Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Management International Review
Erschienen in: Management International Review 6/2016

02.11.2016 | Research Article

TEMPUS FUGIT: A Hermeneutic Approach to the Internationalisation Process

verfasst von: Leila Hurmerinta, Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, Mélanie E. Hassett

Erschienen in: Management International Review | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article focuses on a somewhat neglected topic in international business (IB), namely how we conceptualise time. Time is critical to many IB research areas, especially the internationalisation process. Yet the way we conceive time is all too often taken for granted, even though it has wide ramifications for the theories we develop. In this paper, we turn to the literature on the philosophy of time in order to enrich our understanding of the concept, contrasting what we term the ‘Newtonian’ and the ‘hermeneutic’ perspectives on time. We analyse the treatment of time in the two most popular internationalisation models: the I and U Models. We also offer a hermeneutic basis for understanding internationalisation processes. Our contribution lies not only in making the case as to how philosophical debates are relevant to our conceptualisation of time, but also in proposing a hermeneutical approach to theorising about internationalisation processes.
Vorheriger Artikel The Internationalization Process Model Revisited: An Agenda for Future Research
Nächster Artikel Acceleration and Deceleration in the Internationalization Process of the Firm

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Management International Review

MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW is a double-blind refereed journal that aims at the advancement and dissemination of research in the fields of International Management.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Abbott, A. (1983). Sequences of social events: concepts and methods for the causal and narrative approaches. Historical Methods, 16(4), 129–147.CrossRef
Adam, B. (1990). Time and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Andersen, O. (1993). On the internationalization process of firms: a critical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2), 209–231.CrossRef
Butler, R. (1995). Time in organizations: its experience, explanations and effects. Organization Studies, 16(6), 925–950.CrossRef
Casillas, J. C., & Acedo, F. J. (2013). Speed in the internationalization process of the firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 15–29.CrossRef
Chetty, S., Johanson, M., & Martín, O. M. (2014). Speed of internationalization: conceptualization, measurement and validation. Journal of World Business, 49(4), 633–650.CrossRef
Dalenoort, G. J. (1997). Cognitive aspects of the representation of time. In H. Atmanspacher & E. Ruhnau (Eds.), Time, temporality, now. Experiencing time and concepts of time in an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 179–188). Berlin: Springer.
Dawson, P. (1994). Organizational change: a processual approach. London: Chapman.
Dimitratos, P., & Jones, M. V. (2005). Future directions for international entrepreneurship research. International Business Review, 14(2), 119–128.CrossRef
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books (Nlb).
Figueira-de-Lemos, F., Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2011). Risk management in the internationalization process of the firm: a note to the Uppsala Model. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 143–153.CrossRef
Forsgren, M. (2002). The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: a critical review. International Business Review, 11(3), 257–277.CrossRef
Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things. An archeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.
Friedman, W. (1990). About time. Inventing the fourth dimension. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). Time of transitions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hadjikhani, A. (1997). A note on the criticisms against the internationalization process model. Management International Review, 37(2), 43–66.
Hadjikhani, A., Hadjikhani, A. I., & Thilenius, P. (2014). The internationalization process model: a proposed view of firms’ regular incremental and irregular non-incremental behavior. International Business Review, 23(1), 155–168.CrossRef
Hashai, N., & Almor, T. (2004). Gradually internationalising ‘born global’ firms: and oxymoron? International Business Review, 13(4), 465–483.CrossRef
Hassan, R., & Purser, R. E. (2007). 24/7: time and temporality in the network society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2001). Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hiley, B. J., & Fernandes, M. (1997). Process and time. In H. Atmanspacher, E. Ruhnau, & E. Ruhnau (Eds.), Time, temporality, now. experiencing time and concepts of time in an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 365–383). Berlin: Springer.
Hoy, D. C. (2009). The time of our lives. A critical history of temporality. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRef
Hurmerinta-Peltomäki, L. (2003). Time and internationalisation. Theoretical challenges set by rapid internationalisation. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 217–236.CrossRef
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.CrossRef
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreigness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.CrossRef
Jones, M. V. (1999). The internationalization of small high-technology firms. Journal of International Marketing, 7(4), 15–41.
Juhos, B. (1968). The influence of epistemological analysis on scientific research: ‘length’ and ‘time’ in the special theory of relativity. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Problems in the philosophy of science (pp. 266–277). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.CrossRef
Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141.CrossRef
Kronz, F. M. (1997). Theory and experience of time: philosophical aspects. In H. Atmanspacher & E. Ruhnau (Eds.), Time, temporality, now. experiencing time and concepts of time in an interdisciplinary perspective. 22: 7.
Lamb, P. W., & Liesch, P. W. (2002). The internationalization process of the smaller firm: re-framing the relationships between market commitment, knowledge and involvement. Management International Review, 42(1), 7–26.
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
Langley, A. (2009). Studying processes in and around organizations. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 409–429). London: SAGE Publications.
Liesch, P. W., Welch, L. S., Welch, D., Mcgaughey, S. L., Petersen, B., & Lamb, P. (2002). Evolving strands of research on firm internationalization. An Australian-Nordic perspective. International Studies of Management and Organization, 32(1), 16–35.
Lovejoy, A. O. (1961). The reason, the understanding and time. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
Maxwell, J. A., & Miller, B. A. (2008). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 461–477). New York: Guilford Press.
McDougall, P. P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. (1994). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: the limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6), 469–487.CrossRef
Meyer, K. E. (2007). Contextualising organisational learning: Lyles and Salk in the context of their research. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 27–37.CrossRef
Michailova, S. (2011). Contextualizing in international business research: why do we need more of it and how can we be better at it? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1), 129–139.CrossRef
Middleton, S., Liesch, P. W., & Steen, J. (2011). Organizing time: internationalization narratives of executive managers. International Business Review, 20(2), 136–150.CrossRef
Miettilä, A., & Törnroos, J.-Å. (1993). The meaning of time in the study of buyer-seller relationships. Publications of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Series Discussion and Working Papers 4:1993. Turku.
Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Noorderhaven, N. G., Benders, J., & Keizer, A. B. (2007). Comprehensiveness versus pragmatism: consensus at the Japanese-Dutch interface. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1349–1370.
Nummela, N., Loane, S., & Bell, J. (2006). Change in SME internationalization: an Irish perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(4), 562–583.CrossRef
Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45–64.CrossRef
Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2009). Unique paths. The international growth process of selected Finnish SMEs. Series A-17:2009. Turku: Publications of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.
Petersen, B., & Pedersen, T. (1997). Twenty years after: support and critique of the Uppsala internationalization model. In I. Björkman & M. Forsgren (Eds.), The nature of the international firm (pp. 117–134). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organizational Science, 1(3), 267–292.CrossRef
Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337–348.CrossRef
Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697–713.CrossRef
Poulis, K., Poulis, E., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2013). The role of context in case study selection: an international business perspective. International Business Review, 22(1), 304–314.CrossRef
Ragin, C. C. (1992). “Casing” and the process of social inquiry. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.), Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 217–226). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ruhnau, E. (1997). The deconstruction of time and the emergence of temporality. In H. Atmanspacher & E. Ruhnau (Eds.), Time, temporality, now. Experiencing time and concepts of time in an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 53–68). Berlin: Springer.
Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1996). Three temporalities: toward an eventful sociology. In T. J. McDonald (Ed.), The historic turn in the human sciences (pp. 245–280). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Shove, E., Trentmann, F., & Wilk, R. (2009). Time, consumption and everyday life: practice, materiality and culture. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Turnbull, P. W. (1987). A challenge to the stages theory of the internationalization process. In P. J. Rosson & S. D. Reid (Eds.), Managing export entry and expansion. Concepts and practice (pp. 21–40). New York: Praeger Publishers.
Vahlne, J.-E., & Johanson, J. (2013). The Uppsala model on evolution of the multinational business enterprise—from internationalization to coordination of networks. International Marketing Review, 30(3), 189–210.CrossRef
Welch, C., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2014). Putting process (back) in: research on the internationalization process of the firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(1), 2–23.CrossRef
Welch, C., Plakoyiannaki, E., Piekkari, R., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2013). Legitimizing diverse uses for qualitative research: a rhetorical analysis of two management journals. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 245–264.CrossRef
Welge, M. K., & Holtbrügge, D. (1999). International management under postmodern conditions. Management International Review, 39(4), 305–322.
Zou, H., & Ghauri, P. N. (2010). Internationalizing by learning: the case of Chinese high-tech new ventures. International Marketing Review, 27(2), 223–244.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
TEMPUS FUGIT: A Hermeneutic Approach to the Internationalisation Process
verfasst von
Leila Hurmerinta
Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki
Mélanie E. Hassett
Publikationsdatum
02.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Management International Review / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-8249
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-8901
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0303-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Management International Review 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Research Article

Historical Research Approaches to the Analysis of Internationalisation

Editorial

The Internationalization Process Model Revisited: An Agenda for Future Research

Research Article

Speed of Internationalization of New Business Units: The Impact of Direct and Indirect Learning

Research Article

Acceleration and Deceleration in the Internationalization Process of the Firm