Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Small Business Economics
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics 2/2021

27.05.2019

The complementarity perspective to the entrepreneurial ecosystem taxonomy

verfasst von: Andrew Godley, Norbert Morawetz, Lebene Soga

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increased interest in fast-growing regions and the role played by entrepreneurship ecosystems (EEs) in regional economic development. Building on the entrepreneurship and economic geography literatures, we apply a complementarity perspective to demonstrate that the elements of the EE taxonomy are not independent of each other but in fact are able to work as complementors to each other. The EE taxonomy is therefore a dynamic taxonomy. Very few non-metropolitan regions will possess all four elements of the EE taxonomy in significantly strong levels. So, complementarity between the taxonomy elements within a region is crucial to supporting development for most EEs. We apply this complementarity perspective to the case of the Greater Reading region in the UK. We expect the readership to extend beyond the academic community to policy and entrepreneurship practitioner audiences interested in supporting EE development.
Vorheriger Artikel How do country R&D change the allocation of self-employment across different types?
Nächster Artikel Corporate entrepreneurship strategy: extending our knowledge boundaries through configuration theory

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.
Alvarez, S., Godley, A. C., & Wright, M. (2014). Mark Casson, The Entrepreneur at thirty: continued relevance? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(2), 185–194.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strat. Mgmt. J., 31, 306–333.
Armington, C., & Acs, Z. J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36(1), 33–45.
Arrow, K. J. (1969). Classificatory notes on the production and transmission of technological knowledge. The American Economic Review, 59(2), 29–35.
Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321.
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2013). The missing pillar: the creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 819–836.
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051.
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.
Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2016). The seven secrets of Germany: Economic resilience in an era of global turbulence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M., & Lehmann, E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2015). Entrepreneurship and economic development in cities. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1), 33–60.
Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial finance and technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 1–9.
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: Implications for innovation management? In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.
Beckman, C. M., Hauschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J. (2004). Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science, 15(3), 259–275.
Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2016a). What drives ICT clustering in European cities? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 430–450.
Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2016b). Creativity, entrepreneurship and economic development: city-level evidence on creativity spillover of entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1354–1376.
Belitski, M., & Korosteleva, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial activity across European cities. Econstor. 50th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Sustainable Regional Growth and Development in the Creative Knowledge Economy”, 19–23 August 2010, Jönköping, Sweden.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). “Coopetition” in business networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426.
Best, M. H. (2015). Greater Boston’s industrial ecosystem: a manufactory of sectors. Technovation, 39-40, 4–13.
Borissenko, Y., & Boschma, R. (2016). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems: towards a future research agenda, No 1630. Section of Economic Geography: Utrecht University.
Brown, R., & Mason, S. (2013). Scotland’s companies of scale programme. In An international benchmarking analysis of public programmes for high-growth firms (pp. 64–84). Paris: OECD.
Buenstorf, G., & Fornahl, D. (2009). B2C—bubble to cluster: the dot-com boom, spin-off entrepreneurship, and regional agglomeration. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(3), 349–378.
Cabrera, D., Colosi, L., & Lobdell, C. (2008). Systems thinking. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3), 299–310.
Casson, M. C. (1982). The entrepreneur: an economic theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Casson, M. C., & Godley, A. C. (2015). “Doctor, Doctor…” entrepreneurial diagnosis and market making. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3), 601–621.
Choi, B., Poon, S. K., & Davis, J. G. (2008). Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: a complementarity theory-based approach. Omega, 36(2), 235–251.
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176.
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & VanHove, J. (2015). A look inside accelerators. London: Nesta.
Corden, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2005). Verbatim quotations: whose views count? Qualitative Research, 1(1), 4–6.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
De Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlander, L., & Kammerlander, N. (2017). Innovation with limited resources: management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125–146.
De Villiers Scheepers, M. J., Mealy, E., Clements, M., & Lawrence, A. (2018). Regional entrepreneurship ecosystems support: South East Queensland as case study. In A. O’Connor, E. Stam, E. F. Sussan, & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Entrepreneurial ecosystems (pp. 1–21). Cham: Springer.
Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4), 495–518.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Feldman, M. P. (2014). The character of innovative places: entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 9–20.
Feldman, M., & Braunerhjelm, P. (2006). The genesis of industrial clusters. In P. Braunerhjelm & M. Feldman (Eds.), Cluster genesis: Technology-based industrial development (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feldman, M., & Zoller, T. D. (2012). Dealmakers in place: social capital connections in regional entrepreneurial economies. Regional Studies, 46(1), 23–37.
Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R., & Venables, A. (2001). The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade. MA: MIT Press.
Garnsey, E., & Heffernan, P. (2005). High-technology clustering through spin-out and attraction: the Cambridge case. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1127–1144.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Eliasson, G. (2000). Industrial policy, competence blocs and the role of science in economic development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, 217–241.
Isenberg, D.J. (2010). How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 41–50.
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship, Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs.
Isenberg, D., & Onyemah, V. (2016). Fostering scaleup ecosystems for regional economic growth. Innovations, 11(1–2), 60–79.
Kemeny, T., Feldman, M., Ethridge, F., & Zoller, T. (2015). The economic value of local social networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(5), 1101–1122.
Kirzner, I. M. (1999). Creativity and/or alertness: a reconsideration of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur. The Review of Austrian Economics, 11(1–2), 5–17.
Klepper, S. (2010). The origin and growth of industry clusters: the making of Silicon Valley and Detroit. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1), 15–32.
Lee, N. (2014). What holds back high-growth firms? Evidence from UK SMEs. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 183–195.
Lee, C.-H., Venkatraman, N., Tanriverdi, H., & Iyer, B. (2010). Complementarity-based hypercompetition in the software industry: theory and empirical test, 1990-2002. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1431–1456.
Leten, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Roijakkers, N., Clerix, A., & Van Helleputte, J. (2013). IP models to orchestrate innovation Ecosystems. California Management Review, 55(4), 51–64.
Li, W., Liu, K., Belitski, M., Ghobadian, A., & O'Regan, N. (2016). e-Leadership through strategic alignment: an empirical study of small-and medium-sized enterprises in the digital age. Journal of Information Technology, 31(2), 185–206.
Li, W., Liu, K., Tang, Y., & Belitski, M. (2017). E-Leadership for SMEs in the digital age. In The Palgrave handbook of managing continuous business transformation (pp. 375–416). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Malecki, E. J. (2012). Regional social capital: why it matters. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1023–1039.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
Martin, R. (2015). Rebalancing the spatial economy: the challenge for regional theory. Territory, Politics, Governance, 3(3), 235–272.
Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship (pp. 1–38). Paris: Final Report to OECD.
Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11–30.
Miller, P., & Bound, K. (2011). The startup factories. London: NESTA.
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: entrepreneurs’ self-regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1071–1097.
O’Connor, A., Stam, E., Sussan, F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2018). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: the foundations of place-based renewal. In A. O’connor, E. Stam, E. F. Sussan, & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Entrepreneurial ecosystems (pp. 1–21). Cham: Springer.
Pierce, L. (2009). Big losses in ecosystem niches: how core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strategic Management Journal, 30(3), 323–347.
Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.
Porter, M., & Siggelkow, N. (2008). Contextuality within activity systems and sustainability of competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(2), 34–56.
Qian, H., Acs, Z. J., & Stough, R. R. (2013). Regional systems of entrepreneurship: the nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 559–587.
Saxenian, A. (1996). Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128. CA: Harvard University Press.
Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.
Stam, E. (2007). Why butterflies don’t leave: locational behavior of entrepreneurial firms. Economic Geography, 83(1), 27–50.
Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.
Stam, E. (2018). Measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems. In A. O’connor, E. Stam, E. F. Sussan, & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Entrepreneurial ecosystems (pp. 173–197). Cham: Springer.
Stam, F. C. & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems. USE Discussion Paper Series, nr. 16–13.
Stangler, D. & Bell-Masterson, J. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem, Kauffman Foundation, March Ed.
Sullivan D.M. & Ford C.M. (2014). How entrepreneurs use networks to address changing resource requirements during early venture development. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 38, 551–574.
Sussan, F., Sloboda, B., & Hall, R. (2018). Is there a path from sin city to tech city? The case for Las Vegas. In A. O’Connor, E. Stam, E. F. Sussan, & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Entrepreneurial ecosystems (pp. 173–197). Cham: Springer.
Szerb, L., Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., Ortega-Argilés, R., & Komlósi, É. (2014). REDI: the regional entrepreneurship and development index–measuring regional entrepreneurship report for the European Commission Directorate-general regional and urban policy under contract number 2012.
Thames Valley Berkshire (TVB). (2014). Delivering national growth, locally, strategic economic plan, 2015/16–2020/21 – The evidence base report.
Van der Panne, G. (2004). Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), 593–604.
Van Stel, A. & Storey, D. (2004). The Link between Firm Births and Job Creation: Is there a Upas Tree Effect?, Regional Studies, 38(8), 893–909.
WEF. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and around the globe and early-stage company growth dynamics—an entrepreneur’s perspective. Davos: World Economic Forum http://​www3.​weforum.​org/​docs (Accessed 01/11/2017).
Welter, F., Baker, T., Audretsch, D. B., & Gartner, W. B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship—a call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321.
Williamson, P., & De Meyer, A. (2012). Ecosystem advantage: how to successfully harness the power of partners. California Management Review, 55(1), 24–46.
Wu, B., Wan, Z., & Levinthal, D. A. (2014). Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: innovation incentives and trajectory choices. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9), 1257–1278.
Metadaten
Titel
The complementarity perspective to the entrepreneurial ecosystem taxonomy
verfasst von
Andrew Godley
Norbert Morawetz
Lebene Soga
Publikationsdatum
27.05.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00197-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Small Business Economics 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

The influence of exploratory versus exploitative acquisitions on innovation output in the biotechnology industry

OriginalPaper

Gender (in)equality within the household and business start-up among mothers

OriginalPaper

Knowledge-based service economy and firm entry: an alternative to the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship

OriginalPaper

Local knowledge composition and the emergence of entrepreneurial activities across industries: evidence from Italian NUTS-3 regions

OriginalPaper

The relationship between origin and performance of innovative start-ups: the role of technological knowledge at founding

OriginalPaper

Diversity, innovation and entrepreneurship: where are we and where should we go in future studies?