Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Due to the strength of its two-party system, the opportunity for voters to strategically defect in favor of third party or independent candidates is rare in high profile American elections. Indeed, it has been almost a century since a third party candidate finished better than one of the major party presidential nominees—in 1912 Bull Moose Progressive Teddy Roosevelt finished ahead of Republican William H. Taft. In this study we examine strategic voting in a U.S. Senate election where the independent candidate also finished above one of the major party nominees. In the 2010 Florida Senate contest the sitting Governor Charlie Crist shed his Republican label in order to compete in the general election since he was certain to lose in the GOP primary to Marco Rubio, the eventual winner. Crist finished second by taking a substantial share of votes away from the third place candidate, Democrat Kendrick Meek. Because this type of contest seldom occurs, in American politics there is scant empirical research on strategic voting under these conditions. We employ an unobtrusive survey of a large sample of registered Floridians in order to assess the likelihood of strategic voting among respondents who preferred the Democrat Kendrick Meek. For voters who sincerely preferred the Democrat, a significant portion defected in favor of the Independent Charlie Crist if they expected him to finish ahead of Meek. Additionally, we find that after a major news story broke, in which former President Bill Clinton allegedly advised Meek to drop out of the race so that Crist might win, respondents surveyed after this event were more likely to vote strategically in favor of Crist. Our study clearly demonstrates the importance of political context. Under the appropriate conditions, we find a high likelihood of strategic voting.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., Paolino, P., & Rohde, D. W. (1992). ‘Sophisticated’ voting in the 1988 presidential primaries. American Political Science Review, 86(1), 55–69. CrossRef
Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., Paolino, P., & Rohde, D. W. (2000). Challenges to the American two-party system: Evidence from the 1968, 1980, 1992, and 1996 presidential elections. Political Research Quarterly, 53(3), 495–522.
Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W. (2012). Change and continuity in the 2008 and 2010 elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Aldrich, J. H., Dudley, M. R., & Reifler, J. (2012, January). Sophisticated voting in multicandidate electoral contests: Evidence from the 2010 midterm elections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.
Alvarez, R. M., & Nagler, J. (2000). A new approach for modelling strategic voting in multiparty elections. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 57–75. CrossRef
Barone, M., & McCutcheon, C. (2011). Almanac of American politics 2012. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Bartels, L. M. (1988). Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bensel, R. F., & Sanders, M. E. (1979). The effect of electoral rules on voting behavior: The Electoral College and shift voting. Public Choice, 34(1), 69–85. CrossRef
Black, J. H. (1978). The multicandidate calculus of voting: Application to Canadian federal elections. American Journal of Political Science, 22(3), 609–638. CrossRef
Blais, A., & Nadeau, R. (1996). Measuring strategic voting: A two-step procedure. Electoral Studies, 15(1), 39–52. CrossRef
Blydenburgh, J. C. (1988). Sophisticated voting in the 1980 presidential election. Political Behavior, 10(2), 103–116. CrossRef
Bobo, L., & Gilliam, F. D, Jr. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 377–393. CrossRef
Bowler, S., & Lanoue, D. J. (1992). Strategic and protest voting for third parties: The case of the Canadian NDP. Western Political Quarterly, 45(2), 485–499. CrossRef
Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral preference. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Burden, B. C. (2005). Minor parties and strategic voting in recent U.S. presidential elections. Electoral Studies, 24(4), 603–618. CrossRef
Catanese, D. (2010). The top campaigns of 2010. Politico, November 9, 2010. Accessed October 11, 2011. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44884.html.
Cherry, T. L., & Kroll, S. (2003). Crashing the party: An experimental investigation of strategic voting in primary elections. Public Choice, 114(3), 387–420. CrossRef
Cox, G. W. (1994). Strategic voting equilibria under the single nontransferable vote. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 608–621. CrossRef
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
Duch, R. M., & Palmer, H. D. (2002). Strategic voting in post-Communist democracy? British Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 63–91. CrossRef
Duverger, M. (1955). Political parties. New York: Wiley.
Evans, G., & Heath, A. (1993). A tactical error in the analysis of tactical voting: A response to Niemi, Whitten and Franklin. British Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 131–137. CrossRef
Felsenthal, D. S., & Brichta, A. (1985). Sincere and strategic voters: An Israeli study. Political Behavior, 7(4), 311–324. CrossRef
Ferejohn, J. A., & Fiorina, M. P. (1974). The paradox of not voting: A decision theoretic analysis. American Political Science Review, 68(2), 525–536. CrossRef
Fey, M. (1997). Stability and coordination in Duverger’s Law: A formal model of preelection polls and strategic voting. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 135–147. CrossRef
Fisher, S. D. (2004). Definition and measurement of tactical voting: The role of rational choice. British Journal of Political Science, 34(1), 152–166. CrossRef
Foreman, S. D. (2011). Florida Senate race (Crist v. Meek v. Rubio): The rise of Rubio and fall of Crist. In S. D. Foreman & R. E. Dewhirst (Eds.), The roads to Congress 2010. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Frank, J., & Logan, L. (2010). Gov. Charlie Crist vetoes abortion bill. St. Petersburg Times, June 12, 2010. Accessed June 30, 2011. http://www.tampabay.com/news/health/gov-charlie-crist-vetoes-abortion-bill/1101696.
Franklin, M., Niemi, R., & Whitten, G. (1994). The two faces of tactical voting. British Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 549–557. CrossRef
Fricker, S., Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2005). An experimental comparison of Web and telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(3), 370–392. CrossRef
Galbraith, J. W., & Rae, N. C. (1989). A test of the importance of tactical voting: Great Britain, 1987. British Journal of Political Science, 19(1), 126–136. CrossRef
Heath, A., & Evans, G. (1994). Tactical voting: Concepts, measurement and findings. British Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 557–561. CrossRef
Hsieh, J. F., Niou, E. M. S., & Paolino, P. (1997). Strategic voting in the 1994 Taipei City mayoral election. Electoral Studies, 16(2), 153–163. CrossRef
Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and Web surveys: The effects of mode and question of sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 847–865. CrossRef
MacManus, S. A. (2011). Florida: A ‘red tide’ beaches all Democrats running statewide; U.S. Senate and gubernatorial races highly nationalized. In L. J. Sabato (Ed.), Pendulum swing. New York: Longman.
MacManus, S. A. (2012). Florida: A plummeting economy, tea parties, and Palin give GOP a clean sweep. In C. S. Bullock III (Ed.), Key states, high stakes: Sarah Palin, the tea party and the 2010 elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
McKee, S. C., & Craig, S. C. (2011). Rubio vs. Crist vs. Meek: Coming out of nowhere. In R. E. Adkins & D. A. Dulio (Eds.), Cases in congressional campaigns: Riding the wave. New York: Routledge.
Merolla, J. L. (2009). The effect of information signals on strategic voting in mock mayoral elections. Political Behavior, 31(3), 379–399. CrossRef
Musgrave, J. (2010). Crist earned my support, Wexler says. Palm Beach Post, September 26, 2010. Accessed September 27, 2010. http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/crist-earned-my-support-wexler-says-938765.html.
Niemi, R. G., Whitten, G., & Franklin, M. N. (1992). Constituency characteristics, individual characteristics and tactical voting in the 1987 British general election. British Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 229–240. CrossRef
Niemi, R. G., Whitten, G., & Franklin, M. N. (1993). People who live in glass houses: A response to Evans and Heath’s critique of our note on tactical voting. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 549–553. CrossRef
Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Reinhard, B., Van Sickler, M., & Sharockman, A. (2010). Full day of: No he didn’t, yes he did. St. Petersburg Times, October 30, 2010, pp. 1A, 5A.
Riker, W. H. (1982). The two-party system and Duverger’s Law: An essay on the history of political science. American Political Science Review, 76(4), 753–766. CrossRef
Sakshaug, J. W., Yan, T., & Tourangeau, R. (2010). Nonrepsonse error, measurement error, and mode of data collection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 907–933. CrossRef
Sampson, H., Silva, C., & Marshall, T. (2010). Gov. Crist vetoes teacher tenure bill. St. Petersburg Times, April 16, 2010. Accessed June 30, 2011. http://www.tampabay.com/news/education/k12/article1087675.ece.
Smith, A. C., & Reinhard, B. (2010). Charlie Crist, I-Florida, has long slog to Nov. 2, St. Petersburg Times, April 30, 2010, pp. 1A, 10A.
Tate, K. (1991). Black political participation in the 1984 and 1988 presidential elections. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1159–1176. CrossRef
Tate, K. (2003). Black opinion on the legitimacy of racial redistricting and minority majority districts. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 45–56. CrossRef
Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2003). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. January 5. http://gking.harvard.edu/.
Tourangeau, R., Steiger, D. M., & Wilson, D. (2002). Self-administered questions by telephone, evaluating interactive voice response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(2), 265–278. CrossRef
Whitby, K. J. (2007). The effect of black descriptive representation on black electoral turnout in the 2004 elections. Social Science Quarterly, 88(4), 1010–1023. CrossRef
- Strategic Voting in a U.S. Senate Election
Seth C. McKee
M. V. Hood III
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta