nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

02.02.2021

Subjective value in entrepreneurship

verfasst von: Per L. Bylund, Mark D. Packard

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We produce a definition and argument for explicitly adopting value subjectivism in entrepreneurship research. While the field has progressively shifted toward subjectivism over the past decades, we remain saddled with positivist baggage in our theories’ definitions of key variables, including the concept of value. Although modern scholars readily admit that value is subjective, what is generally meant by this is that it is idiosyncratically determined. We argue that value is more appropriately defined, atop pure subjectivism, as an increase in subjective satisfaction or well-being. We develop and elaborate on this definition and explore its implications for entrepreneurship theory and policy.

Vorheriger Artikel The nascent ecology of social enterprise

Nächster Artikel Institutions, financial development, and small business survival: evidence from European emerging markets

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

A further distinction can be made between the buyer, who pays for a good, and the consumer, who uses and values it. These are often, but not always, the same (e.g., gift giving). Where they are not, the buyer bases his/her willingness to pay upon an empathy-based expected value estimate—what s/he believes the beneficiary would gain from it. For simplicity, we assume for the remaining discussion that buyer and consumer are the same, although the analysis is very similar when they are not.

Studies of creativity show that human imagination is bounded by the familiar. When drawing alien life-forms, for example, participants tend to resort to human-like attributes, drawing them with human eyes, mouths, and other anthropomorphic features (Ward 1994).

Although the point is, we think, correct, it is unlikely that Ford actually said those words (Vlaskovits 2011).

This logic is constrained to the single-buyer case, or where supply is sufficient to satisfy all demand. Where it is not, the logic is similar, but is extended to the margin. That is, the seller would price her good at the marginal willingness to pay that her supply affords, assuming she could reach the whole market. If she had 10 wares, she would want to price her good at or just below the tenth highest valuing customer’s willingness to pay. If customer awareness and accessibility are a problem, as in real-world scenarios, this logic becomes even more complex, requiring the integration of uncertainty bearing.

Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9012-3.CrossRef

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2004). Organizing rent generation and appropriation: Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.09.002.CrossRef

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4.CrossRef

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2010). Entrepreneurship and epistemology: The philosophical underpinnings of the study of entrepreneurial opportunities. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 557–583. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495521.CrossRef

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2013). Epistemology, opportunities, and entrepreneurship: Comments on Venkataraman et al.(2012) and Shane (2012). Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 154–157. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0069.CrossRef

Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. B. (2020). Has the concept of opportunities been fruitful in the field of entrepreneurship? Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0014.CrossRef

Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Anderson, P. (2013). Forming and exploiting opportunities: The implications of discovery and creation processes for entrepreneurial and organizational research. Organization Science, 24(1), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0727.CrossRef

Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., McBride, R., & Wuebker, R. (2014). Realism in the study of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 39(2), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0244.CrossRef

Anderson, R. E. (1973). Consumer dissatisfaction: The effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. Journal of marketing research, 10(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F002224377301000106.CrossRef

Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: HarperCollins.

Baron, R. A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193166.CrossRef

Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36(4), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0149206309353944.CrossRef

Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00147.CrossRef

Brentani, U., & Reid, S. E. (2012). The fuzzy front-end of discontinuous innovation: Insights for research and management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00879.x.CrossRef

Brown, J. W. (2018). Love and other emotions: On the process of feeling. Routledge. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Love_and_Other_Emotions/OwlQDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0.

Brown, L., Packard, M. D., & Bylund, P. L. (2018). Judgment, fast and slow: Toward a judgment view of entrepreneurs' impulsivity. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 10(e00095). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00095.

Buenstorf, G. (2007). Creation and pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunities: An evolutionary economics perspective. Small Business Economics, 28(4), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9039-5.CrossRef

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and Organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann.

Bylund, P. L. (2015). The realm of entrepreneurship in the market: Capital theory, production, and change. In P. L. Bylund & D. Howden (Eds.), The Next Generation of Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Joseph T. Salerno (pp. 89–104). Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises institute.

Bylund, P. L. (2016a). The problem of production: A new theory of the firm. Abingdon: Routledge.

Bylund, P. L. (2016b). The seen, the unseen, and the unrealized: How regulations affect our everyday lives. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Carlsson, B., Braunerhjelm, P., McKelvey, M., Olofsson, C., Persson, L., & Ylinenpää, H. (2013). The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 913–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9503-y.CrossRef

Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1509/2Fjmkr.43.3.345.CrossRef

Chiles, T. H., Tuggle, C. S., McMullen, J. S., Bierman, L., & Greening, D. W. (2010). Dynamic creation: Extending the radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 31(1), 7–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0170840609346923.CrossRef

Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard business review press.

Christopoulos, D., & Vogl, S. (2015). The motivation of social entrepreneurs: The roles, agendas and relations of altruistic economic actors. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.954254.CrossRef

Coase, R. H. (1973). Business organization and the accountant. In J. B. Buchanan & G. F. Thirlby (Eds.), LSE Essays on Cost. New York: New York University Press.

Crawford, G. C., Dimov, D., & McKelvey, B. (2016). Realism, empiricism, and fetishism in the study of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(2), 168–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1056492615601506.CrossRef

Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002.CrossRef

Davidsson, P. (2016). What is entrepreneurship?, Researching Entrepreneurship (pp. 1–19). Springer.

Dimov, D. (2011). Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/2Fj.1540-6520.2010.00423.x.CrossRef

Dimov, D. (2016). Toward a design science of entrepreneurship. In J. A. Katz & A. C. Corbett (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol. models of start-up thinking and action: Theoretical, empirical and pedagogical approaches (pp. 1–31). Bingley: Emerald Press.

Douhan, R., Eliasson, G., & Henrekson, M. (2007). Israel M. Kirzner: An outstanding Austrian contributor to the economics of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 29(1–2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9041-y.CrossRef

Durkheim, É. (1933). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.

Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(02)00225-8.CrossRef

Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. (2010). An update to the individual-opportunity nexus. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 47–76). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2013). Response to the commentaries: The individual-opportunity (IO) nexus integrates objective and subjective aspects of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 160–163. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0192.CrossRef

Eling, K., Griffin, A., & Langerak, F. (2013). Using intuition in fuzzy front-end decision-making: A conceptual framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12136.

Endres, A. M., & Woods, C. R. (2007). The case for more “subjectivist” research on how entrepreneurs create opportunities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550710760003.

Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2009). Entrepreneurs as theorists: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.67.CrossRef

Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2012). Organizing entrepreneurial judgment: A new approach to the firm. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2020). Entrepreneurial opportunities: Who needs them? Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0181.CrossRef

Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2013). Microfoundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0103.CrossRef

Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2008). Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource-based view: Toward a new synthesis. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.41.CrossRef

Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Tharchen, T. (2018). Performativity as ongoing journeys: Implications for strategy, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Long Range Planning, 51, 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.02.003.CrossRef

Gelderen, M. v. (2016). Entrepreneurial autonomy and its dynamics. Applied Psychology, 65(3), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12066.CrossRef

Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2006). New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management, 32(6), 926–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0149206306293860.CrossRef

Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3.CrossRef

Hayek, F. A. V. (1931). Prices and production. London: Routledge and Sons.

Hayek, F. A. V. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.

Hayek, F. A. V. (1952). The counter-revolution of science: Studies on the abuse of reason. Glencoe: Free Press.

von Hippel, E., de Jong, J. P., & Flowers, S. (2012). Comparing business and household sector innovation in consumer products: Findings from a representative study in the United Kingdom. Management Science, 58(9), 1669–1681. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1508.CrossRef

Hjorth, D., Holt, R., & Steyaert, C. (2015). Entrepreneurship and process studies. International Small Business Journal, 33(6), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0266242615583566.CrossRef

Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.356.CrossRef

Hoppe, H.-H. (1995). Economic science and the Austrian method. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Hsee, C. K., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2004). Music, pandas, and muggers: On the affective psychology of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 23 https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.23.CrossRef

Hsieh, C., Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2007). Opportunity discovery, problem solving and a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1255–1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00725.x.CrossRef

Hunt, S. D. (2002). Foundations of marketing theory: Toward a general theory of marketing. ME Sharpe.

Hutt, W. H. (1990). Economists and the public: A study of competition and opinion. Transaction publishers.

Kier, A. S., & McMullen, J. S. (2018). Entrepreneurial imaginativeness in new venture ideation. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2265–2295. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0395.CrossRef

Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Klein, P. G. (2008). Opportunity discovery, entrepreneurial action, and economic organization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.50.CrossRef

Klein, P. G., & Bylund, P. L. (2014). The place of Austrian economics in contemporary entrepreneurship research. The Review of Austrian Economics, 27(3), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-014-0256-x.CrossRef

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Hart, Schaffner, and Marx.

Knight, F. H. (1925). Economic psychology and the value problem. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 39(3), 372–409. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882434.CrossRef

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

Kornberger, M. (2017). The values of strategy: Valuation practices, rivalry and strategic agency. Organization Studies, 38(12), 1753–1773. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0170840616685365.CrossRef

Korsgaard, S., Berglund, H., Thrane, C., & Blenker, P. (2016). A tale of two Kirzners: Time, uncertainty, and the “nature” of opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 867–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/2Fetap.12151.CrossRef

Kotowitz, Y., & Mathewson, F. (1979). Advertising, consumer information, and product quality. The Bell Journal of Economics, 566–588. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003352.

Lachmann, L. M. (1978). Capital and its structure. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.

Leonard, D., & Rayport, J. F. (1997). Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard Business Review, 75, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814295505_0016.CrossRef

Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23464011.CrossRef

Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed--and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef

Lerner, D. A., Hunt, R. A., & Dimov, D. (2018). Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.10.002.CrossRef

Levitt, T. 1960. Marketing myopia: Boston.

Lindenberg, S. (2008). Social rationality, semi-modularity and goal-framing: What is it all about? Analyse & Kritik, 30(2), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2008-0217.CrossRef

Lindenberg, S., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500–525. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0021.CrossRef

Macdonald, E. K., Wilson, H., Martinez, V., & Toossi, A. (2011). Assessing value-in-use: A conceptual framework and exploratory study. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(5), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.05.006.CrossRef

Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879.CrossRef

McMullen, J. S. (2010). Perspective taking and the heterogeneity of the entrepreneurial imagination. In R. Koppl, S. Horwitz, & P. Desrochers (Eds.), Advances in Austrian Economics (Vol. 14, pp. 113–143). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-2134(2010)0000014009.CrossRef

McMullen, J. S. (2015). Entrepreneurial judgment as empathic accuracy: A sequential decision-making approach to entrepreneurial action. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3), 651–681. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137413000386.CrossRef

McMullen, J. S., & Dimov, D. (2013). Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies, 50(8), 1481–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12049.CrossRef

McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379628.CrossRef

McMullen, J. S., Plummer, L. A., & Acs, Z. J. (2007). What is an entrepreneurial opportunity? Small Business Economics, 28(4), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9040-z.CrossRef

Menger, C. (1892). On the origin of money. Economic Journal, 2(6), 239–255.CrossRef

Menger, C. (2007). Principles of economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Mises, L. v. (1951). Profit and loss. South Holland, IL: Consumers-Producers Economic Services.

Mises, L. V. (1953). The theory of money and credit. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Mises, L. V. (1985). Theory and history. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Mises, L. V. (1998). Human action: A treatise on economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Mises, L. V. (2002). Epistemological problems of economics (G. Reisman, Trans.). Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Mises, L. v. (2008). Profit and loss, Planning for Freedom: Let the Market System Work (pp. 143–172). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914.CrossRef

Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729–754.CrossRef

Oliver, R. L. (2010). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the customer. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

Packard, M. D. (2017). Where did interpretivism go in the theory of entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.05.004.CrossRef

Packard, M. D. (2018). Why I am not a performativist (yet). Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 9, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.01.003.CrossRef

Packard, M. D. (2019). Entrepreneurship: Toward the nirvana state of rest. Mises Journal, 7(3), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1222.CrossRef

Packard, M. D., & Clark, B. B. (2020). Probability logic fails in immitigable uncertainty, but strategic logic does not. Academy of Management Review, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0120.

Packard, M. D., & Clark, B. B. (2020). On the Mitigability of Uncertainty and the Choice between Predictive and Nonpredictive Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 45(4), 766–786. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0198.

Packard, M. D., Clark, B. B., & Klein, P. G. (2017). Uncertainty types and transitions in the entrepreneurial process. Organization Science, 28(5), 840–856. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1143.CrossRef

Penrose, E. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: OUP.

Pfeffer, J. (1985). Organizations and organization theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Westminster, MD: Random House.

Pitelis, C. N. (2009). The co-evolution of organizational value capture, value creation and sustainable advantage. Organization Studies, 30(10), 1115–1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0170840609346977.CrossRef

Priem, R. L. (2007). A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23464055.CrossRef

Priem, R. L., Li, S., & Carr, J. C. (2012). Insights and new directions from demand-side approaches to technology innovation, entrepreneurship, and strategic management research. Journal of Management, 38(1), 346–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0149206311429614.CrossRef

Priem, R. L., Wenzel, M., & Koch, J. (2018). Demand-side strategy and business models: Putting value creation for consumers center stage. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.007.CrossRef

Ramoglou, S., & Tsang, E. (2016). A realist perspective of entrepreneurship: Opportunities as propensities. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 410–434. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0281.CrossRef

Ramoglou, S., & Tsang, E. (2018). Opportunities lie in the demand side: Transcending the discovery-creation debate. Academy of Management Review, 43(4), 815–818. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0239.CrossRef

Ramoglou, S., & Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2015). The constructivist view of entrepreneurial opportunities: A critical analysis. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9590-4.CrossRef

Renko, M. (2013). Early challenges of nascent social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 37(5), 1045–1069 10.1111%2Fj.1540-6520.2012.00522.x.CrossRef

Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business.

Rothbard, M. N. 2004. Man, economy, and state with power and market. Scholar’s edition. Auburn, Al: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. Economica, 5(17), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548836.CrossRef

Samuelson, P. A. (1948). Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica, 15(60), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549561.CrossRef

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020.CrossRef

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRef

Sarasvathy, S. D., & Dew, N. (2005). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(5), 533–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-005-0264-x.CrossRef

Sarasvathy, S. D., & Dew, N. (2013). Without judgment: An empirically-based entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Review of Austrian Economics, 26(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-011-0170-4.CrossRef

Say, J. B. (1836). A treatise on political economy: or the production, distribution, and consumption of wealth. Grigg & Elliot.

Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379 https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0046234.CrossRef

Schmidt, J., & Keil, T. (2013). What makes a resource valuable? Identifying the drivers of firm-idiosyncratic resource value. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 206–228 https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5465/amr.2010.0404.CrossRef

Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (R. Opie, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Selden, P. D., & Fletcher, D. E. (2015). The entrepreneurial journey as an emergent hierarchical system of artifact-creating processes. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.002.CrossRef

Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602.CrossRef

Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRef

Shane, S. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0078.CrossRef

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611.

Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Smith, A. (1976). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structures and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Van Praag, C. M. (2003). Business survival and success of young small business owners. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024453200297.CrossRef

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). The four service marketing myths: Remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of service research, 6(4), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1094670503262946.CrossRef

Venkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., & Forster, W. R. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0079.CrossRef

Vlaskovits, P. (2011). Henry ford, innovation, and that “faster horse” quote. Harvard Business Review, 29.

Walras, L. (1954). Eléments d’Economie Politique Pure (W. Jaffé, Trans.). Paris et Lausanne: Richard D. Irwin.

Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1010.CrossRef

Webb, J. W., Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Kistruck, G. M., & Tihanyi, L. (2011). Where is the opportunity without the customer? An integration of marketing activities, the entrepreneurship process, and institutional theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(4), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0237-y.CrossRef

Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008063200484.CrossRef

Witt, U. (2001). Learning to consume–A theory of wants and the growth of demand. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00003851.CrossRef

Wood, M. S., & McKinley, W. (2020). The entrepreneurial opportunity construct: Dislodge or leverage? Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0162.CrossRef

Wood, M. S., Bylund, P., & Bradley, S. (2016). The influence of tax and regulatory policies on entrepreneurs’ opportunity evaluation decisions. Management Decision, 54(5), 1160–1182. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2015-0446.CrossRef

Zbaracki, M. J. (2007). A sociological view of costs of price adjustment: Contributions from grounded theory methods. Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(6), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1330.CrossRef

Zbaracki, M. J., & Bergen, M. (2010). When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21(5), 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0513.CrossRef

Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309335187.CrossRef

Ziegele, M., & Weber, M. (2015). Example, please! Comparing the effects of single customer reviews and aggregate review scores on online shoppers' product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1503.CrossRef

Titel: Subjective value in entrepreneurship
verfasst von: Per L. Bylund
Mark D. Packard
Publikationsdatum: 02.02.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00451-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Skill improvement by product imitation

The effects of social spending on entrepreneurship in developed nations

Institutions, financial development, and small business survival: evidence from European emerging markets

One swallow does not make a summer: episodes and persistence in high growth

Informal institutions, transaction risk, and firm productivity in Myanmar

The entrepreneurial financing of the immigrant entrepreneurs: a literature review