Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Rethinking Criminal Justice in Cyberspace: The EU E-evidence Framework as a New Model of Cross-Border Cooperation in Criminal Matters Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Tackling Teen Sexting—Policing Challenges When Society and Technology Outpace Legislation

verfasst von : Emma Bond, Andy Phippen

Erschienen in: Policing in the Era of AI and Smart Societies

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Concerns over cyberattacks, identify theft, ransomware and online fraud dominate the language of cybercrime and attract considerable public and political attention. Yet within the discourses of online risk, fears surrounding children and young people online remain at the forefront of media and policy debate. In modern society children have become the object of social concern and increasing anxiety about risk, superimposed on protective discourses, located as vulnerable innocents and sexting has attracted considerable attention as a moral panic. Drawing on data from police forces across the UK, this chapter outlines the ad hoc nature of police responses to the complex challenges of the production and sharing of intimate images by young people and it both raises concerns about the inconsistent application of legislation resulting in the criminalisation of minors who may be victims of abuse, and questions effective use of Outcome 21 as an alternative to arrest for young people in the UK since its introduction in 2016.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Algorithms Can Predict Domestic Abuse, But Should We Let Them?
Nächstes Kapitel Image Recognition in Child Sexual Exploitation Material—Capabilities, Ethics and Rights
Fußnoten
1
Marie Collins Foundation is a charitable, UK based organisation who work with children, their families and wider stakeholders to raise awareness of and effectively respond to online child sexual abuse https://​www.​mariecollinsfoun​dation.​org.​uk/​mcf/​what-we-do.
 
2
The processing of the request would be too time consuming or costly to the organisation to fall under the expectations of the act.
 
Literatur
1.
Ahern NR, Mechling B (2013) Sexting: serious problems for youth. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 51(7):22–30
2.
Albury K, Crawford K (2012) Sexting, consent and young people’s ethics: beyond Megan’s story. Cont J Media Cult Studies 26(3):463, 473
3.
Albury K, Crawford K, Bryon P, Mathews B (2013) Young people and sexting in Australia: ethics, representation and the law. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
4.
Beck U (1992) Risk society towards a new modernity. Sage, London
5.
Bond E (2010) The mobile phone = bike shed? Children, sex and mobile phones. New Media Soc 13(4):587–604
6.
Bond E (2010b) Managing mobile relationships—children’s perceptions of the impact of the mobile phone on relationships in their everyday lives. Childhood 17(4):514–529
7.
Bond E (2013) Mobile phones, risk and responsibility: understanding children’s perceptions. CyberPsychol J Psychosoc Res Cyberspace 7(1)
8.
Bond E (2014) Mobile technologies, everyday experiences and children’s everyday lives. Palgrave, Basingstoke
9.
10.
11.
12.
Cohen S (1972) Folk devils and moral panics. MacGibbon and Kee, London
13.
14.
15.
Gidden A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press
16.
Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press, Cambridge
17.
18.
Hales G (2018) ‘Sexting’ Surge or a conceptual muddle? The challenges of analogue Law and Ambiguous Crime Recording. Police Foundation, Washington, DC
19.
Harden J (2000) There’s no place like home: the public/private distinction in children’s theorizing of risk and safety. Childhood 7(1):43–59
20.
Hasinoff AA (2012) Sexting as media production: rethinking social media and sexuality. New Media Soc 14(4):449–465
21.
Heins M (2001) Criminalizing online speech to “protect” the young: what are the benefits and costs? In: Wall DS (ed) Crime and the Internet. Routledge, London, pp 100–112
22.
Henry N, Powell A (2015) Beyond the “sext”: technology-facilitated sexual violence and harassment against adult women. Australian New Zealand J Criminol 48(1):104–118
23.
Hutchby I (2001) Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35(2):441–456CrossRef
24.
James A, Jenks C, Prout A (2010) Theorizing childhood. Polity Press, Cambridge
25.
26.
Jorge, A. (2014) Sexual content and communication. In: Smahel D, Wright MF (eds) Meaning of online problematic situations for children: results of qualitative cross-cultural investigation in nine European countries. EU Kids Online, London
27.
28.
Karaian L (2014) Policing “sexting”: responsibilization, respectability and sexual subjectivity in child protection/crime prevention responses to teenagers’ digital sexual expression. Theoret Criminol 18(3):282–299
29.
Karaian L, Van Meyl K (2015) Reframing risqué/risky: queer temporalities, teenage sexting, and freedom of expression. Laws 4(1):18–36
30.
Kim E, Lee JA, Sung Y, Choi SM (2016) Predicting selfie-posting behaviour on social networking sites: an extension of theory of planned behaviour. Comput Hum Behav 62:116–123
31.
Klettke B, Hallford DJ, Mellor DJ (2014) Sexting prevalence and correlates: a systematic literature review. Clin Psychol Rev 34(1):44–53CrossRef
32.
Lee M, Crofts T (2015) Gender, pressure, coercion and pleasure: untangling motivations for sexting between young people. Br J Criminol 55:454–473
33.
Lenhart A (2009) Teens and sexting. Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC
34.
Ling R (2012) Taken for grantedness: the embedding of mobile communication in society. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRef
35.
Lippman JR, Campbell SW (2014) Damned if you do, damned if you don’t if you’re a girl: relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States. J Child. Media 8(4):371–386
36.
Livingstone S, Haddon L, Görzig A, Ólafsson K (2011) Risks and safety on the Internet: the perspective of European children. Full findings. London, UK: EU Kids Online, LSE
37.
Maus M (2002) The gift. Routledge, Abingdon
38.
McGovern A, Crofts T, Lee M, Milivojevic S (2016) Media, legal and young people’s discourses around sexting. Glob Studies Child 6(4):428–441CrossRef
39.
Mulholland M (2013) Young people and pornography: negotiating pornification. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRef
40.
O’Connell R (2003) A typology of child cybersexploitation and online grooming practices. Cyberspace Research Unit, Preston
41.
Phippen A, Phippen (2018) The UK government internet safety strategy—time to listen to the youth voice? Entertain Law Rev (6)
42.
43.
Phippen A, Bond E (2019) The online harms spearmint paper—just more doing more?’ Entertain Law Rev (6)
44.
Phippen A (2016) Children’s online behaviour and safety: policy and rights challenges. Palgrave, Basingstoke
45.
46.
Renold E, Egan RD, Ringrose J (2015) Introduction. In: Renold E, Ringrose J, Egan RD (eds) Children, sexuality and sexualization. Basingstoke, Palgrave, pp 1–22CrossRef
47.
Ringrose J, Gill R, Livingstone S, Harvey L (2012) A qualitative study of children, young people and “sexting”: a report prepared for the NSPCC
48.
Roche J (1999) Children: rights, participation and citizenship. Childhood 6(4):475–493
49.
Scott S, Jackson S, Backett-Milburn K (1998) Swings and roundabouts: risk anxiety and the everyday world of children. Sociology 32(4):689–705
50.
Spooner K, Vaughn M (2014) Youth sexting: a legislative and constitutional analysis. J School Violence 15(2):213–233
51.
Stroud SR (2014) The dark side of the online self: a pragmatist critique of the growing plague of revenge porn. J. Mass Media Ethics 29(3):168–183
52.
Temple JR, Choi H (2014) Longitudinal association between teen sexting and sexual behaviour. Pediatr Off J Am Acad Pediatr 134(5):1–6
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
Weisskirch RS, Delevi R (2011) “Sexting” and adult romantic attachment. Comput Hum Behav 27(5):1697–1701CrossRef
62.
Willard NE (2010) Sexting and youth: achieving a rational response. J Soc Sci 6(4):542–562
63.
Winter K, Connolly P (1996) “Keeping it in the family”: Thatcherism and the Children Act 1989. In: Pilcher J, Wagg S (eds) Thatcher’s children? Politics, childhood and society in the 1980s and 1990s. Falmer Press, London, pp 29–42
64.
Wolak J, Finkelhor D, Mitchell K (2012) How often are teens arrested for sexting? Data from a national sample of police cases. Pediatrics 129(1):4–12CrossRef
65.
Yar M (2006) Cybercrime and society. Sage, London
Metadaten
Titel
Tackling Teen Sexting—Policing Challenges When Society and Technology Outpace Legislation
verfasst von
Emma Bond
Andy Phippen
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Policing in the Era of AI and Smart Societies

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50612-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-50613-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50613-1_7