Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
The majority of sustainability related social science research conducted to date has primarily focused on individual level behaviors occurring within the environmental domain. In order to achieve the advancements needed to move towards a truly sustainable society, this interdisciplinary field must grow to not only include the social and economic domains, but also expand in scope to study groups and institutions. Sustainability research has paused at the brink of this needed growth and expansion because it has failed, thus far, to build new theories specifically tailored to the three domain model of sustainability. The purpose of this chapter is to encourage scientists to begin identifying and measuring sustainability latent constructs in order to do just that, and to submit two such measures to the academic community. This chapter introduces a revised Assessment of Sustainability Knowledge (ASK) and the Sustainability Attitudes Scale (SAS), and discusses when and how to use them for applied and theoretical purposes. Building theoretical models using these (and other) latent constructs will allow social scientists to test a new and diverse set of hypotheses and push the field to create cutting edge, sustainability-tailored theories.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Allcott, H., & Rogers, T. (2014). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. The American Economic Review,104(10), 3003–3037. CrossRef
Andersson, L., Shivarajan, S., & Blau, G. (2005). Enacting ecological sustainability in the MNC: A test of an adapted value-belief-norm framework. Journal of Business Ethics,59(3), 295–305. CrossRef
Attari, S. Z. (2014). Perceptions of water use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,111(14), 5129–5134. CrossRef
Attari, S. Z., DeKay, M. L., Davidson, C. I., & Bruin, W. B. De. (2010). Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,107(37), 16054–16059. CrossRef
Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology,53(1), 605–634. CrossRef
Campbell, B., & Jones, K. (2015). Assessing Sustainability Attitudes: A New Multi-Dimensional Measure. Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education, Minneapolis, MN.
Catton, W. R., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Paradigms, theories, and the primacy of the HEP-NEP distinction. The American Sociologist, 256–259.
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58(6), 1015–1026. CrossRef
Dunlap, R. E. (2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of Environmental Education,40(1), 3–18. CrossRef
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues,56(3), 425–442. CrossRef
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: Triple bottom line of 21st century business (p. 424). Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.
Frisk, E., & Larson, K. L. (2011). Educating for sustainability: Competencies & practices for transformative action. Journal of Sustainability Education,2(March), 1–20.
Heberlein, T. A. (2012). Navigating environmental attitudes. Conservation Biology,26(4), 583–585. CrossRef
Heeren, A. J., Singh, A. S., Zwickle, A., Koontz, T. M., Slagle, K. M., & McCreery, A. C. (2016). Is sustainability knowledge half the battle? An examination of sustainability knowledge, attitudes, norms, and efficacy to understand sustainable behaviours. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education,17(5), 613–632. CrossRef
Jones, K., & Zwickle, A. (2016). Measuring Sustainability Culture and Attitudes among the Student Body: Why you Should Care. Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education, Baltimore, MD.
Kenyon, G. M. (1988). Basic assumptions in theories of human aging. Emergent theories of aging, 3–18.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (p. 216). Chicago: University of Chicago press. CrossRef
Kumar Giri, A. (2002). The calling of a creative transdisciplinarity. Futures,34(1), 103–115. CrossRef
Lute, M. L., Attari, S. Z., & Sherman, S. J. (2015). Don’t rush to flush. Journal of Environmental Psychology,43, 105–111. CrossRef
Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics,53(1), 5–16. CrossRef
Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science,7(3), 203–223. CrossRef
Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science,13(3), 273–294. CrossRef
National Science Board. (2016). Chapter 7, Science and technology: Public attitudes and public understanding. Science and Engineering Indicators. Retrieved from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/#/.
Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-Analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior,44(2), 257–299. CrossRef
Pirages, D. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Ark II: social response to environmental imperatives (p. 344). New York: Viking Press.
Schaie, K. (1988). The impact of research methodology on theory building in the developmental sciences. In J. E. Birren & V. L. Bengtson (Eds.), Emergent theories of aging: Psychological and social perspectives on time, self and society (pp. 41–58). New York: Springer Publishing Co.
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science,18(5), 429–434. CrossRef
Schutte, A., & Jones, K. (2012). Measuring sustainability attitudes: The development of a new scale. paper presented at the annual meeting of the midwestern psychological association, Chicago, IL
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T. D., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human ecology review,6(2), 81–97.
The World Commission on Environment and Development. (1989). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Toman, M. A. (2006). The difficulty in defining sustainability. The RFF reader in environmental and resource policy (pp. 247–253). Washington: RFF Press.
Vos, R. O. (2007). Defining sustainability: A conceptual orientation. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology,82(4), 334–339. CrossRef
Whitley, C. T., Takahashi, B., Zwickle, A., Besley, J. C., & Lertpratchya, A. P. (2016). Sustainability behaviors among college students: An application of the VBN theory. Environmental Education Research, 1–18.
Zwickle, A., Koontz, T., Slagle, K., & Bruskotter, J. (2014). Assessing sustainability knowledge of a student population. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education,15(4), 375–389. CrossRef
- Sustainability Knowledge and Attitudes—Assessing Latent Constructs
Fallstudie Überschwemmungskarten/© Thaut Images | Fotolia