Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Three strategic games played by the Ju|’hoan—a board, a card, and a gesture game—complicate the rhetorics that suggest an evolutionary or psychological significance of play. They are mostly played by adults, although every individual adult does not necessarily engage in each game. The Ju|’hoan card and board game practices were transmitted through contact across large parts of Botswana and Namibia, while the gesture game n!àì has been known in other San communities. It suggests that the significance of strategic games is more likely found in its potential for social interaction (i.e., allowing to overcome cultural divides) than in evolution and psychology. Within the anthropological literature, strategy games were thought to be absent in egalitarian societies, such as that of the Ju|’hoan. Here, the roles of power, competition, and winning were thought to be disruptive and unwanted. A closer examination of the details behind the Ju|’hoan games shows that not only were strategy games adopted and adapted from neighboring societies but that the game of n!àì was developed by the Ju|’hoan into a competitive one. The evolutionary or psychological significance of play is informed by studies on individual play, children’s play, and games with informal rules. When considering strategic games throughout history, it is their role of facilitator rather than the playing practice itself that makes games relevant across languages, cultural divides, and sociopolitical boundaries.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Alfaro, R., Han, L., & Schilling, K. (2009). Winning at rock-paper-scissors. The College Mathematics Journal, 40(2), 125–128. CrossRef
Chick, G. (1998). Games in culture revisited: A replication and extension of Roberts, Arth, and Bush (1959). Cross-Cultural Research, 32(2), 185–206. CrossRef
Crist, W., de Voogt, A. J., & Dunn-Vaturi, A.-E. (2016). Facilitating interaction: Board games as social lubricants in the Ancient Near East. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 35(2), 181–198. CrossRef
de Voogt, A. J. (2001). Mancala: Games that count. Expedition, 43(1), 38–46.
de Voogt, A. J. (2016). ǂXànúsì as played by the Ju|’hoansi in |Xae|xae, Botswana. Journal of IPCS, 44(4), 260–265.
de Voogt, A. J. (in press). Strategic games in society: The geography of adult play. International Journal of Play.
de Voogt, A. J., Dunn-Vaturi, A.-E., & Eerkens, J. W. (2013). Cultural transmission in the Ancient Near East: Twenty squares and fifty-eight holes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40, 1715–1730. CrossRef
de Voogt, A. J., & Ng, S. Y. (2017). Individual expression, cultural specificity and production bias in Ju|’hoan jewelry-making. Journal of Material Culture. doi: 10.1177/1359183517705410
Dickens, P. J. (2009). English-Ju|’hoan, Ju|’hoan-English Dictionary. Cologne, Germany: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
Huizinga, J. (1938). Homo Ludens: Proeve eener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur [Homo Ludens: Towards a definition of the element of play in culture]. Amsterdam: Tjeenk Willink.
Lee, R. B. (1979). The !Kung San: Men, women, and work in a foraging society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, R. B., & DeVore, I. (Eds.). (1976). Kalahari hunter-gatherers: Studies of the !Kung San and their neighbors. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Marshall, L. (1976). The !Kung of Nyae. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
McCannon, B. C. (2007). Rock paper scissors. Journal of Economics, 92(1), 67–88. CrossRef
Murray, H. J. R. (1952). A history of board games other than chess. Oxford: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.
Roberts, J. M., Arth, M. J., & Bush, R. R. (1959). Games in culture. American Anthropologist, 61(4), 597–605. CrossRef
Sbrzesny, H. (1976). Die Spiele der !Ko-Buschleute: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer sozialisierenden und gruppenbindenden Funktionen. MunichGermany: Piper.
Schapera, I. (1930). The Khoisan peoples of South Africa: Bushmen and Hottentots. London: Routledge.
Snyman, J. W. (1975). Zu|’hõasi fonologie & woordeboek. Cape Town: Balkema.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Townshend, P. (1977). The SWA game of ||hus (das Lochspiel) in the wider context of African mankala. Journal SWA Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft, 31, 85–98.
Townshend, P. (1980). Games of strategy: A new look at correlates and cross-cultural methods. In H. B. Schwartzmann (Ed.), Play and culture: 1978 proceedings of the Association for the Anthropological Study of Play (pp. 217–225). West Point: Leisure Press.
- Strategic interactions: Games of the Ju|’hoan
Alex de Voogt
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Voraussetzungen für wirtschaftliche additive Fertigung/© Marco2811 | Fotolia