Quarterly data (available up to Q3-21) were retrieved from Cambridge Asociates LLC (CA) hosted in Eikon-Reuters database, selecting in first place, all the world and all kinds of assets, and secondly, broken down by geographical areas, according to the following four regions: United States, Europe, Asia/Pacific, Rest of World, and All the World). Together they produce a table with 744 records, of which 713 were finally counted after missing values were excluded.
Table
1 gathers the starting dates and number of observations for each region along with maximum and minimum IRR values. Descriptive statistics are reported in Table
2. We see that the median quarterly IRR for the overall PE industry was 3.15% during the period spanning from 1981Q2 to 2021Q3
6 (3.22% in the United States, 3.78% in Europe, 1.79% in Asia/Pacific). The time series plots and their corresponding histograms are displayed in the
Appendix. We observe that skewness to the right (positive index) is present in almost all the areas (also including the aggregation of total world) with the exception of the Rest of World, whereas the four regions (and also total world) show a leptokurtic distribution (index > 3, indicating that the values are largely concentrated around the mean). Shapiro–Wilk tests reject the hypothesis of the pooled IRR stemming from a normal distribution (graphically histograms overlaying normal distribution are featured in
Appendix: Histograms), and addressing randomness, Runs tests only spot the returns from Europe to stick to a random process.
Table 1
Starting dates and maximum and míimum IRRs
United States | Q2-81 | 162 | 37.82% | Q4-99 | -16.18% | Q4-08 |
Europe | Q4-87 | 136 | 98.66% | Q4-89 | -22.75% | Q4-08 |
Asia/Pacific | Q3-89 | 129 | 18.20% | Q4-99 | -17.27% | Q4-08 |
Rest of World | Q4-90 | 124 | 16.58% | Q4-04 | -19.31% | Q4-08 |
Total | Q2-81 | 162 | 33.58% | Q4-99 | -17.79% | Q4-08 |
Table 2
Descriptive data by Area-Type of Asset
i) Main descriptive statistics |
Area | Average _IRR | Median _IRR | Stddev._ IRR | Skewn. IRR | kurtosis_ IRR |
United States | 3.243% | 3.217% | 5.270% | 1.428 | 14.874 |
Europe | 3.863% | 3.777% | 11.196% | 4.274 | 39.307 |
Asia/Pacific | 2.025% | 1.789% | 5.050% | 0.065 | 4.546 |
Rest of World | 2.332% | 2.617% | 4.733% | -0.675 | 6.960 |
Total | 3.163% | 3.149% | 5.029% | 0.896 | 12.302 |
ii) Shapiro–Wilk test | iii) Runs test |
Area | W | p-value | Area | Runs-s | p-value |
United States | 0.8555 | 0.0000 | United States | -4.414 | 0.000 |
Europe | 0.6884 | 0.0000 | Europe | 0.689 | 0.491 |
Asia/Pacific | 0.9772 | 0.0286 | Asia/Pacific | -2.840 | 0.005 |
Rest of World | 0.9342 | 0.0000 | Rest of World | -4.148 | 0.000 |
Total | 0.8778 | 0.0000 | Total | -3.783 | 0.000 |
In the empirical application, we consider that x
t in (1) can be the errors in a regression model incorporating an intercept and a linear time trend,
$${{\text{y}}_{\text{t}}}\,\,\, = \,\,\,\,{\beta_0}\,\,\, + \,\,\,{\beta_1}\,t\,\, + {x_{\text{t}}};\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,t\,\,\,\, = \,\,\,\,1\,,\,\,\,2\,,\,\,...,$$
(4)
where β
0 and β
1 denote the unknown coefficients of these deterministic terms. In other words, the estimated model is:
$${{\text{y}}_{\text{t}}}\,\,\, = \,\,\,\,{\beta_0}\,\,\, + \,\,\,{\beta_1}\,t\,\, + {x_{\text{t}}};\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{(1\,\, - \,\,B)^d}{x_t}\,\,\, = \,\,\,{u_{t,\,\,\,}}\,\,\,\,\,t\,\,\,\, = \,\,\,\,1\,,\,\,\,2\,,\,\,...,$$
(5)
and we report the estimates of the differencing parameter d under three different scenarios: i) first, we consider the case with no deterministic components, i.e., assuming that β
0 and β
1 are both set up equal to 0 a priori in Eq. (
3); ii) then, we only include a constant, so β
1 = 0, and iii) finally, with both coefficients, β
0 and β
1 freely estimated from the data along with d. In addition, we make different assumptions with respect to the error term u
t in (3). Thus, in Table
3, we suppose u
t is a white noise process; in Table
4, u
t is allowed to be autocorrelated; however, instead of imposing here a given parametric model, we use the exponential spectral approach of Bloomfield (
1973), which is non-parametric in the sense that no functional form is presented for u
t but simply displaying its spectral density function, which is very similar (in logs) to the one produced by AR structures. Finally, in Table
5, and based on the quarterly structure of the data, a seasonal AR(1) process will be adopted.
Table 3
Empirical results based on the assumption of white noise errors
i) Estimated values of d |
Series | No terms | With a constant | With a constant and a linear time trend |
United States | 0.43 (0.30, 0.59) | 0.43 (0.30, 0.59) | 0.43 (0.30, 0.59) |
Europe | -0.09 (-0.23, 0.11) | -0.08 (-0.22, 0.11) | -0.10 (-0.25, 0.10) |
Asia/Pacific | 0.24 (0.11, 0.44) | 0.26 (0.13, 0.45) | 0.22 (0.06, 0.43) |
Rest of the world | 0.35 (0.18, 0.55) | 0.35 (0.19, 0.55) | 0.35 (0.19, 0.55) |
Total | 0.41 (0.28, 0.57) | 0.41 (0.28, 0.57) | 0.41 (0.28, 0.57) |
ii) Estimated coefficients |
Series | d | Constant | Linear trend |
United States | 0.43 (0.30, 0.59) | –- | –- |
Europe | -0.08 (-0.22, 0.11) | 3.8545 (5.80) | –- |
Asia/Pacific | 0.26 (0.13, 0.45) | 1.8836 (1.65) | –- |
Rest of the world | 0.35 (0.18, 0.55) | –- | –- |
Total | 0.41 (0.28, 0.57) | –- | –- |
Table 4
Empirical results based on the assumption of autocorrelated (Bloomfield) errors
i) Estimated values of d |
Series | No terms | With a constant | With a constant and a linear time trend |
United States | 0.33 (0.04, 0.72) | 0.30 (0.02, 0.71) | 0.32 (0.05, 0.71) |
Europe | -0.30 (-0.40, -0.02) | -0.32 (-0.50, -0.02) | -0.43 (-0.64, -0.06) |
Asia/Pacific | 0.08 (-0.07, 0.35) | 0.07 (-0.09, 0.41) | -0.08 (-0.36, 0.32) |
Rest of the world | 0.02 (-0.20, 0.48) | 0.03 (-0.30, 0.47) | 0.02 (-0.25, 0.47) |
Total | 0.30 (0.01, 0.72) | 0.28 (0.01, 0.71) | 0.30 (0.04, 0.71) |
ii) Estimated coefficients |
Series | d | Constant | Linear trend |
United States | 0.30 (0.02, 0.71) | 2.9840 (1.97) | –- |
Europe | -0.43 (-0.64, -0.06) | 4.6859 (1.81) | -0.0132 (-2.21) |
Asia/Pacific | -0.08 (-0.36, 0.32) | -0.1550 (-2.24) | 0.0334 (5.77) |
Rest of the world | 0.03 (-0.30, 0.47) | 2.3303 (5.48) | –- |
Total | 0.28 (0.01, 0.71) | 2.9278 (2.17) | –- |
Table 5
Empirical results based on the assumption of seasonally autocorrelated errors
i) Estimated values of d |
Series | No terms | With a constant | With a constant and a linear time trend |
United States | 0.44 (0.32, 0.58) | 0.44 (0.32, 0.58) | 0.44 (0.32, 0.58) |
Europe | -0.08 (-0.22, 0.13) | -0.08 (-0.22, 0.13) | -0.09 (-0.25, 0.12) |
Asia/Pacific | 0.24 (0.12, 0.42) | 0.26 (0.13, 0.44) | 0.22 (0.06, 0.42) |
Rest of the world | 0.35 (0.19, 0.55) | 0.35 (0.19, 0.55) | 0.35 (0.19, 0.55) |
Total | 0.41 (0.29, 0.56) | 0.41 (0.29, 0.56) | 0.41 (0.29, 0.56) |
ii) Estimated coefficients |
Series | d | Constant | Lin. trend | Seas |
United States | 0.44 (0.32, 0.58) | –- | –- | -0.133 |
Europe | -0.08 (-0.22, 0.13) | 3.8545 (5.79) | –- | 0.036 |
Asia/Pacific | 0.26 (0.13, 0.44) | 1.9355 (1.76) | –- | 0.077 |
Rest of the world | 0.35 (0.19, 0.55) | –- | –- | -0.009 |
Total | 0.41 (0.29, 0.56) | –- | | -0.083 |
If we allow for autocorrelation, first using the exponential spectral model of Bloomfield (
1973), (Table
4) we notice first that the time trend coefficient is now statistically significant for Europe and Asia–Pacific, in the former case with a negative coefficient and in the latter with a positive one (see lower part of the table). With respect to the order of integration, the value is negative for Europe and Asia–Pacific, where the I(0) hypothesis cannot be rejected along with the Rest of the World (d = 0.03). However, for Total and the USA, the coefficient is significantly positive supporting once more the hypothesis of long memory (the estimated value of d is equal to 0.28 for Total and 0.30 for the USA). Note here that for United States and Total, the confidence intervals are very wide including values of d outside the stationary region (d ≥ 0.5). Finally, if seasonal autoregressions are permitted, in Table
5, the results are very similar to those based on white noise errors (Table
3) finding no evidence of time trends; I(0) behavior for the case of Europe and long memory (d > 0) in all the other cases, especially for the US data.
As a robustness method, we also use two widespread semiparametric estimation methods, the log-periodogram estimator (Geweke and Porter-Hudak
1983), and the local Whittle estimation approach of Künsch (
1987) (Table
6). In both cases, a bandwidth parameter specifying the number of Fourier frequencies must be fed between 0 and 1, for which we follow Weijie et al. (
2021) who propose the interval (0.58, 0.67) for the GPH estimator for a sequence length of 100, being (0.59, 0.68) when the length is 300. Results shown on Table
5 are consistent with those reported across Tables
2,
3,
4, with evidence of long memory being found in all cases except for Europe. Performing a parametric approach based on Haslett and Raftery (
1989), the results are once more consistent with the previous one and long memory is found in all cases except for Europe (see Table
7).
Table 6
Robustness tests of parameter “d” (GPH and local Whittle, for bandwidth = 0.65)
United States | 0.40 | 0.19 | 0.09 |
Europe | -0.12 | -0.27 | 0.10 |
Asia/Pacific | 0.20 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
Rest of the world | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.10 |
Total | 0.29 | 0.15 | 0.09 |
Table 7
Estimation of d based on optimal ARFIMA case
United States | 0.4036* |
Europe | 0.0001 |
Asia/Pacific | 0.2529* |
Rest of World | 0.3283* |
Total | 0.3868* |