Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The cohesion policy of the European Union has become its primary instrument promoting development in the peripheral member states. The enduring consequences of the 2007–2008 crisis and the economic governance agenda requiring fiscal discipline from the member states have raised the policy’s significance further. However, similar economic inequalities characterize the EU nowadays as several decades ago. The cohesion policy is by no means alone responsible for this, but the reasons for its ambiguous performance deserve further scrutiny. Empirical studies explain variation in fund performance with domestic institutional quality and absorption capacity, but the member states’ fund spending strategies have not been addressed so far. This is puzzling because they are important determinants of the economic effects of EU funds. The paper fills this gap by investigating the spending strategies of the Southern and the Eastern members in two recent programming cycles (2007–2013 and 2014–2020). Assessed on five expenditure categories, the paper reveals that physical infrastructure investments enjoyed priority over long-term growth-generating R&D and human capital projects and that the allocation of EU funds did not reflect domestic development needs.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Allen D. Cohesion and the structural funds. In: Wallace H, Wallace W, Pollack M, editors. Policy-making in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 213–42.
Bache I, Jones R. Has EU regional policy empowered the regions? A study of Spain and the United Kingdom. Reg Fed Stud. 2000;10(3):1–20. CrossRef
Bachtler J, Mc Master I. EU cohesion policy and the role of the regions: investigating the influence of structural funds in the new member states. Environ Plan C: Gov Policy. 2007;26(2):398–427. CrossRef
Bachtler J, Mendez C, Oraže H. From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: administrative performance and capacity in cohesion policy. Eur Plan Stud. 2014;22(4):735–57. CrossRef
Bähr C. How does sub-national autonomy affect the effectiveness of structural funds? Kyklos. 2008;61(1):3–18. CrossRef
Banister D, Berechman Y. Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. J Transp Geogr. 2001;9(3):209–18. CrossRef
Barro RJ. Human capital and growth. Am Econ Rev. 2001;91(2):12–7. CrossRef
Baun M, Marek D. Regional policy and decentralization in the Czech Republic. Reg Fed Stud. 2006;16(4):409–28. CrossRef
Becker SO, Egger PH, von Ehrlich M. Going NUTS: the effect of EU structural funds on regional performance. J Public Econ. 2010;94(9–10):578–90. CrossRef
Begg I. Cohesion or confusion: a policy searching for objectives. J Eur Integr. 2010;32(1):77–96. CrossRef
Bilbao-Osorio B, Rodríguez-Pose A. From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth Chang. 2004;35(4):434–55. CrossRef
Bloom S, Petrova V. National subversion of supranational goals: ‘pork-barrel’ politics and EU regional aid. Europe-Asia Stud. 2013;65(8):1599–620. CrossRef
Boldrin M, Canova F. Regional policies and EU enlargement. In: Funck B, Pizzati L, editors. European Integration, Regional Policy and Growth. The World Bank. Washington D.C.: 2003. pp. 33–94.
Börzel, TA. States and regions in the European Union: institutional adaptation in Germany and Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Bourne AK. The impact of European integration on regional power. JCMS: J Common Mark Stud. 2003;41(4):597–620.
Bouvet F, Dall’erba S. European regional structural funds: how large is the influence of politics on the allocation process? JCMS: J Common Mark Stud. 2010;48(3):501–28.
Bruszt L. Multi-level governance—the eastern versions emerging patterns of regional developmental governance in the new member states. Reg Fed Stud. 2008;18(5):607–28. CrossRef
Bruszt L, McDermott GA. Introduction: the governance of transnational regulatory integration and development. In: Bruszt L, McDermott GA, editors. Leveling the playing field: transnational regulatory integration and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
Bruszt L, Vukov V. Transnationalizing states in Europe’s peripheries: European integration and the evolution of economic state capacities in the southern and eastern peripheries of Europe. J Comp Econ Stud. 2015;10:69–92.
Cappelen A, Castellacci F, Fagerberg J, Verspagen B. The impact of EU regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union. JCMS: J Common Mark Stud. 2003;41(4):621–44.
Charron N. Explaining the allocation of regional structural funds: the conditional effect of governance and self-rule. Eur Union Polit. 2016;17(4):638–59. CrossRef
Cosci S, Mirra L. A spatial analysis of growth and convergence in Italian provinces: the role of road infrastructure. Reg Stud. 2018;52(4):516–27. CrossRef
Dellmuth LM. The cash divide: the allocation of European Union regional grants. J Eur Public Policy. 2011;18(7):1016–33. CrossRef
Dellmuth LM, Stoffel MF. Distributive politics and intergovernmental transfers: the local allocation of European Union structural funds. Eur Union Polit. 2012;13(3):413–33. CrossRef
Ederveen S, de Groot HLF, Nahuis R. Fertile soil for structural funds?A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European cohesion policy. Kyklos. 2006;59(1):17–42. CrossRef
European Commission. Cohesion Policy 2007–2013. National Strategic Reference Frameworks. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/atlas2007/fiche/nsrf.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2018.
Fagerberg J, Verspagen B. Heading for divergence? Regional growth in Europe reconsidered. JCMS: J Common Mark Stud. 1996;34(3):431–48.
Ferry M, McMaster I. Cohesion policy and the evolution of regional policy in Central and Eastern Europe. Europe-Asia Studies. 2013;65(8):1502–28. CrossRef
Frisina L. Understanding regional development: absorption, institutions and socio-economic growth in the regions of the European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2008.
Grabbe H. How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity. J Eur Public Policy. 2001;8(6):1013–31. CrossRef
Griffith R, Redding S, Van Reenen J. Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Rev Econ Stat. 2004;86(4):883–95. CrossRef
Hooghe L. Cohesion policy and European integration: building multi-level governance: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Hughes J, Sasse G, Gordon C. Conditionality and compliance in the EU’s eastward enlargement: regional policy and the reform of sub-national government. JCMS: J Common Market Stud. 2004a;42(3):523–51.
Hughes J, Sasse G, Gordon C. Europeanization and regionalization in the EU’s enlargement to central and Eastern Europe: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004b.
Jacoby W. Managing globalization by managing central and Eastern Europe: the EU’s backyard as threat and opportunity. J Eur Public Policy. 2010;17(3):416–32. CrossRef
Jacoby W. The EU factor in fat times and in lean: did the EU amplify the boom and soften the bust? J Common Mark Stud. 2014;52:52–70.
Kemmerling A, Bodenstein T. Partisan politics in regional redistribution do parties affect the distribution of EU structural funds across regions? Eur Union Polit. 2006;7(3):373–92. CrossRef
Kyriacou AP, Roca-Sagalés O. The impact of EU structural funds on regional disparities within member states. Environ Plan C: Gov Policy. 2012;30(2):267–81. CrossRef
Lakshmanan TR. The broader economic consequences of transport infrastructure investments. J Transp Geogr. 2011;19(1):1–12. CrossRef
Le Gallo J, Dall’erba S, Guillain R. The local versus global dilemma of the effects of structural funds. Growth Chang. 2011;42(4):466–90. CrossRef
Leonardi R. Cohesion policy in the European Union: the building of Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. CrossRef
Lucas RE. On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ. 1988;22(1):3–42. CrossRef
Medve-Bálint G. Funds for the wealthy and the politically loyal? How EU funds may contribute to increasing regional disparities in East Central Europe. In: Bachtler J, Hardy S, Berkowitz P, Muravska T, editors. EU cohesion policy: reassessing performance and direction, regions and cities, London; New York: Routledge: 2017. pp. 220–240.
Mohl P, Hagen T. Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Reg Sci Urban Econ. 2010;40(5):353–65. CrossRef
Nelson RR, Phelps ES. Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. Am Econ Rev. 1966;56(1/2):69–75.
Paraskevopoulos CJ, Leonardi R. Introduction: adaptational pressures and social learning in European regional policy—cohesion (Greece, Ireland and Portugal) vs. CEE (Hungary, Poland) countries. Reg Fed Stud. 2004;14(3):315–54. CrossRef
Richardson HW. Growth pole spillovers: the dynamics of backwash and spread. Reg Stud. 1976;10(1):1–9. CrossRef
Rodriguez-Pose A, Garcilazo E. Quality of government and the returns of investment: examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. OECD Regional Development Working Papers. OECD Publishing; 2013.
Romer PM. Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ. 1986;94:1002–37. CrossRef
Scherpereel JA. EU cohesion policy and the Europeanization of Central and East European regions. Reg Fed Stud. 2010;20(1):45–62. CrossRef
Sloboda BW, Yao VW. Interstate spillovers of private capital and public spending. Ann Reg Sci. 2008;42(3):505–18. CrossRef
Spendzharova AB, Vachudova M. Catching up? Consolidating liberal democracy in Bulgaria and Romania after EU accession. West Eur Polit. 2012;35(1):39–58. CrossRef
Straub S. Infrastructure and growth in developing countries: recent advances and research challenges. Policy Research Working Paper Series 4460. World Bank Development Research Department; 2008.
SWECO. Final report - ERDF and CF regional expenditure. Stockholm: SWECO International AB. Report prepared for the European Commission. 2008. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2018.
Terracciano B, Graziano PR. EU cohesion policy implementation and administrative capacities: insights from Italian regions. Reg Fed Stud. 2016;26(3):293–320. CrossRef
Tosun J. Absorption of regional funds: a comparative analysis. JCMS: J Common Mark Stud. 2014;52(2):371–87.
- The Cohesion Policy on the EU’s Eastern and Southern Periphery: Misallocated Funds?
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta