nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

State-of-the-Art of BIM-Based LCA in the Building Sector

verfasst von : Vivian W. Y. Tam, Yijun Zhou, Chethana Illankoon, N Le Khoa, Zhiyu Huang

Erschienen in: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

It is widely recognized that the integration of building information modeling (BIM) and life cycle assessment (LCA) can enhance sustainable development in the building sector. However, a comprehensive and in-depth understanding the state-of-the-art of BIM-based LCA is still scarce. This paper therefore intends to conduct a critical review and analysis of the integration of BIM and LCA in the building sector based on previous studies and provide research gaps and their future practice and development. A qualitative content analysis was adopted to analyze 71 publications. The research results indicate a growing interest in exploring the potential of BIM to facilitate the environmental performance assessment of buildings since 2013. Additionally, previous studies focused on the two topics: integration methods of BIM and LCA and the application of BIM-based LCA. Eight specific sub-topics was identified and classified within the two topics. Five sub-topics was classified within the former, including: drivers and barriers to BIM-based LCA; integrity and accuracy of data flow during integration processes; comparison and analysis of BIM software and LCA tools; material and components libraries for data structure; and effective ways to integrate BIM with LCA, and three sub-topics was classified, including: the evaluation and optimization of environmental impacts-being the most popular one; the evaluation of economic impacts of buildings; and comparative analysis and decision making of alternative scenarios. A framework is then proposed for systematically elaborating developments and gaps of BIM-based LCA. This study contributes to the architecture, engineering and construction literature by presenting the state-of-the-art of BIM-based LCA application and the future practice and development in the building sector.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Supervision System on Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling: Lessons from Shenzhen, Hangzhou and Chongqing, China

Nächstes Kapitel A Study on the Urban Multi-center Spatial Structure Based on POI Data—Taking Guangzhou as an Example

Ajayi, S. O., et al. (2015). Life cycle environmental performance of material specification: A BIM-enhanced comparative assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 6(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2093761X.2015.1006708CrossRef

Antón, L. Á., & Díaz, J. (2014). Integration of life cycle assessment in a BIM environment. Procedia Engineering, 85, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.525CrossRef

Asdrubali, F., Baldassarri, C., & Fthenakis, V. (2013). Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energy and Buildings, 64, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.018CrossRef

Basbagill, J., et al. (2013). Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts. Building and Environment, 60, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.009CrossRef

Becerik-Gerber, B., & Kensek, K. (2010). Building Information Modeling in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction: Emerging Research Directions and Trends. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCEEI.1943-5541.0000023

Castro, R., & Pasanen, P. (2019).How to design buildings with Life Cycle Assessment by accounting for the material flows in refurbishment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 225(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012019.

Cavalliere, C. et al. (2019). Consistent BIM-led LCA during the entire building design process. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 323(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012099.

Cavalliere, C., et al. (2019). Continuous BIM-based assessment of embodied environmental impacts throughout the design process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 941–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.247CrossRef

Crippa, J., et al. (2020). A systematic review of BIM usage for life cycle impact assessment. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-03-2019-0028CrossRef

10.

Di Bari, R. et al. (2019). Step-by-step implementation of BIM-LCA: A case study analysis associating defined construction phases with their respective environmental impacts. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 323(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012105.

11.

Ding, L., Zhou, Y., & Akinci, B. (2014). Building Information Modeling (BIM) application framework: The process of expanding from 3D to computable nD. Automation in Construction, 46(Oct.), 82–93.

12.

Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health care for Women International, 13, 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006CrossRef

13.

Durão, V. et al. (2019). Integration of environmental life cycle information in BIM objects according with the level of development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 225(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012075.

14.

Eleftheriadis, S., Mumovic, D., & Greening, P. (2017). Life cycle energy efficiency in building structures: A review of current developments and future outlooks based on BIM capabilities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 811–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.028CrossRef

15.

Falagas, M. E., et al. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsfCrossRef

16.

Fischer, M. A. R. T. I. N., Hartmann, T. I. M. O & Neuberg, F. R. A. N. K. (2004). Combining different project modeling approaches for effective support of multi-disciplinary engineering tasks.

17.

Gomes, V., Barros, N. N., & Ruschel, R. C. (2019). Building information modelling for whole-building LCA: BIM4LCA. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 290(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012044.

18.

Grussing, M. N. (2014). Life cycle asset management methodologies for buildings. Journal of Infrastructure Systems.

19.

Hollberg, A., Genova, G., & Habert, G. (2020). Evaluation of BIM-based LCA results for building design. Automation in Construction, 109(May 2019), 102972. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102972

20.

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15, 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687CrossRef

21.

Hu, X., et al. (2019). Understanding stakeholders in off-site manufacturing: A literature review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001674CrossRef

22.

Hu, X., Chong, H. Y., & Wang, X. (2019). Sustainability perceptions of off-site manufacturing stakeholders in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.258CrossRef

23.

Iddon, C. R., & Firth, S. K. (2013). Embodied and operational energy for new-build housing: A case study of construction methods in the UK. Energy and Buildings, 67(2013), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.041CrossRef

24.

Inyim, P., Rivera, J., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Integration of building information modeling and economic and environmental impact analysis to support sustainable building design. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000308CrossRef

25.

Jrade, A., & Abdulla, R. (2012). Integrating building information modeling and life cycle assessment Tools to Design Sustainable Buildings. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference of CIB W78, 173–182. Available at: http://itc.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?w78-2012-Paper-24.

26.

Jrade, A., & Jalaei, F. (2013). Integrating building information modelling with sustainability to design building projects at the conceptual stage. Building Simulation, 6(4), 429–444.CrossRef

27.

Kim, T.-H., et al. (2013). Life Cycle Costing: Maintenance and Repair Costs of Hospital Facilities Using Monte Carlo Simulation.

28.

Kota, S., et al. (2014). Building Information Modeling (BIM)-based daylighting simulation and analysis. Energy and Buildings, 81(oct.), 391–403.

29.

Kylili, A., & Fokaides, P. A. (2017). Policy trends for the sustainability assessment of construction materials: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 35, 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.013CrossRef

30.

Lee, C., et al. (2012). Life Cycle Cost Analysis on Glass Type of High-Rise Buildings for Increasing Energy Efficiency and Reducing CO₂ Emission in Korea. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 138(7), 897–904.CrossRef

31.

Lee, S., et al. (2015). Green template for life cycle assessment of buildings based on building information modeling: Focus on embodied environmental impact. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(12), 16498–16512. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71215830CrossRef

32.

Marzouk, M., Azab, S., & Metawie, M. (2018). BIM-based approach for optimizing life cycle costs of sustainable buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.280CrossRef

33.

Marzouk, M., & Omar, M. (2013). Multiobjective optimisation algorithm for sewer network rehabilitation. Structure & Infrastructure Engineering, 9(11), 1094–1102.CrossRef

34.

Meex, E., et al. (2018). Requirements for applying LCA-based environmental impact assessment tools in the early stages of building design. Building and Environment, 133(February), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.016CrossRef

35.

Morgan, D. L. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3(1), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300107CrossRef

36.

Najjar, M., et al. (2017). Integration of BIM and LCA: Evaluating the environmental impacts of building materials at an early stage of designing a typical office building. Journal of Building Engineering, 14(March), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.10.005CrossRef

37.

Najjar, M. K., et al. (2019). Life cycle assessment methodology integrated with BIM as a decision-making tool at early-stages of building design. International Journal of Construction Management, pp. 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1637098

38.

Obrecht, T. P., et al. (2020). BIM and LCA integration: A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145534.

39.

Peng, C. (2016). Calculation of a building’s life cycle carbon emissions based on Ecotect and building information modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.078CrossRef

40.

Penttil, H. (2006). Describing the changes in architectural information technology to understand design complexity and free-form architectural expression. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 11, 395–408.

41.

Pombo, O., Rivela, B., & Neila, J. (Jun 2016). The challenge of sustainable building renovation: assessment of current criteria and future outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123(1), 88–100.

42.

Rezaei, F., Bulle, C., & Lesage, P. (2019). Integrating building information modeling and life cycle assessment in the early and detailed building design stages. Building and Environment, 153(February), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.034CrossRef

43.

Röck, M., et al. (2018). LCA and BIM: Visualization of environmental potentials in building construction at early design stages. Building and Environment, 140, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.006CrossRef

44.

Santos, R. et al. (2016). BIM in LCA/LCEA Analysis : Comparative analysis of Multi-family House and Single-family. Bim, (Commission 2015), 212–223.

45.

Santos, R., et al. (2019). Integration of LCA and LCC analysis within a BIM-based environment. Automation in Construction, 103(March), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.011CrossRef

46.

Satu et al. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing.

47.

Schneider-Marin, P. et al. (2020). Uncertainty analysis of embedded energy and greenhouse gas emissions using BIM in early design stages. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072633.

48.

Schultz, J., et al. (2016). A benchmark study of BIM-based whole-building life-cycle assessment tools and processes. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 7(3–4), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/2093761X.2017.1302839CrossRef

49.

Seo, S., Tucker, S., & Newton, P. (2007). Automated material selection and environmental assessment in the context of 3D building modelling. Journal of Green Building, 2(2), 51–61.CrossRef

50.

Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710.CrossRef

51.

Seyis, S. (2020). Mixed method review for integrating building information modeling and life-cycle assessments. Building and Environment, 173(January), 106703. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106703

52.

Shadram, F., & Mukkavaara, J. (2018). An integrated BIM-based framework for the optimization of the trade-off between embodied and operational energy. Energy and Buildings, 158, 1189–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.017CrossRef

53.

Shin, Y. S., & Cho, K. (2015). BIM application to select appropriate design alternative with consideration of LCA and LCCA. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015(i). doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/281640.

54.

Soust-Verdaguer, B., Llatas, C., & García-Martínez, A. (2016). Simplification in life cycle assessment of single-family houses: A review of recent developments. Building and Environment, 103, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.014CrossRef

55.

Soust-Verdaguer, B., Llatas, C., & García-Martínez, A. (2017). Critical review of bim-based LCA method to buildings. Energy and Buildings, 136, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.009CrossRef

56.

USDOE. (2011). Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2009. Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/beta/environment/emissions/ghg_report/pdf/tbl11.pdf.

57.

Wastiels, L., & Decuypere, R. (2019). Identification and comparison of LCA-BIM integration strategies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 323(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012101.

58.

Weissenberger, M., Jensch, W., & Lang, W. (2014). The convergence of life cycle assessment and nearly zero-energy buildings: The case of Germany. Energy & Buildings, 76(Jun), pp. 551–557.

59.

Yang, W., & Wang, S. S. (2013). A BIM-LCA framework and case study of a residential building in Tianjin. Modeling and Computation in Engineering II–Proceedings of the 2nd SREE Conference on Modeling and Computation in Engineering, CMCE 2013, pp. 83–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/b14896-14.

60.

Yang, X., et al. (2018). Building-information-modeling enabled life cycle assessment, a case study on carbon footprint accounting for a residential building in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.070CrossRef

Titel: State-of-the-Art of BIM-Based LCA in the Building Sector
verfasst von: Vivian W. Y. Tam
Yijun Zhou
Chethana Illankoon
N Le Khoa
Zhiyu Huang
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3586-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-16-3587-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3587-8_6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"