nach oben

Information Systems and e-Business Management

Erschienen in:

01.06.2010 | Original Article

Structuredness and its significance for correctness of process models

verfasst von: Ralf Laue, Jan Mendling

Erschienen in: Information Systems and e-Business Management | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Recent research has shown that business process models from practice suffer from several quality problems. In particular, the correctness of control flow has been analyzed for industry-scale collections of process models revealing that error ratios are surprisingly high. In the past the structuredness property has been discussed as a guideline to avoid errors, first in research on programming, and later also in business process modeling. In this paper we investigate the importance of structuredness for process model correctness from an empirical perspective. We introduce definitions of two metrics that quantify the (un)structuredness of a process model, the degree of structuredness and the unmatched connector count. Then, we use the event-driven process chain models of the SAP reference model for validating the capability of these metrics to predict error probability. Our findings clearly support the importance of structuredness as a design principle for achieving correctness in process models.

Vorheriger Artikel An exploratory classification of applications in the realm of collaborative modeling and design

Nächster Artikel Towards assessing the networkability of health care providers: a maturity model approach

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

van der Aalst WMP (1997) Verification of workflow nets. In: Pierre Azéma, Gianfranco Balbo (eds) Application and theory of petri nets 1997, vol 1248 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 407–426

van der Aalst WMP (1999) Formalization and verification of event-driven process chains. Inf Softw Technol 41(10):639–650CrossRef

van der Aalst WMP, Lassen KB (2008) Translating unstructured workflow processes to readable BPEL: theory and implementation. Inf Softw Technol 50(3):131–159CrossRef

Ammarguellat Z (1992) A control-flow normalization algorithm and its complexity. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 18(3):237–251CrossRef

Bache R (1990) Graph theory models of software. Ph.D. Thesis, South Bank University, London

Balasubramanian S, Gupta M (2005) Structural metrics for goal based business process design and evaluation. Bus Process Manage J 11(6):680–694CrossRef

Basili V, Briand L, Melo W (1996) A validation of object-oriented design metrics as quality indicators. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 22(10):751–761CrossRef

Becker J, Rosemann M, von Uthmann C (2000) Guidelines of business process modeling. In: van der Aalst WMP, Desel J, Oberweis A (eds) Business process management. Models, techniques, and empirical studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 30–49

Cardoso J (2005) How to measure the control-flow complexity of web processes and workflows. In: Fischer L (ed) Workflow handbook 2005. Future strategies, lighthouse point

Cardoso J (2006) Process control-flow complexity metric: an empirical validation. In: IEEE international conference on services computing (IEEE SCC 06). IEEE Computer Society, USA, pp 167–173

Cardoso J, Mendling J, Neumann G, Reijers H (2006) A discourse on complexity of process models. In: Eder J, Dustdar S (eds) Proceedings of the BPM 2006 workshops, workshop on business process design BPI 2006. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4103, pp 115–126

Daneva M, Heib R, Scheer A-W (1996) Benchmarking business process models. IWi Research Report 136, Institute for Information Systems, University of the Saarland, Germany

Davies I, Green P, Rosemann M, Indulska M, Gallo S (2006) How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data Knowl Eng 58(3):358–380CrossRef

Dehnert J, van der Aalst WMP (2004) Bridging the gap between business models and workflow specifications. Int J Coop Inf Syst 13(3):289–332CrossRef

Dehnert J, Zimmermann A (2005) On the suitability of correctness criteria for business process models. In: van der Aalst WMP, Benatallah B, Casati F, Curbera F (eds) Business process management, 3rd international conference, BPM 2005, Nancy, France, September 5–8, 2005. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3649, pp 386–391

Dumas M, van der Aalst WMP, ter Hofstede AHM (eds) (2005) Process aware information systems: bridging people and software through process technology. Wiley, Hoboken

Erl T (2005) Service-oriented architecture: concepts, technology, and design. Prentice Hall, Upple Saddle Revier

Fenton NE, Whitty RW (1986) Axiomatic approach to software metrication through program decomposition. Comput J 29(4):329–339CrossRef

Ferris C (2003) What are web services? Communications of the ACM 46(6):31–32CrossRef

Gilmore DJ, Green TRG (1984) Comprehension and recall of miniature programs. Int J Man Mach Stud 21(1):31–48CrossRef

Gruhn V, Laue R (2006a) Complexity metrics for business process models. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on business information systems (BIS 2006). Lecture notes in informatics, vol 85

Gruhn V, Laue R (2006b) Adopting the cognitive complexity measure for business process models. In: Yao Y, Shi Z, Wang Y, Kinsner W (eds) Proceedings of the firth IEEE international conference on cognitive informatics, ICCI 2006, July 17–19, Beijing, China, IEEE, pp 236–241

Gruhn V, Laue R (2007a) On experiments for measuring cognitive weights for software control structures. In: Zhang D, Wang Y, Kinsner W (eds) Proceedings of the sixth IEEE international conference on cognitive informatics, ICCI 2007, August 6–8, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA, IEEE, pp 116–119

Gruhn V, Laue R (2007b) What business process modelers can learn from programmers. Sci Comput Program 65(1):4–13CrossRef

Gruhn V, Laue R (2007c) Good and bad excuses for unstructured business process models. In: Proceedings of 12th European conference on pattern languages of programs (EuroPLoP 2007)

Holl A, Valentin G (2004) Structured business process modeling (SBPM). In: Information systems research in Scandinavia (IRIS 27) (CD-ROM)

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

Kafura D (1985) A survey of software metrics. In: ACM’85: Proceedings of the 1985 ACM annual conference on The range of computing : mid-80’s perspective. New York, pp 502–506

Kang B-K, Bieman JM (1999) A quantitative framework for software restructuring. J Softw Maint 11:245–284CrossRef

Keller G, Nüttgens M, Scheer A-W (1992) Semantische Prozessmodellierung auf der Grundlage “Ereignisgesteuerter Prozessketten (EPK)”. Heft 89, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Saarbrücken, Germany

Keller G, Teufel T (1998) SAP(R) R/3 process oriented implementation: iterative process prototyping. Addison-Wesley, USA

Kiepuszewski B, ter Hofstede AHM, Bussler C (2000) On structured workflow modelling. In: Wangler B, Bergman L (eds) Advanced information systems engineering, 12th international conference CAiSE 2000, Stockholm, Sweden, June 5–9, 2000. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1789, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 431–445

Kindler E (2006) On the semantics of EPCs: resolving the vicious circle. Data Knowl Eng 56(1):23–40CrossRef

Krogstie J, Sindre G, Jørgensen HD (2006) Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Eur J Inf Syst 15(1):91–102CrossRef

Lassen KB, van der Aalst WMP (2008) Complexity metrics for workflow nets. Inf Softw Technol 51:610–626CrossRef

Lindland OI, Sindre G, Sølvberg A (1994) Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw 11(2):42–49CrossRef

Mendling J, Lassen KB, Zdun U (2006) Transformation strategies between block-oriented and graph-oriented process modelling languages. In: Lehner F, Nösekabel H, Kleinschmidt P (eds) Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2006, XML4BPM Track, Band 2, pp 297–312, Passau, Germany, February 2006

Mendling J (2008) Metrics for process models: empirical foundations of verification, error prediction and guidelines for correctness. Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 6. Springer, Heidelberg

Mendling J, van der Aalst WMP (2007) Formalization and verification of EPCs with OR-joins based on state and context. In: Krogstie J, Opdahl AL, Sindre G (eds) Proceedings of the 19th conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE 2007). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4495, Trondheim, Norway, pp 439–453

Mendling J, Neumann G, van der Aalst WMP (2007a) Understanding the occurrence of errors in process models based on metrics. In: Meersman R, Tari Z (eds) OTM conference 2007, proceedings, part I. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4803, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 113–130

Mendling J, Reijers HA, Cardoso J (2007b) What makes process models understandable?. In: Alonso G, Dadam P, Rosemann M (eds) Business process management, 5th international conference, BPM 2007, Brisbane, Australia, September 24–28, 2007. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4714, Brisbane, Australia, pp 48–63

Mendling J, Strembeck M (2008) Influence factors of understanding business process models. In: Abramowicz W, Fensel D (eds) Proceedings of the 11th international conference on business information systems (BIS 2008). Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 7, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 142–153

Mendling J, Verbeek HMW, van Dongen BF, van der Aalst WMP, Neumann G (2008) Detection and Prediction of Errors in EPCs of the SAP Reference Model. Data Knowl Eng 64(1):312–329CrossRef

Moody DL (2005) Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data Knowl Eng 55(3):243–276CrossRef

Morasca S (1999) Measuring attributes of concurrent software specifications in petri-nets. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on software metrics. IEEE Computer Society, USA, pp 100–110

Nissen ME (1998) Redesigning reengineering through measurement-driven inference. MIS Q 22(4):509–534CrossRef

Oulsnam G (1982) Unravelling unstructured programs. Comput J 25(3):379–387

Ouyang C, Dumas M, Breutel S, ter Hofstede AHM (2006) Translating standard process models to bpel. In: Dubois E, Pohl K (eds) Advanced information systems engineering, 18th international conference, CAiSE 2006, Luxembourg, Luxembourg, June 5–9, 2006. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4001, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 417–432

Reijers HA, Vanderfeesten ITP (2004) Cohesion and Coupling Metrics for Workflow Process Design. In: Desel J, Pernici B, Weske M (eds) International conference on business process management (BPM 2004). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3080, Springer, Berlin, pp 290–305

Roberts ES (1995) Loop exits and structured programming: reopening the debate. In: SIGCSE ’95: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education, New York, pp 268–272

Rolón Aguilar E, García F, Ruiz F, Piattini M (2007) An exploratory experiment to validate measures for business process models. In: First international conference on research challenges in information science (RCIS)

Scheer A-W (2000) ARIS—business process modeling, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin

Selby RW, Basili VR (1991) Analyzing error-prone system structure. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 17:141–152CrossRef

Shen VY, Yu T-J, Thebaut SM, Paulsen LR (1985) Identifying error-prone software. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 11:317–324CrossRef

Vaishnavi VK, Purao S, Liegle J (2007) Object-oriented product metrics: A generic framework. Inf Sci 177:587–606CrossRef

Vanderfeesten I, Cardoso J, Reijers HA (2007) A weighted coupling metric for business process models. In: Eder J, Tomassen SL, Opdahl A, Sindre G (eds) Proceedings of the CAiSE 2007 forum. CEUR workshop proceedings, vol 247, pp 41–44, Trondheim, Norway

Vanderfeesten I, Mendling J, Reijers H, van der Aalst W, Cardoso J (2008) On a quest for good process models: the cross-connectivity metric. In: Bellahsene Z, Leonard M (eds) Proceedings of the 20th international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE 2008), Montpellier, France, June 16–20, 2008. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5074, pp 480–494

Vanhatalo J, Völzer H, Leymann F (2007) Faster and more focused control-flow analysis for business process models through sese decomposition. In: Krämer BJ, Lin K-J, Narasimhan P (eds) Service-oriented computing—ICSOC 2007, fifth international conference, Vienna, Austria, September 17–20, 2007, proceedings, lecture notes in computer science, vol 4749, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 43–55. ISBN 978-3-540-74973-8

Wand Y, Weber R (2002) Research commentary: information systems and conceptual modeling–A research agenda. Inf Syst Res 13(4):363CrossRef

Weyuker EJ (1998) Evaluating software complexity measures. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 14(9):1357–1365CrossRef

Zhao W, Hauser R, Bhattacharya K, Bryant BR, Cao F (2006) Compiling business processes: untangling unstructured loops in irreducible flow graphs. Int J Web Grid Serv 2(1):68–91CrossRef

Titel: Structuredness and its significance for correctness of process models
verfasst von: Ralf Laue
Jan Mendling
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2010
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Information Systems and e-Business Management / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1617-9846
Elektronische ISSN: 1617-9854
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-009-0120-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

The enabling role of Web services in information system development practices: a grounded theory study

Towards assessing the networkability of health care providers: a maturity model approach

Cloud-based decision support systems and availability context: the probability of successful decision outcomes

Analysis of B2B e-marketplaces: an operations perspective

An exploratory classification of applications in the realm of collaborative modeling and design