Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This emerging technology report reviews a new development in educational technology, student-facing dashboards, which provide comparative performance feedback to students calculated by Learning Analytics-based algorithms on data generated from university students’ use of educational technology. Instructor- and advisor-facing dashboards emerged as one of the first direct applications of Learning Analytics, but the results from early implementations of these displays for students provide mixed results about the effects of their use. In particular, the “one-size-fits-all” design of many existing systems is questioned based on findings in related research on performance feedback and student motivation which has shown that various internal and external student-level factors affect the impact of feedback interventions, especially those using social comparisons. Integrating data from student information systems into underlying algorithms to produce personalized dashboards may mediate the possible negative effects of feedback, especially comparative feedback, and support more consistent benefits from the use of such systems.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Aguilar, S. (2016). Perceived motivational affordances: Capturing and measuring students’ sense- making around visualizations of their academic achievement information. (Doctoral Dissertation) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Aguilar, S., Holman, C., & Fishman, B. (2015). Game-inspired design empirical evidence in support of gameful learning environments. Games and Culture. doi: 10.1177/1555412015600305.
Arnold, K. E. (2010). Signals: Applying academic analytics. ECUCAUSE Quarterly,33(1), 1.
Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 267–270). ACM.
Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2013). Gamification: Design of IT-based enhancing services for motivational support and behavioral change. Business Information Systems Engineering,5, 275–278. CrossRef
Bodily, R., & Verbert, K. (2017). Trends and issues in student-facing learning analytics reporting systems research. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Vancouver, CA: ACM.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research,65(3), 245–281. CrossRef
Christy, K. R., & Fox, J. (2014). Leaderboards in a virtual classroom: A test of stereotype threat and social comparison explanations for women’s math performance. Computers & Education,78, 66–77. CrossRef
Corrin, L., & de Barba, P. (2014). Exploring students’ interpretation of feedback delivered through learning analytics dashboards. In Proceedings of the ascilite 2014 conference (pp. 629–633). Dunedin, NZ.
Corrin, L. & de Barba, P. (2015). How do students interpret feedback delivered via dashboards? In Proceedings of the international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 430–431). Poughkeepsie, NY: ACM.
Dawson, S., Bakharia, A., & Heathcote, E. (2010). SNAPP: Realizing the affordances of real-time SNA within networked learning environments. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on networked learning. http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2010/abstracts/PDFs/Dawson.pdf
Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., van der Werf, G., Buunk, A. P., & van der Zee, Y. G. (2008). Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research,78, 828–879. CrossRef
Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J.-J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers in Education,63, 380–392. CrossRef
Durall, E., & Gros, B. (2014). Learning analytics and a metacognitive tool. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on computer supported education (CSEDU) (pp. 380–384).
Duval, E. (2011). Attention please! Learning analytics for visual recommendation. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 9–17). New York, NY: ACM.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations,7(2), 117–140. CrossRef
Fritz, J. (2011). Classroom walls that talk: Using online course activity data of successful students to raise self-awareness of underperforming peers. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 89–97. CrossRef
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study of intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education,8, 152–161. CrossRef
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research,77(1), 81–112. CrossRef
Khan, I., & Pardo, A. (2016). Data2U: Scalable real time student feedback in active learning environments. In Proceedings of the international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 249–253). Edinburgh, Scotland: ACM.
Koester, B. P., Grom, G. & McKay, T. A. (2016). Patterns of gendered performance difference in introductory STEM courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research. arXiv:1608.07565 [physics.ed-ph].
Krumm, A., Waddington, R. J., Teasley, S. D., & Lonn, S. (2014). A learning management system-based early warning system for academic advising in undergraduate engineering. In Learning analytics: From research to practice (pp. 103–119). New York, NY: Springer.
Lonn, S., Aguilar, S. & Teasley, S. D. (2014). Issues, challenges, and lessons learned when scaling up a learning analytics intervention. In Proceedings of the international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 234–239). Leuven, Belgium: ACM.
Major, B., Testa, M., & Bylsma, W. H. (1991). Responses to upward and downward social comparisons: The impact of esteem-relevance and perceived control in social comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Contemporary theory and research (pp. 237–260). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pardo, A., & Dawson, S. (2015). How can data be used to improve learning? In P. Reiman, S. Bull, M. Kickermeier-Rusy, R. Vatrapu, & B. Wasson (Eds.), Measuring and visualizing learning in the information-rich classroom. London: Routledge.
Reimers, G., & Neovesky, A. (2015). Student focused dashboards—An analysis of current student dashboards and what students really want. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on computer supported education (CSEDU) (pp. 399–404).
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,35(1), 4–28. CrossRef
Suls, J. E., & Wills, T. A. E. (1991). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. MAHWAH: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Teasley, S. D., Haley, S., Oster, M., Haynes, C., & Whitmer, J. (2017). How am I doing?: Evaluating student-facing performance dashboards in higher education (Manuscript in preparation).
Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press.
Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., & Santos, J. L. (2013). Learning analytics dashboard applications. American Behavioral Scientist,57(10), 1500–1509. CrossRef
Wise, A. F. (2014). Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics. In Proceedings of the international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 203–211). Leuven, Belgium: ACM. CrossRef
Young, J. R. (2016). What clicks from 70,000 courses reveal about student learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 63(3). http://www.chronicle.com/article/What-Clicks-From-70000/237704.
- Student Facing Dashboards: One Size Fits All?
Stephanie D. Teasley
- Springer Netherlands
in-adhesives, MKVS, Neuer Inhalt/© Zühlke, Künstliche Intelligenz und die Potenziale des maschinellen Lernens für die Industrie/© zapp2photo / stock.adobe.com