nach oben

Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. The Business Civil Society and its Impact on Romanian Public Administration

verfasst von : Sebastian Văduva

Erschienen in: From Corruption to Modernity

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The reform initiatives of the past two decades in Romania are praiseworthy, and the incontestable fact is that the state of the economy and the government is significantly better now than at the dawn of the 1989 Revolution. The Europeanization of the public administration is partially successful, especially in the capital city and a few other urban centers. There are a number of ongoing, successful public administration reform initiatives throughout the country, some of which I have outlined in previous chapters. This continuous work is vitally important and necessary to improve customer/citizen services, agency design, increase efficiency, and modernize the Romanian public administration. In the concluding chapter of this volume, I would like to attempt a modest theoretical contribution to the Romanian public administration reform dialogue, not from a traditionalist bureaucratic perspective but rather from a libertarian, free-market, somewhat postmodern public administration theory. My conceptual approach will be that current traditional public administration reform initiatives ought to be complemented by the revitalization of the civil society, individual responsibilities, and voluntary initiatives.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Robert Pollock, in In the Middle East, Arbitrary Government Feeds Rage, the Heritage Foundation website (2002).

Classical economist referred to profit as “waste” since profit is the difference between revenues and expenses. The internal tendency of the firm is to maximize profit (waste) by selling their products at as high of a price as possible above its costs. In a free-market system where competition is free and entrance into an industry unhindered, new entrepreneurs would eliminate that waste by entering the market and selling the same product at lower prices.

Alexander, J. C. (1998). Real civil societies: Dilemmas of institutionalization. London: Sage.

Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Boston: Little, Brown.

Anheier, H., Glasius, M., & Kaldor, M. (2001). Introducing global civil society. In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2001. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Armstrong, K. A. (2008). Rediscovering civil society: The European Union and the White Paper on Governance. European Law Journal, 8(1), 102–132.CrossRef

Ash, T. G. (1990). The magic lantern: The revolution of ‘89 witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin and Prague. New York: Vintage Press.

Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimating. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.CrossRef

Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2000). Globalization, tax competition, and the fiscal crisis of the welfare state. Harvard Law Review, 113, 1575–1676.CrossRef

Badea, A. S. (2012). Corruption-an inhibiting factor for the efficient implementation of structural funds in Romania. CES Working Papers, 4(2), 110–120.

Banfield, E. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Barnouw, V. (1979). Ethnopsychology; personality and culture. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

Baron, D. P. (2003). Private politics. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12, 31–66.CrossRef

Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.

Bermeo, N. G., & Nord, P. G. (2000). Civil society before democracy: Lessons from nineteenth-century Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Blaney, D. L., & Pasha, M. K. (1993). Civil society and democracy in the Third World: Ambiguities and historical possibilities. Studies in Comparative International Development, 28(1), 3–24.CrossRef

Bleahu, A. (2004). Romanian migration to Spain. Motivation, networks and strategies. New patterns of labour migration in Central and Eastern Europe. Cluj-Napoca, Rumania: Public Policy Centre.

Boddewyn, J. (1995). The legitimacy of international-business political behavior. International Trade Journal, 9, 143–161.CrossRef

Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.). (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Boyett, I. (1997). The public sector entrepreneur—A definition. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 3(2), 77–92.CrossRef

Bozeman, A. B. (1994). Politics and culture in international history: From the ancient Near East to the opening of the modern age. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Brush, C. G., & Hisrich, R. D. (1991). Antecedent influences on women-owned businesses. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 6(2), 9–17.CrossRef

Bruszt, L., Campos, N. F., Fidrmuc, J., & Roland, G. (2010). Civil society, institutional change and the politics of reform: The great transition. Budapest, Hungary: European University Institute and Central European University.

Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent—Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Busenitz, L., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003.CrossRef

Caruana, A., Ewing, M., & Ramaseshan, B. (2002). Effects of some environmental challenges and centralization on the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of public sector entities. The Service Industries Journal, 22(2), 43–58.CrossRef

Chambers, P., & Thomson, A. (2005). Political religion and political change in Wales. Sociology, 39(1), 29–46.CrossRef

Clark, J. (1990). Democratizing development: The role of voluntary organizations. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Colwell, K., & Narayanan, V. K. (2010). Foresight in economic development policy: Shaping the institutional context for entrepreneurial innovation futures. Original Research Journal, 42(4), 295–303.

Covin, J., & Slevin, D. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice., 16(1), 7–25.

Cragg, W. (Ed.). (2005). Ethics codes, corporations and the challenge of globalization. Toronto, ON, Canada: Edward Elgar.

Crawford, N. C. (2002). Argument and change in world politics: Ethics, decolonialization, and humanitarian intervention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Crouch, C. (2006). Modeling the firm in its market and organizational environment: Methodologies for studying corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies, 27, 1533–1551.CrossRef

Cumming, D. (2007). Government policy towards entrepreneurial finance: Innovation investment funds. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 193–235.CrossRef

Cutler, A. C. (2001). Critical reflections on the Westphalian assumptions of international law and organization: A crisis of legitimacy. Review of International Studies, 27, 133–150.CrossRef

Day, J. D., & Jung, M. (2000). Corporate transformation without a crisis. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 116–127.

Deitelhoff, N. (2009). The discursive process of legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC case. International Organization, 63, 33–65.CrossRef

Den Hond, F., & De Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901–924.CrossRef

Detomasi, D. A. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance: Modeling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 321–334.CrossRef

Di Palma, G. (1991). Legitimation from the top to civil society: Politico-cultural change in Eastern Europe. World Politics, 44(01), 49–80.CrossRef

Dietz, S. (1980). Die Buddhistische Briefliteratur Indiens. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 47–73.CrossRef

Eisenstadt, S. N., & Lemarchand, R. (Eds.). (1981). Political clientelism, patronage and development. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Eisenstadt, S. N., & Roniger, L. (1984). Patrons, clients and friends: Interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Elster, J. (1986). The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In J. Elster & A. Hylland (Eds.), Foundations of social choice theory (pp. 103–132). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Esman, M. J., & Uphoff, N. T. (1984). Local organizations: Intermediaries in rural development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38–52.CrossRef

Frederick, D. (2009). The role of corruption in emerging economies the case of Romania. In Emerging issues and challenges in business & economics: Selected Contributions from the 8th Global Conference (p. 301). Firenze University Press.

Frenkel, S. J., & Scott, D. (2002). Compliance, collaboration, and codes of labor practice: The Adidas connection. California Management Review, 45(1), 29–49.CrossRef

Frye, T., & Shleifer, A. (1997). The invisible hand and the grabbing hand. American economic review. American Economic Association, 87(2), 354–358.

Fung, A. (2003). Deliberative democracy and international labor standards. Governance, 16, 51–71.CrossRef

Gellner, E. (1994). Conditions of liberty: Civil society and its rivals. London: Hamish Hamilton.

Greeley, A. (1997). Coleman revisited. Religious structures as a source of social capital. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 587–594.CrossRef

Gutman, A., & Thompson, F. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Gutman, A., & Thompson, F. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Heins, V. (2004). Civil society’s barbarisms. European Journal of Social Theory, 7(4), 499.CrossRef

Hellman, J., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2000). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption, and influence in transition. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2444. World Bank Institute and EBRD.

Henderson, P. D. (2001). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2005). Legitimacy, interest group pressures, and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of Management Review, 30, 361–382.CrossRef

Hess, D. (2008). The three pillars of corporate social reporting as new governance regulation: Disclosure, dialogue, and development. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 447–482.CrossRef

Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30, 837–857.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hopkins, M. O. (2012). Romania’s civil society and its moral underpinnings: The symbolic discourse of a post-socialist state. Multilingual Discourses, 1(1), 21.

Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Huntington, S. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53, 379–408.CrossRef

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Cultural, economical and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Isenberg, D. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of American cities. New York: Random House.

Kaul, I., Conceiçăo, P., Le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (Eds.). (2003). Providing global public goods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Keane, J. (1998). Civil society: Old images, new visions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Keil, T. J. (2006). Romania’s tortured road toward modernity. Boulder, CO: East European Monographs.

Keim, G. D. (2001). Business and public policy. Competing in the political market place. In M. Hitt, R. Freeman, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 583–601). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Kessides, N. I. (2004). Reforming infrastructure: Privatization, regulation, and competition. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRef

Kohler-Koch, B. (2009). The three worlds of European civil society? What role for civil society for what kind of Europe? Policy and Society, 28(1), 47–57.CrossRef

Kroeber, A. L., & Parsons, T. (1958). The concept of culture and of social system. American Sociological Review, 23, 582–583.

Kumar, S. (2007). Methods for community participation. A complete guide for the practitioners. Bourton on Dunsmore, Rugby, Warwickshire, England: ITDG.

LaClair, J. A., & Rao, R. P. (2002). Helping Employees Embrace Change. The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 17–20.

Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence, and policy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Lawson, E., & Price, C. (2003). The psychology of change management. The McKinsey Quarterly, Special edition: The value in organization, pp. 30–41.

Lee, S. M., & Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35, 401–416.CrossRef

Linder, A. A. (2010). A study of Horatio Alger| His work and the times (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Connecticut State University).

Locke, J. (1988). Locke: Two treatises of government student edition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor relations and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817–835.CrossRef

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRef

Marx, K. (1972). The Marx-Engels reader (Vol. 4). New York: W. W. Norton.

Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166–179.CrossRef

McGee, R. (2005). The ethics of tax evasion: A survey of Romanian business students and faculty. Available at SSRN 813345.

McGee, R. W., & Gelman, W. (2009). Opinions on the ethics of tax evasion: A comparative study of ten transition economies. Accounting Reform in Transition and Developing Economies, 12, 495–508.CrossRef

McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1992). More like each other than anyone else? A cross-cultural study of entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 419–429.CrossRef

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.

Michael, B. (2004). The rise and fall of the anti-corruption industry: Toward second generation anti-corruption reforms in Central and Eastern Europe? Budapest, Hungary: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative.

Miclea, M. (2005). Raport asupra stării sistemului naţional de învăţământ (Report on National Education System State).

Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770–791.CrossRef

Miller, W. L., Grødeland, A., & Koshechkina, T. Y. (2001). A culture of corruption? Coping with government in postcommunist Europe. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.

Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: Productive, unproductive, or destructive? New York: Baylor University.

Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33, 750–770.CrossRef

Mitchell, W., & Simmons, R. T. (1994). Beyond politics: Markets, welfare, and the failure of bureaucracy. Independent Studies in Political Economy, 4(4), 601–613.

Mondrack, S. (2008). The protestant work ethic revisited: A promising concept or an outdated idea? Social Science Research Center Berlin. Employment Social Structure and Welfare State.

Moynihan, D. P. (2006a). Ambiguity in policy lessons: The agencification experience. Public Administration, 84, 1029–1050.CrossRef

Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. University of Wisconsin-Madison. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00557.x.

Müller, H. (2004). Arguing, bargaining and all that: Communicative action, rationalist theory and the logic of appropriateness in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 10, 395–435.CrossRef

Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations. The Australian Quarterly, December 1968. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.

North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review, 61(2), 417–427.CrossRef

Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 773–775.CrossRef

Parker, G. R. (2004). Self-policing in politics: The political economy of reputational controls on politicians. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pascaru, M., & Buţiu, C. A. (2009). Civil society, public participation and religious affiliation. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 8, 22.

Pearce, J. A., II, & Doh, J. P. (2005). The high impact of collaborative social initiatives. Sloan Management Review, 46, 30–38.

Przeworski, A., Limongi, F., & Alvarez, M. E. (1996). What makes democracies endure? Journal of Democracy, 7(1), 39–55. Published in Spanish Agora 3(5):67-87, 1996; in Portuguese in Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política 40/41:113-136, 1997; in Polish in Civitas (Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences).CrossRef

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Radu, M. (1998). The burden of eastern orthodoxy. Religion in World Affairs. JAI Press. doi:10.1016/S0030-4387(98)90007-2

Ramamurti, R. (1986). Public entrepreneurs: Who they are and how they operate. California Management Review, 28(3), 142–158.CrossRef

Rasche, A., & Esser, D. E. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability. Applying Habermasian discourse ethics to accountability research. Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 251–267.CrossRef

Rau, Z. (Ed.). (1991). The reemergence of civil society in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Ray, J. J. (1982). The protestant ethic in Australia. Journal of Social Psychology, 116(1), 127–138.CrossRef

Riddell, R., & Robinson, M. (1995). Non-governmental organizations and rural poverty alleviation. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

Rifkin, J. (1995). The end of work. The decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. New York: Putnam.

Risse, T. (1999). International norms and domestic change: Arguing and communicative behavior in the human rights area. Politics and Society, 27, 529–559.CrossRef

Risse, T. (2002). Transnational actors and world politics. In W. von Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 255–274). London: Sage.

Risse, T. (2004). Global governance and communicative action. Government and Opposition, 39, 288–313.CrossRef

Roach, B. (2005). A primer on multinational corporations. In A. D. Chandler & B. Mazlish (Eds.), Leviathans. Multinational corporations and the new global history (pp. 19–44). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Roloff, J. (2007). Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focused stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 233–250.CrossRef

Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government, causes, consequences and reform. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Kornai, J. (Eds.). (2004). Building a trustworthy state in post socialist transition. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.

Rothstein, B. (2009). Anti-corruption—A Big Bang theory. QoG Working Paper No. 2007:3.

Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Cambridge, England: University of Chicago Press.

Ruggie, J. G. (2004). Reconstructing the global public domain: Issues, actors, and practices. European Journal of International Relations, 10, 499–531.CrossRef

Sadler, R. J. (2000). Corporate entrepreneurship in the public sector: The dance of the chameleon. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(2), 25–43.CrossRef

Salisbury, R. H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 3, 1–32.CrossRef

Sandu, D. (2007). Community selectivity of temporary emigration from Romania. Romanian Journal of Population Studies, 1-2, 11.

Saulean, D., & Epure, C. (1998). Defining the nonprofit sector: Romania, In L. Salamon, & H. Anheier (eds.) The John Hopkins comparative nonprofit sector.

Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility. Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.CrossRef

Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo G. (2010). The political role of global business and civil society actors—A paradigm shift in business and society and its implications for CSR, governance, and democracy. 5th Organization Studies Summer Workshop 2010. Social Movements, Civil Societies and Corporations. Margaux, France, 26–28 May 2010.

Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors. Towards a new role of the TNC in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 502–532.CrossRef

Scherer, A. G., & Smid, M. (2000). The downward spiral and the U.S. model principles. Why MNEs should take responsibility for the improvement of World-Wide social and environmental conditions. Management International Review, 40, 351–371.

Schroth, P. W., & Bostan, A. D. (2004). International constitutional law and anti-corruption measures in the European Union’s accession negotiations: Romania in comparative perspective. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 12, 625–711.CrossRef

Seligman, A. (Ed.). (2004). Modest claims: Dialogues and essay on tolerance and tradition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Shamir, R. (2004). Between self-regulation and the Alien Tort Claims Act: On the contested concept of corporate social responsibility. Law & Society Review, 38, 635–664.CrossRef

Spar, D. L., & La Mure, L. T. (2003). The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business. California Management Review, 45(3), 78–101.CrossRef

Stansbury, J. (2008). Reasoned moral agreement: Applying discourse ethics within organization. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 33–56.CrossRef

Strand, R. (1983). A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the social environment. Academy of Management Review, 8, 90–96.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.

Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15, 350–363.CrossRef

Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004). The importance of nongovernmental organizations in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 463–483.CrossRef

Terry, L. D. (1993). Why we should abandon the misconceived quest to reconcile public entrepreneurship with democracy: A response to Bellone and Goerl’s “Reconciling Public Entrepreneurship and Democracy”. Public Administration Review, 53(4), 393–395.CrossRef

Thomas, A. S., & Mueller, S. L. (2000). A case for comparative entrepreneurship: Assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 287–301.CrossRef

Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457.CrossRef

Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. New York: Irwin.

Utting, P. (2002). Regulating business via multi-stakeholders initiatives: A preliminary assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: UNRISD.

Văduva, S. (2004). Antreprenoriatul. Practici aplicative în România şi în alte ţări în tranziţie, Editura Economică.

Vlăsceanu, M. (2010). Economie socială şi antreprenoriat. O analiză a sectorului non-profit. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.

Wallace, C., Pichler, F., & Haerpfer, C. (2012). Changing patterns of civil society in Europe and America 1995–2005 is Eastern Europe different? East European Politics & Societies, 26(1), 3–19.CrossRef

Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner.

Wennekers, A. R. M., Noorderhaven, N. G., Hofstede, G., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). Cultural and economic determinants of business ownership across countries. Frontiers for Entrepreneurship, Babson College.

Whetton, D. A., & Mackey, A. (2002). A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society, 41, 393–414.CrossRef

Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19–40.CrossRef

Wolf, K. D. (2005). Private actors and the legitimacy of governance beyond the state: Conceptional outlines and empirical explorations. In A. Benz & I. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Governance and democratic legitimacy (pp. 200–227). London: Routledge.

Wolf, K. D. (2008). Emerging patterns of global governance: The new interplay between the state, business and civil society. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 225–248). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

Yaziji, M., & Doh, J. (2009). NGOs and corporations. Conflict and collaboration. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Zakaria, F. (2003). The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. Political science. New York: W.W. Norton.

Zamfir, C. (Ed.). (2001). Poverty overcoming strategies. Bucureşti, Hungary: UNDP România.

Zampetakis, L. A., & Moustakis, V. (2007). Fostering corporate entrepreneurship through internal marketing implications for change in the public sector. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(4), 413–433.CrossRef

Zürn, M. (2002). From interdependence to globalization. In W. von Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 235–254). London: Sage.CrossRef

Titel: The Business Civil Society and its Impact on Romanian Public Administration
verfasst von: Sebastian Văduva
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: From Corruption to Modernity
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26996-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-26997-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26997-9_3