Skip to main content

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Sustainable Operations Management (SOM) Strategy and Management: An Introduction to Part I

verfasst von : Poul Houman Andersen

Erschienen in: Operations Management and Sustainability

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Sustainable operations management (SOM) and strategy concerns the procedures, processes, practices and systems through which firms—individually or organized in wider inter-organizational structures—initiate, create and deliver outputs that are both profitable from a business perspective, using the resources at their disposal while at the same time taking preservation or even improvement of the natural and/or social environment into account. This builds on the recognition, that companies must also take sustainability issues into account in order to ensure long-term success and survival (Hart, 2005; Starik, Kanashiro, & Collins, 2017). Thus, in a sustainable business context, strategy and management research builds on more general insights from these disciplines but seeks to apply it in the context of sustainability. Sustainable operations provide an interesting context for exploring further the nature of strategizing. However, concepts and insights emanating from a sustainability focus may also provide important insights to the strategy and management disciplines. Research on the triple bottom line is an influential point of reference for strategizers as well as for strategic research linking to the SOM agenda (Lee, 2004). Another important conversation relates to the crucial link between research on strategic innovation and blueprinting sustainable operation systems with a strategic impact on company identity and operations. Research on strategic innovation and disruption may find disruptive operations management designs not only useful as research areas but they also have the potential to provide insights that fundamentally challenge existing conceptualizations. Understanding the meaning of market disruption as opposed to market discovery, discussed among entrepreneurs and new business venturists, are anchor points.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Agi, M. A., & Nishant, R. (2017). Understanding influential factors on implementing green supply chain management practices: An interpretive structural modelling analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 351–363. Agi, M. A., & Nishant, R. (2017). Understanding influential factors on implementing green supply chain management practices: An interpretive structural modelling analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 351–363.
Zurück zum Zitat Amini, M., & Bienstock, C. C. (2014). Corporate sustainability: An integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 12–19. Amini, M., & Bienstock, C. C. (2014). Corporate sustainability: An integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 12–19.
Zurück zum Zitat Angwin, D. N., Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Regner, P., & Scholes, K. (2017). Exploring strategy. Harlow: Pearson. Angwin, D. N., Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Regner, P., & Scholes, K. (2017). Exploring strategy. Harlow: Pearson.
Zurück zum Zitat Ansoff, H. I. (1980). Strategic issue management. Strategic Management Journal, 1(2), 131–148.CrossRef Ansoff, H. I. (1980). Strategic issue management. Strategic Management Journal, 1(2), 131–148.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.CrossRef Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRef Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barney, J. B. (1986). Types of competition and the theory of strategy: Toward an integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 791–800.CrossRef Barney, J. B. (1986). Types of competition and the theory of strategy: Toward an integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 791–800.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(4), 372–387.CrossRef Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(4), 372–387.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Braungarth, M., & McDonough, W. (2009). Cradle to cradle – Remaking the way in which we make things. London: Vintage Books. Braungarth, M., & McDonough, W. (2009). Cradle to cradle – Remaking the way in which we make things. London: Vintage Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490–506.CrossRef Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490–506.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dutton, J. E., & Ottensmeyer, E. (1987). Strategic issue management systems: Forms, functions, and contexts. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 355–365.CrossRef Dutton, J. E., & Ottensmeyer, E. (1987). Strategic issue management systems: Forms, functions, and contexts. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 355–365.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.CrossRef Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Esty, D. C., & Winston, A. S. (2006). Green to gold: How smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value and build competitive advantage. New Haven: Yale University Press. Esty, D. C., & Winston, A. S. (2006). Green to gold: How smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value and build competitive advantage. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.CrossRef Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487.CrossRef Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, T., & Scheermesser, M. (2006). Approaches to corporate sustainability among German companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(3), 150–165.CrossRef Hahn, T., & Scheermesser, M. (2006). Approaches to corporate sustainability among German companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(3), 150–165.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hamel, G., & Ruben, P. (2000). Leading the revolution (Vol. 286). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Hamel, G., & Ruben, P. (2000). Leading the revolution (Vol. 286). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479.CrossRef Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, S. L. (2015). Innovation, creative destruction and sustainability. Research-Technology Management, 48(5), 21–27.CrossRef Hart, S. L. (2015). Innovation, creative destruction and sustainability. Research-Technology Management, 48(5), 21–27.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. The Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–67. Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. The Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–67.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482–492. Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482–492.
Zurück zum Zitat Knoppen, D., & Sáenz, M. J. (2015). Purchasing: Can we bridge the gap between strategy and daily reality? Business Horizons, 58(1), 123–133. Knoppen, D., & Sáenz, M. J. (2015). Purchasing: Can we bridge the gap between strategy and daily reality? Business Horizons, 58(1), 123–133.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, H. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102–112. Lee, H. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102–112.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathews, J. A. (2014). Greening of capitalism: How Asia is driving the next great transformation. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. Mathews, J. A. (2014). Greening of capitalism: How Asia is driving the next great transformation. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nill, J., & Kemp, R. (2009). Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? Research Policy, 38(4), 668–680.CrossRef Nill, J., & Kemp, R. (2009). Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? Research Policy, 38(4), 668–680.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 96. Porter, M. E. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 96.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 2. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 2.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–124. Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–124.
Zurück zum Zitat Savitz, A. W., & Weber, K. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success – And how you can too. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Savitz, A. W., & Weber, K. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success – And how you can too. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrivastava, P., & Hart, S. (1995). Creating sustainable corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 4(3), 154–165.CrossRef Shrivastava, P., & Hart, S. (1995). Creating sustainable corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 4(3), 154–165.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Starik, M., Kanashiro, P., & Collins, E. (2017). Sustainability management textbooks: Potentially necessary, but probably not sufficient. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(3), 500–503.CrossRef Starik, M., Kanashiro, P., & Collins, E. (2017). Sustainability management textbooks: Potentially necessary, but probably not sufficient. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(3), 500–503.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.CrossRef Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Sustainable Operations Management (SOM) Strategy and Management: An Introduction to Part I
verfasst von
Poul Houman Andersen
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93212-5_2