nach oben

Learning Environments Research

Erschienen in:

01.04.2015 | Original Paper

Teachers’ perceptions of effective school-wide programs and strategies for English language learners

verfasst von: Kip Téllez, George Manthey

Erschienen in: Learning Environments Research | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Data suggest that teachers lack confidence in teaching English language learners (ELLs). Teachers’ perceived shortcomings have been identified but little is known about why these perceptions exist or how they might be associated with broader measures of efficacy. We surveyed 578 Californian teachers of ELLs to explore the relations among teachers’ perceptions of ELL strategies and school programs, teachers’ ratings of collective efficacy in meeting all students’ needs, and the general school climate. Descriptive data and two multiple regression analyses suggest two primary findings: teachers’ perceived collective efficacy for English language development (ELD) instruction was higher than their individual efficacy (relative to previous studies), and measures of general school-wide collective efficacy when associated with perceived strength of ELD practices and programs. These results suggest that school-wide reforms designed to improve ELL instruction might yield greater collective efficacy. Policies that could enhance teachers’ perceived ELD efficacy are discussed.

Vorheriger Artikel Associations between psychosocial aspects of English classroom environments and motivation types of Chinese tertiary-level English majors

Nächster Artikel Architecture students’ perceptions of their learning environment and their academic performance

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Goddard (2001) and Ross et al. (2004) demonstrated that prior student achievement can predict collective efficacy. Goddard found that two-thirds of the variation in collective efficacy could be explained by reading test scores. Ross et al. (2004) confirmed their hypothesis “that scores from a mandated assessment would influence teacher perceptions of their effectiveness as a staff” (p. 177).

The minimum school return rate for inclusion in the study was 25 %. The mean return rate was 75 %.

Fifty-one percent of students at reporting schools qualified for free or reduced-price lunch. This figure matches closely the overall SES level of elementary schools in the state (54 % free or reduced-price lunch). The mean enrollment figure for participating schools was 595, slightly larger than the statewide average of 506 (California Department of Education 2013).

We chose a 10 % cutoff because it reflected a number of ELLs in a classroom that probably would have an impact on a teacher’s instruction. With an average of 25 students in Californian elementary school classrooms, 10 % of ELLs per classroom would translate to approximately two ELLs per class. Teachers with fewer than two ELLs in their class, we argue, probably would not be required to alter their overall instruction to accommodate ELLs. We recognise there is no set percentage of ELLs per class that would cause a teacher to reorient instruction. We acknowledge our cutoff is somewhat arbitrary but our direct experience in working with hundreds of teachers to enhance their ELD instruction suggests that one or two ELLs in a classroom does not typically have an impact on whole-class instruction.

We did not solicit other identifying demographic information on the premise that we agreed to share our data with school principals, which, especially in smaller schools, could identify which teachers completed the survey.

Because this study provided the first time when this survey was used in a research setting, we conducted a factor analysis for these items comprising the Culture, Focus and Affirmation subscales. Results from an unrotated, principal components analysis revealed three factors that accounted for 69 % of the variance. The first factor extracted in the model was clearly the most efficacious, accounting for 52 % of the variance. The Focus subscale was most associated with the first factor with item loadings all over 0.69. The second factor accounted for the Culture subscale (loadings all over 0.55). The Affirmation subscale was associated with the third and final factor with each item loading over 0.49. Readers interested in a full component matrix can e-mail the lead author.

Likert scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Agree, and 4 = Strongly Agree.

We did not ask teachers to rate their own skill as ELD teachers. After much consideration, we decided that the question simply was out of place within the overall survey. Furthermore, the teachers would logically include their own teaching in a school-wide rating; therefore, an assessment of the school would include an assessment of their individual skills.

Each of these variables was measured with a single question, a strategy in contrast to the measurement of other constructs in the study. In measuring collective efficacy and school climate variables, we attempted to assess a latent variable—a construct, in other words—that required several questions. The questions regarding ELD effectiveness were straightforward questions about teaching practice. Perhaps we would have gained more detail with additional questions, but we had to keep the survey short enough to be completed during an otherwise busy staff meeting. Finally, these single items are similar to those used by other researchers when studying the confidence of teachers regarding their ELLs (Alexander et al. 1999; Gándara et al. 2005).

A random sample of teachers across all schools was selected for interviews. This sample offered a good representative subset of the overall teachers in our study, with a mean class EL of 42 % (compared to the overall figure of 46 %).

Alexander, D., Heaviside, S., Farris, E., & Burns, S. (1999). Status of education reform in public elementary and secondary schools: Teachers’ perspectives. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Ancess, J. (2003). Beating the odds: High schools as communities of commitment. New York: Teachers College Press.

Aud, S., Fox, M. A., & KewalRamani, A. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups (NCES No. 2010015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00064.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.CrossRef

Brookover, W. B., Schweitzer, J. H., Schneider, J. M., Beady, C. H., Flood, P. K., & Wisenbaker, J. M. (1978). Elementary school social climate and school achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 301–318. doi:10.3102/00028312015002301.CrossRef

California Department of Education. (2013). CalWORKS data files (2003 and prior). Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sh/cw/filesafdc.asp

Counts, G. S. (2010). The selective character of American secondary education. Charleston, SC: BiblioLife. (Original work published in 1922).

Croninger, R. G., Rice, J. K., Rathbun, A., & Nishio, M. (2007). Teacher qualifications and early learning: Effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 26, 312–324. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.05.008.CrossRef

Driscoll, D. L., Appiah-Yeboah, A., Salib, P., & Rupert, D. J. (2007). Merging qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research: How to and why not. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 3, 19–28. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmeea/18/

Flinders, D. J. (1988). Teacher isolation and the new reform. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(1), 17–29. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/jcs/

Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences (pp. 3–28). London: Pergamon Press.

Gándara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Driscoll, A. (2005). Listening to teachers of English language learners: A survey of California teachers. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.

Gibson, C. B. (2001). Me and us: Differential relationships among goal-setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 789–808. doi:10.1002/job.114.CrossRef

Goddard, R. D. (2001). Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 467–476. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.467.CrossRef

Goddard, R. D. (2002). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the measurement of collective efficacy: The development of a short form. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 97–110. doi:10.1177/0013164402062001007.CrossRef

Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 479–507. doi:10.3102/00028312037002479.CrossRef

Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X033003003.CrossRef

Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. Elementary School Journal, 102, 3–17. doi:10.1086/499690.CrossRef

Guo, Y., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Relations among preschool teachers’ self-efficacy, classroom quality, and children’s language and literacy gains. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1094–1103. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.005.CrossRef

Hart, J. E., & Lee, O. (2003). Teacher professional development to improve the science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 475–501. doi:10.1080/15235882.2003.10162604.CrossRef

Hemphill, F.C., & Vanneman, A. (2011). Achievement gaps: How hispanic and white students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the national assessment of educational progress (NCES 2011-459). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.

Hoy, W. K., Sweetland, S. R., & Smith, P. A. (2002). Toward an organizational model of achievement in high schools: The significance of collective efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 77–93. doi:10.1177/0013161X02381004.CrossRef

Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184–208. Retrieved from EBSCOhost database.

Kurz, T. B., & Knight, S. L. (2004). An exploration of the relationship among teacher efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and goal consensus. Learning Environments Research, 7, 111–128. doi:10.1023/B:LERI.0000037198.37750.0e.CrossRef

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Lieberman, A., & Wood, D. R. (2003). Inside the National Writing Project: Connecting network learning and classroom teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

López, G. R., Scribner, J. D., & Mahitivanichcha, K. (2001). Redefining parental involvement: Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 253–288. doi:10.3102/00028312038002253.CrossRef

Maden, M. (Ed.). (2001). Success against the odds—Five years on: Revisiting effective schools in damaged areas. London: Routledge/Falmer.

Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Minicucci, C., Berman, P., McLaughlin, B., McLeod, B., Nelson, B., & Woodworth, K. (1995). School reform and student diversity. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(1), 77–80. Retrieved from http://www.kappanmagazine.org

Miramontes, O. B., Nadeau, A., & Commins, N. L. (1997). Restructuring schools for linguistic diversity: Linking decision making to effective programs. New York: Teachers College Press.

Mora, J. K. (2000). Policy shifts in language-minority education: A mismatch between politics and pedagogy. The Educational Forum, 64, 204–214. doi:10.1080/00131720008984756.CrossRef

Parrish, T., Merickel, A., Pérez, M., Linquanti, R., Socias, M., Spain, A., & Delancey, D. (2006). Effects of the implementation of Proposition 227 on the education of English learners, K-12: Findings from a five-year evaluation. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 61–94. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0201_2.CrossRef

Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Gray, P. (2004). Prior student achievement, collaborative school processes, and collective teacher efficacy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3, 163–188. doi:10.1080/15700760490503689.CrossRef

Rumberger, R. W., & Gándara, P. (2004). Seeking equity in the education of California’s English learners. Teachers College Record, 106, 2032–2056. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/

Talbert, J. E. (2009). Professional learning communities at the crossroads: How systems hinder or engender change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (Vol. 23, pp. 555–571). Dordrecht: Springer.

Téllez, K. (2004). Preparing teachers for Latino children and youth: Policies and practice. The High School Journal, 88(2), 43–54.CrossRef

Téllez, K. (2010). Teaching English learners: Foster language and the democratic experience. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

Téllez, K., & Waxman, H. (2006). Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policy, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.CrossRef

Washburn, T. E. (2006). Teachers’ collective efficacy beliefs and student achievement in Virginia elementary schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.openthesis.org/documents/Teachers-collective-efficacy-beliefs-student-68122.html

Waxman, H. C. (1992). Reversing the cycle of educational failure for students in at-risk school environments. In H. C. Waxman, J. W. de Felix, J. Anderson, & H. P. Baptiste Jr (Eds.), Students at risk in at-risk schools: Improving environments for learning (pp. 1–9). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

Waxman, H. C., Padrón, Y. N., & Gray, J. (Eds.). (2004). Educational resiliency: Student, teacher, and school perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

Williams, T., Hakuta, K., Haertel, E., & Levin, J. (2007). Similar English learner students, different results: Why do some schools do better? A follow-up analysis, based on a large-scale survey of California elementary schools serving low-income and EL students. Mountain View, CA: EdSource.

Titel: Teachers’ perceptions of effective school-wide programs and strategies for English language learners
verfasst von: Kip Téllez
George Manthey
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Learning Environments Research / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1387-1579
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1855
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9173-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Sex, grade-level and stream differences in learning environment and attitudes to science in Singapore primary schools

Associations between psychosocial aspects of English classroom environments and motivation types of Chinese tertiary-level English majors

Validation and application of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey in English language teacher education classrooms in Iran

SWDYT: So What Do You Think? Canadian students’ attitudes about peerScholar, an online peer-assessment tool

Architecture students’ perceptions of their learning environment and their academic performance

Effectiveness of teaching strategies for engaging adults who experienced childhood difficulties in learning mathematics