Skip to main content

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Stochastic Dominance Option Pricing II: Option Bounds Under Transaction Costs

verfasst von : Stylianos Perrakis

Erschienen in: Stochastic Dominance Option Pricing

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter presents the available theoretical results for the valuation of individual index and index futures options under proportional transaction costs. These include the reservation write (upper) bounds on prices for European and American call options and the reservation purchase (lower) bounds for European and American put option prices, whose violations can generate riskless profits. They also include the reservation purchase (lower) bounds for European and American call options, which are, however, specific to the assumed trading time partition. It is also shown that these call option lower bounds converge to an elegant continuous time limit.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
We elaborate on the precise sequence of events. The trader enters the market at date t with dollar holdings \( {x}_t-{\gamma}_t{y}_t \) in the bond account and \( {y}_t/{S}_t \) cum dividend shares of stock. Then the stock pays cash dividend \( {\delta}_t{y}_t \) and the dollar holdings in the bond account become \( {x}_t \). Thus, the trader has dollar holdings \( {x}_t \) in the bond account and \( {y}_t/{S}_t \) ex dividend shares of stock.
 
2
The above argument implies that if the no-sale constraint were to be removed the reservation write price would decrease. Unfortunately removing the constraint would also require modeling the stochastic evolution of the option price till expiration. The required assumptions as to option market equilibrium would severely limit the generality of our results.
 
3
See also Constantinides and Perrakis (2007, pp. 83–84).
 
4
In expression (4.​16) the first term in the RHS exceeds the second one by Jensen’s inequality. The second term is the Merton (1973) lower bound under transaction costs. In the diffusion case that we examine next the first term tends to the second as \( \Delta t\to 0 \). In the numerical work we use only the second term in the algorithm.
 
5
Hereafter we use \( f(.) \) for both the return and its random component \( \varepsilon \).
 
6
See Perrakis and Czerwonko (2009) for the details of the numerical algorithm.
 
7
At t = T − 1 we use the Merton bound in (3.3) with the corresponding value of \( {g}_{T-1}\left({S}_{T-1}\right) \).
 
8
As with European options, the trader enters the market at date t with dollar holdings \( {x}_t-{\gamma}_t{y}_t \) in the bond account and \( {y}_t/{S}_t \) cum dividend shares of stock. The trader is informed whether she has been “assigned” or not. If the trader has not been “assigned”, the stock pays cash dividend \( {\gamma}_t{y}_t \) and the dollar holdings in the bond account become \( {x}_t \). Thus, the trader has dollar holdings \( {x}_t \) in the bond account and \( {y}_t/{S}_t \) ex dividend shares of stock. If the trader has been “assigned”, the trader pays \( \left(1+{\gamma}_t\right){S}_t-K \) and not \( {S}_t-K \) because the call is exercised before the stock goes ex dividend. Then the stock pays cash dividend \( {\gamma}_t{y}_t \). Thus, the trader has dollar holdings \( {x}_t-{\gamma}_t{y}_t+{\gamma}_t{y}_t-\left\{\left(1+{\gamma}_t\right){S}_t-K\right\} \) \( =\kern0.5em {x}_t-\left\{\left(1+{\gamma}_t\right){S}_t-K\right\} \) in the bond account and \( {y}_t/{S}_t \) ex dividend shares of stock.
 
9
Clearly, any other assumption about the exercise policies of the option holders would result in a larger value function for the option writer and, hence, in a lower reservation write price for the call. Hence, the reservation write price derived under the worst-case scenario is also a reservation price under alternative exercise assumptions.
 
10
Naturally, at the maturity date T, \( {\left[\left(1+{\gamma}_T\right){S}_T-K\right]}^{+} \) is a tighter upper bound on the reservation write price of an American call. The upper bound of Eq. (4.​45) does not become tighter in the special case \( T={T}^{\hbox{'}} \).
 
11
This mixed process has iid returns and can be easily computed by using the tree method developed by Amin (1993).
 
12
The reservation purchase price of a put is derived under this constrained policy. As we argued in footnote 9, the reservation price that we derive continues to be valid when the constraint is removed.
 
