Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 3/2021

17.11.2020

The Development and Validation of a Survey for Evaluating Primary Students’ Self-efficacy in STEM Activities

verfasst von: Tian Luo, Winnie Wing Mui So, Wai Chin Li, Jianxin Yao

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

STEM integration has become a popular concept not only in the context of education practices but also as a way of learning. The integration of the STEM domains is evident in students’ learning experiences when engaging in STEM activities. However, there is a lack of instruments for evaluating students’ levels of self-efficacy in these activities. Therefore, the aims of this study were to develop a survey for evaluating upper primary students’ self-efficacy in STEM activities and to explore whether a student’s gender, grade, and participation in STEM activities predict his or her self-efficacy in STEM activities. A total of 844 fourth- to sixth-grade primary students participated in this study. After pilot testing, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted, the survey was found to have a single-factor structure with high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .90). Linear regression analysis showed that school and out-of-school participation in STEM activities significantly predicted the students’ self-efficacy in STEM activities, while grade and gender did not. The survey developed in this study provides a reliable and valid way to measure students’ self-efficacy in STEM activities. These findings also highlight the importance of encouraging students’ participation in both formal and informal STEM activities.
Vorheriger Artikel STEM Teachers’ Preparation, Teaching Beliefs, and Perceived Teaching Competence: a Multigroup Structural Equation Approach
Nächster Artikel Giving Feedback on Peers’ Concept Maps in an Inquiry Learning Context: The Effect of Providing Assessment Criteria

