Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research 2/2016

08.10.2015

State Abortion Policy and Unintended Birth Rates in the United States

verfasst von: Marshall H. Medoff

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Restrictive state abortion laws make it more difficult and costly for women to obtain an abortion. The fundamental law of demand posits that an increase in the cost of an abortion should cause the number of abortions to decrease. This suggests that restrictive state abortion laws should cause women with unintended pregnancies to have fewer abortions and concomitantly more unintended births. This paper investigates the impact four restrictive state abortion laws—No Medicaid Funding, Parental Involvement, Mandatory Counseling and Waiting Periods—have on the unintended birth rates of the 50 US states for the year 2006. Using a variety of methodologies, the empirical results show that, contrary to the theoretical prediction, these four antiabortion laws do not have a significant positive effect on unintended birth rates.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Cockrill, K., & Weitz, T. A. (2010). Abortion patients’ perceptions of abortion regulation. Women’s Health Issues, 20, 12–19.CrossRef Cockrill, K., & Weitz, T. A. (2010). Abortion patients’ perceptions of abortion regulation. Women’s Health Issues, 20, 12–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, J. E., & Barrilleaux, C. (1993). Public opinion, interest groups and public policy making in the American states. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 203–221). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications. Cohen, J. E., & Barrilleaux, C. (1993). Public opinion, interest groups and public policy making in the American states. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 203–221). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Finer, L. B., & Kost, K. (2011). Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 43, 78–87.CrossRef Finer, L. B., & Kost, K. (2011). Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 43, 78–87.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2011). Unintended pregnancy in the United States: Incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception, 84, 478–485.CrossRef Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2011). Unintended pregnancy in the United States: Incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception, 84, 478–485.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Folbre, N. (2001). The invisible heart: Economics and family values. New York: New York University. Folbre, N. (2001). The invisible heart: Economics and family values. New York: New York University.
Zurück zum Zitat Goggin, M. L., & Wlezien, C. (1993). Abortion opinion and policy in the American states. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 190–202). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications. Goggin, M. L., & Wlezien, C. (1993). Abortion opinion and policy in the American states. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 190–202). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Guttmacher Institute. (2008, 2006, 2004, 2002). State policies in brief. New York: Guttmacher Institute. Guttmacher Institute. (2008, 2006, 2004, 2002). State policies in brief. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas-Wilson, D. (1997). Women’s reproductive choices: The impact of medicaid funding restrictions. Family Planning Perspectives, 29, 228–233.CrossRef Haas-Wilson, D. (1997). Women’s reproductive choices: The impact of medicaid funding restrictions. Family Planning Perspectives, 29, 228–233.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Joyce, T. (2011). The supply-side economics of abortion. New England Journal of Medicine, 365, 1466–1469.CrossRef Joyce, T. (2011). The supply-side economics of abortion. New England Journal of Medicine, 365, 1466–1469.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. (1996). Teen motherhood and abortion access. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 467–506.CrossRef Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. (1996). Teen motherhood and abortion access. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 467–506.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Levine, P. B. (2003). Parental involvement laws and fertility behavior. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 861–878.CrossRef Levine, P. B. (2003). Parental involvement laws and fertility behavior. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 861–878.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Levine, P. B., Trainor, A. B., & Zimmerman, D. J. (1996). The effect of medicaid abortion funding on abortions, pregnancies and births. Journal of Health Economics, 15, 555–578.CrossRef Levine, P. B., Trainor, A. B., & Zimmerman, D. J. (1996). The effect of medicaid abortion funding on abortions, pregnancies and births. Journal of Health Economics, 15, 555–578.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matthews, S., Ribar, D., & Wilhelm, M. (1997). The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates. Family Planning Perspectives, 29, 52–60.CrossRef Matthews, S., Ribar, D., & Wilhelm, M. (1997). The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates. Family Planning Perspectives, 29, 52–60.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Medoff, M. H. (2002). The determinants and impact of state abortion restrictions. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61, 481–494.CrossRef Medoff, M. H. (2002). The determinants and impact of state abortion restrictions. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61, 481–494.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Medoff, M. H. (2007). Price, restrictions and abortion demand. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 583–599.CrossRef Medoff, M. H. (2007). Price, restrictions and abortion demand. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 583–599.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Medoff, M. H., & Dennis, C. (2011). Public preferences, political party control and restrictive state abortion laws. American Review of Politics, 30, 307–331. Medoff, M. H., & Dennis, C. (2011). Public preferences, political party control and restrictive state abortion laws. American Review of Politics, 30, 307–331.
Zurück zum Zitat Medoff, M. H., Dennis, C., & Stephens, K. (2011). The impact of party control on the diffusion of parental involvement laws in the US states. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 11, 325–347.CrossRef Medoff, M. H., Dennis, C., & Stephens, K. (2011). The impact of party control on the diffusion of parental involvement laws in the US states. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 11, 325–347.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Norrander, B., & Wilcox, C. (1999). Public opinion and policymaking in the states: The case of post-Roe abortion policy. Policy Studies Journal, 27, 702–722.CrossRef Norrander, B., & Wilcox, C. (1999). Public opinion and policymaking in the states: The case of post-Roe abortion policy. Policy Studies Journal, 27, 702–722.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sen, B. (2003). An indirect test for whether restricting medicaid funding for abortion increases pregnancy-avoidance behavior. Economics Letters, 81, 155–163.CrossRef Sen, B. (2003). An indirect test for whether restricting medicaid funding for abortion increases pregnancy-avoidance behavior. Economics Letters, 81, 155–163.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sonfield, A., Kost, K., Gold, R. B., & Finer, L. B. (2011). The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: National and state-level estimates. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 43, 84–102.CrossRef Sonfield, A., Kost, K., Gold, R. B., & Finer, L. B. (2011). The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: National and state-level estimates. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 43, 84–102.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
State Abortion Policy and Unintended Birth Rates in the United States
verfasst von
Marshall H. Medoff
Publikationsdatum
08.10.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1135-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Social Indicators Research 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe