nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

01.12.2015

Teachers’ professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice

verfasst von: Peter R. Albion, Jo Tondeur, Alona Forkosh-Baruch, Jef Peeraer

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Teachers in the 21st century are facing new challenges as a result of the expanding possibilities of ICT integration in every aspect of the school milieu. Studies have shown the potential of teacher professional development (TPD) that is tailored to local conditions as well as global components and takes advantage of mutual support among teachers, as well as modeling of effective practices. The goal of the paper is to consider the issue of TPD with reference to the usage of ICT as a lever for educational change in a systemic manner, based on the application of local as well as international research. This paper will synthesize some key issues and challenges for TPD in the ICT-saturated 21st century, illustrated in four cases presented herein, which synthesize elements of practice and theory. Based on the literature and the four case studies, we suggest a conceptual model for identifying and evaluating TPD practices using ICT as a lever for educational change and innovation, accompanied by research aimed to develop TPD models. We include suggestions for more effectively linking research to practice and will lay out possible research directions, as a means of facilitating evidence-based decisions and policies.

Vorheriger Artikel Preparing teachers for schooling in the digital age: A meta-perspective on existing strategies and future challenges

Nächster Artikel Technology enhanced assessment in complex collaborative settings

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

AICTEC. (2009). Digital education revolution implementation roadmap. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/Documents/AICTEC_DER_ROADMAPAdvice.pdf.

Albion, P., Knezek, D., Adubra, E. (2011). Teacher professional development. Paper presented at the EDUsummIT 2011.

Albion, P., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Tondeur, J. (2013).Working Group 3: Summary Report and Action Agenda. Retrieved from http://www.edusummit.nl/resources/results-edusummit-2013/.

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research a decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.CrossRef

Barton, R., & Haydn, T. (2006). Trainee teachers’ views on what helps them to use information and communication technology effectively in their subject teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 257–272.CrossRef

Bausmith, J. M., & Barry, C. (2011). Revisiting professional learning communities to increase college readiness the importance of pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 40(4), 175–178.CrossRef

Bereiter, C. (2013). Principled practical knowledge: not a bridge but a ladder. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 4–17. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.812533.CrossRef

Campbell, R., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, R., & Robinson, W. (2003). Differential teacher effectiveness: towards a model for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), 347–62.CrossRef

Cavanagh, R. F., & Koehler, M. J. (2013). A turn toward specifying validity criteria in the measurement of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 129–148.CrossRef

Collis, B., & Jung, I. (2003). Uses of information and communication technologies in teacher education. In C. Latchem & B. Robinson (Eds.), Teacher education through open and distance learning (pp. 171–192). London: Routledge/Falmer.

Creemers, B. P. M. (2002). From school effectiveness and school improvement to effective school improvement: Background, theoretical analysis, and outline of the empirical study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8, 343–362.CrossRef

Dart, J., & Davies, R. (2003). A dialogical, story-based evaluation tool: the most significant change technique. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(2), 137–155. doi:10.1177/109821400302400202.CrossRef

DEEWR. (2010). ICT innovation fund guidelines 2010–2012. Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/DigitalStrategyforTeachers/Documents/ICTInnovationGuidelines.pdf.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: a critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.CrossRef

Finger, G., Albion, P., Jamieson-Proctor, R., Cavanagh, R., Grimbeek, P., Lloyd, M., et al. (2013). Teaching Teachers for the Future (TTF) project TPACK survey: summary of the key findings. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 13–25.

Finley, L., & Hartman, D. (2004). Institutional change and resistance: teacher preparatory faculty and technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 319–337.

Forkosh-Baruch, A., Nachmias, R., Mioduser, D., & Tubin, D. (2005). ‘Islands of Innovation’ and ‘School-Wide Implementation’: two patterns of ICT-based pedagogical innovations in schools. Human Technology, 1(2), 202–215.CrossRef

Fullan, M. (1991). The New meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Gibson, S., & Brooks, C. (2013). Rethinking 21st century professional development. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 4(2), 973–982.

Grunberg, J., & Summers, M. (1992). Computer innovation in schools: a review of selected research literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 1(2), 255–276.CrossRef

Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2002). A Top-down strategy to enhance information technologies into Israeli higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(2), 76–91.

Gutiérrez, K. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2014). Relevance to practice as a criterion for rigor. Educational Researcher, 43(1), 19–23.CrossRef

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools (pp. 1–22). Albany: SUNY Press.

Harari, H. (1992). “Tomorrow 98”. Report by the committee of science and technology education. Israel: The ministry of education. [Hebrew].

Heck, D., & Sweeney, T. (2013). Using most significant change stories to document the impact of the teaching teachers for the future project: an Australian teacher education story. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 36–47.

Hennessy, S., & London, L. (2013). Learning from International experiences with interactive whiteboards: The role of professional development in integrating the technology: OECD publishing.

Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.CrossRef

Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teaching knowledge and learning experiences in forming technologyintegrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302.

Jamieson-Proctor, R., Albion, P., Finger, G., Cavanagh, R., Fitzgerald, R., Bond, T., & Grimbeek, P. (2013). Development of the TTF TPACK survey instrument. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 26–35.

Jaros, M. (2014). Leadership and methodology challenges in higher education: integrating personaldevelopment, skills and competences in the space of digital systems. Global Journal of Information Technology, 4(1), 1–6.MathSciNet

Kalogiannakis, M. (2010). Training with ICT for ICT from the trainee’s perspective. A local ICT teacher training experience. Education and Information Technologies, 15(1), 3–17.CrossRef

Karagiorgi, Y., & Charalambous, K. (2006). ICT in-service training and school practices: in search for the impact. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 32(4), 395–411.CrossRef

Kennisnet Foundation. (2011). Four in balance monitor 2011. ICT in Dutch primary, secondary and vocational education. The Hague: Kennisnet Foundation.

Kirkup, G., & Kirkwood, A. (2005). Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching—a tale of gradualism rather than revolution. Learning Media and Technology, 30(2), 185–199.CrossRef

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740–762.CrossRef

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., Rosenberg, J. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. ICT integrated teacher education: A resource book, 2–7. Retrieved from http://cemca.org.in/resources/books.

Kozma, R. B. (2003). Global perspectives: innovative technology integration practices from around the world. Learning and Leading with Technology, 31(2), 7–54.

Kozma, R. B. (2008). Comparative analysis of policies for ICT in education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (Vol. 20, pp. 1083–1096). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Kozma, R.B., & Vota, W.S. (2014). ICT in developing countries: Policies, Implementation, and Impact. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 885–894). Springer New York.

Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 279–290.CrossRef

Latchem, C. R., & Jung, I. (2010). Distance and blended learning in Asia. New York: Routledge.

Leask, M., & Younie, S. (2013). National models for continuing professional development: the challenges of twenty-first-century knowledge management. Professional Development in Education, 39(2), 273–287. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.749801.CrossRef

Lee, Y.-J., Hung, D., & Cheah, H.-M. (2008). IT and educational policy in the Asia-pacific region. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (Vol. 20, pp. 1119–1132). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Li, S. C., & Choi, T. H. (2014). Does social capital matter? A quantitative approach to examining technology infusion in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/jcal.12010.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Lim, C. P., Chai, C. S., & Churchill, D. (2011). A framework for developing pre-service teachers’ competencies in using technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Educational Media International, 48(2), 69–83.CrossRef

Lim, C. P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Bridging the gap: technology trends and use of technology in schools. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 59–68.

Mandinach, B. E. (2005). The development of effective evaluation methods for E-learning: a concept paper and action plan. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1814–1835.CrossRef

Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1893–1906.CrossRef

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.CrossRef

MOE Israel. (1993). Policy for action in computers in education. Israel: MOE. [Hebrew].

MOE Israel. (2011). Adapting the education system to the 21st century – master plan 2011–2012. Israel: MOE. [Hebrew].

Newman, L., & Mowbray, S. (2012). ‘We were expected to be equal’: teachers and academics sharing professional learning through practitioner inquiry. Teachers and Teaching, 18(4), 455–468. doi:10.1080/13540602.2012.696046.CrossRef

Otto, T. L., & Albion, P. R. (2002). Understanding the role of school leaders in realizing the potential of ICTs in education. In D. Willis, J. Price, & N. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education 13th international conference (pp. 506–510). Nashville: AACE.

Pearson, M., & Naylor, S. (2006). Changing contexts: teacher professional development and ICT pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 11(3–4), 283–291.CrossRef

Peeraer, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2011a). Information and communication technology in teacher education in an emerging developing country: Vietnam’s baseline situation at the start of ‘The Year of ICT’. Computers & Education, 56(4), 974–982.CrossRef

Peeraer, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2011b). Information and communication technology in teacher education in Vietnam: from policy to practice. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 1–15.

Peeraer, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). The limits of programmed professional development on integration of information and communication technology in education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28.

Prestridge, S. (2010). The alignment of digital pedagogy to current teacher beliefs. Paper presented at ACEC2010: Digital Diversity. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Computers in Education. Retrieved from http://acec2010.info/proposal/252/beliefs-behind-teacher-influences-their-ict-practices.

Reeves, T. (2011). Can Educational Research Be Both Rigorous and Relevant? Educational Designer: Journal of the International Society for Design and Development in Education, 1(4).

Reynolds, D., Teddlie, C., Hopkins, D., & Stringfield, S. (2000). Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 206–231). London: Falmer Press.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). NY: Free Press.

Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. V., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112.CrossRef

Sari, E., & Herrington, J. (2013). Using design-based research to investigate the design and development of an online community of practice for teacher professional development. In EdMedia 2013 World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Victoria, BC, Canada, 121–127.

Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRef

Surry, D. W., Ensminger, D. C., & Haab, M. (2005). A model for integrating instructional technology into higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 327–329.CrossRef

Teo, T. (2010). A path analysis of pre-service teachers’ attitudes to computer use: applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(1), 65–79.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., Hermans, R., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008a). Exploring the link between teachers’ educational belief profiles and different types of computer use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2541–2553.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., Valcke, M., & Van Braak, J. (2008b). A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 494–506.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., Cooper, M., & Newhouse, C. P. (2010). From ICT coordination to ICT integration: a longitudinal case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(4), 296–306.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., Kershaw, L. H., Vanderlinde, R. R., van Braak, J. (2013). Getting inside the black box of technology integration in education: Teachers’ stimulated recall of classroom observations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3).

Twining, P., Raffaghelli, J., Albion, P. R., & Knezek, D. (2013). Moving education into the digital age: the contribution of teachers’ professional development. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 426–437. doi:10.1111/jcal.12031.CrossRef

UNESCO. (2002). Information and communication technologies in teacher education—a planning guide. Paris: UNESCO, Division of Higher Education.

Vanderlinde, R., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Using an online tool to support school-based ICT policy planning in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 434–447.CrossRef

Vanderlinde, R., Aesaert, K., & Van Braak, J. (2014). Institutionalised ICT use in primary education: a multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 72, 1–10.CrossRef

Vrasidas, C. (2014). The rhetoric of reform and teachers’ use of ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/bjet.12149.

Wagner, D. A., Day, B., James, T., Kozma, R. B., Miller, J., & Unwin, T. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of ICT in education projects: a handbook for developing countries. Washington: infoDev, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.

Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E., & Monseur, C. (2013). The use of ICT in education: a survey of schools in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 11–27.CrossRef

Titel: Teachers’ professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice
verfasst von: Peter R. Albion
Jo Tondeur
Alona Forkosh-Baruch
Jef Peeraer
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9401-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Preparing teachers for schooling in the digital age: A meta-perspective on existing strategies and future challenges

Technology enhanced assessment in complex collaborative settings

Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice

Digital citizenship within global contexts

Digital equity and intercultural education

Research-informed strategies to address educational challenges in a digitally networked world