Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Embedding Diversity in Social Entrepreneurial Research: India’s Learning Laboratories Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Stimulated Innovation Cycle to Serve the Poor: A Case of Mann Deshi Mahila Group

verfasst von : Balram Bhushan

Erschienen in: Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Business Models

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Innovation acts as a tool for capacity building. Social problems do not occur in isolation; hence, a single innovation is not sufficient, instead they require a combination of innovations. As these innovations are directly related to survival needs of the poor, the lag time between idea generation and innovation should be minimized. Considering multiple innovations of Mann Deshi Mahila Group (MDMG), this chapter proposes a stimulated innovation cycle to serve the marginalized. The chapter identifies two types of innovation, namely stratified innovation and sequential innovation. Layered innovation connects two value chains, and sequential innovations are interventions in the same value chain. These two types of innovations are the precursors of each other, thereby generating stimulated innovation cycle.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Social Entrepreneurship Through Micro-Entrepreneurs of Self-Help Groups
Nächstes Kapitel Effectiveness of Impact-Investing at the Base of the Pyramid: An Empirical Study from India
Literatur
Arend, R. J. (2013). A heart-mind-opportunity nexus: Distinguishing social entrepreneurship for entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 313–315.CrossRef
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.CrossRef
Bacq, S., Hartog, C., & Hoogendoorn, B. (2013). A quantitative comparison of social and commercial entrepreneurship: Toward a more nuanced understanding of social entrepreneurship organizations in context. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 40–68.CrossRef
Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(5–6), 373–403.CrossRef
Busenitz, L. W., Sharfman, M. P., Townsend, D. M., & Harkins, J. A. (2016). The emergence of dual-identity social entrepreneurship: Its boundaries and limitations. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 25–48.CrossRef
Chell, E., Spence, L. J., Perrini, F., & Harris, J. D. (2016). Social entrepreneurship and business ethics: Does social equal ethical? Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 619–625.CrossRef
Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363–376.CrossRef
Corner, P. D., & Ho, M. (2010). How opportunities develop in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 635–659.CrossRef
Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship (pp. 1–6). Draft Paper for Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership, Graduate School of Business. Stanford: Stanford University.
Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2003). Sector-bending: Blurring lines between nonprofit and for-profit. Society, 40(4), 16–27.CrossRef
Dorado, S. (2006). Social entrepreneurial ventures: Different values so different process of creation, no? Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 319–343.CrossRef
Dorado, S., & Ventresca, M. J. (2013). Crescive entrepreneurship in complex social problems: Institutional conditions for entrepreneurial engagement. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 69–82.CrossRef
Duhl, L. (2000). The social entrepreneurship of change. New York, NY: Pace University Press.
Farmer, J., & Kilpatrick, S. (2009). Are rural health professionals also social entrepreneurs? Social Science & Medicine, 69(11), 1651–1658.CrossRef
Fowler, A. (2000). NGDOs as a moment in history: Beyond aid to social entrepreneurship or civic innovation? Third World Quarterly, 21(4), 637–654.CrossRef
Glaeser, E. L., & Scheinkman, J. (2000). Non-market interactions (Working Paper Series No. 8053). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gusfield, J. R. (1989). Constructing the ownership of social problems: Fun and profit in the welfare state. Social Problems, 36(5), 431–441.CrossRef
Hajek, F., Ventresca, M. J., Scriven, J., & Castro, A. (2011). Regime-building for REDD+: Evidence from ecosystem services initiatives in south-eastern Peru. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(2), 201–215.CrossRef
Henry, C. (2015). Doing well by doing good: Opportunity recognition and the social enterprise partnership. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 137–160.CrossRef
Jennings, J. E., Edwards, T., Jennings, P. D., & Delbridge, R. (2015). Emotional arousal and entrepreneurial outcomes: Combining qualitative methods to elaborate theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 113–130.CrossRef
Kickul, J., Janssen-Selvadurai, C., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). A blended value framework for educating the next cadre of social entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 479–493.CrossRef
Lee, I. (2015). A social enterprise business model for social entrepreneurs: Theoretical foundations and model development. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3(4), 269–301.CrossRef
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.CrossRef
Mair, J., & Sharma, S. (2012). Performance measurement and social entrepreneurship. In C. K. Volkmann, K. O. Tokarski, & K. Ernst (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship and social business: An introduction and discussion with case studies (pp. 175–189). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.CrossRef
Marshall, R. S. (2011). Conceptualizing the international for-profit social entrepreneur. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(2), 183–198.CrossRef
McMullen, J. S. (2011). Delineating the domain of development entrepreneurship: A market-based approach to facilitating inclusive economic growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 185–193.CrossRef
Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616–640.CrossRef
Mueller, S., Nazarkina, L., Volkmann, C., & Blank, C. (2011). Social entrepreneurship research as a means of transformation: A vision for the year 2028. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 112–120.CrossRef
Murphy, P. J., & Coombes, S. M. (2009). A model of social entrepreneurial discovery. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 325–336.CrossRef
Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 611–633.CrossRef
Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461.CrossRef
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973/1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 135–144). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. (Originally published as part of Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 1973, 155–169.)CrossRef
Sahlman, W. A. (1996). Some thoughts on business plans. In W. A. Sahlman, H. Stevenson, M. J. Roberts, & A. V. Bhide (Eds.), The entrepreneurial venture (pp. 138–176). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351.CrossRef
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.
Seelos, C., Ganly, K., & Mair, J. (2006). Social entrepreneurs directly contribute to global development goals. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 235–254). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246.CrossRef
Szymańska, A., & Jegers, M. (2016). Modelling social enterprises. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 87(4), 501–527.CrossRef
VanSandt, C. V., Sud, M., & Marmé, C. (2009). Enabling the original intent: Catalysts for social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 419–428.CrossRef
Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21–35.CrossRef
Zahra, S. A., Newey, L. R., & Li, Y. (2014). On the frontiers: The implications of social entrepreneurship for international entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 137–158.CrossRef
Zahra, S. A., Rawhouser, H. N., Bhawe, N., Neubaum, D. O., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). Globalization of social entrepreneurship opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(2), 117–131.CrossRef
Zinger, J. T., & LeBrasseur, R. (2003). The benefits of business planning in early stage small enterprises. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 1–15.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Stimulated Innovation Cycle to Serve the Poor: A Case of Mann Deshi Mahila Group
verfasst von
Balram Bhushan
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Business Models

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74487-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-74488-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74488-9_8