nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. The Charm of Salient Issues? Parties’ Strategic Behavior in Press Releases

verfasst von : Caroline Dalmus, Regula Hänggli, Laurent Bernhard

Erschienen in: How Political Actors Use the Media

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

During election campaigns political actors strategically choose issues to focus on. Besides highlighting issues over which a party exerts issue ownership, they may also engage with issues highly salient in the media. The present chapter analyses under which conditions parties prefer focusing on the issues they own, and in which cases they rather pay attention to issues on the media agenda. A content analysis of press releases and newspaper coverage in Switzerland, Germany, France and Great Britain during national election campaigns shows that issue ownership matters across countries and explains quite well the parties’ issue selection strategies. However, exogenous events like crisis, scandals or catastrophes motivate to follow up on news coverage, even at the cost of owned issues.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Moving Beyond the Single Mediated Arena Model: Media Uses and Influences Across Three Arena’s

Nächstes Kapitel News Tone and the Government in the News: When and Why Do Government Actors Appear in the News?

Abbe, O. G., Goodliffe, J., & Patterson, K. D. (2003). Agenda setting in congressional elections: The impact of issues and campaigns on voting behavior. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 419–430. doi:10.1177/106591290305600404.CrossRef

Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1994). Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues-the joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(3), 335–357. doi:10.1086/269431.CrossRef

Bélanger, E., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 477–491. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001.CrossRef

Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 53–74.CrossRef

Brandenburg, H. (2002). Who follows whom? The impact of parties on media agenda formation in the 1997 British general elections campaign. Harvard Journal of Press and Politics, 7(3), 34–54.

Brandenburg, H. (2004). Manipulating the dimensions. A comparative study of campaign effects on media agenda formation. Paper prepared for ECPR joint sessions, Uppsala, Sweden.

Brettschneider, F. (2004). Agenda-setting, agenda-cutting, agenda-surfing. Themenmanagement bei der Bundestagswahl 2002. In H. Oberreuter (Ed.), Der versäumte Wechsel (pp. 9–34). München: Olzog.

Boydstun, A. E., Bevan, S., & Thomas, H. F. (2014). The importance of attention diversity and how to measure it. Policy Studies Journal, 42(2), 173–196. doi:10.1111/psj.12055.CrossRef

Budge, I., & Farlie, D. J. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London and Boston: G. Allen and Unwin.

Dalmus, C., Hänggli, R., & Bernhard, L. (2016). Issue competition between parties across communication channels: An empirical analysis of the 2011 Swiss federal elections. NCCR Democracy working paper, 93.

Dalton, R., Beck, P., Huckfeldt, R., & Koetzle, W. (1998). A test of the media-centred agenda-setting: Newspaper content and public interests in a presidential election. Political Communication, 15, 463–481.CrossRef

Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Müller, W. C., & Winkler, A. K. (2014). How parties compete for votes: A test of saliency theory. European Journal of Political Research, 53, 57–76. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12017.CrossRef

Elmelund-Praestekaer, C. (2011). Mapping parties’ issue agenda in different channels of campaign ommunication: A wild goose chase? Javnost-the Public, 18(1), 37–51. doi:10.1080/13183222.2011.11009050.CrossRef

Geiss, S. (2011). Agenda builder oder agenda surfer? Eine Analyse der Thematisierungsmacht der Onlinekommunikation am Beispiel des Podcasts “Angela Merkel—die Kanzlerin direkt”. In J. F. M. Haschke, André Michael (Ed.), Politik - Deutsch, Deutsch - Politik: Aktuelle Trends und Forschungsergebnisse (pp. 133–156). Berlin: Frank & Timme.

Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media influence: When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40, 663–677. doi:10.1017/S0007123410000037.CrossRef

Haselmayer, M., Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. (2017). Partisan bias in message selection: Media gatekeeping of party press releases. Political Communication, 1–18. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1265619.

Helbling, M., & Tresch, A. (2011). Measuring party positions and issue salience from media coverage: Discussing and cross-validating new indicators. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 174–183. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.12.001.CrossRef

Helfer, L., & Van Aelst, P. (2016). What makes party messages fit for reporting? An experimental study of journalistic news selection. Political Communication, 33(1), 59–77. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.969464.CrossRef

Just, M. R., Crigler, A. N., Alger, D. E., Cook, T. E., Kern, M., & West, D. M. (1996). Crosstalk, citizen, candidates and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Kepplinger, H. M., & Habermeier, J. (1995). The impact of key eventson the presentation of reality. European Journal of Communication, 10(3), 371–390.CrossRef

Lachat, R. (2014). Issue ownership and the vote: The effects of associative and competence ownership on issue voting. Swiss Political Science Review, 20(4), 727–740. doi:10.1111/spsr.12121.CrossRef

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.CrossRef

Norris, P., Curtice, J., Sanders, D., Scammell, M., & Semetko, H. A. (1999). On message. Communicating the campaign. London: Sage.

Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. doi:10.2307/2111797.CrossRef

Petrocik, J. R., Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2003). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 599–626.

Robertson, D. B. (1976). A theory of party competition. London: Wiley.

Seeberg, H. B. (2016). How stable is political parties’ issue ownership? A cross-time, cross-national analysis. Political Studies, 1–18. doi:10.1177/0032321716650224.

Sides, J. (2006). The origins of campaign agendas. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 407–436. doi:10.1017/S0007123406000226.CrossRef

Sigelman, L., & Buell, E. H. (2004). Avoidance or engagement? Issue convergence in US presidential campaigns, 1960–2000. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 650–661. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00093.x.CrossRef

Tresch, A., Lefevere, J., & Walgrave, S. (2015). ‘Steal me if you can!’ The impact of campaign messages on associative issue ownership. Party Politics, 21(2), 198–208. doi:10.1177/1354068812472576.CrossRef

Tresch, A., Lefevere, J., & Walgrave, S. (2017). How parties’ issue emphasis strategies vary across communication channels: The 2009 regional election campaign in Belgium. Acta Politica, 1–23. doi 10.1057/s41269-016-0036-7.

Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. (2014). Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics, 37(5), 1019–1045. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.911483.CrossRef

Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2007). Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Issue-party identifications in Belgium, 1991–2005. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(1), 37–67. doi:10.1177/1081180X06297572.CrossRef

Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x.CrossRef

Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2016). Information and arena: The dual function of the news media for political elites. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 496–518. doi:10.1111/jcom.12229.CrossRef

Walgrave, S., Tresch, A., & Lefevere, J. (2015). The conceptualisation and measurement of issue ownership. West European Politics, 38(4), 778–796. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1039.CrossRef

Titel: The Charm of Salient Issues? Parties’ Strategic Behavior in Press Releases
verfasst von: Caroline Dalmus
Regula Hänggli
Laurent Bernhard
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: How Political Actors Use the Media
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60248-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60249-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60249-3_10