nach oben

Environmental Management

Erschienen in:

07.01.2022

The Changes in Climate Change Concern, Responsibility Assumption and Impact on Climate-friendly Behaviour in EU from the Paris Agreement Until 2019

verfasst von: Miglė Jakučionytė-Skodienė, Genovaitė Liobikienė

Erschienen in: Environmental Management | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Climate change is one of the primary environmental problems broadly discussed in the Paris Agreement. In the literature, authors mainly focused on the changes in climate change concern. However, it is more important to answer whether the changes in concerns and responsibilities affect climate-friendly behaviour. Therefore, this study’s objective was to analyse the changes in climate change concern, personal responsibility, and climate-friendly behaviour in EU-28 from 2015 (the launch of the Paris Agreement) to 2019 and evaluate how these changes contributed to separate actions. The changes in climate change concern and personal responsibility were statistically significant (F value). During the analysed period, the purchase of energy-efficient appliances increased the most. Meanwhile, the usage of environmentally friendly transport alternatives decreased. The determinants of changes in climate-friendly behaviour were identified using the multiple linear regression model. Results showed that changes in climate change concern significantly and positively affected waste management and choice of energy supplier which offers a greater share of energy from renewable sources and purchased of low-energy homes. Meanwhile, personal responsibility significantly and positively influenced switching energy suppliers but had a negative effect on home insulation. Furthermore, residents who performed high-cost behaviours (purchase of low-energy homes) also switched energy suppliers and insulated their homes. Therefore, the results indicated that the benefit and cost of behaviour (time, money) are very important aspects to promote climate-friendly behaviour. This study suggested that policymakers should raise public awareness about climate change and take all efforts to reduce the cost of high-cost behaviours and enable the possibilities to perform climate-friendly behaviour.

Nächster Artikel Natural Resource Managers Use and Value Western-Based Science, but Barriers to Access Persist

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abejon R, Bala A, Vazqualez-Rowe I (2020) When plastic packaging should be preferred: life cycle analysis of packages for fruit and vegetable distribution in the Spanish peninsular market. Resour Conserv Recycling 155:104666CrossRef

Achtnicht M, Madlener R (2014) Factors influencing German house owners‘ preferences on energy retrofits. Energy Policy 68:254–263CrossRef

Albrecht G (2011) Chronic environmental change: emerging ‘psychoterratic syndromes. In: Weissbecker, I, (ed.) Climate Change and Human Well-Being: Global Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, New York, NY: 43–56.

Alston M, Kent J (2008) The Big Dry: the link between rural masculinities and poor health outcomes for farming men. J Sociol 44(2):133–147CrossRef

Austin KE, Rich LJ, Kiem SA, Handley T, Perkins D, Kelly JB (2020) Concerns about climate change among rural residents in Australia. J Rural Stud 75:98–109CrossRef

Baiardi D, Morana C (2021) Climate change awareness: empirical evidence for the European Union. Energy Econ 96:105163CrossRef

Bateman T, O’Connor K (2016) Felt responsibility and climate engagement: distinguishing adaptation from mitigation. Glob Environ Change 41:206–215CrossRef

Bauer A, Mendrad K (2019) Standing up for the Paris Agreement: do global climate targets influence individuals’ greenhouse gas emissions? Environ Sci Policy 99:72–79CrossRef

Baul TK, Datta D, Alam A (2018) A comparative study on household level energy consumption and related emissions from renewable (biomass) and non-renewable energy sources in Bangladesh. Energy Policy 114:598–608CrossRef

Barr S, Shaw G, Coles T (2011) Times for (Un)sustainability? Challenges and opportunities for developing behaviour change policy. A case-study of consumers at home and away. Glob Environ Change 21(4):1234–1244CrossRef

Bi P, Williams S, Loughnan M (2011) The effects of extreme heat on human mortality and morbidity in Australia: implications for public health. Asia Pac J Public Health 23(2):27–36

Boto-Garcia D, Bucciol A (2020) Climate change: personal responsibility and energy saving. Ecol Econ 169:106530CrossRef

Bouman T, Verschoor M, Albers JC, Bohm G (2020) When worry about climate change leads to climate action: how values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Glob Environ Change 62:102061CrossRef

Boykoff M, Yulsman T (2013) Political economy, media, and climate change: Sinews of modern life. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Clim Change 4:359–371

Brulle RJ, Jenkins JC, Carmichael J (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002-2010. Clim Change 114(2):169–188CrossRef

Brügger A, Dessai S, Devine-Wright P, Morton AT (2015) Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change. Nat Clim Change 5(12):1031–1037CrossRef

Capstick S, Whitmarsh L, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N, Upham P (2014) International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. WIREs Clim Change 6(1):35–61CrossRef

Carrico RA, Truelove BH, Vandenbergh PM, Dana D (2015) Does learning about climate change adaptation change support for mitigation? J Environ Psychol 41:19–29CrossRef

De Leeuw A, Valois P, Ajzen I, Schmidt P (2015) Using theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behaviour in high-school students: Implecations for educational interventions. J Environ Psychol 42:128–135CrossRef

Dienes C (2015) Actions and intentions to pay for climate change mitigation: environmental concern and the role of economic factors. Ecol Econ 109:122–129CrossRef

Douenne T, Fabre A (2019) French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies. Ecol Econ 169:106496CrossRef

Druckman JN, McGrath MC (2019) The evidence for motivated reasoning climate change preference formation. Nat Clim Change 9:111–119CrossRef

Ek K, Soderholm P (2008) Households‘ switching behavior between electricity suppliers in Sweden. Uti Policy 16(4):254–261CrossRef

European Council meeting, 2020. Conclusions – 10 and 11 December 2020. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/47296/1011-12-20-euco-conclusions-en.pdf

Evans L, Milfont LT, Lawrence J (2014) Considering local adaptation increases willingness to mitigate. Glob Environ Change 25:69–75CrossRef

Fuller BJ, Marler EL, Hester K (2006) Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J Organ Behav 27(8):1089–1120CrossRef

Flurin C (2017) Eco-districts: development and evaluation. A European Case Study. Procedia Environ Sci 37:34–45CrossRef

Franzen A, Vogn D (2013) Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: a comparative analysis of 33 countries. Glob Environ Change 23(5):1001–1008CrossRef

Fridays for Future (2020) Fridays for future. Online: https://fridaysforfuture.org/ (Accessed 14 Feb 2021).

Frondel M, Sommer S, Simora M (2017) Risk perception of climate change: empirical evidence of Germany. Ecol Econ 137:173–183CrossRef

Gifford R (2011) The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychologist 66(4):290–302CrossRef

Global Climate Strike. 2019. Global climate strike, Sep. 20–27. Accessed 14 Dec 2021.

Grafton QR, Libecap CG, O’Brien JR, Landry C (2012) Comparative assessment of water markets: insights from the Murray–Darling Basin of Australia and the Western USA. Water Policy 14(2):175–193CrossRef

Hersch J, Viscusi KW (2006) The generational divide in support for environmental policies: European Evidence. Clim Change 77(1-2):121–136CrossRef

Howell AR, Capstick S, Whitmars L (2016) hImpacts of adaptation and responsibility framings on attitudes towards climate change mitigation. Clim Change 136:445–461CrossRef

IEA 2019. Global Energy Review 2019: The latest trends in energy and emissions in 2019. Flagship report – April 2020. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2019.

James M, Ambrose M (2017) Retrofit or behaviour change? Which has the greater impact on energy consumption in low income households? Procedia Eng 180:1558–1567CrossRef

Jakučionytė-Skodienė M, Liobikienė G (2021) Climate change concern, personal responsibility and actions related to climate change mitigation in EU countries: cross-cultural analysis. J Clean Prod 281:125189

Jakučionytė-Skodienė M, Dagiliūtė R, Liobikienė G (2020) Do general pro-environmental behaviour, attitude, and knowledge contribute to energy savings and climate change mitigation in the residential sector? Energy 193:116784.CrossRef

Jänicke M (2017) The multi-level system of global climate governance – the model and its current state: the multi-level system of global climate governance. Environ Policy Gov 27(2):108–121CrossRef

Joss S, Cowley R, de Jong M, Muller B, Park BS, Rees WE, Roseland M, Rydin Y (2015) Tomorrow’s city today: prospects for standardising sustainable urban development. London: University of Westminster. ISBN: 978-0-9570527-5-8, p. 52

Kaesehage K, Leyshon M, Caseldine C (2014) Communicating climate change - learning from business: Challenging values, changing economic thinking, innovating the low carbon economy. Fennia 192(2):81–99CrossRef

Kaiser FG, Scheuthle H (2003) Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Personal Individ Differences 35(5):1033–1048CrossRef

Kasser J, Zhao YY (2017) The myths and the reality of problem‐solving. INCOSE 27(1):1114–1124CrossRef

Kesternich M, Romer D, Flues F (2019) The power of active choice: Field experimental evidence on repeated contribution decisions to a carbon offsetting program. Eur Economic Rev 114:76–91CrossRef

Kuthe A, Körfgen A, Stötter J, Keller L (2019) Strenghtening their climate change literacy: A case study addressing the weaknesses in young people‘s climate change awareness. Applied Environmental Education and Communication An International Journal 19(2):1–14

Lachapelle E, Boric PC, Rabe B (2012) Public attitudes toward climate science and climate policy in federal systems: Canada and the United States Compared. Rev Policy Res 29(3):334–357CrossRef

Lawson DF, Stevenson K, Peterson MN, Carrier SJ (2019) Children can foster climate change concern among their parents. Nat Clim Change 9(6):1–5CrossRef

Linderhof V, Oosterhuis F, Bartelings H, Van Beukering PJH (2019) Effectivenes of deposit-refund systems for household waste in the Netherlands: applying a partial equilibrium model. J Environ Manag 232:842–850CrossRef

Liobikienė G, Minelgaitė A (2021) Energy and resource-savings behaviours in European Union countries: The Campbell paradigm and goal framing theory approaches. Sci Total Environ 750:141745CrossRef

Lo AY (2016) National income and environmental concern: observations from 35 countries. Public Underst Sci 25(7):873–890CrossRef

McCright MA, Dunlap ER (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American Public’s Views Of Global Warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Q 52(2):155–194CrossRef

McCright MA, Marquart-Pyatt TS, Shwom LR, Brechin RS, Allen S (2016) Ideology, capitalism, and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States. Energy Res Soc Sci 21:180–189CrossRef

Minelgaitė A, Liobikienė G (2019) Waste problem in European Union and its influence on waste management behaviour. Sci Total Environ 667:86–93CrossRef

Motawa I, Oladokun M (2014) A model for the complexity of household energy consumption. Energy Build 87:313–323CrossRef

Moore HE, Boldero J (2017) Designing interventions that last: a classification of environmental behaviors in relation to the activities, costs, and effort involved for adoption and maintenance. Front Psychol 8:18–74CrossRef

Nauges C, Wheeler S (2017) The complex relationship between households’ climate change concerns and their water and energy mitigation behaviour. Ecol Econ 141:87–94CrossRef

Nisbet MC, Myers T (2007) The polls – trends twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opin Q 71:444–470CrossRef

Ng S, Wood HS, Ziegler DA (2015) Ancient floods, modern hazards: the Ping River, paleofloods and the ‘lost city’ of Wiang Kum Kam. Nat Hazards 75:2247–2263CrossRef

Ohler MA, Billger MS (2014) Does environmental concern change the tragedy of the commons? Factors affecting energy saving behaviors and electricity usage. Ecol Econ 107:1–12CrossRef

Paco A, Lavrador T (2017) Environmental knowledge and attitudes and behaviours towards energy consumption. J Environ Manag 197:384–392CrossRef

Pidgeon N (2012) Climate change risk perception and communication: adressing a critical moment? Risk Anal 32(6):951–956CrossRef

Pothitou M, Hanna FR, Chalvatzis JK (2016) Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: an empirical study. Appl Energy 184:1217–1229CrossRef

Poortinga W, Steg L, Bohm G, Whitmarsh L (2019) Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: a cross-European analysis. Glob Environ Change 55:25–35CrossRef

Rath S, Tripathy A, Tripathy AR (2020) Prediction of new active cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic using multiple linear regression model. Diabetes Metab Syndrome: Clin Res Rev 14(5):1467–1474CrossRef

Rezaei R, Safa L, Damalas CA, Ganjkhanloo MM (2019) Drivers of farmers’ intention to use integrated pestmanagement: integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. J Environ Manag 236:328–339CrossRef

Rickard NL, Yang JZ, Seo M, Harrison MT (2014) The “I” in climate: The role of individual responsibility in systematic processing of climate change information. Glob Environ Change 26:39–52CrossRef

Romanach LM, Leviston Z, Jeanneret T, Gardner J (2017) Low-carbon homes, thermal comfort and household practices: uplifting the energy-efficiency discourse. Energy Procedia 121:238–245CrossRef

Saheb Y, Heinz O, Sandor S (2018) Energy transition of Europe’s building stock. Implications for EU 2030. Sustainable Development Goals. Annales des Mines - Responsabilité et environnement 2018/2 (N° 90), p. 62–67

Schill M, Godefroit-Winkel D, Hogg MK (2020) Young children‘s consumer agency: The case of French children and recycling. J Bus Res 110:292–305.CrossRef

Schultz WP, Zelezny CL (2003) Reframing environmental messages to be congruent with American Values. Hum Ecol Rev 10(2):126–136

Scruggs L, Benegal S (2012) Declining public concern about climate change: can we blame the great recession? Glob Environ Change 22(2):505–515CrossRef

Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32(6):957–972CrossRef

Skogen K, Helland H, Kaltenborn B (2018) Concern about climate change, biodiversity loss, habitat degradation and landscape change: embedded in different packages of environmental concern? J Nat Conserv 44:12–20CrossRef

Steg L, Bolderdijk JW, Keizer K, Perlaviciute G (2014) An Integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: the role of values, situational factors and goals. J Environ Psychol 38:104–115CrossRef

Steenjes K, Arnold A, Corner A, Mays C (2017) European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. Project: EPCC-European Perceptions of Climate Change and Energy Preferences: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/98660/7/EPCC.pdf

Štreimikienė D (2015) Assessment of reasonably achievable GHG emission reduction target in Lithuanian households. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:460–467CrossRef

Tabi A (2013) Does pro-environmental behaviour affect carbon emissions? Energy Policy 63:972–981CrossRef

Tranter B (2013) The great divide: political candidate and voter polarisation over global warming in Australia. Aust J Politics Hist 59(3):397–413CrossRef

UK Programme (2019) Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction, International Energy Agency and the United Nations Environment Programme: 2019 global status report for buildings and construction: towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. http://inx.lv/Ei4A

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2015) Paris Climate Change Conference – November 2015. https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf

Van Borgstede C, Johnsson F, Andersson M (2013) Public attitudes to climate change and carbon mitigation – Implications for energy associated behaviours. Energy Policy 57:182–193CrossRef

Van der Linden S, Leiserowitz A, Rosenhthal S, Maibach E (2017) Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change. Science 358(6367):1141–1142CrossRef

Visschers VHM (2017) Public perception of uncertainties within climate change science. Risk Anal 38(1):43–55CrossRef

Wakiyama T, Kuramochi T (2017) Scenario analysis of energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction potentials to ratchet up Japanese mitigation target in 2030 in the residential sector. Energy Policy 103:1–15CrossRef

Wang B, Wang Q, Wei MY, Li PZ (2018) Role of renewable energy in China’s energy security and climate change mitigation: an index decomposition analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 90:187–194CrossRef

Weber EU, Stern PC (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychologist 66(4):315–328CrossRef

Wei J, Chen H, Long R (2016) Is ecological personality always consistent with low-carbon behavioral intention of urban residents? Energy Policy 98:343–352CrossRef

Wheeler S, Zuo A, Bjornlund H (2013) Farmers’ climate change beliefs and adaptation strategies for a water scarce future in Australia. Glob Environ Change 23:537–547CrossRef

Whitmarsh L (2011) Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: dimensions, determinants and change over time. Glob Environ Change 21:690–700CrossRef

Whitmarsh L, Capstick S (2018) Perceptions of climate change. In: Clayton S, Manning C (Eds), Psychology and climate change: Human perceptions, impacts, and responses: p. 13–33. Netherlands, Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press

Williamson K, Satre-Meloy A, Velasco K, Green K (2018) Climate Change Needs Behavior Change: Making the Case For Behavioral Solutions to Reduce Global Warming. Arlington, VA: Rare

Zaval L, Keenan E, Johnson JE (2014) How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nat Clim Change 4(2):143–147CrossRef

Zsoka A, Szerenyi Z, Szechy A, Kocsis T (2013) Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. J Clean Prod 48:126–138CrossRef

Titel: The Changes in Climate Change Concern, Responsibility Assumption and Impact on Climate-friendly Behaviour in EU from the Paris Agreement Until 2019
verfasst von: Miglė Jakučionytė-Skodienė
Genovaitė Liobikienė
Publikationsdatum: 07.01.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Environmental Management / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01574-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Wealth and Education Influences on Spatial Pattern of Tree Planting in a Tropical Metropolis in Brazil

Assessment of Water Quality Parameters and their Seasonal Behaviour in a Portuguese Water Supply System: a 6-year Monitoring Study

The Influence of a Climate Change Narrative on the Stated Preferences for Long-term Groundwater Management

The Presence of Denitrifiers In Bacterial Communities of Urban Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Biosolids in Western Canada: A Case Study on Public Risk Perception and Factors Influencing Public Attitudes

Natural Resource Managers Use and Value Western-Based Science, but Barriers to Access Persist