. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 104–111.CrossRef
Kwon, M. J., & Stoneman, P. (1995). The impact of technology adoption on firm productivity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(3–4), 219–234.CrossRef
Lee, B., & Barua, A. (1999). An integrated assessment of productivity and efficiency impacts of information technology investments: Old data, new analysis and evidence. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12(1), 21–43.CrossRef
Lee, B., & Menon, N. M. (2000). Information technology value through different normative lenses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 99–119.CrossRef
Lee, G., & Perry, J. L. (2002). Are computers boosting productivity? A test of the paradox in State Governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(1), 77–102.CrossRef
Lee, S., Xiang, J. Y., & Kim, J. K. (2011). Information technology and productivity: Empirical evidence from the Chinese electronics industry. Information & Management, 48(2–3), 79–87.CrossRef
Lehr, B., & Lichtenberg, F. (1999). Information technology and its impact on productivity: Firm-level evidence from government and private data sources, 1977–1993. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(2), 335–362.CrossRef
Lehr, W., & Lichtenberg, F. R. (1998). Computer use and productivity growth in US Federal Government agencies, 1987-92. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 257–279.CrossRef
Licht, G., & Moch, D. (1999). Innovation and information technology in services. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(2), 363–383.CrossRef
Lichtenberg, F. R. (1995). The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(3–4), 201–218.CrossRef
Lin, W. T., & Shao, B. B. M. (2006). The business value of information technology and inputs substitution: The productivity paradox revisited. Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 493–507.CrossRef
Liu, T.-K., Chen, J.-R., Huang, C. J., & Yang, C.-H. (2014). Revisiting the productivity paradox: A semiparametric smooth coefficient approach based on evidence from Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 300–308.CrossRef
Loveman, G. W. (1994). An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. In A. Thomas, S. Michael (Hrsg.), Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies (S. 84–110). New York: Oxford University Press.
Luo, Y., & Bu, J. (2016). How valuable is information and communication technology? A study of emerging economy enterprises. Journal of World Business, 51(2), 200–211.CrossRef
Macdonald, S., Anderson, P., & Kimbel, D. (2000). Measurement or management?: Revisiting the productivity paradox of information technology. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 69(4), 601–617.CrossRef
Mahmood, M. A., & Mann, G. J. (1993). Measuring the organizational impact of information technology investment: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 97–122.CrossRef
Marsh, I. W., Rincon-Aznar, A., Vecchi, M., & Venturini, F. (2017). We see ICT spillovers everywhere but in the econometric evidence: A reassessment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(6), 1067–1088.CrossRef
Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487–505.CrossRef
Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.CrossRef
Melville, N., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. (2007). The productivity impact of information technology across competitive regimes: The role of industry concentration and dynamism. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 229–242.CrossRef
Menon, N. M., Lee, B., & Eldenburg, L. (2000). Productivity of information systems in the healthcare industry. Information Systems Research, 11(1), 83–92.CrossRef
Menon, N. M., Yaylacicegi, U., & Cezar, A. (2009). Differential effects of the two types of information systems: A hospital-based study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 297–316.CrossRef
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. American Economic Review, 80(3), 511–528.
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2–3), 179–208.CrossRef
Mitra, S., & Chaya, A. K. (1996). Analyzing cost-effectiveness of organizations: The impact of information technology spending. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 29–57.CrossRef
Moshiri, S., & Simpson, W. (2011). Information technology and the changing workplace in Canada: Firm-level evidence. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1601–1636.CrossRef
Neirotti, P., & Paolucci, E. (2007). Assessing the strategic value of Information Technology: An analysis on the insurance sector. Information & Management, 44(6), 568–582.CrossRef
Obermaier, R. (2017). Industrie 4.0 als unternehmerische Gestaltungsaufgabe: Strategische und operative Handlungsfelder für Industriebetriebe. In R. Obermaier (Hrsg.), Industrie 4.0 als unternehmerische Gestaltungsaufgabe – Betriebswirtschaftliche, technische und rechtliche Herausforderungen (S. 3–34). Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRef
Osei-Bryson, K.-M., & Ko, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance using regression splines analysis. Information & Management, 42(1), 1–13.CrossRef
Oz, E. (2005). Information technology productivity: In search of a definite observation. Information & Management, 42(6), 789–798.CrossRef
Polák, P. (2017). The productivity paradox: A meta-analysis. Information Economics and Policy, 38,38–54.CrossRef
Prattipati, S. N., & Mensah, M. O. (1997). Information systems variables and management productivity. Information & Management, 33(1), 33–43.CrossRef
Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Patnayakuni, N. (1996). Refocusing where and how IT value is realized: An empirical investigation. Omega, 24(4), 399–412.CrossRef
Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Patnayakuni, N. (1997). Technology investment and business performance. Communications of the ACM, 40(7), 89–97.CrossRef
Ramirez, R., Melville, N., & Lawler, E. (2010). Information technology infrastructure, organizational process redesign, and business value: An empirical analysis. Decision Support Systems, 49(4), 417–429.CrossRef
Ross, A. (2002). A multi-dimensional empirical exploration of technology investment, coordination and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(7), 591–609.CrossRef
Sabherwal, R., & Jeyaraj, A. (2015). Information technology impacts on firm performance: An extension of Kohli and Devaraj (2003). MIS Quarterly, 39(4), 809–836.CrossRef
Schryen, G. (2013). Revisiting IS business value research: What we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(2), 139–169.CrossRef
Shu, W., & Strassmann, P. A. (2005). Does information technology provide banks with profit? Information & Management, 42(5), 781–787.CrossRef
Simon, H. A. (1987). The steam engine and the computer: What makes technology revolutionary. Educom Bulletin, 22(1), 2–5.
Sircar, S., & Choi, J. (2009). A study of the impact of information technology on firm performance: A flexible production function approach. Information System Journal, 19(3), 313–339.CrossRef
Sircar, S., Turnbow, J. L., & Bordoloi, B. (2000). A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 69–97.CrossRef
Solow, R. M. (12. Juli 1987). We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Review, S. 36.
Spitz-Oener, A. (2006). Technical change, job tasks, and rising educational demands: Looking outside the wage structure. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(2), 235–270.CrossRef
Strassmann, P. A. (1990). The business value of computers: An executive’s guide. New Canaan: Information Economics Press.
Syverson, C. (2017). Challenges to mismeasurement explanations for the US productivity slowdown. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 165–186.CrossRef
Tam, K. Y. (1998). Analysis of firm-level computer investments: A comparative study of three Pacific-rim economies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(3), 276–286.CrossRef
Tambe, P., & Hitt, L. M. (2012). The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Information Systems Research, 23(3), 599–617.CrossRef
Tambe, P., & Hitt, L. M. (2014a). Job hopping, information technology spillovers, and productivity growth. Management Science, 60(2), 338–355.CrossRef
Tambe, P., & Hitt, L. M. (2014b). Measuring information technology spillovers. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 53–71.CrossRef
Tambe, P., Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Science, 58(5), 843–859.CrossRef
Thong, J. Y. L., Yap, C.-S., & Raman, K. S. (1996). Top management support, external expertise and information systems implementation in small businesses. Information Systems Research, 7(2), 248–267.CrossRef
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.CrossRef
Triplett, J. E. (1999). The solow productivity paradox: What do computers do to productivity? The Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(2), 309–334.CrossRef
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142.CrossRef
Wang, P. (2010). Chasing the hottest IT: Effects of information technology fashion on organizations. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 63–85.CrossRef
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 8–23.
Weill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 307–333.CrossRef
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.CrossRef
Wilson, D. J. (2009). Beggar thy neighbor? The in-state, out-of-state, and aggregate effects of R&D tax credits. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(2), 431–436.CrossRef
Wu, L., Jin, F., & Hitt, L. M. (2018). Are all spillovers created equal? A network perspective on information technology labor movements. Management Science, 64(7), 3168–3186.CrossRef
Yorukoglu, M. (1998). The information technology productivity paradox. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(2), 551–592.CrossRef
Zhu, K. (2004). The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and e-commerce capability: A resource-based assessment of their business value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 167–202.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Zur Bedeutung von Solows Paradoxon: Empirische Evidenz und ihre Übertragbarkeit auf Digitalisierungsinvestitionen in einer Industrie 4.0
verfasst von
Robert Obermaier
Stefan Schweikl
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
Handbuch Industrie 4.0 und Digitale Transformation

Print ISBN: 978-3-658-24575-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-24576-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24576-4_22