Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Association Rules for Anomaly Detection and Root Cause Analysis in Process Executions Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Support of Justification Elicitation: Two Industrial Reports

verfasst von : Clément Duffau, Thomas Polacsek, Mireille Blay-Fornarino

Erschienen in: Advanced Information Systems Engineering

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The result of productive processes is commonly accompanied by a set of justifications which can be, depending on the product, process-related qualities, traceability documents, product-related experiments, tests or expert reports, etc. In critical contexts, it is mandatory to substantiate that a product’s development has been carried out appropriately which results in an inflation of the quantity of justification documents. This mass of document and information is difficult to manage and difficult to assess (in terms of soundness). In this paper, we report on the experience gained on two industrial case studies, in which we applied a justification elicitation approach based on justification diagrams and justification pattern diagrams in order to identify necessary and sufficient justification documentation.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Relational Process Structure
Nächstes Kapitel Configurations of User Involvement and Participation in Relation to Information System Project Success
Fußnoten
1
In the first version, these diagrams are called the Argumentation Diagram, but to avoid any ambiguity with dialogical argumentation, we chose to use the term Justification Diagram.
 
2
ATA chapters are defined by the Air Transport Association of America. It is a common referencing standard for all commercial aircraft documentation. An ATA chapter represents a aircraft domain like Air Conditioning & Pressurization (ATA 21), Electrical Power (ATA 24) or Pneumatics (ATA 36).
 
Literatur
1.
AAMI AT: Guidance on the use of agile practices in the development of medical device software. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (2012)
2.
Balci, O.: Verification, validation, and accreditation. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Winter Simulation, pp. 41–44. IEEE Computer Society Press (1998)
3.
Bieber, P., Boniol, F., Durrieu, G., Poitou, O., Polacsek, T., Wiels, V., Martinez, G.: MIMOSA: Towards a model driven certification process. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS 2016) (2016)
4.
Camillieri, C., Parisi, L., Blay-Fornarino, M., Precioso, F., Riveill, M., Cancela Vaz, J.: Towards a software product line for machine learning workflows: focus on supporting evolution. In: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Models and Evolution Co-located with ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS), October 2016
5.
Cassano, V., Maibaum, T.S.E.: The definition and assessment of a safety argument. In: 25th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops, ISSRE Workshops, pp. 180–185. IEEE Computer Society (2014)
6.
Chowdhury, T., Lin, C.w., Kim, B., Lawford, M., Shiraishi, S., Wassyng, A., Division, S., View, M.: Principles for systematic development of an assurance case template from ISO 26262. In: ISSREW 2017 (2017)
7.
Dalpiaz, F., Franch, X., Horkoff, J.: istar 2.0 language guide. CoRR abs/1605.07767 (2016)
8.
Duffau, C., Camillieri, C., Blay-Fornarino, M.: Improving confidence in experimental systems through automated construction of argumentation diagrams. In: ICEIS 2017 (2017)
9.
Duffau, C., Grabiec, B., Blay-Fornarino, M.: Towards embedded system agile development challenging verification, validation and accreditation: application in a healthcare company. In: ISSREW 2017 (2017)
10.
Emmet, L., Cleland, G.: Graphical notations, narratives and persuasion: a pliant systems approach to hypertext tool design. In: Blustein, J., Allen, R.B., Anderson, K.M., Moulthrop, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, HYPERTEXT 2002, pp. 55–64. ACM (2002)
11.
Franch, X., Fernández, D.M., Oriol, M., Vogelsang, A., Heldal, R., Knauss, E., Travassos, G.H., Carver, J.C., Dieste, O., Zimmermann, T.: How do practitioners perceive the relevance of requirements engineering research? an ongoing study (2017). arXiv:​1705.​06013
12.
González, V., Génova Fuster, G., Álvarez Rodríguez, J.M., Llorens Morillo, J.B., et al.: An analysis of safety evidence management with the structured assurance case metamodel (2017)
13.
Kelly, T., Weaver, R.: The goal structuring notation - a safety argument notation. In: Proceedings of Dependable Systems and Networks 2004 Workshop on Assurance Cases (2004)
14.
15.
Knauss, E., Liebel, G., Schneider, K., Horkoff, J., Kasauli, R.: Quality requirements in agile as a knowledge management problem: more than just-in-time. In: 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), pp. 427–430 (2017)
16.
Kunz, W., Rittel, H.: Issues as elements of information systems. Working Paper 131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, California (1970)
17.
van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering - From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley, New York (2009)
18.
MacLean, A., Young, R.M., Bellotti, V.M.E., Moran, T.P.: Questions, options, and criteria: elements of design space analysis. Hum. Comput. Interact. 6(3), 201–250 (1991)CrossRef
19.
20.
Nguyen, C.M., Sebastiani, R., Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J.: Requirements evolution and evolution requirements with constrained goal models. In: Comyn-Wattiau, I., Tanaka, K., Song, I.-Y., Yamamoto, S., Saeki, M. (eds.) ER 2016. LNCS, vol. 9974, pp. 544–552. Springer, Cham (2016). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-46397-1_​42CrossRef
21.
Nisbett, R.E.: Rules for Reasoning. Psychology Press, London (1993)
22.
OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0, January 2011
23.
OMG: Structured assurance case meta-model (SACM) (2013)
24.
Polacsek, T.: Validation, accreditation or certification: a new kind of diagram to provide confidence. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, RCIS, pp. 59–466 (2016)
25.
Polacsek, T., Roussel, S., Bouissiere, F., Cuiller, C., Dereux, P.-E., Kersuzan, S.: Towards thinking manufacturing and design together: an aeronautical case study. In: Mayr, H.C., Guizzardi, G., Ma, H., Pastor, O. (eds.) ER 2017. LNCS, vol. 10650, pp. 340–353. Springer, Cham (2017). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-69904-2_​27CrossRef
26.
Rempel, P., Mäder, P., Kuschke, T., Cleland-Huang, J.: Mind the gap: Assessing the conformance of software traceability to relevant guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2014, pp. 943–954. ACM (2014)
27.
Toulmin, S.E.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003). updated Edition, first published in (1958)
28.
Metadaten
Titel
Support of Justification Elicitation: Two Industrial Reports
verfasst von
Clément Duffau
Thomas Polacsek
Mireille Blay-Fornarino
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Advanced Information Systems Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91562-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-91563-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91563-0_5