Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This paper reviews 47 articles dealing with tensions at the intersection of management control and innovation. One purpose is to present the status of the research in the area in terms of types of articles, research methods, theoretical approaches, and tension-related terms used. A second purpose is to conceptually compare the use and interpretations of tension in the reviewed articles, as well as to systematically map and categorize highlighted competing demands. A third purpose is to suggest a tension-based framework. Among other characteristics and trends, the paper indicates an increased research interest in the issue of tensions during the review period (1991–2015). Although different theoretical approaches are adopted, the contingency approach is the most common. Furthermore, the review shows that several tension-related terms are used either alone or in parallel in the articles, often interchangeably and without clarifying their definitions. The tension-based framework presents four different types of tension: (1) inherent innovation-control tensions, (2) inherent management control tensions, (3) created management control tensions, and (4) decision-making tensions in innovation practices. The framework also suggests interpretations of and responses to tensions related to management control and innovation. Theoretically, the framework can enable a more precise debate that builds on previous research, since it clarifies potential ways to structure future research. From a practical point of view the presented framework can be helpful for managers dealing with tensions, by encouraging creative management control solutions that can enable innovation.
Achtenhagen, L., & Melin, L. (2003). Managing the homogeneity–heterogeneity duality. In A. M. Pettigrew, et al. (Eds.), Innovative forms of organizing. London: SAGE Publications.
Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47. CrossRef
Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61–89. CrossRef
Adler, P. S., & Chen, C. X. (2011). Combining creativity and control: Understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 63–85. CrossRef
Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 271–301. CrossRef
Akroyd, C., & Maguire, W. (2011). The roles of management control in a product development setting. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 8(3), 212–237. CrossRef
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2004). Interfaces of control. Technocratic and socio-ideological control in global management consultancy firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 423–444. CrossRef
Artto, K., Kulvik, I., Poskela, J., & Turkulainen, V. (2011). The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 408–421. CrossRef
Aubert, B. A., Kishore, R., & Iriyama, A. (2015). Exploring and managing the “innovation through outsourcing” paradox. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24, 255–269. CrossRef
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339. CrossRef
Barnson, S. C. (2014). Toward a theory of coaching paradox. Quest, 66(4), 371–384. CrossRef
Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, 12–30. CrossRef
Bisbe, J., & Malagueño, R. (2009). The choice of interactive control systems under different innovation management modes. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 371–405. CrossRef
Bisbe, J., & Otley, D. (2004). The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(8), 709–737. CrossRef
Brattström, A., & Richtnér, A. (2014). Good cop–bad cop: Trust, control, and the lure of integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 584–598. CrossRef
Breunig, K. J., Aas, T. H., & Hydle, K. M. (2014). Incentives and performance measures for open innovation practices. Measuring Business Excellence, 18(1), 45–54. CrossRef
Brühl, R., Horch, N., & Osann, M. (2010). Improving integration capabilities with management control. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 385–408. CrossRef
Canonico, P., & Söderlund, J. (2010). Getting control of multi-project organizations: Combining contingent control mechanisms. International Journal of Project Management, 28, 796–806. CrossRef
Carter, W. R., Davis, P. E., Herchen, J. L., & Chandna, V. (2013). Pitfalls and paradoxes: Coping with the capabilities-rigidities dilemma in whole networks. Journal of Business Strategies, 30(2), 97–119.
Cautela, C., & Zurlo, F. (2011). Managing the five tensions of the design process. Design Management Review, 22(3), 6–14. CrossRef
Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. CrossRef
Chenhall, R. H., Kallunki, J.-P., & Silvola, H. (2011). Exploring the relationships between strategy, innovation, and management control systems: The roles of social networking, organic innovative culture, and formal controls. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 23, 99–128. CrossRef
Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1995). Organic decision and communication processes and management accounting systems in entrepreneurial and conservative business organizations. Omega, 23(5), 485–497. CrossRef
Chiesa, V., Frattini, F., Lamberti, L., & Noci, G. (2009). Exploring management control in radical innovation projects. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(4), 416–443. CrossRef
Cooper, H. (2009). Research synthesis and meta-analysis—a step-by-step approach. Applied social research methods series (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191. CrossRef
Davila, T. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4), 383–409. CrossRef
Davila, T., Foster, G., & Li, M. (2009). Reasons for management control systems adoption: Insights from product development systems choice by early-stage entrepreneurial companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3), 322–347. CrossRef
Davila, T., Foster, G., & Oyon, D. (2009). Accounting and control; entrepreneurship and innovation: Venturing into new research opportunities. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 281–311. CrossRef
Ecker, B., van Triest, S., & Williams, C. (2013). Management control and the decentralization of R&D. Journal of Management, 39(4), 906–927. CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2000). Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 703–705. CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M., Furr, N. R., & Bingham, C. B. (2010). Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263–1273. CrossRef
Eldridge, S., van Iwaarden, J., van der Wiele, T., & Williams, R. (2014). Management control systems for business processes in uncertain environments. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 31(1), 66–81. CrossRef
Francis, D., & Bessant, J. (2005). Targeting innovation and implications for capability development. Technovation, 25, 171–183. CrossRef
Frow, N., Marginson, D., & Ogden, S. (2005). Encouraging strategic behaviour while maintaining management control: Multi-functional project teams, budgets, and the negotiation of shared accountabilities in contemporary enterprises. Management Accounting Research, 16(3), 269–292. CrossRef
Gaim, M., & Wåhlin, N. (2016). In search of a creative space: A conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxical tensions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 32, 33–44. CrossRef
Goodale, J. C., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Covin, J. G. (2011). Operations management and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating effect of operations control on the antecedents of corporate entrepreneurial activity in relation to innovation performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 116–127. CrossRef
Harris, M. L., Collins, R. W., & Hevner, A. R. (2009). Control of flexible software development under uncertainty. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 400–419. CrossRef
Haustein, E., Luther, R., & Schuster, P. (2014). Management control systems in innovation companies: A literature based framework. Journal of Management Control, 24, 343–382. CrossRef
Henri, J.-F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organization and Society, 31(6), 529–558. CrossRef
Hodgson, D., & Briand, L. (2013). Controlling the uncontrollable: ‘Agile’ teams and illusions of autonomy in creative work. Work, employment and society, 27(2), 308–325. CrossRef
Janssen, S., Moeller, K., & Schlaefke, M. (2011). Using performance measures conceptually in innovation control. Journal of Management Control, 22, 107–128. CrossRef
Janssens, M., & Steyaert, C. (1999). The world in two and a third way out? The concept of duality in organization theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 15(2), 121–139. CrossRef
Jeacle, I., & Carter, C. (2012). Fashioning the popular masses: Accounting as mediator between creativity and control. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25(4), 719–751. CrossRef
Jørgensen, B., & Messner, M. (2010). Accounting and strategizing: A case study from new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 184–204. CrossRef
Khazanchi, S., Lewis, M. W., & Boyer, K. K. (2007). Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 871–884. CrossRef
Kivisaari, S. (1991). Management of innovation in the modern corporation: Dilemmas in the corporate control of R&D. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7(3), 219–228. CrossRef
Knardal, P. S., & Pettersen, I. J. (2015). Creativity and management control: The diversity of festival budgets. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(4), 679–696. CrossRef
Kruis, A-M., Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. (2015). The levers of control framework: An exploratory analysis of balance. Management Accounting Research, (In press)
Le Theule, M. A., & Fronda, Y. (2005). The organization in tension between creation and rationalization: Facing management views to artistic and scientific creators. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16, 749–786. CrossRef
Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 50(2), 127–149. CrossRef
Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2006). The role of market and entrepreneurship orientation and internal control in the new product development activities of Chinese firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 336–347. CrossRef
Lueg, R., & Radlach, R. (2016). Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review. European Management Journal, 34, 158–171. CrossRef
Lövstål, E. (2008). Management Control Systems in Entrepreneurial Organisations—A Balancing Challenge. Ph.D .Thesis, Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School.
Magnusson, M., Boccardelli, P., & Börjesson, S. (2009). Managing the efficiency-flexibility tension in innovation: Strategic and organizational aspects. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(1), 2–7. CrossRef
Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package—opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287–300. CrossRef
Massaro, M., Bardy, R., & Pitts, M. (2012). Supporting creativity through knowledge integration during the creative processes. A management control system perspective. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), 258–267.
McCarthy, I. P., & Gordon, B. R. (2011). Achieving contextual ambidexterity in R&D organizations: A management control system approach. R&D Management, 41(3), 240–258. CrossRef
Merchant, K., & Van der Stede, W. (2012). Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Mouritsen, J., Hansen, A., & Hansen, C. Ø. (2009). Short and long translations: Management accounting calculations and innovation management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 738–754. CrossRef
Mundy, J. (2010). Creating dynamic tensions through balanced use of management control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(5), 499–523. CrossRef
Normann, R. (1975). Skapande företagsledning. Stockholm: Bonnier Alba.
Perez-Freije, J., & Enkel, E. (2007). Creative tension in the innovation process: How to support the right capabilities. European Management Journal, 25(1), 11–24. CrossRef
Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578.
Poskela, J., & Martinsuo, M. (2009). Management control and strategic renewal in the front end of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(6), 671–684. CrossRef
Prajogo, D. I., & McDermott, C. M. (2011). The relationship between multidimensional organizational culture and performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(7), 712–735. CrossRef
Pärl, Ü. (2014). The role of dialogue between executives and ground-level employees mediated by MACS. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(2), 189–212. CrossRef
Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 189–198. CrossRef
Revellino, S., & Mouritsen, J. (2009). The multiplicity of controls and the making of innovation. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 341–369. CrossRef
Revellino, S., & Mouritsen, J. (2015). Accounting as an engine: The performativity of calculative practices and the dynamics of innovation. Management Accounting Research, 28, 31–49. CrossRef
Roberts, J. (1991). The possibilities of accountability. Accounting Organizations and Society, 16(4), 355–368. CrossRef
Silaen, P., & Williams, R. (2009). Management control systems: A model for R&D units. Accounting Research Journal, 22(3), 262–274. CrossRef
Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Smith, W. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623. CrossRef
Smith, W., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.
Stewart, J. (2014). Implementing an innovative public sector program. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(3), 241–250. CrossRef
Strauss, E., & Zecher, C. (2013). Management control systems: A review. Journal of Management Control, 23(4), 233–268. CrossRef
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. CrossRef
Tessier, S., & Otley, D. (2012). A conceptual development of Simons’ levers of control framework. Management Accounting Research, 23, 171–185. CrossRef
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology of developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. CrossRef
Verbeeten, F. H. M., & Boons, A. N. A. M. (2009). Strategic priorities, performance measures and performance: An empirical analysis of Dutch firms. European Management Journal, 27, 113–128. CrossRef
Vlaar, P. W. L., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Towards a dialectic perspective on formalization in interorganizational relationships: How alliance managers capitalize on the duality inherent in contracts, rules and procedures. Organization Studies, 28(4), 437–466. CrossRef
Vosselman, E., & van der Meer-Kooistra, J. (2009). Accounting for control and trust building in interfirm transactional relationships. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 267–283.
Ylinen, M., & Gullkvist, B. (2012). The effects of tolerance for ambiguity and task uncertainty on the balanced and combined use of project controls. European Accounting Review, 21(2), 395–415. CrossRef
Ylinen, M., & Gullkvist, B. (2014). The effects of organic and mechanistic control in exploratory and exploitative innovations. Management Accounting Research, 25, 93–112. CrossRef
- Tensions at the intersection of management control and innovation: a literature review
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia