Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Some argue that labor is the least mobile factor of production in the real world due to legal barriers set up by sovereign states. Despite of being an integral part of globalization, immigration is viewed negatively in public opinion. Often when related issues appear in the media, they are about illegal immigrants or some other negative images such as taking jobs away, depressing wages, etc. It seems the imperfections in the labor market, such as unionization, also serve to create the negative images. For instance, it is alleged that “mass immigration helps employers and hurts workers, and unions flourish when immigration is low and they flounder when immigration is high” (Salt Lake Union Tribune, September 3, 2001). There are also cries that the AFL-CIO has abandoned American workers, because the Executive Council of the AFL-CIO in February 2000 announced a reversal in its posture, by proclaiming that it now “proudly stands on the side of immigrant workers.” While before that, the AFL-CIO had sought to protect wages of native-born workers by excluding immigrants. However, by making immigrants more vulnerable, such sanctions also helped put pressure on the wages of native-born workers. Also, in Japan while many employers hire immigrants (sometimes illegal ones), it is the local workers and the government that are against immigration.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Boeri, T., Hanson, G. H., & McCormick, B. (2002). Immigration policy and the welfare state – a report for the Fondazione Rodolfo Debenedetti. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borjas, G. J. (1999). Heaven’s door: Immigration policy and the American economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Filer, R. (1992). The effect of immigrant arrival on migratory patterns of native workers. In G. Borjas & R. Freeman (Eds.), Immigration and the work force. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Fuest, C., & Thum, M. (2000). Welfare effects of immigration in a dual labor market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30, 551–563. CrossRef
Fuest, C., & Thum, M. (2001). Immigration and skill formation in unionized labor. European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 557–573. CrossRef
Mezzetti, C., & Dinopoulos, E. (1991). Domestic unionization and import competition. Journal of International Economics, 31, 79–100. CrossRef
Schmidt, C. M., Stilz, A., & Zimmermann, K. F. (1994). Mass migration, unions, and government intervention. Journal of Public Economics, 55, 185–201. CrossRef
Zhao, L. (2001). Quantitative trade restrictions in unionized economies. Review of International Economics, 9, 81–93. CrossRef
Zhao, L., & Kondoh, K. (2007). Temporary and permanent immigration under unionization. Review of Development Economics, 11, 346–358. CrossRef
Zimmermann, K. F. (1995). Tackling the European migration problems. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 45–62. CrossRef
- Temporary and Permanent Immigration Under Unionization
- Springer Singapore
- Chapter 5
Entwicklung einer Supply-Strategie bei der Atotech Deutschland GmbH am Standort Feucht