Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The American public remains largely moderate on many issues, but incivility and hostility are rife in American politics. In this paper, I argue that the alignment of multiple issue attitudes along the traditional ideological spectrum helps explain the asymmetrical rise in negative political affect. I introduce belief congruence theory as a supplemental theoretical framework to social identity theory. Cross-sectional data reveal a significant association between issue alignment and negative out-party affect that is neither mediated nor moderated by partisan identity. A first-difference approach using two panel studies then addresses potential heterogeneity bias by testing a change-on-change model within individuals. Both panels, which are from different time periods, covering different issues, reveal significant associations between issue alignment and outgroup dislike. In contrast, partisan identity was only significantly associated with ingroup affect. This work suggests that cross-cutting issue preferences could help attenuate political hostility and reiterate the need to reconsider the role of issue-based reasoning in polarized America.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Abramowitz, A. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Abrams, S. J., & Fiorina, M. P. (2015). Are leaning independents just weak partisans under another name? Unpublished manuscript.
Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J. M. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 215–232. CrossRef
Bafumi, J., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2009). A new partisan voter. Journal of Politics, 71, 1–24. CrossRef
Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 408–446. CrossRef
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. CrossRef
Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, ingroup conflict, and conflict reduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, R. J. (1984). The role of similarity in intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 603–623). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Brown, R. J. (1996). Tajfel’s contribution to the reduction of intergroup conflict. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 169–189). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Federico, C. M., & Hunt, C. V. (2013). Political information, political involvement, and reliance on ideology in political evaluation. Political Behavior, 35(1), 89–112. CrossRef
Federico, C. M., & Schneider, M. C. (2007). Political expertise and the use of ideology: Moderating effects of evaluative motivation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 221–252. CrossRef
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588. CrossRef
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2006). Culture war? The myth of polarized America (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26. CrossRef
Garner, A., & Palmer, H. (2011). Polarization and issue consistency over time. Political Behavior, 33, 225–246. CrossRef
Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Groenendyk, E. (2012). Justifying party identification: A case of identifying with the “lesser of two evils”. Political Behavior, 34, 453–475. CrossRef
Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. (2008). The persuadable voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156. CrossRef
Huddy, L. (2013). From group identity to political cohesion and commitment. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. Levy (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 737–773). New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. CrossRef
Insko, C. A., Nacoste, R. W., & Moe, J. L. (1983). Belief congruence and racial discrimination: Review of the evidence and critical evaluation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 153–174. CrossRef
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405–431. CrossRef
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. CrossRef
Klar, S. (2014). Identity importance and political engagement among American independents. Political Psychology, 35(4), 577–591. CrossRef
Klar, S., & Krupnikov, Y. (2016). Independent politics: How American disdain for parties leads to political inaction. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Lenz, G. S. (2012). Follow the leader? How voters respond to politicians’ policies and performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Levendusky, M. (2009). Partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and Conservatives became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Levendusky, M. S. (2010). Clearer cues, more consistent voters: A benefit of elite polarization. Political Behavior, 32, 111–131. CrossRef
Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation? Political Psychology, 20(1), 99–126. CrossRef
Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2012). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. New York: Basic Books.
Mason, L. (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145. CrossRef
Pew Research Center. (2016). Partisanship and political animosity. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Putz, D. W. (2002). Partisan conversion in the 1990s: Ideological realignment meets measurement theory. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1199–1209. CrossRef
Rogowski, J. C., & Sutherland, J. L. (2016). How ideology fuels affective polarization. Political Behavior, 38, 485–508. CrossRef
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.
Rokeach, M., & Mezei, L. (1966). Race and shared belief as factors in social choice. Science, 151(3707), 167–172. CrossRef
Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Evidence of the long-term persistence of adults’ political predispositions. Journal of Politics, 61(1), 1–28. CrossRef
Sniderman, P. M., & Stiglitz, E. H. (2012). The reputational premium: A theory of party identification and policy reasoning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stoker, L., & Jennings, M. K. (2008). Of time and the development of partisan polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 619–635. CrossRef
Struch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctiveness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 364–373. CrossRef
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39. CrossRef
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
Therriault, A., Tucker, J. A., & Brader, T. (2011). Cross-pressures and political participation. Paper 23, Conference Proceedings at OpenSIUC.
- The Correlates of Discord: Identity, Issue Alignment, and Political Hostility in Polarized America
Lori D. Bougher
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta