Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability
Erschienen in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 2/2016

24.05.2016

Teacher evaluation—accountability and improving teaching practices

verfasst von: Stephan Gerhard Huber, Guri Skedsmo

Erschienen in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

Since the turn of the century, teacher evaluation1 has been put forward as an important strategy to serve both accountability and school improvement purposes, particularly in countries such as England and the USA, as well as elsewhere. Out of 28 countries surveyed in the OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes (2013), 22 reported having national- or state-level policy frameworks for teacher evaluation. In the six remaining countries, practices to provide feedback on teachers’ work are designed and implemented locally. …
Nächster Artikel Unpacking the data: an analysis of the use of Danielson’s (2007) Framework for Professional Practice in a teaching residency program

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
The term ‘teacher evaluation’ is here used synonymously with ‘teacher assessment’.
 
Literatur
Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P. & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers Investigate their Work. An introduction to action research across the professions. London & New York: Routledge.
Bollington, R., Hopkins, D., & West, M. (1991). An introduction to teacher appraisal. New York: Cassell.
Creemers, B., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: a contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. New York: Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., & Rothstein, J. (2012). Evaluating teacher evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 8–15.CrossRef
Gunter, H. M. (2002). Teacher appraisal 1988–1998: a case study. School Leadership and Management, 22(1), 61–72.CrossRef
Gunter, H. M., Grimaldi, E., Hall, D., & Serpieri, R. (2016). NPM and educational reform in Europe. In H. M. Gunter, E. Grimaldi, D. Hall, & R. Serpieri (Eds.), New public management and the reform of education. European lessons for policy and practice. London: Routledge.
Hallinger, P., Heck, R., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: an analysis of the evidence. Journal of Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5–28.CrossRef
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Huber, S. G. (1996). Dovetailing school effectiveness and school improvement. Cambridge: Department of Education, University of Cambridge.
Huber, S. G. (1999a). School effectiveness: was macht Schule wirksam? Internationale Schulentwicklungsforschung (I). Schul-Management, 2, 10–17.
Huber, S. G. (1999b). School improvement: Wie kann Schule verbessert werden? Internationale Schulentwicklungsforschung (II). Schul-Management, 3, 7–18.
Huber, S. G. (1999c). Effectiveness & improvement: wirksamkeit und verbesserung von schule - eine zusammenschau. Triologie Internationaler Schulentwicklungsforschung Schul-Management, 2.
Huber, S. G. (2011). The impact of professional development: a theoretical model for empirical research, evaluation, planning and conducting training and development programmes. Professional Development in Education, 37(5), 837–853.CrossRef
Kimball, S. M., & Milanowski, A. T. (2009). Examining teacher evaluation validity and leadership decision making within a standards-based evaluation system. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(1), 34–70.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Lockwood, J. R., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B., Le, V., & Martinez, J. F. (2007). The sensitivity of value-added teacher effect estimates to different mathematics achievement measures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(1), 47–67.CrossRef
Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2013). Leading via teacher evaluation: the case of the missing clothes? Educational Researcher, 42(6), 349–354.CrossRef
OECD (2013). Teachers for the 21st century. Using evaluation to improve teaching. Paris.
Papay, J. P. (2012). Refocusing the debate: assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 123–141.CrossRef
Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., & Schaffer, G. (2002). World class schools: international perspectives on school effectiveness. London: Routlege Falmer.CrossRef
Scheerens, J., Luyten, H., Steen, R., & Luyten-de Thouars, Y. (2007). Review and meta-analyses of school and teaching effectiveness. Enschede: Department of Educational Organisation and Management, University of Twente.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Schön, D. (1984). Leadership as reflection-in-action. In T. Sergiovanni & J. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture (pp. 36–63). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Webb, P. T. (2006). The choreography of accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 201–214.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Teacher evaluation—accountability and improving teaching practices
verfasst von
Stephan Gerhard Huber
Guri Skedsmo
Publikationsdatum
24.05.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1874-8597
Elektronische ISSN: 1874-8600
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9241-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Chinese middle school teachers’ preferences regarding performance evaluation measures

OriginalPaper

Validating “value added” in the primary grades: one district’s attempts to increase fairness and inclusivity in its teacher evaluation system

OriginalPaper

Unpacking the data: an analysis of the use of Danielson’s (2007) Framework for Professional Practice in a teaching residency program

OriginalPaper

Teachers’ perceptions of effective teaching: a comparative study of elementary school teachers from China and the USA