Skip to main content

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Challenges for Regulation and Control in an Environment of Rapid Technological Innovations

verfasst von : Simon Grima, Jonathan Spiteri, Inna Romanova

Erschienen in: InsurTech: A Legal and Regulatory View

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Currently, amplified use of the ITC-technologies and digitalization in almost all industries has changed the value and significance of the information. The use of these new technologies offer tremendous opportunities for innovation and development, but at the same time ask for regulation and control policies to ensure appropriate storage and use of information and avoid illicit utilization of data. Moreover, use of innovative technologies such as blockchain-based technology, artificial intelligence, cloud technology, and others has complicated and disrupted the landscape of the financial services providers and their ancillary service providers such as auditors, underwriters, advisors, actuaries, lawyers, and regulators. The insurance services industry as well is substantially influenced by these current developments especially through the intensive adoption of InsurTech and RegTech solutions. With this paper, we aim through a review of the literature, to highlight the challenges in regulation and control in an environment of rapid technological innovation, specifically focusing on InsurTech and RegTech, offering logical solutions to insurance companies. We also provide an analysis of the essence of the main technologies used or potentially used by the insurance services industry as big data, blockchain-based technology, artificial intelligence, and cloud technology, identifying the benefits and risks of these innovative technologies. The analysis results in the proposed strategy to develop and calibrate controls and regulations. To make suggestions for the use of the technological innovative potential in the insurance services industry, we integrate the basic utility model of behavior, as well as the underlying regulatory and control principles as a benchmark. The basic dilemma thereby refers to the control versus innovation dilemma, as all of the strategies for control of innovation due to technology in insurance markets are imperfect. Therefore, the efficiently managed controls are required to be flexible enough to allow for quick recalibration, whenever this is necessary, possibly with Artificial Intelligence or other RegTech solutions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Craig (2017).
 
2
Romānova et al. (2018).
 
3
Kasinow (2017).
 
4
Marian (2015).
 
5
Benton and Radziwill (2017).
 
7
Lee (2017).
 
8
Gupta (2017).
 
9
BlockGeeks (2017).
 
10
Sirigada (2015).
 
11
Salam (2012).
 
12
Ralf (2017).
 
13
Holder et al. (2016).
 
14
Chandler (2013).
 
15
Vaughan (2014).
 
16
Djankov et al. (2003).
 
17
Shleifer (2005).
 
18
Beim and McCurdy (2009).
 
19
Duff & Phelps (2017).
 
20
Kahneman and Tversky (1979).
 
21
Thaler (1980).
 
22
Simon (1955).
 
23
Simon (1957).
 
24
Newell and Simon (1972).
 
25
Iyengar and Lepper (2000).
 
26
Ellsberg (1961).
 
27
Samuelson and Zeckhauser (1988).
 
28
O’Donoghue and Rabin (1999).
 
29
Agnew and Szykman (2005).
 
30
Dambe et al. (2013).
 
31
Bénabou and Tirole (2006).
 
32
Ariely et al. (2009).
 
33
Ezell et al. (2016).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Agnew JR, Szykman LR (2005) Asset allocation and information overload: the influence of information display, asset choice, and investor experience. J Behav Finance 6(2):57–70CrossRef Agnew JR, Szykman LR (2005) Asset allocation and information overload: the influence of information display, asset choice, and investor experience. J Behav Finance 6(2):57–70CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am Econ Rev 99(1):544–555CrossRef Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am Econ Rev 99(1):544–555CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Am Econ Rev 96(5):1652–1678CrossRef Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Am Econ Rev 96(5):1652–1678CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dambe K, Hunt S, Iscenko Z, Brambley W (2013) Applying behavioural economics at the Financial Conduct Authority. Occasional Paper 1, FCA Dambe K, Hunt S, Iscenko Z, Brambley W (2013) Applying behavioural economics at the Financial Conduct Authority. Occasional Paper 1, FCA
Zurück zum Zitat Djankov S, Glaeser E, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2003) The new comparative economics. J Comp Econ 31(4):595–619CrossRef Djankov S, Glaeser E, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2003) The new comparative economics. J Comp Econ 31(4):595–619CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duff & Phelps (2017) The global regulatory outlook 2016. Duff & Phelps, New York Duff & Phelps (2017) The global regulatory outlook 2016. Duff & Phelps, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q J Econ 75(4):643–669CrossRef Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q J Econ 75(4):643–669CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holder C, Khurana V, Harrison F, Jacobs L (2016) Robotics and law: key legal and regulatory implications of the robotics age (Part I of II). Comput Law Secur Rev 32:383–402CrossRef Holder C, Khurana V, Harrison F, Jacobs L (2016) Robotics and law: key legal and regulatory implications of the robotics age (Part I of II). Comput Law Secur Rev 32:383–402CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Iyengar S, Lepper M (2000) When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol 79:995–1006CrossRef Iyengar S, Lepper M (2000) When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol 79:995–1006CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291CrossRef Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving, vol 104, no 9. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving, vol 104, no 9. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Zurück zum Zitat O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Am Econ Rev 89(1):103–124CrossRef O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Am Econ Rev 89(1):103–124CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Romānova I, Grima S, Spiteri J, Kudinska M (2018) The Payment Services Directive 2 and competitiveness: the perspective of European Fintech companies. Eur Res Stud J XXI(2):5–24 Romānova I, Grima S, Spiteri J, Kudinska M (2018) The Payment Services Directive 2 and competitiveness: the perspective of European Fintech companies. Eur Res Stud J XXI(2):5–24
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson W, Zeckhauser RJ (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertain 1:7–59CrossRef Samuelson W, Zeckhauser RJ (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertain 1:7–59CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shleifer A (2005) Understanding regulation. Eur Financ Manage 11(4):439–451CrossRef Shleifer A (2005) Understanding regulation. Eur Financ Manage 11(4):439–451CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69(1):99–118CrossRef Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69(1):99–118CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon HA (1957) Models of man; social and rational. Wiley, Oxford, England Simon HA (1957) Models of man; social and rational. Wiley, Oxford, England
Zurück zum Zitat Thaler R (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J Econ Behav Organ 1(1):39–60CrossRef Thaler R (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J Econ Behav Organ 1(1):39–60CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vaughan TM (2014) Observations on insurance regulations – uniformity, efficiency, and financial stability. In: Biggs JH, Richardson MP (eds) Modernizing insurance regulators, New York University Stern. Wiley Finance Series, ch. 4, pp 31–41CrossRef Vaughan TM (2014) Observations on insurance regulations – uniformity, efficiency, and financial stability. In: Biggs JH, Richardson MP (eds) Modernizing insurance regulators, New York University Stern. Wiley Finance Series, ch. 4, pp 31–41CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Challenges for Regulation and Control in an Environment of Rapid Technological Innovations
verfasst von
Simon Grima
Jonathan Spiteri
Inna Romanova
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27386-6_4