nach oben

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

Erschienen in:

02.06.2016 | Original paper

Static Liquefaction Analysis Considering Principal Stress Directions and Anisotropy

verfasst von: Abouzar Sadrekarimi

Erschienen in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Static liquefaction failure of a sloping ground occurs when the shear stress applied by a monotonic triggering load exceeds the undrained yield (peak) shear strength of the saturated liquefiable cohesionless soil. Current practices for determining the in-situ undrained yield strength for ground subject to static shear stress either rely on a suite of costly laboratory tests on undisturbed field samples or empirical correlations based on in-situ penetration tests which do not account for the effects of anisotropic consolidation, intermediate principal stress, and mode of shear on the degree of strain-softening and brittleness of cohesionless soils. This study investigates the effects of variations in the direction and relative magnitudes of principal stresses associated with different modes of shear and ground slopes on static liquefaction failure of cohesionless soils. Empirical relationships are developed between soil brittleness index and maximum excess pore water pressure ratio to characterize soil shearing behavior observed in a database of 271 undrained laboratory shear tests collected from the past literature. The application of these relationships for estimating the static liquefaction triggering strength of cohesionless soils under sloping grounds is described for plane-strain boundary conditions and the results are compared with those back-calculated for several cases of static liquefaction flow failures. The proposed procedure incorporates variations in mode of shear and initial stress anisotropy in an empirical formulation based on in-situ penetration tests.

Vorheriger Artikel Development of Analytical Models to Estimate Pile Setup in Cohesive Soils Based on FE Numerical Analyses

Nächster Artikel The Detection of the Boulders in Metro Tunneling in Granite Strata Using a Shield Tunneling Method and a New Method of Coping with Boulders

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abramson LW, Lee TS, Sharma S, Boyce GM (2001) Slope stability and stabilization methods, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

Adalier K, Elgamal AW (2002) Seismic response of adjacent dense and loose saturated sand columns. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:115–127CrossRef

Alarcon-Guzman A, Leonards GA, Chameau JL (1988) Undrained monotonic and cyclic strength of sands. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 114:1089–1109CrossRef

Al-Tarhouni M, Simms P, Sivathayalan S (2011) Cyclic behaviour of reconstituted and desiccated-rewet thickened gold tailings in simple shear. Can Geotech J 48:1044–1060CrossRef

Anderson SA, Sitar N (1995) Analysis of rainfall-induced debris flows. J Geotech Eng ASCE 121:544–552CrossRef

Arthur JRF, Menzies BK (1972) Inherent anisotropy in a sand. Geotechnique 22:115–128CrossRef

Bagnold RA (1954) Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 225:49–63CrossRef

Been K, Jefferies MG, Crooks JHA, Rothenburg L (1987) The cone penetration test in sands. Part II, general inference of state. Geotechnique 37:285–299CrossRef

Been K, Jefferies MG, Hachey J (1991) The critical state of sands. Geotechnique 41:365–381CrossRef

Bishop AW (1971) Shear strength parameters for undisturbed and remoulded soil specimens. Roscoe memorial symposium. Cambridge University, Cambridge, pp 3–58

Bjerrum L (1971) Subaqueous slope failures in Norwegian fjords. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute

Buscarnera G, Whittle A (2013) Model prediction of static liquefaction: influence of the initial state on potential instabilities. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 139:420–432CrossRef

Castro G (1969) Liquefaction of sands. Harvard University, Cambridge

Chang WJ, Rathje EM, Stokoe KH, Hazirbaba K (2007) In situ pore-pressure generation behavior of liquefiable sand. J Geotech Geoenviron 133:921–931CrossRef

Chung EKF (1985) Effects of stress path and prestrain history on the undrained monotonic and cyclic loading behaviour of saturated sand. Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, p 103

Cornforth DH (1964) Some experiments on the influence of strain conditions on the strength of sand. Geotechnique 14:143–167CrossRef

Damavandinejad Monfared S, Sadrekarimi A (2013) An overview of existing methods for estimating state parameter from cone penetration test results. GeoMontreal. Canadian Geotechnical Society, Montreal, Quebec

Davis RO, Bolton MD (1997) Strength of post-liquefaction flows—a speculative velocity dependent model. 9th International conference of the association for computer methods and advances in geomechanics, Wuhan, China

Davis AP, Poulos SJ, Castro G (1988) Strengths backfigured from liquefaction case histories. 2nd International conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, St. Louis, MO, pp. 1693–1701

Di Prisco C, Matiotti R, Nova R (1995) Theoretical investigation of the undrained stability of shallow submerged slopes. Geotechnique 45:479–496CrossRef

Doanh T, Ibraim E, Matiotti R (1997) Undrained instability of very loose Hostun sand in triaxial compression and extension. Part 1: experimental observations. Mech Cohesive Frict Mater 2:47–70CrossRef

Fear CE, Robertson PK (1995) Estimating the undrained strength of sand—a theoretical framework. Can Geotech J 32:859–870CrossRef

Fiegel GL, Kutter BL (1994) Liquefaction mechanism for layered soils. J Geotech Eng ASCE 120:737–755CrossRef

Fourie AB, Blight GE, Papageorgiou G (2001) Static liquefaction as a possible explanation for the Merriespruit tailings dam failure. Can Geotech J 38:707–719CrossRef

Fuentes W, Triantafyllidis T, Lizcano A (2012) Hypoplastic model for sands with loading surface. Acta Geotech 7:177–192CrossRef

Gajo A, Piffer L (1999) The effects of preloading history on the undrained behaviour of saturated loose sand. Soils Found 39:43–54CrossRef

Han C, Vardoulakis I (1991) Plane strain compression experiments on water-saturated fine-grained sand. Geotechnique 41:49–78CrossRef

Harris WW (1994) Localization of loose granular soils and its effect on undrained steady state strength. Northwestern University, Evanston

Hofmann BA, Sego DC, Robertson PK (2000) In situ ground freezing to obtain undisturbed samples of loose sand. J Geotech Geoenviron 126:979–989CrossRef

Hyodo M, Tanimizu H, Yasufuku N, Murata H (1994) Undrained cyclic and monotonic triaxial behavior of saturated loose sand. Soils Found 34:19–32CrossRef

Imam SMR, Morgenstern NR, Robertson PK, Chan DH (2002) Yielding and flow liquefaction of loose sand. Soils Found 42:19–31CrossRef

Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43:351–415CrossRef

Ishihara K, Yasuda S, Yoshida Y (1990) Liquefaction-induced flow failure of embankments and residual strength of silty sands. Soils Found 30:69–80CrossRef

Ishihara K, Tsukamoto Y, Shibayama T (2003) Evaluation of slope stability against flow in saturated sand, Reports on Geotechnical Engineering, Soil Mechanics and Rock Mechanics, 75^th Anniversary of K. Terzaghi’s Erdbaumechanik. Institut fur Grundbau und Bodenmechanik-Technische Universitat, Wien, pp 41–54

Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35:245–296CrossRef

Iverson RM, LaHusen RG (1989) Dynamic pore-pressure fluctuations in rapidly shearing granular materials. Science 246:796–799CrossRef

Iverson RM, Reid ME, LaHusen RG (1997) Debris-flow mobilization from landslides. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 25:85–138CrossRef

Jefferies MG (1993) Nor-sand—a simple critical state model for sand. Geotechnique 43:91–103CrossRef

Kato S, Ishihara K, Towhata I (2001) Undrained shear characteristics of saturated sand under anisotropic consolidation. Soils Found 41:1–11CrossRef

Keyhani R, Haeri SM (2013) Evaluation of the effect of anisotropic consolidation and principle stress rotation on undrained behavior of silty sands. Scientia Iranica A 20:1637–1653

Kokusho T (2013) Liquefaction potential evaluations: energy-based method versus stress-based method. Can Geotech J 50:1088–1099CrossRef

Kokusho T, Kojima T (2002) Mechanism for postliquefaction water film generation in layered sand. J Geotech Geoenviron 128:129–137CrossRef

Konrad J-M (1990) The minimum undrained strength of two sands. J Geotech Eng ASCE 116:932–947CrossRef

Konrad JM (1993) Undrained response of loosely compacted sands during monotonic and cyclic compression. Geotechnique 43:69–90CrossRef

Koppejan AW, van Wamelen BM, Weinberg LJH (1948) Coastal landslides in the Dutch province of Zeeland. 2nd International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Rotterdam, Holland, pp 89–96

Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

Kramer SL, Seed BH (1988) Initiation of static liquefaction under static loading conditions. J Geotech Eng ASCE 114:412–430CrossRef

Kulasingam R, Malvick EJ, Boulanger RW, Kutter BL (2004) Strength loss and localization of silt interlayers in slopes of liquefied sand. J Geotech Geoenviron 130:1192–1202CrossRef

Lade PV (1992) Static instability and liquefaction of loose fine sandy slopes. J Geotech Eng ASCE 118:51–71CrossRef

Lade PV, Yamamuro JA, Bopp PA (2006) Drained and undrained strengths of sand in axisymmetric tests at high pressures. In: Lade PV, Nakai T (eds) Second Japan-U.S. workshop on testing, modeling, and simulation in geomechanics. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Kyoto, Japan, pp 87–102

Lavigne TA (1988) The effects of anisotropic consolidation on the liquefaction potential of mine tailings. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York

Lee KL (1965) Triaxial compressive strength of saturated sand under seismic loading conditions. University of California, Berkeley

Lee K (1970) Comparison of plane strain and triaxial tests on sand. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 96:901–923

Marachi N, Duncan J, Chan C, Seed H (1981) Plane-strain testing of sand. In: Yong RN, Townsend FC (eds) Laboratory shear strength of soils, ASTM STP 740. American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 294–302

Meneses-Loja J, Ishihara K, Towhata I (2000) Flow failure of saturated sand under simultaneous monotonic and cyclic stresses. J Geotech Geoenviron 126:131–138CrossRef

Mesri G (2007) Yield strength and critical strength of liquefiable sands in sloping ground. Geotechnique 57:309–311CrossRef

Mooney M (1996) An experimental study of strain localization and the mechanical behavior of sand. Northwestern University, Evanston

Mroz Z, Boukpeti N, Drescher A (2003) Constitutive model for static liquefaction. Int J Geomech ASCE 3:133–144CrossRef

Muhammad K (2012) Case history-based analysis of liquefaction in sloping ground. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, p 489

Nakata Y, Hyodo M, Murata H, Yasufuku N (1998) Flow deformation of sands subjected to principal stress rotation. Soils Found 38:115–128CrossRef

Okada Y, Sassa K, Fukuoka H (2005) Undrained shear behaviour of sands subjected to large shear displacement and estimation of excess pore-pressure generation from drained ring shear tests. Can Geotech J 42:787–803CrossRef

Okura Y, Kitahara H, Sammori T (2000) Fluidization in dry landslides. Eng Geol 56:347–360CrossRef

Olson SM (2001) Liquefaction analysis of level and sloping ground using field case histories and penetration resistance. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, p 549

Olson SM, Mattson BB (2008) Mode of shear effects on yield and liquefied strength ratios. Can Geotech J 45:574–587CrossRef

Olson SM, Stark TD (2002) Liquefied strength ratio from liquefaction flow failure case histories. Can Geotech J 39:629–647CrossRef

Olson SM, Stark TD (2003) Yield strength ratio and liquefaction analysis of slopes and embankments. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 129:727–737CrossRef

Park S-S, Byrne PM (2004) Practical constitutive model for soil liquefaction. In: Pande GN, Pietruszczak S (eds) Numerical models in geomechanics (NUMOG IX). A. A. Balkema, Amsterdam, pp 181–187

Plewes HD, O’Neil GD, McRoberts EC, Chan WK (1989) Liquefaction considerations for Suncor tailings ponds, dam safety seminar. BiTech Publisher, Edmonton, pp 39–50

Poulos SJ, Castro G, France JW (1985) Liquefaction evaluation procedure. J Geotech Eng ASCE 111:772–792CrossRef

Riemer MF (1992) The effects of testing conditions on the constitutive behavior of loose, saturated sand under monotonic loading. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California

Riemer MF, Seed RB (1997) Factors affecting apparent position of the steady-state line. J Geotech Geoenvirion Eng ASCE 123:281–288CrossRef

Saada A, Townsend FC (1981) State of the art: laboratory strength testing of soils. In: Yong RN, Townsend FC (eds) Laboratory shear strength of soils, ASTM STP 740. American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 7–77

Sadrekarimi A (2014) Effect of the mode of shear on static liquefaction analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001182

Sayao A, Vaid YP (1996) Effect of intermediate principal stress on the deformation response of sand. Can Geotech J 33:822–828CrossRef

Seid-Karbasi M, Byrne PM (2007) Seismic liquefaction, lateral spreading, and flow slides: a numerical investigation into void redistribution. Can Geotech J 44:873–890CrossRef

Shibuya S, Hight DW (1987) On the stress path in simple shear. Géotechnique 37:511–515CrossRef

Sivathayalan S, Vaid YP (2002) Influence of generalized initial state and principal stress rotation on the undrained response of sands. Can Geotech J 39:63–76CrossRef

Sladen JA, D’Hollander RD, Krahn J (1985) The liquefaction of sands, a collapse surface approach. Can Geotech J 22:564–578CrossRef

Stark TD, Mesri G (1992) Undrained shear strength of liquefied sands for stability analysis. J Geotech Eng ASCE 118:1727–1747CrossRef

Symes MJ (1983) Rotation of principal stresses in sand. University of London, London

Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

Uthayakumar M, Vaid YP (1998) Static liquefaction of sands under multiaxial loading. Can Geotech J 35:273–283CrossRef

Vaid YP, Thomas J (1995) Liquefaction and postliquefaction behavior of sand. J Geotech Eng ASCE 121:163–173CrossRef

Vaid YP, Stedman JD, Sivathayalan S (2001) Confining stress and static shear effects in cyclic liquefaction. Can Geotech J 38:580–591CrossRef

Wanatowski D (2005) Strain softening and instability of sand under plane-strain conditions. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Wanatowski D, Chu J (2007) Static liquefaction of sand in plane strain. Can Geotech J 44:299–313CrossRef

Wang X (2008) Geotechnical analysis of flow slides, debris flows, and related phenomena. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta

Wijewickreme D, Sanin MV (2010) Postcyclic reconsolidation strains in low-plastic fraser river silt due to dissipation of excess pore-water pressures. J Geotech Geoenviron 136:1347–1357CrossRef

Wride CE, Robertson PK (1997) Phase I and III data review report (Mildred Lake and J-pit sites, Syncrude Canada Ltd.), CANLEX technical report. University of Alberta, Edmonton

Yoshimine M, Ishihara K, Vargas W (1998) Effects of principal stress direction and intermediate principal stress on undrained shear behavior of sand. Soils Found 38:179–188CrossRef

Yoshimine M, Robertson PK, Wride CE (1999) Undrained shear strength of clean sands to trigger flow liquefaction. Can Geotech J 36:891–906CrossRef

Yoshimine M, Robertson P, Wride CE (2001) Undrained shear strength of clean sands to trigger flow liquefaction: reply. Can Geotech J 38:654–657CrossRef

Zdravkovic L, Jardin RJ (2000) Undrained anisotropy of K0-consolidated silt. Can Geotech J 37:178–200CrossRef

Zhang HM, Garga VK (1997) Quasi-steady state: a real behaviour? Can Geotech J 34:749–761CrossRef

Titel: Static Liquefaction Analysis Considering Principal Stress Directions and Anisotropy
verfasst von: Abouzar Sadrekarimi
Publikationsdatum: 02.06.2016
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0960-3182
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1529
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0033-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Criteria of Acceptance for Constant Rate of Strain Consolidation Test for Tropical Cohesive Soil

Simulation for the Spatial–Time Characteristics of High Arch Dam

The Blasting Test and Blasting Vibration Monitoring of Vertical Crater Retreat Mining Method in the Luohe Iron Mine

Pressure-Relief Mining of the Working Face Under the Coal Pillar in the Close Distance Coal Seams

Stabilization of Expansive Soil with Cement Kiln Dust and RBI Grade 81 at Subgrade Level

The Detection of the Boulders in Metro Tunneling in Granite Strata Using a Shield Tunneling Method and a New Method of Coping with Boulders