Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Information Science and Technology: A New Paradigm in Military Medical Research Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. The Adoption and Use of Tethered Electronic Personal Health Records for Health Management

verfasst von : Saeed Alzahrani, Tuğrul Daim

Erschienen in: R&D Management in the Knowledge Era

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Information Technology becomes a crucial part of the health-care system and it is getting more attention worldwide. Health IT includes well-known systems that have transformed the health sector such as Electronic Health Records (EHR), Electronic Medical Records (EMR), and Electronic Personal Health Records (ePHR). ePHR aims at enabling patients to take more active role in their care by giving them the ability to access their health records in a secure and safe environment. ePHR allows greater patient-provider engagement. The provider’s adoption rate of the ePHR as a tool to connect with patients and to enable them to have access to their records is increasing at an accelerated rate. However, the patient’s ePHR adoption rate remains low. In the USA, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) reports an increase in the number of office-based physicians’ and hospitals’ adoption of the EHR. The number of office-based physicians adopting EHR increased from 17% in 2008 to 58% as of 2015. Similarly, it shows that the nonfederal acute care hospitals with certified EHR rate increased from 9% in 2008 to 84% as of 2015 [1]. Despite the efforts to encourage the health-care providers’ adoption of certified EHR and ePHR, the adoption rate by patients remains below expectations [2]. This rate is expected to increases due to the wide attention and efforts led by governments and health-care providers to engage patients in their care. The forecasts of future ePHR adoption are expecting 75% of adults to adopt and use ePHR by 2020 [3]. More attention is needed to improve the patient’s adoption of ePHR.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Behind-the-Meter Energy Storage Implementation
Nächstes Kapitel A Practical Strategic Planning Approach for R&D Organisations
Literatur
1.
Office of National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. (2018). Justification of estimates for appropriations committee: Fiscal year 2018. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
2.
Laugesen, J., & Hassanein, K. (2017). Adoption of personal health records by chronic disease patients: A research model and an empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 256–272.CrossRef
3.
Ford, E. W., Hesse, B. W., & Huerta, T. R. (2016). Personal health record use in the United States: Forecasting future adoption levels. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(3), e73.CrossRef
4.
5.
Irizarry, T., DeVito Dabbs, A., & Curran, C. R. (2015). Patient portals and patient engagement: A state of the science review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(6), e148.CrossRef
6.
7.
8.
9.
Roehrs, A., da Costa, C. A., Righi, R. R., & de Oliveira, K. S. F. (2017). Personal health records: A systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(1), e13.CrossRef
10.
AHIMA Personal Health Record Practice Council. (2006). Helping consumers select PHRs: Questions and considerations for navigating an emerging market. Journal of AHIMA, 77(10), 50–59.
11.
Tang, P. C., Ash, J. S., Bates, D. W., Overhage, J. M., & Sands, D. Z. (2006). Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 121–126.CrossRef
12.
Rockville, M. D., Maurer, M., Dardess, P., Carman, K. L., Frazier, K., & Smeeding, L. (2012). Guide to patient and family engagement: Environmental scan report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
13.
Richardson, W., Berwick, D., & Bisgard, J. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.
14.
Washington, L. (2014). Enabling consumer and patient engagement with health information. Journal of AHIMA, 85(2), 56–59.
15.
Pagliari, C., Detmer, D., & Singleton, P. (2007). Electronic personal health records. In Emergence and implications for the UK. London: The Nuffield Trust.
16.
17.
18.
Procop, G. W., Yerian, L. M., Wyllie, R., Harrison, A. M., & Kottke-Marchant, K. (2014). Duplicate laboratory test reduction using a clinical decision support tool. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 141(5), 718–723.CrossRef
19.
20.
Emont, S. (2011). Measuring the impact of patient portals: What the literature tells us. Oakland, CA: California HealthCare Foundation.
21.
Liederman, E. M., Lee, J. C., Baquero, V. H., & Seites, P. G. (2005). The impact of patient-physician web messaging on provider productivity. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 19(2), 81–86.
22.
Kaelber, D., & Pan, E. C. (2008). The value of personal health record (PHR) systems. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2008, 343–347.
23.
Griffin, A., Skinner, A., Thornhill, J., & Weinberger, M. (2016). Patient Portals. Applied Clinical Informatics, 7(2), 489–501.CrossRef
24.
Wright, A., Feblowitz, J., Samal, L., McCoy, A. B., & Sittig, D. F. (2014). The Medicare electronic health record incentive program: Provider performance on core and menu measures. Health Services Research, 49(1 Pt 2), 325–346.CrossRef
25.
Wade-Vuturo, A. E., Mayberry, L. S., & Osborn, C. Y. (2013). Secure messaging and diabetes management: Experiences and perspectives of patient portal users. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(3), 519–525.CrossRef
26.
27.
Goldzweig, C. L., et al. (2013). Electronic patient portals: Evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 159(10), 677–687.CrossRef
28.
Chaudhry, B., et al. (2006). Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144(10), 742–752.CrossRef
29.
Ammenwerth, E., Schnell-Inderst, P., & Hoerbst, A. (2012). The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: A systematic review of controlled trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), e162.CrossRef
30.
Jamal, A., McKenzie, K., & Clark, M. (2009). The impact of health information technology on the quality of medical and health care: A systematic review. The HIM Journal, 38(3), 26–37.CrossRef
31.
32.
Caligtan, C. A., & Dykes, P. C. (2011). Electronic health records and personal health records. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 27(3), 218–228.CrossRef
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
Kruse, C. S., Argueta, D. A., Lopez, L., & Nair, A. (2015). Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(2), e40.CrossRef
41.
Vance, B., Tomblin, B., Studney, J., & Coustasse, A. (2015). Benefits and barriers for adoption of personal health records. Paper presented at the 2015 Business and Health Administration Association Annual Conference, at the 51st Annual Midwest Business Administration Association International Conference, Chicago, IL.
42.
Witry, M. J., Doucette, W. R., Daly, J. M., Levy, B. T., & Chrischilles, E. A. (2010). Family physician perceptions of personal health records. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 7, 1d.
43.
CarriónSeñor, I., Fernández-Alemán, J. L., & Toval, A. (2012). Are personal health records safe? A review of free web-accessible personal health record privacy policies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(4), e114.CrossRef
44.
Kahn, J. S., Aulakh, V., & Bosworth, A. (2009). What it takes: Characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health Affairs, 28(2), 369–376.CrossRef
45.
Council on Clinical Information Technology. (2009). Using personal health records to improve the quality of health Care for Children. Pediatrics, 124(1), 403–409.CrossRef
46.
Kahn, J. S., et al. (2010). Personal health records in a public hospital: Experience at the HIV/AIDS clinic at San Francisco general hospital. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(2), 224–228.CrossRef
47.
Dontje, K., Corser, W. D., & Holzman, G. (2014). Understanding patient perceptions of the electronic personal health record. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 10(10), 824–828.CrossRef
48.
Kim, K., & Nahm, E. (2012). Benefits of and barriers to the use of personal health records (PHR) for health management among adults. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 16(3), 1–9.
49.
Lober, W., et al. (2006). Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly population. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2006, 514–518.
50.
Yau, G. L., Williams, A. S., & Brown, J. B. (2011). Family physicians’ perspectives on personal health records: Qualitative study. Canadian Family Physician, 57(5), e178–e184.
51.
Nazi, K. M. (2013). The personal health record paradox: Health care professionals’ perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(4), e70.CrossRef
52.
Miller, D. P., Jr., Latulipe, C., Melius, K. A., Quandt, S. A., & Arcury, T. A. (2016). Primary care providers’ views of patient portals: Interview study of perceived benefits and consequences. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1), e8.CrossRef
53.
Vydra, T. P., Cuaresma, E., Kretovics, M., & Bose-Brill, S. (2015). Diffusion and use of tethered personal health Records in Primary Care. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 12(Spring), 1c.
54.
Menon, A. S., Greenwald, S., Ma, T. J., Kooshesh, S., & Duriseti, R. (2012). Patient and physician willingness to use personal health records in the emergency department. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(2), 172–175.CrossRef
55.
Keplinger, L. E., et al. (2013). Patient portal implementation: Resident and attending physician attitudes. Family Medicine, 45(5), 335–340.
56.
Antoun, J. (2016). Electronic mail communication between physicians and patients: A review of challenges and opportunities. Family Practice, 33(2), 121–126.CrossRef
57.
Bishop, T. F., Press, M. J., Mendelsohn, J. L., & Casalino, L. P. (2013). Electronic communication improves access, but barriers to its widespread adoption remain. Health Affairs (Millwood), 32(8), 1361–1367.CrossRef
58.
Chung, M.-H., Ho, C.-H., & Wen, H.-C. (2016). Predicting intentions of nurses to adopt patient personal health records: A structural equation modeling approach. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 136, 45–53.CrossRef
59.
Gartrell, K., Trinkoff, A. M., Storr, C. L., Wilson, M. L., & Gurses, A. P. (2015). Testing the electronic personal health record acceptance model by nurses for managing their own health. Applied Clinical Informatics, 6(2), 224–247.CrossRef
60.
Ratzan, S. C., & Parker, R. M. (2000). National library of medicine current bibliographies in medicine: Health literacy. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services.
61.
Vernon, J. A., Trujillo, A., Rosenbaum, S. J., & DeBuono, B. (2007). Low health literacy: Implications for national health policy. Washington, DC: George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services.
62.
Norman, C. D., & Skinner, H. A. (2006). eHEALS: The eHealth literacy scale. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(4), e27.CrossRef
63.
Noblin, A. M., Wan, T. T. H., & Fottler, M. (2012). The impact of health literacy on a Patient’s decision to adopt a personal health record. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 9, 1–13.
64.
Jensen, J. D., King, A. J., Davis, L. S. A., & Guntzviller, L. M. (2010). Utilization of internet technology by low-income adults: The role of health literacy, health numeracy, and computer assistance. Journal of Aging and Health, 22(6), 804–826.CrossRef
65.
Monkman, H., & Kushniruk, A. (2013). Applying usability methods to identify health literacy issues: An example using a personal health record. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 183, 179–185.
66.
Cortelyou-Ward, K., Williamsa, C., & Noblin, A. (2012). Using the personal health record to improve health literacy: A social capital perspective. International Journal of Business, Humanities, and Technology, 2(3), 7–15.
67.
Segall, N., et al. (2011). Usability evaluation of a personal health record. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2011, 1233–1242.
68.
Sakaguchi-Tang, D. K., Bosold, A. L., Choi, Y. K., & Turner, A. M. (2017). Patient portal use and experience among older adults: Systematic review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 5(4), e38.CrossRef
69.
Liu, L. S., & Hayes, G. R. (2010). Heuristic evaluation of personal health records systems. In International Workshop on Interactive Systems in Healthcare (p. 101).
70.
Sheehan, B., & Lucero, R. J. (2015). Initial usability and feasibility evaluation of a personal health record-based self-management system for older adults. EGEMS (Wash DC), 3(2), 1152.
71.
Price, M., Bellwood, P., & Davies, I. (2015). Using usability evaluation to inform Alberta’s personal health record design. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 208, 314–318.
72.
73.
74.
75.
Fontaine, P., Ross, S. E., Zink, T., & Schilling, L. M. (2010). Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. Journal of American Board of Family Medicine, 23(5), 655–670.CrossRef
76.
77.
Fricton, J. R., & Davies, D. (2008). Personal health records to improve health information exchange and patient safety. In K. Henriksen, J. B. Battles, M. A. Keyes, & M. L. Grady (Eds.), Advances in patient safety: New directions and alternative approaches. Vol. 4: Technology and medication safety. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).
78.
Wen, K.-Y., Kreps, G., Zhu, F., & Miller, S. (2010). Consumers’ perceptions about and use of the internet for personal health records and health information exchange: Analysis of the 2007 health information National Trends Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(4), e73.CrossRef
79.
Patel, V. N., Dhopeshwarkar, R. V., Edwards, A., Barrón, Y., Sparenborg, J., & Kaushal, R. (2012). Consumer support for health information exchange and personal health records: A regional health information organization survey. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(3), 1043–1052.CrossRef
80.
81.
82.
Archer, N., Fevrier-Thomas, U., Lokker, C., McKibbon, A., Willison, D., & Straus, S. (2010). Electronic Personal Health Records: An Environmental Scan. Working Paper No. 34. McMaster Business Research Centre (MeRC), McMaster University: Hamilton, Canada
83.
Norman, C. D., & Skinner, H. A. (2006). eHealth literacy: Essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(2), e9.CrossRef
84.
Saranto, K., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (1997). Computer literacy in nursing; developing the information technology syllabus in nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(2), 377–385.CrossRef
85.
Day, K., & Gu, Y. (2012). Influencing factors for adopting personal health record (PHR). Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 178, 39–44.
86.
Koivunen, M., Hätönen, H., & Välimäki, M. (2008). Barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of an interactive internet-portal application for patient education in psychiatric hospitals. Patient Education and Counseling, 70(3), 412–419.CrossRef
87.
Cocosila, M., & Archer, N. (2012). Consumer perceptions of the adoption of electronic personal health records: An empirical investigation. In 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems.
88.
Kim, E., Mayani, A., Modi, S., Kim, Y., & Soh, C. (2005). Evaluation of patient-centered electronic health record to overcome digital divide. Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1, 593–596.
89.
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.CrossRef
90.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.CrossRef
91.
Wells, S., Rozenblum, R., Park, A., Dunn, M., & Bates, D. W. (2015). Organizational strategies for promoting patient and provider uptake of personal health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(1), 213–222.CrossRef
92.
Jha, A. K., et al. (2009). Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(16), 1628–1638.CrossRef
93.
Urowitz, S., et al. (2012). Improving diabetes management with a patient portal: Qualitative study of a diabetes self-management portal. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), e158.CrossRef
94.
Fiks, A. G., et al. (2016). Adoption of a portal for the primary care management of pediatric asthma: A mixed-methods implementation study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(6), e172.CrossRef
95.
Pai, H. H., Lau, F., Barnett, J., & Jones, S. (2013). Meeting the health information needs of prostate cancer patients using personal health records. Current Oncology, 20(6), e561–e569.CrossRef
96.
Clark, S. J., Costello, L. E., Gebremariam, A., & Dombkowski, K. J. (2015). A national survey of parent perspectives on use of patient portals for their Children’s health care. Applied Clinical Informatics, 6(1), 110–119.CrossRef
97.
Zettel-Watson, L., & Tsukerman, D. (2016). Adoption of online health management tools among healthy older adults: An exploratory study. Health Informatics Journal, 22(2), 171–183.CrossRef
98.
Yamin, C. K., et al. (2011). The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(6), 568–574.CrossRef
99.
Goel, M. S., Brown, T. L., Williams, A., Cooper, A. J., Hasnain-Wynia, R., & Baker, D. W. (2011). Patient reported barriers to enrolling in a patient portal. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(Suppl 1), i8–i12.CrossRef
100.
Turner, A. M., et al. (2015). Use of patient portals for personal health information management: The older adult perspective. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2015, 1234–1241.
101.
Czaja, S. J., Zarcadoolas, C., Vaughon, W. L., Lee, C. C., Rockoff, M. L., & Levy, J. (2015). The usability of electronic personal health record systems for an underserved adult population. Human Factors, 57(3), 491–506.CrossRef
102.
Ong, C.-S., Lai, J.-Y., & Wang, Y.-S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, 41(6), 795–804.CrossRef
103.
Ma, C.-C., Kuo, K.-M., & Alexander, J. W. (2016). A survey-based study of factors that motivate nurses to protect the privacy of electronic medical records. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16, 13.CrossRef
104.
Nazi, K. M. (2010). Veterans’ voices: Use of the American customer satisfaction index (ACSI) survey to identify my HealtheVet personal health record users’ characteristics, needs, and preferences. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(2), 203–211.CrossRef
105.
Hogan, T. P., Wakefield, B., Nazi, K. M., Houston, T. K., & Weaver, F. M. (2011). Promoting access through complementary eHealth technologies: Recommendations for VA’s home Telehealth and personal health record programs. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(2), 628.CrossRef
106.
107.
Woods, S. S., et al. (2013). Patient experiences with full electronic access to health records and clinical notes through the my HealtheVet personal health record pilot: Qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(3), e65.CrossRef
108.
Nazi, K. M., Hogan, T. P., McInnes, D. K., Woods, S. S., & Graham, G. (2013). Evaluating patient access to electronic health records: Results from a survey of veterans. Medical Care, 51(3 Suppl 1), S52–S56.CrossRef
109.
Shimada, S. L., et al. (2014). Personal health record reach in the veterans health administration: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), e272.CrossRef
110.
Altuwaijri, M. M. (2008). Electronic-health in Saudi Arabia. Just around the corner? Saudi Medical Journal, 29(2), 171–178.
111.
Alsulame, K., Khalifa, M., & Househ, M. (2016). E-health status in Saudi Arabia: A review of current literature. Health Policy and Technology, 5(2), 204–210.CrossRef
112.
El Mahalli, A. (2015). Adoption and barriers to adoption of electronic health records by nurses in three governmental hospitals in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 12, 1f.
113.
Khudair, A. A. (2008). Electronic health records: Saudi physicians’ perspective. In 5th IET International Seminar on Appropriate Healthcare Technologies for Developing Countries (AHT 2008).
114.
Al-Sahan, A., & Saddik, B. (2016). Perceived challenges for adopting the personal health record (PHR) at Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA)- Riyadh. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 8(3), e205.
115.
Alsanea, N. (2012). The future of health care delivery and the experience of a tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 32(2), 117–120.CrossRef
116.
117.
Baird, A., Raghu, T. S., & Tulledge-Scheitel, S. M. (2012). The role of policy in the prevention of personal health record (PHR) market failure. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(2), 117–132.CrossRef
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
Ahern, D. K., Woods, S. S., Lightowler, M. C., Finley, S. W., & Houston, T. K. (2011). Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(5 Suppl 2), S162–S172.CrossRef
127.
128.
129.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.CrossRef
130.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
131.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.CrossRef
132.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 50.
133.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRef
134.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRef
135.
Dillon, A., & Morris, M. G. (1996). User acceptance of information technology: Theories and models. In M. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
136.
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159.CrossRef
137.
Yarbrough, A. K., & Smith, T. B. (2007). Technology acceptance among physicians: A new take on TAM. Medical Care Research and Review, 64(6), 650–672.CrossRef
138.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.CrossRef
139.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
140.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173–191.CrossRef
141.
Hsieh, P.-J. (2015). Physicians’ acceptance of electronic medical records exchange: An extension of the decomposed TPB model with institutional trust and perceived risk. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(1), 1–14.CrossRef
142.
Emani, S., et al. (2016). Awareness and use of the after-visit summary through a patient portal: Evaluation of patient characteristics and an application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(4), e77.CrossRef
143.
McGill, T. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2009). A task–technology fit view of learning management system impact. Computers & Education, 52(2), 496–508.CrossRef
144.
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1998). Supporting software maintenance with software engineering tools: A computed task–technology fit analysis. Journal of Systems and Software, 44(2), 107–120.CrossRef
145.
Gebauer, J., Shaw, M. J., & Gribbins, M. L. (2010). Task-technology fit for mobile information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 25(3), 259–272.CrossRef
146.
Laugesen, J. D. (2013). Adoption of Electronic Personal Health Records by Chronic Disease Patients: Integrating Protection Motivation Theory and Task-Technology Fit, Doctoral dissertation, McMaster University, London.
147.
Chen, P.-S., Yu, C.-J., & Chen, G. Y.-H. (2015). Applying task-technology fit model to the healthcare sector: A case study of hospitals’ computed tomography patient-referral mechanism. Journal of Medical Systems, 39(8), 80.CrossRef
148.
Lin, T.-C. (2014). Mobile nursing information system utilization: The task-technology fit perspective. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 32(3), 129–137.CrossRef
149.
Cady, R. G., & Finkelstein, S. M. (2014). Task-technology fit of video telehealth for nurses in an outpatient clinic setting. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 20(7), 633–639.CrossRef
150.
Willis, M. J., El-Gayar, O. F., & Deokar, A. V. (2009). Evaluating task-technology fit and user performance for an electronic health record system. In AMCIS 2009 Proceedings (p. 327).
151.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.CrossRef
152.
Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760–767.CrossRef
153.
AlAwadhi, S., & Morris, A. (2008). The use of the UTAUT model in the adoption of E-Government services in Kuwait. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008) (p. 219).CrossRef
154.
Marchewka, J. T., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 93.
155.
Min, Q., Ji, S., & Qu, G. (2008). Mobile commerce user acceptance study in China: A revised UTAUT model. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(3), 257–264.CrossRef
156.
Kijsanayotin, B., Pannarunothai, S., & Speedie, S. M. (2009). Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand’s community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(6), 404–416.CrossRef
157.
Tavares, J., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Electronic health record patient portal adoption by health care consumers: An acceptance model and survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(3), e49.CrossRef
158.
Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., & Zhang, X. (2011). ‘Just what the doctor ordered’: A revised UTAUT for EMR system adoption and use by doctors. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10).
159.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York/London: Free Press/Collier Macmillan.
160.
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-29(1), 28–45.CrossRef
161.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215.CrossRef
162.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557–582.CrossRef
163.
Emani, S., et al. (2012). Patient perceptions of a personal health record: A test of the diffusion of innovation model. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), e150.CrossRef
164.
Zhang, X., Yu, P., Yan, J., & Ton A M Spil, I. (2015). Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: A case study in a primary care clinic. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 71.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Adoption and Use of Tethered Electronic Personal Health Records for Health Management
verfasst von
Saeed Alzahrani
Tuğrul Daim
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Buch
R&D Management in the Knowledge Era

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15408-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-15409-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15409-7_4