13
See, for instance, Modest and Sundaresan (1983).
 
14
See Merton (1982) for a clear statement on this issue.
 
15
This property is again the monotonicity condition mentioned in the proof of Theorem 1</InternalRef>, which requires a relatively “small” investment in the option relative to the stockholdings \( {w}_t \).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Amin, Kaushik I. 1993. Jump Diffusion Option Valuation in Discrete Time. Journal of Finance 48: 1833–1863.CrossRef Amin, Kaushik I. 1993. Jump Diffusion Option Valuation in Discrete Time. Journal of Finance 48: 1833–1863.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Constantinides, George M., and Stylianos Perrakis. 2002. Stochastic Dominance Bounds on Derivatives Prices in a Multiperiod Economy with Proportional Transaction Costs. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26: 1323–1352.CrossRef Constantinides, George M., and Stylianos Perrakis. 2002. Stochastic Dominance Bounds on Derivatives Prices in a Multiperiod Economy with Proportional Transaction Costs. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26: 1323–1352.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2007. Stochastic Dominance Bounds on American Option Prices in Markets with Frictions. Review of Finance 11: 71–115.CrossRef ———. 2007. Stochastic Dominance Bounds on American Option Prices in Markets with Frictions. Review of Finance 11: 71–115.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Constantinides, George M., Michal Czerwonko, Jens C. Jackwerth, and Stylianos Perrakis. 2011. Are Options on Index Futures Profitable for Risk Averse Investors? Empirical Evidence. Journal of Finance 66: 1407–1437.CrossRef Constantinides, George M., Michal Czerwonko, Jens C. Jackwerth, and Stylianos Perrakis. 2011. Are Options on Index Futures Profitable for Risk Averse Investors? Empirical Evidence. Journal of Finance 66: 1407–1437.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Levy, H. 1985. Upper and Lower Bounds of Put and Call Option Value: Stochastic Dominance Approach. Journal of Finance 40: 1197–1217.CrossRef Levy, H. 1985. Upper and Lower Bounds of Put and Call Option Value: Stochastic Dominance Approach. Journal of Finance 40: 1197–1217.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, J., J. Pan, and T. Wang. 2005. An Equilibrium Model of Rare Event Premia and Its Implications for Option Smirks. Review of Financial Studies 18: 131–164.CrossRef Liu, J., J. Pan, and T. Wang. 2005. An Equilibrium Model of Rare Event Premia and Its Implications for Option Smirks. Review of Financial Studies 18: 131–164.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Merton, R.C. 1973. Theory of Rational Option Pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4: 141–184.CrossRef Merton, R.C. 1973. Theory of Rational Option Pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4: 141–184.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Merton, Robert C. 1976. Option Pricing When the Underlying Stock Returns Are Discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 125–144.CrossRef Merton, Robert C. 1976. Option Pricing When the Underlying Stock Returns Are Discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 125–144.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Merton, R.C. 1982. On the Mathematics and Economic Assumptions of Continuous-Time Financial Models. In Financial Economics: Essays in Honor of Paul Cootner, ed. W.F. Sharpe and C.M. Cootner. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Merton, R.C. 1982. On the Mathematics and Economic Assumptions of Continuous-Time Financial Models. In Financial Economics: Essays in Honor of Paul Cootner, ed. W.F. Sharpe and C.M. Cootner. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Merton, Robert C. 1992. Continuous-Time Finance. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell. Merton, Robert C. 1992. Continuous-Time Finance. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Modest, M., and M. Sundaresan. 1983. The Relationship Between Spot and Futures Prices in Stock Index Futures Markets: Some Preliminary Evidence. Journal of Futures Markets 3: 15–41.CrossRef Modest, M., and M. Sundaresan. 1983. The Relationship Between Spot and Futures Prices in Stock Index Futures Markets: Some Preliminary Evidence. Journal of Futures Markets 3: 15–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oancea, I.M., and S. Perrakis. 2014. From Stochastic Dominance to Black-Scholes: An Alternative Option Pricing Paradigm. Risk and Decision Analysis 5: 99–112. Oancea, I.M., and S. Perrakis. 2014. From Stochastic Dominance to Black-Scholes: An Alternative Option Pricing Paradigm. Risk and Decision Analysis 5: 99–112.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritchken, P.H. 1985. On Option Pricing Bounds. Journal of Finance 40: 1219–1233.CrossRef Ritchken, P.H. 1985. On Option Pricing Bounds. Journal of Finance 40: 1219–1233.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Stochastic Dominance Option Pricing II: Option Bounds Under Transaction Costs
verfasst von
Stylianos Perrakis
Copyright-Jahr
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11590-6_4