Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Hidden Side of Co-Creation in a Complex Multi-Stakeholder Environment: When Self-Organization Fails and Emergence Overtakes Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Systemic Evaluation Approach to Meet the Challenges of Complexity

verfasst von : Mika Nieminen, Kirsi Hyytinen, Vesa Salminen, Sampsa Ruutu

Erschienen in: Society as an Interaction Space

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Traditional linear evaluation approaches are not able to address the dynamic interrelationships and feedback mechanisms involved in the increasingly complex social environment. To meet the challenges of complexity, new evaluation approaches are required. This chapter contributes to this discussion by suggesting a new integrative evaluation approach which combines foresight, multi-criteria evaluation and system dynamic modelling into the evaluation process. The developed methodology is applied in the evaluation of the Finnish Innovation Fund, Sitra.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Mission-Oriented Public Policy and the New Evaluation Culture
Nächstes Kapitel Participative Policymaking in Complex Welfare System: A Delphi Study
Fußnoten
3
Sitra law (only in Finnish) Laki Suomen itsenäisyyden juhlarahastosta. 24.8.1990/717 http://​www.​finlex.​fi/​fi/​laki/​ajantasa/​1990/​19900717
 
5
The more detailed results are published in the evaluation report (executive summary is available in English; the whole report is available only in Finnish) and publicly available at https://​media.​sitra.​fi/​2017/​11/​29120141/​Selvityksia127.​pdf.
 
6
Before formulating the comprehensive system dynamic model, two narrower models were created to describe the dynamics of the two selected case areas. These models helped to create the comprehensive model.
 
Literatur
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2013). Innovation ecosystems. In M. Dodgson, D. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation management (pp. 204–288). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cabrera, D., Colosi, L., & Lobdell, C. (2008). Systems thinking. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31, 299–310.CrossRef
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. I). Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell.
Chen, H. T. (2005). Theory driven evaluation. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation (pp. 415–419). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cozzens, S., & Melkers, J. (1997). Use and usefulness of performance measurement in state science and technology programs. Policy Studies Journal, 25(3), 425–435.CrossRef
Denzin, N. (2006). Sociological methods: A sourcebook (5th ed.). Piscataway: Aldine Transaction.
Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2013). The productivity challenge in services: Measurement and strategic perspectives. The Service Industries Journal, 33(3–4), 282–299.CrossRef
Dyehouse, M., Bennett, D., Harbor, J., Childress, A., & Dark, M. (2009). A comparison of linear and systems thinking approaches for program evaluation illustrated using Indiana Interdisciplinary GK-12. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 187–196.CrossRef
Edquist, C. (2005). Reflections on the systems of innovation approach. Science and Public Policy, 31(6), 485–489.CrossRef
Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (2004). System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Eoyang, G., & Holladay, R. (2013). Adaptive action: Leveraging uncertainty in your organization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Forrester, J. W. (2007). System dynamics—The next fifty years. System Dynamics Review, 23(2/3), 359–370.CrossRef
Forss, K., Marra, M., & Schwartz, R. (2011). Evaluating the complex: Attribution, contribution, and beyond. London: Transaction Publishers.
Freeman, C., & Louca, F. (2002). As time goes by: From the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Funnel, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.CrossRef
Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33, 897–920.CrossRef
Geels, F. W. (2005). System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, evidence and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Geels, F. W., & Kemp, R. (2007). Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29(4), 441–455.CrossRef
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.CrossRef
Hansson, F. (2006). Organisational use of evaluation. Evaluation, 12(2), 159–178.CrossRef
Hargreaves, M. B., & Podems, D. (2012). Advancing systems thinking in evaluation: A review of four publications. American Journal of Evaluation, 33, 462–470.CrossRef
Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. New York: Basic Books.
Hyytinen, K., Ruutu, S., Nieminen, M., Gallouj, F., & Toivonen, M. (2014). A system dynamic and multi-criteria evaluation of innovations in environmental services. Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment, 3, 29–52.
Kemp, R., Rip, A., & Schot, J. (2001). Constructing transition paths through the management of niche. In R. Garud & P. Karnoe (Eds.), Path dependency and creation (pp. 269–299). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kemp, R., & Rotmans, J. (2004). Managing the transition to sustainable mobility. In B. Elzen, F. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 137–167). Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.
Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation. The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–195.CrossRef
Kivisaari, S., Lovio, R., & Väyrynen, E. (2004). Managing experiments for transition: Examples of societal embedding in energy and health care sectors. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 223–250). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Martin, B. R. (2010). The origins of the concept of ‘foresight’ in science and technology: An insider’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 1438–1447.CrossRef
Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1989). Research foresight: Priority-setting in science. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.
Mayne, J. (2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18, 270–280.CrossRef
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems. A primer. Chelsea Green, White River Junction.
Merril, J. A., Deegan, M., Wilson, R., Kaushal, R., & Frederiks, K. (2013). A system dynamics evaluation model: Implementation of health information exchange for public health reporting. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20, 131–138.CrossRef
Miles, I. (2013). Interactive impacts—Foresight as a product, service and coproduction process. In D. Dirk Meissner, L. Gokhberg, & A. Sokolov (Eds.), Technology and innovation policy for the future: Potentials and limits of foresight studies (pp. 63–82). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Mitleton-Kelly, E. (Ed.). (2007). Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organizations. The application of complexity theory to organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Nieminen, M., & Hyytinen, K. (2015). Future-oriented impact assessment: Supporting strategic decision-making in complex socio-technical environments. Evaluation, 21(4), 448–461.CrossRef
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford.
Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. J. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change: Vol. 2. Resources and technology (pp. 327–399). Battelle Press: Columbus.
Rip, A. (2003). Societal challenges for R&D evaluation. In P. Shapira & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), Learning from science and technology policy evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe (pp. 35–59). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Ritala, P., Armila, L., & Blomqvist, K.-M. (2009). Innovation orchestration capability—Defining the organizational and individual level determinants. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 569–591.CrossRef
Rittel, H., & Webber Melvin, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRef
Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2009). Complexity and transition management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2), 184–196.CrossRef
Sterman, J. D. (2001). System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review, 43(4), 8–25.CrossRef
Tait, J., & Williams, R. (1999). Policy approaches to research and development: foresight, framework and competitiveness. Science and Public Policy, 26(2), 101–112.CrossRef
van der Knaap, P. (2006). Performance evaluation and performance management. Overcoming the downsides of policy objectives and performance indicators. Evaluation, 12(3), 278–293.CrossRef
Williams, B., & Hummelbrunner, R. (2011). Systems concepts in action. A practitioner’s Toolkit. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Williams, B., & Imam, I. (Eds.). (2007). Systems concepts in evaluation: An expert anthology. Point Reyes: Edge Press of Inverness.
Windrum, P., & García-Goñi, M. (2008). A neo-Schumpeterian model of health services innovation. Research Policy, 37(4), 649–672.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Systemic Evaluation Approach to Meet the Challenges of Complexity
verfasst von
Mika Nieminen
Kirsi Hyytinen
Vesa Salminen
Sampsa Ruutu
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Buch
Society as an Interaction Space

Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0068-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-0069-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0069-5_5