Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Eurasian Business Review 2/2021

03.04.2020 | Regular Article

Sticky cost behavior: evidence from small and medium sized enterprises in Turkey

verfasst von: Hakan Özkaya

Erschienen in: Eurasian Business Review | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Evidence regarding cost behavior mostly comes from big listed companies. Cost behavior of SMEs, which are backbones of economy, is under-researched. This paper intends to fill this gap by providing evidence on cost stickiness from SMEs in an emerging economy. Cost stickiness refers to the notion that costs increase and decrease by differing magnitude for a specific change in the activity volume. Analyses of data for Turkish SMEs from 2013 to 2017 indicate that; total costs, cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative costs are sticky in varying degrees. Cost stickiness of total costs and selling general and administrative costs reverses following a revenue decline period. The degree of stickiness of all cost categories is positively related to asset intensity and employee intensity while the degree of stickiness of total costs and cost of goods sold is negatively related to debt intensity. The degree of cost stickiness is higher for small revenue decreases than for greater revenue decreases. Finally, firms in different industries have different cost behaviors.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
To check the degree of multicollinearity, the variance inflation factor (VIF) for independent variables are calculated. The centered VIF value for the variables is the same since there are only two variables in Model I and it is 1.63. First introduced by Marquardt (1970), VIF value indicates an extreme degree of collinearity when it is higher than 10. Some subsequent studies argue that multicollinearity leads to poorly estimated regression coefficients when VIF values exceed 5 (Paul 2006). While the extreme collinearity is problematic, less than extreme collinearity has less impact on the results (Mason and Perreault 1991). Moreover, even the presence of near extreme multicollinearity (VIFs between 5 and 10) does not violate the least squares estimates’ being the best linear unbiased estimates (BLUE). The presence of multicollinearity inflates the standard errors of the coefficient by the square root of the VIF value estimated for that variable. That is standard errors for the coefficient of both independent variables are 1.28 (square root of 1.63) times as large as they would be if they had been uncorrelated with each other (Allison 1999). Likewise, the unaffected t statistics for the variables would be the reported t-statistics divided by 1.28. Thus, neither the coefficient values, nor their significance values are adversely affected by the presence of collinearity for Model I. Although VIF values and their adjustments are not reported for each estimation result table, the same holds for other models as well.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47–63. Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47–63.
Zurück zum Zitat Balakrishnan, R., & Gruca, T. S. (2008). Cost stickiness and core competency: A note. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 993–1006.CrossRef Balakrishnan, R., & Gruca, T. S. (2008). Cost stickiness and core competency: A note. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 993–1006.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Balakrishnan, R., Labro, E., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2014). Cost structure and sticky costs. Journal of management accounting research, 26(2), 91–116.CrossRef Balakrishnan, R., Labro, E., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2014). Cost structure and sticky costs. Journal of management accounting research, 26(2), 91–116.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baltagi, B. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester: Wiley. Baltagi, B. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43–79.CrossRef Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43–79.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Chen, L. T. (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111–127.CrossRef Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Chen, L. T. (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111–127.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bosch, J. M. A., & Blandon, J. G. (2011). The influence of size on cost behaviour associated with tactical and operational flexibility. Estudios de Economia, 38(2), 419–455.CrossRef Bosch, J. M. A., & Blandon, J. G. (2011). The influence of size on cost behaviour associated with tactical and operational flexibility. Estudios de Economia, 38(2), 419–455.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bugeja, M., Lu, M., & Shan, Y. (2015). Cost stickiness in Australia: Characteristics and determinants. Australian Accounting Review, 25(3), 248–261.CrossRef Bugeja, M., Lu, M., & Shan, Y. (2015). Cost stickiness in Australia: Characteristics and determinants. Australian Accounting Review, 25(3), 248–261.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. C. (2006). A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 127–140.CrossRef Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. C. (2006). A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 127–140.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cannon, J. N. (2014). Determinants of “sticky costs”: An analysis of cost behavior using United States air transportation industry data. The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1645–1672.CrossRef Cannon, J. N. (2014). Determinants of “sticky costs”: An analysis of cost behavior using United States air transportation industry data. The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1645–1672.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Celik, M., & Kok, D. (2013). The validity of cost stickiness in Turkey: A panel data analysis in Istanbul stock exchange (ISE). Business and Economics Research Journal, 4(4), 1–37. Celik, M., & Kok, D. (2013). The validity of cost stickiness in Turkey: A panel data analysis in Istanbul stock exchange (ISE). Business and Economics Research Journal, 4(4), 1–37.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252–282.CrossRef Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252–282.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng, S., Jiang, W., & Zeng, Y. (2018). Does access to capital affect cost stickiness? Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 25(1–2), 177–198.CrossRef Cheng, S., Jiang, W., & Zeng, Y. (2018). Does access to capital affect cost stickiness? Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 25(1–2), 177–198.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, S., Karatzimas, S., & Naoum, V. C. (2017). The sticky cost phenomenon at the local government level: Empirical evidence from Greece. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(4), 445–463.CrossRef Cohen, S., Karatzimas, S., & Naoum, V. C. (2017). The sticky cost phenomenon at the local government level: Empirical evidence from Greece. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(4), 445–463.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dalla Via, N., & Perego, P. (2014). Sticky cost behaviour: Evidence from small and medium sized companies. Accounting & Finance, 54(3), 753–778.CrossRef Dalla Via, N., & Perego, P. (2014). Sticky cost behaviour: Evidence from small and medium sized companies. Accounting & Finance, 54(3), 753–778.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dierynck, B., Landsman, W. R., & Renders, A. (2012). Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1219–1246.CrossRef Dierynck, B., Landsman, W. R., & Renders, A. (2012). Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1219–1246.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marquardt, D. W. (1970). Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics, 12(3), 591–612.CrossRef Marquardt, D. W. (1970). Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics, 12(3), 591–612.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mason, C. H., & Perreault, W. D., Jr. (1991). Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 268–280.CrossRef Mason, C. H., & Perreault, W. D., Jr. (1991). Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 268–280.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Noreen, E., & Soderstrom, N. (1994). Are overhead costs strictly proportional to activity?: Evidence from hospital departments. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1–2), 255–278.CrossRef Noreen, E., & Soderstrom, N. (1994). Are overhead costs strictly proportional to activity?: Evidence from hospital departments. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1–2), 255–278.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Noreen, E., & Soderstrom, N. (1997). The accuracy of proportional cost models: Evidence from hospital service departments. Review of Accounting Studies, 2(1), 89–114.CrossRef Noreen, E., & Soderstrom, N. (1997). The accuracy of proportional cost models: Evidence from hospital service departments. Review of Accounting Studies, 2(1), 89–114.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Öztürk, E., & Zeren, F. (2016). Maliyet Yapışkanlığının Geçerliliğinin Test Edilmesi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği-Testing of The Validity of The Cost Stickiness: The Example of Borsa İstanbul. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 31–42.CrossRef Öztürk, E., & Zeren, F. (2016). Maliyet Yapışkanlığının Geçerliliğinin Test Edilmesi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği-Testing of The Validity of The Cost Stickiness: The Example of Borsa İstanbul. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 31–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shust, E., & Weiss, D. (2014). Discussion of asymmetric cost behavior—Sticky costs: Expenses versus cash flows. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 81–90.CrossRef Shust, E., & Weiss, D. (2014). Discussion of asymmetric cost behavior—Sticky costs: Expenses versus cash flows. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 81–90.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441–1471.CrossRef Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441–1471.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.CrossRef White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Boston: Cengage Learning. Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Zurück zum Zitat Yükçü, S., & Özkaya, H. (2011). Cost behavior in Turkish firms: Are selling, general and administrative costs and total operating costs “sticky”? World of Accounting Science, 13(3), 1–27. Yükçü, S., & Özkaya, H. (2011). Cost behavior in Turkish firms: Are selling, general and administrative costs and total operating costs “sticky”? World of Accounting Science, 13(3), 1–27.
Metadaten
Titel
Sticky cost behavior: evidence from small and medium sized enterprises in Turkey
verfasst von
Hakan Özkaya
Publikationsdatum
03.04.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Eurasian Business Review / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1309-4297
Elektronische ISSN: 2147-4281
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00156-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Eurasian Business Review 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe