Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 2/2023

09.09.2022

Survey on IoV Routing Protocols

verfasst von: Samira Harrabi, Ines Ben Jaafar, Khaled Ghedira

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Internet of vehicles (IoV) can be considered as a superset of vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs). It extends VANET’s structure, applications and scale. Unlike, the traditional intelligent transportation system (ITS), IoV focus more on information interactions between vehicles, roadside units (RSU) and humans. The principal aim is to make people obtain road traffic information easily and in real-time, to ensure the travel convenience, and to increase the travel comfort. The goal behind the Internet of vehicles is essentially to be used in urban traffic environment to ensure network access for passengers and drivers. The environment of the IoV is the combination of different wireless network environment as well as road conditions. Despite its continuing expansion, the IOV contains different radio access technologies that lead to a heterogeneous network, and make it more crucial than the VANET. These drawbacks pose numerous challenges, especially the routing one. In IoV environment, the routing protocol must cope with events such as link failure and to find the best route to propagate the data toward the desired destination. In this paper, we mainly focus on surveying the IoV routing protocols, hence we present and compare unicast, multicast and broadcast protocols.
Vorheriger Artikel SIS-BAM Algorithm for Angular Parameter Estimation of 2-D Incoherently Distributed Sources
Nächster Artikel A Low Profile Meta-Material Loaded Koch Fractal Antenna for Broadband Public Safety Applications

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
Dua, A., Kumar, N., & Bawa, S. (2014). A systematic review on routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks. Vehicular Communications, 1(1), 33–52.CrossRef
3.
Pernin, J. L., & Schwartz, A. (1982). Economic aspects of multiservice subscriber loops in telematics networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 9(30), 2211–2214.CrossRef
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Saleet, H., Langar, R., Naik, K., Boutaba, R., Nayak, A., & Goel, N. (2011). Intersection-based geographical routing protocol for VANETs: A proposal and analysis. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(9), 4560–4574.CrossRef
9.
Abbasi, I. A., Nazir, B., Abbasi, A., Bilal, S. M., & Madani, S. A. (2014). A traffic flow-oriented routing protocol for VANETs. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 1, 121.CrossRef
10.
Salkuyeh, M. A., & Abolhassani, B. (2016). An adaptive multipath geographic routing for video transmission in urban VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(10), 2822–2831.CrossRef
11.
Yaqoob, S., Ullah, A., Akbar, M., Imran, M., & Shoaib, M. (2019). Congestion avoidance through fog computing in internet of vehicles. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10, 3863–3877.CrossRef
12.
Harrabi, S., Ben Jaafar, I., & Ghedira, K. (2016). VANETs networking protocols: An analytical study. In: The Tenth International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications (SENSORCOMM 2016), July 24–28, Nice, France.
13.
Petteri, K. (2002). Classification of adhoc routing protocols. Naval Academy, Finland: Finnish Defence Forces.
14.
Shivahare, B. D., Wahi, C., & Shivhare, S. (2012). Comparison of proactive and reactive routing protocols in mobile adhoc network using routing protocol property. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2(3), 356–359.
15.
Dhankharand, S., & Agrawal, S. (2014). VANETs: A survey on routing protocols and issues. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(6), 13427–13435.
16.
17.
Moreand, R. R., & Sankpal, S. V. (2013). Performance evaluation of an efficient dsdv routing protocols for adhoc networks. ITSI Transactions on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 1, 15–18.
18.
Clausenand, T., & Jacquet, P. (2003). Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR). RFC3626, Network Working Group.
19.
Yi, J., Cizeron, E., Hamma, S., Parrein, B., & Lesage, P. (2008). Implementation of multi path and multiple descriptions coding in OLSR. In Proceeding of 4thOLSRIntrop/Workshop, Ottawa-Canada.
20.
Gilbert, G.-C., Branch, J.-W., & Szymanski, B.-K. (2006). A self-selection technique for flooding and routing in wireless ad-hoc networks. International Journal of Network and Systems Management, 14(3), 359–380.CrossRef
21.
Johnsonand, D.-B., & Maltz, D.-A. (1996). Dynamic source routing in ad-hoc wireless networks. In Mobile computing, Chap. 5, Vol. 353 of the series. The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science (pp. 153–181).
22.
23.
Maria, B., Nabil, B., Deep, S.-K., & Driss, E. L. (2013). Recent study of routing protocols in VANET: Survey and taxonomy. In The 1st international work shop on vehicular networks and telematics (WVNT13), Marrakech-Morocco.
24.
Haas, Z. J. (1997). The zone routing protocol (ZRP) for adhoc networks. Internet Draft.
25.
Allaland, S., & Boudjit, S. (2013). Geo cast routing protocol for VANET: Survey and geometry driven scheme proposal. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security, 3, 20–36.
26.
Karpand, B., & Kung, H.-T. (2000). GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom00), Massachusetts.
27.
Liand, F., & Wang, Y. (2007). Routing in vehicular adhoc networks: A survey. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 2(2), 1222.
28.
Santns, R. A., Edwards, R. M., Edwards, A., & Belis, D. (2004). A novel cluster-based location routing algorithm for inter-vehicular communication. In Personal, indoor and mobile radio communications, IEEE proceedings of the 15th annual symposium, Barcelona-Spain.
29.
30.
Jiang, M., Li, J., & Tay, Y. C. (1999). Cluster based routing protocol (CBRP) (Internet-Draft draft-ietf-manetcbrp-spec-01.txt). In National University of Singapore, I.E.T.F. (IETF), Ed. (pp. 1–27).
31.
Harrabi, S., Ben Jaafar, I., & Ghedira, K. (2016). Routing challenges and solutions in vehicular ad hoc networks. Sensors and Transducer Journal, 206(11), 31–42.
32.
Bernsen, J., & Manivannan, D. (2009). Unicast routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks: A critical comparison and classification. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5, 1–18.CrossRef
33.
Wu, H., Fujimoto, R., Guensler, R., & Hunter, M. (2004). MDDV: A mobility-centric data dissemination algorithm for vehicular networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET’04) New York, NY, USA.
34.
Longchar, I. T., Chamframary, R., Deka, D. J., & Sivakumar, T. (2015). A survey on unicast routing protocols for VANET. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 6(2), 1390–1392.
35.
Zhao, J., & Gao, G. (2008). VADD: Vehicle-assisted data delivery in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 27, 1910–1922.CrossRef
36.
Navis Vigilia, A., & Suresh Suseela, J. (2016). Survey on unicast, multicast and broadcast routing techniques in vehicular ad-hoc networks, present and future. British Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 13(4), 1–26.CrossRef
37.
Vaishali, D., Khairnar, M., & Kotecha, K. (2013). Simulation-based performance evaluation of routing protocols in vehicular ad-hoc network. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(10), 1–14.
38.
Naumov, V., & Gross, T. (2007). Connectivity-aware routing (CAR) in vehicular ad hoc networks. In IEEE international conference on computer communications, Anchorage (pp. 1919–1927).
39.
Chen, Y. S., Lin, Y. W., & Pan, C. Y. (2009). A diagonal-intersection-based routing protocol for urban vehicular ad hoc networks. Telecommunication System, 299–316.
40.
Osman, A., Sid Ahmed, A., Babiker A., & Nabi Mustefa, A. (2015). Review and comparison between routing protocols in vehicular ad-hoc networks. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4(7), 1–14.
41.
Lochert, C., Mauve, M., Fera, H., & Hartenstein, H. (2005). Geographic routing in city scenarios. ACMSIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications, 9(1), 69–72.CrossRef
42.
Perkins, C. E., & Royer, E. M. Multicast operation of the ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking, Seattle, Washington, USA, 15–20 August (pp. 207–218).
43.
Bachir, A., & Benslimane, A. (2003). A multicast protocol in ad hoc networks inter-vehicle geocast. IEEE Semiannual Vehicular Technology Conference, 4, 2456–2460.
44.
Joshi, H. P., Sichitiu, M., & Kihl, M. (2007). Distributed robust geocast multicast routing for inter-vehicle communication. In WEIRD workshop on WiMax, wireless and mobility.
45.
46.
Kihl, M., Sichitiu, M., Ekeroth, T., & Rozenberg, M. (2007). Reliable geographical multicast routing in vehicular adhoc networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4517, 315–325.CrossRef
47.
Chakraborty, D. (2012). Distant node based multicast routing protocol. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 2(3), 49–55.CrossRef
48.
Chitra, M., & Sathya, S. S. (2013). Efficient broadcasting mechanisms for data dissemination in vehicular ad hoc networks. International Journal of Mobile Network Communication and Telematics (IJMNCT), 3(3), 47–63.CrossRef
49.
Zhang, M., & Wolff, R. S. (2010). A border node based routing protocol for partially connected vehicular ad hoc networks. Journal of Communications, 5(2), 130–143.CrossRef
50.
Tonguz, O. K., Wisitpongphan, N., Bai, F., Mudalige, P., & Sadekar, V. (2007). Broadcasting in VANET. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on mobile networking for vehicular environments (Vol. 7, No. 12).
51.
Korkmaz, G., Ekici, E., & Ozg Uner, F. (2006). An efficient fully ad-hoc multi-hop broadcast protocol for intervehicular. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications. ICC (pp. 423–428).
52.
Mouhcine, E., Mansouri, K., & Mohamed, Y. (2018). Intelligent vehicle routing system using VANET strategy combined with a distributed ant colony optimization. In International conference on advanced information technology, services and systems (pp. 230–237). Springer.
53.
Joshua, C. J., Duraisamy, R., & Varadarajan, V. (2019). A reputation based weighted clustering protocol in VANET: A multiobjective firefly approach. Mobile Networks and Applications, 24(4), 1199–1209.CrossRef
54.
Gupta, M., Sabharwal, N., Singla, P., Singh, J., & Rodrigues, J. J. (2018). Psarv: Particle swarm angular routing in vehicular ad hoc networks. In International conference on wireless intelligent and distributed environment for communication (pp. 115–127). Springer.
55.
Hu, X., Wu, T., & Wang, Y. (2019). Social coalition-based V2V broadcasting optimization algorithm in VANETs. In International conference on swarm intelligence (pp. 318–325). Springer.
56.
Yarinezhad, R., & Sarabi, A. (2019). A new routing algorithm for vehicular ad-hoc networks based on glowworm swarm optimization algorithm. Journal of AI and Data Mining, 7(1), 69–76.
57.
Toutouh, J., & Alba, E. (2018). A swarm algorithm for collaborative traffic in vehicular networks. Vehicular Communications, 12, 127–137.CrossRef
58.
Harrabi, S., Ben Jaafar, I., & Ghedira, K. (2018). A swarm intelligence-based routing protocol for vehicular networks. International Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems (IJVICS), 3(4), 306–320.CrossRef
59.
Poonia, R. C. (2018). A performance evaluation of routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks with swarm intelligence. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 9(4), 830–835.
60.
Zhao, Q., Zhu, Y., Chen, C., Zhu, H., & Li, B. (2013). When 3G meets VANET: 3G-assisted data delivery in VANETs. IEEE Sensors Journal, 13(10), 3575–3584.CrossRef
61.
Shafiee, K., Attar, A., & Leung, V. C. M. (2011). WLAN–WiMAX double-technology routing for vehicular networks. In Proceedings of IEEE VTC Fall (pp. 1–6).
62.
Li, Y., Ying, K., Cheng, P., Yu, H., & Luo, H. (2012). Cooperative data dissemination in cellular-VANET heterogeneous wireless networks. In Proceedings of 4th HSIC (pp. 1–4).
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
Kannhavong, B., Nakayama, H., Nemoto, Y., Kato, N., & Jamalipour, A. (2007). A survey of routing attacks in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 14(5), 85–91.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Survey on IoV Routing Protocols
verfasst von
Samira Harrabi
Ines Ben Jaafar
Khaled Ghedira
Publikationsdatum
09.09.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09976-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Wireless Personal Communications 2/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Retraction Note

Retraction Note: Platform Design of Sports Meeting Management System for Regular Colleges and Universities Based on B/S Structure

OriginalPaper

A QoS Aware Three Way Point Rule based Fusion of Earth Worm and Deer Hunt Optimization Routing in Wireless Sensor Network

OriginalPaper

Modified Adaptive Mechanism for Optimising IEEE 802.15.4 WPANs for Wireless Sensor Networks

OriginalPaper

A Survey on Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI Analysis

OriginalPaper

Intelligent IDS: Venus Fly-Trap Optimization with Honeypot Approach for Intrusion Detection and Prevention

Retraction Note

Retraction Note: Scenario Classification of Wireless Network Optimization Based on Big Data Technology

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise