Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Collaboration Learning in the Interdisciplinary Workshop Based on Design Thinking: A Learning Outcome Perspective

verfasst von : Jun Xu, Gang Liu, Sicong Liu, Raoshan Xu

Erschienen in: Design, User Experience, and Usability: Designing Interactions

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Design thinking has been indicated as an approach to improve innovation abilities by focusing on collaborative learning and working. In the past five years, innovation workshops which combined design thinking and interdisciplinary sprung up in China’s colleges. In order to explore an effective teaching strategy and improve the teaching effectiveness in these workshops, researchers made learning outcomes based on the five main parts of design thinking, and performed the collaborative task for students. In past teaching practice, the researchers found that students tended to do what they can; few of them were willing to learn what they can’t. In this paper, I focus on proposing four learning outcomes to promote students in the multidisciplinary workshop to learn from each other in performing the task together. The four learning outcomes are: a poster of user research, a storyboard, 3 prototypes and a road show. The paper also answers two questions, (1) How to make learning outcomes to deal with cognitive divergences among interdisciplinary students? (2) How to promote collaboration learning effectiveness in interdisciplinary workshops?
This paper introduces a project in which thirty college students, who came from four programs, performed a smart product design task in interdisciplinary groups. The research has two objectives: to experiment the advantages and disadvantages of four learning outcomes in collaborate learning for four specialties students, to reveal the significance of four learning outcomes at interdisciplinary collaborative learning.
In the interdisciplinary workshop, thirty college students came from design, electronic, machinery and software programs. The students were put into five groups based on different disciplines and performed four learning outcomes, which were a poster of user research, a storyboard, three prototypes and a road show. It took eight days to finish the whole task. At the end of the workshop, the students filled in the questionnaire. The data showed that more than the half students thought the four learning outcomes enhanced their learning interest, and promoted their collaborative learning.
The results obtained in this research summarized the advantages and disadvantages of the four learning outcomes and proposed the significance of these at interdisciplinary workshop. The advantages are these outcomes reduced learning difficulties and divergences as well as shorten the collaboration time. The disadvantages demonstrated can’t improve the professional abilities and interdisciplinary collaboration in deeper level. Next the two significances outcomes were, a. it improved interdisciplinary student collaborative abilities by using 4 learning outcomes, b. it provided a visualization method to reduce the difficulties in collaboration learning and provided a model to make self-reflections.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ramírez, M.-S., García-Peñalvo, F.-J.: Co-creation and open innovation: systematic literature review. Comunicar 54(1) (2017) Ramírez, M.-S., García-Peñalvo, F.-J.: Co-creation and open innovation: systematic literature review. Comunicar 54(1) (2017)
Zurück zum Zitat Fu, K.: Interdisciplinary learning through design activities uniting fundamentals of engineering curriculum. In: ICED15 (2017) Fu, K.: Interdisciplinary learning through design activities uniting fundamentals of engineering curriculum. In: ICED15 (2017)
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, P.N.: Is ‘design thinking’ the new liberal arts? Chron. Higher Educ. (2015) Miller, P.N.: Is ‘design thinking’ the new liberal arts? Chron. Higher Educ. (2015)
Zurück zum Zitat Carlgren, L., Rauth, I., Elmquist, M.: Framing design thinking: the concept in idea and enactment. Creativity Innov. Manage. 25, 38–54 (2016)CrossRef Carlgren, L., Rauth, I., Elmquist, M.: Framing design thinking: the concept in idea and enactment. Creativity Innov. Manage. 25, 38–54 (2016)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huo, X.: Focusing on training Hou Jian innovative educational system. China Higher Educ. 19, 36–38 (2014) Huo, X.: Focusing on training Hou Jian innovative educational system. China Higher Educ. 19, 36–38 (2014)
Zurück zum Zitat Jun, X.: A teaching experiment of design thinking based for the innovation course: take DET innovation workshop of nanjing college of information technology for example. Zhuangshi 9 (2017) Jun, X.: A teaching experiment of design thinking based for the innovation course: take DET innovation workshop of nanjing college of information technology for example. Zhuangshi 9 (2017)
Zurück zum Zitat An, H.: Innovative education for higher vocational education in the perspective of “All Innovations”. Educ. Careers 15, 81–83 (2016) An, H.: Innovative education for higher vocational education in the perspective of “All Innovations”. Educ. Careers 15, 81–83 (2016)
Zurück zum Zitat Yan, H.: Cultivation of students’ creative ability in higher vocational colleges - practice and exploration of “3T” mode. China Vocat. Tech. Educ. 17, 54–63 (2015) Yan, H.: Cultivation of students’ creative ability in higher vocational colleges - practice and exploration of “3T” mode. China Vocat. Tech. Educ. 17, 54–63 (2015)
Zurück zum Zitat Yin, B.: Research status and development trend of design thinking. In: Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 19, p. 1166 (2013) Yin, B.: Research status and development trend of design thinking. In: Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 19, p. 1166 (2013)
Zurück zum Zitat Cross, N.: Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Des. Issues 17, 49–55 (2001)CrossRef Cross, N.: Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Des. Issues 17, 49–55 (2001)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8, 5–21 (1992)CrossRef Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8, 5–21 (1992)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 5, 61–62,81–101,111. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996) Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 5, 61–62,81–101,111. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Zurück zum Zitat Cross, N.: Designerly ways of knowing. Des. Stud. 3(4), 221–227 (1982)CrossRef Cross, N.: Designerly ways of knowing. Des. Stud. 3(4), 221–227 (1982)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat IDEO: Field Guide to Human-Centered Design IDEO: Field Guide to Human-Centered Design
Zurück zum Zitat Jaskiewicz, T.: Prototype-centric explorative interaction design approach. In: Proceeding of 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 598–600 (2017) Jaskiewicz, T.: Prototype-centric explorative interaction design approach. In: Proceeding of 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 598–600 (2017)
Zurück zum Zitat Kekan, H.: On maker education and innovation education. Educ. Res. 4, 12–24 (2016) Kekan, H.: On maker education and innovation education. Educ. Res. 4, 12–24 (2016)
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, G.: The basic proposition of vocational education curriculum reform in the realization of professional ability. Vocat. Educ. Forum, 4–9 (2010) Xu, G.: The basic proposition of vocational education curriculum reform in the realization of professional ability. Vocat. Educ. Forum, 4–9 (2010)
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, G.: Positioning and presentation of teaching objectives of integrated vocational education courses. Vocat. Educ. Forum 15, 76–79 (2013) Zhang, G.: Positioning and presentation of teaching objectives of integrated vocational education courses. Vocat. Educ. Forum 15, 76–79 (2013)
Zurück zum Zitat Wen, Z.: Investigation and analysis of the status quo of innovation and entrepreneurship education in higher vocational colleges. China Vocat. Tech. Educ. (27) (2016) Wen, Z.: Investigation and analysis of the status quo of innovation and entrepreneurship education in higher vocational colleges. China Vocat. Tech. Educ. (27) (2016)
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, T.: Change by Design, 5th edn. Northern Joint Publishing Media (Group) Co., Ltd. Wan Juan Publishing Co., (2011) Brown, T.: Change by Design, 5th edn. Northern Joint Publishing Media (Group) Co., Ltd. Wan Juan Publishing Co., (2011)
Zurück zum Zitat Lattuca, L.R., Voight, L.J., Fath, K.Q.: Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? theoretical support and researchable questions. Rev. High. Educ. Fall (2004) Lattuca, L.R., Voight, L.J., Fath, K.Q.: Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? theoretical support and researchable questions. Rev. High. Educ. Fall (2004)
Metadaten
Titel
The Collaboration Learning in the Interdisciplinary Workshop Based on Design Thinking: A Learning Outcome Perspective
verfasst von
Jun Xu
Gang Liu
Sicong Liu
Raoshan Xu
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91803-7_12

Neuer Inhalt