main-content

## Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

verfasst von: Luigi Romano

Erschienen in:

## Abstract

In steady-state conditions, explicit expressions for tyre characteristics may be derived using the theoretical framework provided by the brush theory. This chapter is, thus, dedicated to addressing the stationary problem from both the local and global perspectives. The fundamental concepts of critical slip and spin are introduced with respect to an isotropic tyre, and the deformation of the bristles inside the contact patch is investigated for different operating conditions of the tyre. Analytical functions describing the tyre forces and moment acting inside the contact patch are obtained for the particular case of a rectangular contact patch. The analysis is qualitative in nature.
Fußnoten
1
A D-convex set is a set convex along a specified direction. Analogously, a D-convex function is a function which is convex along a given direction. The reader may refer to [19] for additional details.

2
In turn, the existence of a continuous leading edge ensures that the steady-state displacement of the bristle is at least $$C^0(\mathscr {P})$$.

3
From a global perspective, full and partial sliding conditions have not been defined rigorously in the literature. An intuitive way of stating mathematically full sliding conditions would be to consider the Lebesgue measures $$\lambda ^*(\cdot )$$ of the contact patch $$\mathscr {P}$$ and its sliding region $$\mathscr {P}^\text {(s)}$$. Then full sliding would occur if $$\lambda ^*(\mathscr {P}^\text {(s)})\equiv \lambda ^*(\mathscr {P})$$, and partial sliding if $$\lambda ^*(\mathscr {P}^\text {(s)})< \lambda ^*(\mathscr {P})$$. With the same rationale, vanishing sliding conditions would correspond to $$\lambda ^*(\mathscr {P}^\text {(a)})\equiv \lambda ^*(\mathscr {P})$$.

4
When the tyre is anistoropic, a constant sliding direction cannot be found.

5
It should be noticed that, since it is assumed that the contact patch has no lateral dimension, the analytical expressions for the stiffnesses in Eq. (3.15) should be reduced by a factor of 2b. This consideration also holds for Sect. 3.5.

Literatur
1.
Pacejka HB (2012) Tire and vehicle dynamics, 3rd edn. Elsevier/BH, Amsterdam
2.
Limebeer DJN, Massaro M (2018) Dynamics and optimal control of road vehicle. Oxford University Press
3.
Sakai H (1990) Study on cornering properties of tire and vehicle. Tire Sci Technol 18(3):136–169. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​2346/​1.​2141697
4.
Svendenius J (2007) Tire modelling and friction estimation [dissertation]. Lund
5.
Pacejka HB, Bakker E (1992) The magic formula tire model. Int J Vehic Mech Mob 21(1):1–18
6.
Bayle P, Forissier JF, Lafon S (1993) A new tyre model for vehicle dynamics simulations. Autom Technol Int, 193–198
7.
Pacejka HB, Besselink IJM (1997) Magic formula tyre model with transient properties. Vehicle Syst Dyn 27(sup001):234–249 CrossRef
8.
Besselink IJM, Schmeitz AJC, Pacejka HB (2010) An improved magic formula/swift tyre model that can handle inflation pressure changes. Vehicle Syst Dyn 48(sup1):337–352 CrossRef
9.
Farroni F, Giordano D, Russo M et al. (2014) TRT: thermo racing tyre a physical model to predict the tyre temperature distribution. Meccanica 49:707–723. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11012-013-9821-9
10.
Farroni F (2016) T.R.I.C.K.-tire/Road interaction characterization & knowledge—a tool for the evaluation of tire and vehicle performances in outdoor test sessions. Mechan Syst Signal Proc 72–73:808-831. ISSN 0888-3270. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ymssp.​2015.​11.​019
11.
Farroni F, Russo M, Sakhnevych A, Timpone F (2019) TRT EVO: Advances in real-time thermodynamic tire modeling for vehicle dynamics simulations. Proc IMechE Part D: J Autom Eng 233(1):121–135 CrossRef
12.
Farroni F, Sakhnevych A, Timpone F (2017) Physical modelling of tire wear for the analysis of the influence of thermal and frictional effects on vehicle performance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L: J Mater Des Appl 231(1–2):151–161
13.
Sakhnevych A (2021) Multiphysical MF-based tyre modelling and parametrisation for vehicle setup and control strategies optimisation. Vehicle Syst. Dyn. 2021. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​00423114.​2021.​1977833
14.
Gipser M (2007) FTire—the tire simulation model for all applications related to vehicle dynamics. Vehicle Syst Dyn 45(S1):139–151. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​0042311080189996​0
15.
Gipser M (2016) FTire and puzzling tyre physics: teacher, not student. Vehicle Syst Dyn 54(4):448–462. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​00423114.​2015.​1117116
16.
Gipser M (2005) FTire: a physically based application-oriented tyre model for use with detailed MBS and finite-element suspension models. Vehicle Syst Dyn 43(sup1):76–91. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​0042311050013994​0
18.
Romano L, Timpone F, Bruzelius F, Jacobson B. Analytical results in transient brush tyre models: theory for large camber angles and classic solutions with limited friction. Meccanica. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11012-021-01422-3
19.
Matoušek, J (2001) On directional convexity. Discrete Comput Geom 25:389–403. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s004540010069
20.
Evans LC (2010) Partial differential equations. 2nd ed. American Mathematical Society
21.
Guiggiani M (2018) The science of vehicle dynamics, 2nd edn. Springer International, Cham(Switzerland) CrossRef