Skip to main content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare 4/2022

15.11.2021 | Original Paper

Strategy-proof and fair reallocation with single-peaked preferences

verfasst von: Zhen Zhao, Shinji Ohseto

Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
share
TEILEN

Abstract

We consider the strategy-proof rules for reallocating individual endowments of an infinitely divisible good when agents’ preferences are single-peaked. In social endowment setting, the seminal work established by Sprumont (Econometrica 59:509–519, 1991) proves that the uniform rule is the unique one which satisfies strategy-proofness, efficiency, and envy-freeness. However, the uniform rule is not so appealing in our model since it disregards the differences in individual endowments. In other words, the uniform rule is not individually rational. In this paper, we propose a new rule named the uniform proportion rule. First, we prove that it is the unique rule which satisfies strategy-proofness, efficiency, and envy-freeness on proportion and we show that it is individually rational. Then, we show that our rule is indeed a member of the class of sequential allotment rules characterized by Barberà et al. (Games Econ Behav 18:1–21, 1997).

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 58.000 Bücher
  • über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko





Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Fußnoten
1
An agent is a demander (respectively, supplier) whenever his endowment is strictly less (respectively, greater) than his peak. The formal definition is given in Sect. 2.
 
2
The concept of envy-freeness in terms of allotment changes, called fair net trade, was formulated by Kolm (1972) and Schmeidler and Vind (1972) in the more general context of exchange economies.
 
3
See also Klaus et al. (1997), Klaus (2001), and Moreno (2002).
 
4
There are many interesting axiomatic studies on the uniform rule, for example, Ching (1992, 1994), Mizobuchi and Serizawa (2006), Sakai and Wakayama (2012) and Sönmez (1994).
 
5
By feasibility, \( \lambda \) can be precisely computed as \( \lambda = \frac{E - \sum _ {i \in N^{*}(R)}p(R_i)}{\sum _ {j \notin N^{*}(R)}e_j}\).
 
6
See Klaus et al. (1997) and Hashimoto and Wakayama (2021).
 
7
This is based on the idea of an anonymous referee.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Barberà S, Jackson MO, Neme A (1997) Strategy-proof allotment rules. Games Econ Behav 18:1–21 CrossRef Barberà S, Jackson MO, Neme A (1997) Strategy-proof allotment rules. Games Econ Behav 18:1–21 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benassy JP (1982) The economics of market disequilibrium. Academic Press, New York Benassy JP (1982) The economics of market disequilibrium. Academic Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Ching S (1992) A simple characterization of the uniform rule. Econ Lett 40:57–60 CrossRef Ching S (1992) A simple characterization of the uniform rule. Econ Lett 40:57–60 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ching S (1994) An alternative characterization of the uniform rule. Soc Choice Welf 11:131–136 CrossRef Ching S (1994) An alternative characterization of the uniform rule. Soc Choice Welf 11:131–136 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Foley DK (1967) Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ Essays 7:45–98 Foley DK (1967) Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ Essays 7:45–98
Zurück zum Zitat Hashimoto K, Wakayama T (2021) Fair reallocation in economies with single-peaked preferences. Int J Game Theory 50:773–785 CrossRef Hashimoto K, Wakayama T (2021) Fair reallocation in economies with single-peaked preferences. Int J Game Theory 50:773–785 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klaus B (2001) Uniform allocation and reallocation revisited. Rev Econ Des 6:85–98 Klaus B (2001) Uniform allocation and reallocation revisited. Rev Econ Des 6:85–98
Zurück zum Zitat Klaus B, Peters H, Storcken T (1997) Reallocation of an infinitely divisible good. Econ Theory 10:305–333 CrossRef Klaus B, Peters H, Storcken T (1997) Reallocation of an infinitely divisible good. Econ Theory 10:305–333 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klaus B, Peters H, Storcken T (1998) Strategy-proof reallocation of an infinitely divisible good. In: Butzer PL, Jongen HTh, Oberschelp W (eds) Charlemagne and the liberal arts: 1200 years of civilization and science in Europe, volume 2: mathematical arts. Brepols Verlag, Aachen, pp 455–470 Klaus B, Peters H, Storcken T (1998) Strategy-proof reallocation of an infinitely divisible good. In: Butzer PL, Jongen HTh, Oberschelp W (eds) Charlemagne and the liberal arts: 1200 years of civilization and science in Europe, volume 2: mathematical arts. Brepols Verlag, Aachen, pp 455–470
Zurück zum Zitat Kolm SC (1972) Justice et Équité. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris Kolm SC (1972) Justice et Équité. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Mizobuchi H, Serizawa S (2006) Maximal domain for strategy-proof rules in allotment economies. Soc Choice Welf 27:195–210 CrossRef Mizobuchi H, Serizawa S (2006) Maximal domain for strategy-proof rules in allotment economies. Soc Choice Welf 27:195–210 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno B (2002) Single-peaked preferences, endowments and population-monotonicity. Econ Lett 75:87–95 CrossRef Moreno B (2002) Single-peaked preferences, endowments and population-monotonicity. Econ Lett 75:87–95 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sakai T, Wakayama T (2012) Strategy-proofness, tops-only and the uniform rule. Theory Decis 72:287–301 CrossRef Sakai T, Wakayama T (2012) Strategy-proofness, tops-only and the uniform rule. Theory Decis 72:287–301 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schmeidler D, Vind K (1972) Fair net trades. Econometrica 40:637–642 CrossRef Schmeidler D, Vind K (1972) Fair net trades. Econometrica 40:637–642 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sönmez T (1994) Consistency, monotonicity and the uniform rule. Econ Lett 46:229–235 CrossRef Sönmez T (1994) Consistency, monotonicity and the uniform rule. Econ Lett 46:229–235 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sprumont Y (1991) The division problem with single-peaked preferences: a characterization of the uniform allocation rule. Econometrica 59:509–519 CrossRef Sprumont Y (1991) The division problem with single-peaked preferences: a characterization of the uniform allocation rule. Econometrica 59:509–519 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Strategy-proof and fair reallocation with single-peaked preferences
verfasst von
Zhen Zhao
Shinji Ohseto
Publikationsdatum
15.11.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Social Choice and Welfare / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01374-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Social Choice and Welfare 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner