Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Numerous studies have investigated the business benefits of corporate philanthropy (CP), which can be considered as part of a company’s belief systems. However, it remains unclear under which conditions and to what extent philanthropic activities are associated with corporate financial performance (CFP). This study sets out to shed light on the relationship between CP and CFP by means of a meta-analysis. A total of 183 effect sizes from 45 empirical studies are statistically integrated and analyzed within several subgroups. Particular attention is paid to time-lagged variable measurements that allow interpretation for causality. The general relationship between CP and CFP is found to be significantly positive. Furthermore, results reveal that CP is positively related to subsequent CFP across a wide range of different study designs, including different operationalizations of CFP and CP, different sample criteria, and the control for moderating variables. This paper goes beyond the question of if CP affects CFP and provides a status quo for a more detailed discussion on how and when CP influences CFP. Consequently, integrating research on mediating variables and adding perspectives of management control literature to the CP research field are suggested as promising avenues for future research.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Marked references (*) are included in the meta-analysis
*Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 641–654.
Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2005). A meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, 57, 18.
*Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2012). Retail philanthropy: Firm size, industry, and business cycle. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 435–448. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1048-x.
*Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 229–241. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9167-5.
*Amran, A. B., Ling, L. L., & Sofri, Y. (2007). A study of corporate philanthropic traits among major malaysian corporations. Social Responsibility Journal, 3, 21–30. doi: 10.1108/17471110710840206.
*Balabanis, G., Phillips, H. C., & Lyall, J. (1998). Corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top British companies: Are they linked? European Business Review, 98, 25–44. doi: 10.1108/09555349810195529.
*Bandeira-de-Mello, R., Marcon, R., & Alberton, A. (2008). Drivers of discretionary firm donations in Brazil. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 5, 275–288.
Barends, E., Rousseau, D. M., & Briner, R. B. (2014). Evidence-based management: The basic principles. Amsterdam: Center for Evidence-Based Management.
*Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Profit maximisation vs. agency: An analysis of charitable giving by UK firms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 517–534. doi: 10.1093/cje/bei036.
*Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1325–1343. doi: 10.1002/smj.714.
*Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: A stakeholder analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1411–1434. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00480.x.
*Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 855–877. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2006.02.001.
*Buchholtz, A. K., Amason, A. C., & Rutherford, M. A. (1999). Beyond resources. Business & Society, 38, 167.
*Chen, D., Jiang, D., & Yu, X. (2015). Corporate philanthropy and bank loans in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.03.004.
*Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2007). Corporate charitable contributions: A corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 131–144. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9567-1.
*Chen, M.-H., & Lin, C.-P. (2015). The impact of corporate charitable giving on hospitality firm performance: Doing well by doing good? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 47, 25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.02.002.
Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 127–168. CrossRef
Combs, J. G., Crook, T. R., & Shook, C. L. (2005). The dimensionality of organizational performance and its implications for strategic management research. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 2, 259. CrossRef
*Cowan, A., Huang, C.-H., Padmanabhan, P., & Wang, C.-H. (2013). The determinants of foreign giving: An exploratory empirical investigation of US manufacturing firms. International Business Review, 22, 407–420. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.05.005.
Dalton, D.R., & Dalton, C.M. (2005). Strategic management studies are a special case for meta-analysis. In D. J. Ketchen, D. D. Bergh (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (pp. 31–63), vol 2. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
*Diltz, J. D. (1995). The private cost of socially responsible investing. Applied Financial Economics, 5, 69–77.
*Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258. doi: 10.2307/256324.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits (pp. 32–33, 122–124). New York Times Magazine, September 13.
*Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 445–471. doi: 10.2307/2393734.
*Gao, F., Faff, R., & Navissi, F. (2012). Corporate philanthropy: Insights from the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 20, 363–377. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2011.11.002.
*Gao, Y. (2011). Philanthropic disaster relief giving as a response to institutional pressure: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 64, 1377–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.003.
Geyskens, I., Krishnan, R., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Cunha, P. V. (2009). A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management,. doi: 10.1177/0149206308328501.
Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall., Inc.
*Hall, P. L., & Rieck, R. (1998). The effect of positive corporate social actions on shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 11(2), 83–89.
*Hapitan, R. B. (2012). An analysis of a signalling model of corporate philanthropy for selected philippine banks. Journal of International Business Research, 11, 45–56.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Cambridge: Academic Press.
*Hogan, K., Olson, G. T., & Sharma, R. (2014). The role of corporate philanthropy on ratings of corporate social responsibility and shareholder return. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 11, 108–125.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. CrossRef
*Iatridis, G. E. (2015). Corporate philanthropy in the US stock market: Evidence on corporate governance, value relevance and earnings manipulation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 39, 113–126. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2015.03.004.
*Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Donating money to get money: The role of corporate philanthropy in stakeholder reactions to IPOs. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 1118–1152. doi: 10.1111/joms.12090.
*Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2013a). Critical mass of women on BODs, multiple identities, and corporate philanthropic disaster response: Evidence from privately owned Chinese firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 303–317. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1589-7.
*Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2013b). The CEO’s representation of demands and the corporation’s response to external pressures: Do politically affiliated firms donate more? CEO . Management and Organization Review, 9, 87–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2012.00297.x.
Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 857–878. doi: 10.1348/096317909X477495. CrossRef
Ke, J.-L., Qiu, X.-W., & Jiang, Y.-F. (2015). The effect of corporate philanthropy on organization commitment and job performance of employees: Workplace spirituality as mediating variable. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5, 466. CrossRef
*Lerner, L. D., & Fryxell, G. E. (1988). An empirical study of the predictors of corporate social performance: A multi-dimensional analysis. ournal of Business Ethics, 7, 951–959.
*Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good good for you? how corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 182–200.
Lim, T. (2010). Measuring the value of corporate philanthropy. New York: Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
*Litz, R. A., & Samu, S. (2008). Altruistic by association, altruistic for advantage? Buying groups and small firm community involvement. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 646–667.
Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good...and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspccitication? Strategic Management Journal 603–609.
Mitchell, T. R., & James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26, 530–547.
*Muller, A., & Kräussl, R. (2011a). The value of corporate philanthropy during times of crisis: The sensegiving effect of employee involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 203–220. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0861-6.
*Muller, A., & Kräussl, R. (2011b). Doing good deeds in times of need: A strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 911–929. doi: 10.1002/smj.917.
Navarro, P. (1988). Why do corporations give to charity? Journal of Business, 61, 65–93. CrossRef
Nelson, R. L. (1970). Economic factors in the growth of corporate giving. Russell Sage Foundation.
*Patten, D. M. (2008). Does the market value corporate philanthropy? Evidence from the response to the 2004 tsunami relief effort. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 599–607. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9534-x.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80, 56–68.
*Pyo, G., & Lee, H.-Y. (2013). The association between corporate social responsibility activities and earnings quality: Evidence from donations and voluntary issuance of CSR reports. Journal of Applied Business Research 29, 945–962. http://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/JABR/issue/archive
*Qiu, X. (2013). Corporate philanthropic disaster response and post performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 6, 39–51.
Rangan, K. V., Chase, L., & Sohel, K. (2015). The truth about CSR. Harvard Business Review, 93(1/2), 40–49.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638. CrossRef
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantiative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59–82.
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2015). Business cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: Differentiating ethical motivations. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–19, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2938-0.
*Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2004). Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Business & Society, 43, 135–161. doi: 10.1177/0007650304263919.
*Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 195–211. doi: 10.1023/A:1024199411807.
Simons, R. (1994). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Brighton: Harvard Business Press.
*Su, J., & He, J. (2010). Does giving lead to getting? Evidence from Chinese private enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 73–90. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0183-0.
Tian, X. (2012). Empirical Research on Organization Performance and the Influential Factors of Corporate Philanthropy. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 6(13).
*Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19, 143–159.
*Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1159–1181. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0548.
Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2015). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance the moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society, 0007650315584317, doi: 10.1177/0007650315584317.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229–267. CrossRef
*Ye, K., & Zhang, R. (2011). Do lenders value corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 197–206. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0898-6.
*Zhang, J., Yang, B., Wang, F., & Wang, P. (2012). Corporate philanthropic giving: Active responsibility or passive ingratiation? Evidence from Chinese family-controlled listed companies. Journal of Applied Business Research 28, 427–439. http://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/JABR/issue/archive
*Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z., & Zhu, J. (2010). Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: Evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 51–63. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0067-3.
- The benefits of doing good: a meta-analysis of corporate philanthropy business outcomes and its implications for management control
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, So bewältigen Sie Stress im Fernstudium/© granata68 | stock.adobe.com | AdobeStock