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of abnormal psychology, 112(4), 545.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational, & Psychological Testing (US). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ardura, D., & Galán, A. (2019). The interplay of learning approaches and self-efficacy in secondary school students’ academic achievement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1723–1743.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. 
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: a preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5/6), 23.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: a comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955–970.
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(4)
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions, 154, 136–136.
Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science education, 95(6), 1049–1065.
Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baxter, J. (2011). Answering the unexpected questions: exploring the relationship between students’ creative self-efficacy and teacher ratings of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 342.
Carlson, K. D., & Herdman, A. O. (2012). Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 17–32.
Carmines, E., & Mclver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved models: analysis of covariance structures. Beverly Hills: CA: Sage. (Reprinted.
Concannon, J. P., & Barrow, L. H. (2009). A cross-sectional study of engineering students’ self-efficacy by gender, ethnicity, year, and transfer status. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 163–172.
Concannon, J. P., & Barrow, L. H. (2012). A reanalysis of engineering majors’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 742–753.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189–211
Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 63–79.
Dou, R., Hazari, Z., Dabney, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2019). Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: the importance of talking science. Science Education
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3.
Fouad, N. A., Smith, P. L., Enochs, L. (1997). Reliability and validity evidence for the middle school self-efficacy scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(1), 17.
Güngören, S. (2009). The effect of grade level on elementary school students’ motivational beliefs in science. Master’s Dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turquia
Hair, J. F. (2006). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson Education India.
Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., & Moore, T. (2014). Development of an instrument to assess attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 271–279.
Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146.
Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: a meta-analysis. European journal of psychology of education, 28(1), 1–35.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1–55.
Hutchison, M. A. (2007). Factors affecting the self-efficacy beliefs of first-and second-year engineering students (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University).
Hutchison Green, M. A., Follman, D. K., & Bodner, G. M. (2008). Providing a voice: qualitative investigation of the impact of a first-year engineering experience on students’ efficacy beliefs. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 177–190.
Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: the issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in human behavior, 23(6), 2823–2837.
Johnson, C. C. (2013). Conceptualizing integrated STEM education. School Science and Mathematics, 113(8), 367–368.
Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child development, 73(2), 509–527.
Karaarslan, G., & Sungur, S. (2011). Elementary students’ self-efficacy beliefs in science: role of grade level, gender, and socio-economic status. Science Education International, 22(1), 72–79.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11.
Kline, R. B. (2009). Becoming a behavioral science researcher: A guide to producing research that matters. New York: Guilford Press.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1996). Career development from a social cognitive perspective. Career choice and development, 3, 373–421.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Hackett, G., & Brown, D. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career choice and development, 4, 255–311.
Lent, R. W., Sheu, H. B., Miller, M. J., Cusick, M. E., Penn, L. T., & Truong, N. N. (2018). Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: a meta-analytic path analysis of the social–cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(1), 17.
Liao, H., Armstrong, P. I., Rounds, J. (2008). Development and initial validation of public domain Basic Interest Markers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 159-183.
Louis, R. A., & Mistele, J. M. (2012). The differences in scores and self-efficacy by student gender in mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1163–1190.
Lofgran, B. B., Smith, L. K., & Whiting, E. F. (2015). Science self-efficacy and school transitions: elementary school to middle school, middle school to high school. School Science and Mathematics, 115(7), 366–376.
Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R., & Kennedy, M. S. (2016). Measuring undergraduate students’ engineering self-efficacy: a validation study. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 366–395.
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: country comparisons: international comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report. Australian Council of Learned Academies, Melbourne, Vic.
Milner, D. I., Horan, J. J., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2014). Development and evaluation of STEM interest and self-efficacy tests. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(4), 642–653.
Moore, T. J., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing the state of the art of STEM integration. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 15(1), 5.
Mustafa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., Said, M., & Haruzuan, M. N. (2016). A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225–4228.
Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Jackson, C., Miller, M., Walcott, B., Little, D. L., Speler, L., & Schroeder, D. C. (2014). Developing middle school students’ interests in STEM via summer learning experiences: see Blue STEM Camp. School Science & Mathematics, 114(6), 291–301.
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas: Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Science Board (US). (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the US science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system. National Science Foundation.
Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2010). Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), 391–408.
Oh, Y. J., Jia, Y., Lorentson, M., & LaBanca, F. (2013). Development of the educational and career interest scale in science, technology, and mathematics for high school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 780–790.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 138(2), 353.
Randhawa, B. S., Beamer, J. E., & Lundberg, I. (1993). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the structural model of mathematics achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 85(1), 41.
Sahin, A. (2013). STEM clubs and science fair competitions: effects on post-secondary matriculation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(1), 5–11.
Saxton, E., Burns, R., Holveck, S., Kelley, S., Prince, D., Rigelman, N., & Skinner, E. A. (2014). A Common Measurement System for K-12 STEM education: adopting an educational evaluation methodology that elevates theoretical foundations and systems thinking. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 40, 18.
So, W. W. M. (2013). Connecting mathematics in primary science inquiry projects. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 385-406.
So, W. W. M., Zhan, Y., Chow, S. C. F., Leung, C. F. (2018). Analysis of STEM activities in primary students’ science projects in an informal learning environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(6), 1003-1023.
Toulmin, C. N., & Groome, M. (2007). Building a science, technology, engineering, and math agenda. Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association.
Tseng, K., Chang, C., Lou, S., & Chen, W. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102.
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International journal of science education, 27(6), 639–654.
Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 622–639.
van Aalderen Smeets, S. I., Walma Van Der Molen, J. H., & Xenidou Dervou, I. (2018). Implicit STEM ability beliefs predict secondary school students’ STEM self-efficacy beliefs and their intention to opt for a STEM field career. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56, 465–485.
Wang, C., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323.
Young, J. R., Ortiz, N., & Young, J. L. (2017). STEMulating interest: a meta-analysis of the effects of out-of-school time on student STEM interest. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 5(1), 62–74.
Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215-246.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 82–91.
Metadaten
Titel
The Development and Validation of a Survey for Evaluating Primary Students’ Self-efficacy in STEM Activities
verfasst von
Tian Luo
Winnie Wing Mui So
Wai Chin Li
Jianxin Yao
Publikationsdatum
17.11.2020
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09882-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Journal of Science Education and Technology 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Pedagogy, Partnership, and Collaboration: A Longitudinal, Empirical Study of Serious Educational Gameplay in Secondary Biology Classrooms

ReviewPaper

A Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning-Based Science Assessments: Factors Impacting Machine-Human Score Agreements

OriginalPaper

Web-Based Virtual Lab for Learning Design, Operation, Control, and Optimization of an Anaerobic Digestion Process

OriginalPaper

Giving Feedback on Peers’ Concept Maps in an Inquiry Learning Context: The Effect of Providing Assessment Criteria

OriginalPaper

Investigating Engagement and Flow with a Placed-Based Immersive Virtual Reality Game

OriginalPaper

The Effects of Scientific Self-efficacy and Cognitive Anxiety on Science Engagement with the “Question-Observation-Doing-Explanation” Model during School Disruption in COVID-19 Pandemic

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise