nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Suitability of Different Decision-Making Methods Applied for Analysing Sustainable Post-disaster Temporary Housing

verfasst von : S. M. Amin Hosseini, Oriol Pons, Albert de la Fuente

Erschienen in: Resettlement Challenges for Displaced Populations and Refugees

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Increasing population of urban areas by 2050, especially in areas highly prone to natural hazards, could potentially threaten vulnerable cities in the face of future disaster events. Alternative temporary housing (TH) needs to be assessed as an important element of local resiliency. In this regard, there are some interrelated factors that can have antithetical impacts on the different cases of TH. Thus, proper decision-making models can be highly useful to deal with this complex multifaceted process. These models should be flexible and adaptable to existing local and boundary conditions since a TH strategy could lead to different satisfactions and perceptions. This chapter aims to present a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for choosing the most sustainable temporary housing alternative. To this end, general requirements of the decision-making process for dealing with temporary housing selection are specified and organized based on the assessed cases. Finally, all possible decision-making methods are assessed to determine the most suitable one based on correspondence between the methods and the requirements. As a result, this study concludes that a robust MCDM method should incorporate concept method to objectively measure the satisfaction degree of every stakeholder involved. In this sense, the Integrated Value Model for Sustainable Assessment (MIVES) is a suitable method for assessing the sustainability of temporary housing since this includes the value function method (based on the utility theory).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Analyzing Flood Fatalities in Vietnam Using Statistical Learning Approach and National Disaster Database

Aguado, A., Caño, A. d., Cruz, M. P., Gómez, D., & Josa, A. (2012). Sustainability assessment of concrete structures within the Spanish structural concrete code. CONSTRUCTION Engineering and Management, 138(2), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000419.CrossRef

Alarcon, B., Aguado, A., Manga, R., & Josa, A. (2011). A value function for assessing sustainability: Application to industrial buildings. Sustainability, 3, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3010035.CrossRef

Alexander, D. E. (2004). Planning for post-disaster reconstruction. I-Rec 2004 International Conference Improving Post-Disaster Reconstruction in Developing Countries.

Alexander, D. E. (2010). The L’Aquila earthquake of 6 April 2009 and Italian government policy on disaster response. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2(4), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2010.511450.CrossRef

Alparslan, E., Ince, F., Erkan, B., Aydöner, C., Özen, H., & Dönertaş, A. (2008). A GIS model for settlement suitability regarding disaster mitigation, a case study in Bolu Turkey. Engineering Geology, 96(3), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.006.CrossRef

Amini Hosseini, K., Hosseinioon, S., & Pooyan, Z. (2013). An investigation into the socioeconomic aspects of two major earthquakes in Iran. Disasters, 37(3), 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12001.CrossRef

Arslan, H. and Unlu, A. (2006), “The evaluation of community participation in housing reconstruction projects after Duzce earthquake”, 2006 International Conference and Student Competition on Post-disaster Reconstruction “Meeting Stakeholder Interests”, p 13, available at: https://www.grif.umontreal.ca/pages/ARSLAN_%20Hakan.pdf (accessed October 15, 2015).

Aruldoss, M., Lakshm, T. M., & Venkatesan, V. P. (2013). A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajis-1-1-5.CrossRef

Barakat, S. (2003). Housing reconstruction after conflict and disaster. London: Overseas Development Institute.

Chandler, P. J. (2007). Environmental factors influencing the siting of temporary housing. Master thesis, Louisiana State University, Department of Environmental Studies , Louisiana State University.

Chen, Z., Chen, X., Li, Q., & Chen, J. (2013). The temporal hierarchy of shelters: A hierarchical location model for earthquake-shelter planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.763944.

Chua, J., & Su, Y. (2012). The application of TOPSIS method in selecting fixed seismic shelter for evacuation in cities. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.061.CrossRef

Collins, S., Corsellis, T., & Vitale, A. (2010). Transitional shelter: understanding shelter from the emergency through reconstruction and beyond. ALNAP.

Cuadrado, J., Zubizarreta, M., Pelaz, B., & Marcos, I. (2015a). Methodology to assess the environmental sustainability of timber structures. Construction and Building Materials, 86, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.109.CrossRef

Cuadrado, J., Zubizarreta, M., Rojí, E., García, H., & Larrauri, M. (2015b). Sustainability-related decision making in industrial buildings: An AHP analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/157129.CrossRef

Coffey, V., & Trigunarsyah, B. (2012). Rebuilding housing after a disaster: factors for failure. In Proceedings of 8th Annual International Conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure, Renewal and Reconstruction (IIIRR) (pp. 292–300). Kumamoto University.

de la Fuente, A., Armengou, J., Pons, O., & Aguado, A. (2014). New precast concrete tower system for wind – Turbine support and tool to asses its sustainability index. Civil Engineering and Management.

del Caño, A., Gomez, D., & de la Cruz, M. P. (2012). Uncertainty analysis in the sustainable design of concrete structures: A probabilistic method. Construction and Building Materials, 37, 865–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.020.CrossRef

del Caño, A., Cruz, M. P., Cartelle, J. J., & Lara, M. (2015). Conceptual framework for an integrated method to optimize sustainability of engineering systems. Energy and Power Engineering, 9, 608–615. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-8975/2015.07.002.CrossRef

Da Silva, J. (2010). Key Considerations in Post-Disaster Reconstruction.

Davidson, C. H. (2009). The challenge of organizational design for manufactured construction. Construction innovation, 9(1), 42–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170910931534.CrossRef

Davis, I. (1982). Shelter after disaster. Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic Press.

Dikmen, N., Elias-Ozkan, S. T., & Davidson, C. (2012). Comparison of post-disaster housing procurement methods in rural areas of Turkey. Open House International, 37(1), 28–39.

Doocy, S., Gabriel, M., Collins, S., Robinson, C., & Stevenson, P. (2006). Implementing cash for work programmes in post-tsunami Aceh: Experiences and lessons learned. Disasters, 30(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00321.x.CrossRef

El-Anwar, O., & Chen, L. (2012). Computing a displacement distance equivalent to optimize plans for Postdisaster temporary housing projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000601.CrossRef

El-Anwar, O., El-Rayes, K., & Elnashai, A. (2009a). Optimizing large-scale temporary housing arrangements after natural disasters. Computing in Civil Engineering, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:2(110)).

El-Anwar, O., El-Rayes, K., & Elnashai, A. (2009b). An automated system for optimizing post-disaster temporary housing allocation. Computing in Civil Engineering, 23(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:2(110))10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:2(110)).CrossRef

Erdik, M. (2000). Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce (Turkey) Earthquakes.

Fois, F., & Forino, G. (2014). The self-built ecovillage in L’Aquila, Italy: Community resilience as a grassroots response to environmental shock. Disasters, 38(4), 719–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12080.CrossRef

Ghafory-Ashtiany, M., & Hosseini, M. (2008). Post-bam earthquake: Recovery and reconstruction. Natural Hazards, 44(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9108-3.CrossRef

Gharaati, M. & Davidson, C. (2008). Who Knows Best? An Overview of Reconstruction after the Earthquake in Bam, Iran. In: Proceedings of the 4th International i-Rec Conference, University of Canterbury. Christchurch, New Zealand.

Hale, T., & Moberg, C. R. (2005). Improving supply chain disaster preparedness: A decision process for secure site location. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030510594576.CrossRef

Hall, A. D. (1962). A methodology for systems engineering. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.

Hayles, C. S. (2010). An examination of decision making in post disaster housing reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/17595901111149141.CrossRef

Hidayat, B. A. (2010). A literature review of the role of project management in post-disaster reconstruction. Proceedings of 26th annual ARCOM conference (pp. 1269–1278). Association of Researchers in Construction Management.

Hosseini, S. M. A., de la Fuente, A., & Pons, O. (2016a). Multi-criteria decision-making method for assessing the sustainability of post-disaster temporary housing units technologies: A case study in Bam, 2003. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.012.CrossRef

Hosseini, S. M. A., de la Fuente, A., & Pons, O. (2016b). Multicriteria decision-making method for sustainable site location of post-disaster temporary housing in urban areas. Construction Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001137.

Hosseini, S. M. A., Pons, O., Arroyo, C. M., & de la Fuente, A. (2016c). Identifying temporary housing main vertexes through assessing post-disaster recovery programs. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 10(10), 1344–1351.

Hosseini, S. M. A., Pons, O., & de la Fuente, A. (2017). A combination of the knapsack algorithm and MIVES for choosing optimal temporary housing site locations: A case study in Tehran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.013.

Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (2012). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey (Vol. 186). Springer Science & Business Media, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York.

Hadafi, F., & Fallahi, A. (2010). Temporary housing respond to disasters in developing countries-case study: Iran-Ardabil and Lorestan Province Earthquakes. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, 1536–1542.

Johnson, C. (2002). What’s the big deal about temporary housing? Planning considerations for temporary accommodation after disasters: Example of the 1999 Turkish earthquakes. In 2002 TIEMS disaster management conference. Waterloo.

Johnson, C. (2007a). Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Habitat International, 31(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.03.002.CrossRef

Johnson, C. (2007b). Strategic planning for post-disaster temporary housing. Disasters, 31(4), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2007.01018.x.CrossRef

Johnson, C. (2009). Planning for temporary. In C. J. Gonzalo Lizarralde (Ed.), Rebuilding after disasters: From emergency to sustainability (pp. 70–87). New York: Taylor & Francis.

Johnson, C., Lizarralde, G., & Davidson, C. H. (2006). A systems view of temporary housing projects in post-disaster reconstruction. Construction Management and Economics, 24(4), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600567977.CrossRef

Kapucu, N., & Garayev, V. (2011). Collaborative decision-making in emergency and disaster management. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(6), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.561477.CrossRef

Kates, R. W., Colten, C. E., Laska, S., & Leatherman, S. P. (2006). Reconstruction of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(40), 14653–14660.CrossRef

Kennedy, J., Ashmore, J., Babister, E., & Kelman, I. (2008). The meaning of ‘build back better’: Evidence from post-tsunami Aceh and Sri Lanka. Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00529.x.CrossRef

Khazai, B., & Hausler, E. (2005). Intermediate shelters in bam and permanent shelter reconstruction in villages following the 2003 bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21(S1), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2098907.CrossRef

Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Jiao, J. (2013). A GIS-based suitability analysis of Xiamen’s green space in park for earthquake disaster prevention and refuge. Urban Planning and Design Research, 1(1) 1–8.

Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S. (2003). Assessing community impacts of natural disasters. Natural Hazards Review, 4(4), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:4(176).CrossRef

Lizarralde, G., & Davidson, C. (2006). Learning from the poor. i-Rec conference proceedings 2006: Post-disaster reconstruction: Meeting the stakeholders’ interest.

McConnan, I. (1998). Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in disaster response. < The> Sphere Project.

Ma, D., Chu, J., Liu, X., & Zhao, S. (2011). Study on evaluation of earthquake evacuation capacity in village based on multi-level Grey evaluation. Systems Engineering Procedia, 1, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.08.015.CrossRef

McCarthy, F. X. (2008). FEMA disaster housing and hurricane Katrina: Overview, analysis, and congressional options. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

McCarthy, K. F., Peterson, D. J., Sastry, N., & Pollard, M. (2006). The repopulation of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.CrossRef

Nigg, J. M., Barnshaw, J., & Torres, M. R. (2006). Hurricane Katrina and the flooding of New Orleans: Emergent issues in sheltering and temporary housing. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205285889.CrossRef

Nojavan, M., & Omidvar, B. (2013). The Selection of Site for Temporary Sheltering using Fuzzy Algorithms;Case study: Tehran Metropolitan after earthquake,Municipal districts No, 1(31), 205–221.

Omidvar, B., Baradaran-Shoraka, M., & Nojavan, M. (2013). Temporary site selection and decision-making methods: A case study ofTehran, Iran. Disasters, 37(3), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12007.CrossRef

Ormazabal, G., Viñolas, B., & Aguado, A. (2008). Enhancing value in crucial decisions: Line 9 of the Barcelona Subway. Journal of Management in Engineering, 24(4), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:4(265).CrossRef

Ozernoy, V. M. (1989). A framework for building an expert system for MCDM models selection. In In improving decision making in Organisations (pp. 553–562). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

Özerdem, A., & Rufini, G. (2013). L’Aquila’s reconstruction challenges: Has Italy learned from its previous earthquake disasters? Disasters, 37(1), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01296.x.CrossRef

Pearce, L. (2003). Disaster management and community planning, and public participations: How to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 28(2–3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022917721797.CrossRef

Peng, Y., Shen, Q., Shen, L., Lu, C., & Yuan, Z. (2014). A generic decision model for developing concentrated rural settlement in post-disaster reconstruction: A China study. Natural Hazards, 71(1), 611–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0924-3.CrossRef

Pons, O., & Aguado, A. (2012). Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spain. Building and Environment, 53, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.007.CrossRef

Pons, O., & de la Fuente, A. (2013). Integrated sustainability assessment method applied to structural concrete columns. Construction and Building Materials, 49, 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.009.CrossRef

Pujadas, P., Pardo-Bosch, F., Aguado-Renter, A., & Aguado, A. (2017). MIVES multi-criteria approach for the evaluation, prioritization, and selection of public investment projects. A case study in the city of Barcelona. Land Use Policy, 64, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.014.CrossRef

Rossetto, T., D’Ayala, D., Gori, F., Persio, R., Han, J., Novelli, V., et al. (2014). The value of multiple earthquake missions: The EEFIT L’Aquila earthquake experience. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(1), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9588-y.CrossRef

San-José Lombera, J.-T., & Rojo, J. C. (2010). Industrial building design stage based on a system approach to their environmental sustainability. Construction and Building Materials, 24(4), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.019.

San-José Lombera, J. T. , & Garrucho Aprea, I. G. (2010). A system approach to the environmental analysis of industrial buildings. Building and environment, 45(3), 673–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.012.

Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial, 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Stanujkic, D., Djordjevic, B., & Djordjevic, M. (2013). Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks. Serbian Journal of Management, 8(2), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm8-3774.CrossRef

Steinberg, F. (2007). Housing reconstruction and rehabilitation in Aceh and Nias, Indonesia—Rebuilding lives. Habitat International, 31(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.11.002.CrossRef

Tas, N., Cosgun, N., & Tas, M. (2007). A qualitative evaluation of the after earthquake permanent housings in Turkey in terms of user satisfaction—Kocaeli, Gundogdu permanent housing model. Building and Environment, 42, 3418–3431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.09.002.CrossRef

Triantaphyllou, E. (2013). Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study (Vol. 44). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

von Meding, J., Wong, J., Kanjanabootra, S., & Tafti, M. T. (2016). Competence-based system development for post-disaster project management. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 25(3), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-07-2015-0164.CrossRef

Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56–66.

Viñolas, B. (2011). Applications and advances of MIVES methodology in multi-criteria assessments. PhD thesis, UPC, Barcelona.

Viñolas, B., Aguado, A., Josa, A., Villegas, N., & Prada, M. Á. (2009). Aplicación del análisis de valor para una evaluación integral y objetiva del profesorado universitario. 6(1).

Wei, L., Li, W., Li, K., Liu, H., & Chenguse, A. L. (2012). Decision Support for urban shelter locations based on covering model. Procedia Engineering, 43, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.011.CrossRef

Weiss, N. E. (2006). Rebuilding housing after hurricane Katrina: Lessons learned and unresolved issues. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

Yi, H., & Yang, J. (2014). Research trends of post disaster reconstruction: The past and the future. Habitat International, 42, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.10.005.CrossRef

Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(3), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1.CrossRef

Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016). Development of TOPSIS method to solve complicated decision-making problems: An overview on developments from 2000 to 2015. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15, 645–682. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016300019.CrossRef

Titel: Suitability of Different Decision-Making Methods Applied for Analysing Sustainable Post-disaster Temporary Housing
verfasst von: S. M. Amin Hosseini
Oriol Pons
Albert de la Fuente
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Resettlement Challenges for Displaced Populations and Refugees
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92497-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-92498-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92498-4_16

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"