Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare 4/2022

15.11.2021 | Original Paper

Strategy-proof and fair reallocation with single-peaked preferences

verfasst von: Zhen Zhao, Shinji Ohseto

Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We consider the strategy-proof rules for reallocating individual endowments of an infinitely divisible good when agents’ preferences are single-peaked. In social endowment setting, the seminal work established by Sprumont (Econometrica 59:509–519, 1991) proves that the uniform rule is the unique one which satisfies strategy-proofness, efficiency, and envy-freeness. However, the uniform rule is not so appealing in our model since it disregards the differences in individual endowments. In other words, the uniform rule is not individually rational. In this paper, we propose a new rule named the uniform proportion rule. First, we prove that it is the unique rule which satisfies strategy-proofness, efficiency, and envy-freeness on proportion and we show that it is individually rational. Then, we show that our rule is indeed a member of the class of sequential allotment rules characterized by Barberà et al. (Games Econ Behav 18:1–21, 1997).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
An agent is a demander (respectively, supplier) whenever his endowment is strictly less (respectively, greater) than his peak. The formal definition is given in Sect. 2.
 
2
The concept of envy-freeness in terms of allotment changes, called fair net trade, was formulated by Kolm (1972) and Schmeidler and Vind (1972) in the more general context of exchange economies.
 
3
See also Klaus et al. (1997), Klaus (2001), and Moreno (2002).
 
4
There are many interesting axiomatic studies on the uniform rule, for example, Ching (1992, 1994), Mizobuchi and Serizawa (2006), Sakai and Wakayama (2012) and Sönmez (1994).
 
5
By feasibility, \( \lambda \) can be precisely computed as \( \lambda = \frac{E - \sum _ {i \in N^{*}(R)}p(R_i)}{\sum _ {j \notin N^{*}(R)}e_j}\).
 
6
See Klaus et al. (1997) and Hashimoto and Wakayama (2021).
 
7
This is based on the idea of an anonymous referee.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Barberà S, Jackson MO, Neme A (1997) Strategy-proof allotment rules. Games Econ Behav 18:1–21CrossRef Barberà S, Jackson MO, Neme A (1997) Strategy-proof allotment rules. Games Econ Behav 18:1–21CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benassy JP (1982) The economics of market disequilibrium. Academic Press, New York Benassy JP (1982) The economics of market disequilibrium. Academic Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Ching S (1992) A simple characterization of the uniform rule. Econ Lett 40:57–60CrossRef Ching S (1992) A simple characterization of the uniform rule. Econ Lett 40:57–60CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ching S (1994) An alternative characterization of the uniform rule. Soc Choice Welf 11:131–136CrossRef Ching S (1994) An alternative characterization of the uniform rule. Soc Choice Welf 11:131–136CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Foley DK (1967) Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ Essays 7:45–98 Foley DK (1967) Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ Essays 7:45–98
Zurück zum Zitat Hashimoto K, Wakayama T (2021) Fair reallocation in economies with single-peaked preferences. Int J Game Theory 50:773–785CrossRef Hashimoto K, Wakayama T (2021) Fair reallocation in economies with single-peaked preferences. Int J Game Theory 50:773–785CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klaus B (2001) Uniform allocation and reallocation revisited. Rev Econ Des 6:85–98 Klaus B (2001) Uniform allocation and reallocation revisited. Rev Econ Des 6:85–98
Zurück zum Zitat Klaus B, Peters H, Storcken T (1997) Reallocation of an infinitely divisible good. Econ Theory 10:305–333CrossRef Klaus B, Peters H, Storcken T (1997) Reallocation of an infinitely divisible good. Econ Theory 10:305–333CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klaus B, Peters H, Storcken T (1998) Strategy-proof reallocation of an infinitely divisible good. In: Butzer PL, Jongen HTh, Oberschelp W (eds) Charlemagne and the liberal arts: 1200 years of civilization and science in Europe, volume 2: mathematical arts. Brepols Verlag, Aachen, pp 455–470 Klaus B, Peters H, Storcken T (1998) Strategy-proof reallocation of an infinitely divisible good. In: Butzer PL, Jongen HTh, Oberschelp W (eds) Charlemagne and the liberal arts: 1200 years of civilization and science in Europe, volume 2: mathematical arts. Brepols Verlag, Aachen, pp 455–470
Zurück zum Zitat Kolm SC (1972) Justice et Équité. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris Kolm SC (1972) Justice et Équité. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Mizobuchi H, Serizawa S (2006) Maximal domain for strategy-proof rules in allotment economies. Soc Choice Welf 27:195–210CrossRef Mizobuchi H, Serizawa S (2006) Maximal domain for strategy-proof rules in allotment economies. Soc Choice Welf 27:195–210CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno B (2002) Single-peaked preferences, endowments and population-monotonicity. Econ Lett 75:87–95CrossRef Moreno B (2002) Single-peaked preferences, endowments and population-monotonicity. Econ Lett 75:87–95CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sakai T, Wakayama T (2012) Strategy-proofness, tops-only and the uniform rule. Theory Decis 72:287–301CrossRef Sakai T, Wakayama T (2012) Strategy-proofness, tops-only and the uniform rule. Theory Decis 72:287–301CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schmeidler D, Vind K (1972) Fair net trades. Econometrica 40:637–642CrossRef Schmeidler D, Vind K (1972) Fair net trades. Econometrica 40:637–642CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sönmez T (1994) Consistency, monotonicity and the uniform rule. Econ Lett 46:229–235CrossRef Sönmez T (1994) Consistency, monotonicity and the uniform rule. Econ Lett 46:229–235CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sprumont Y (1991) The division problem with single-peaked preferences: a characterization of the uniform allocation rule. Econometrica 59:509–519CrossRef Sprumont Y (1991) The division problem with single-peaked preferences: a characterization of the uniform allocation rule. Econometrica 59:509–519CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Strategy-proof and fair reallocation with single-peaked preferences
verfasst von
Zhen Zhao
Shinji Ohseto
Publikationsdatum
15.11.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Social Choice and Welfare / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01374-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Social Choice and Welfare 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe