nach oben

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Erschienen in:

13.08.2021 | Original Empirical Research

The differing impacts of brand-line breadth and depth on customers’ repurchasing behavior of frequently purchased packaged goods

verfasst von: Philippe Aurier, Victor D. Mejía

Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Offering the ideal product that individuals will systematically repurchase (intensification) and satisfying their need for variety in order to make them cross-purchase within a brand-line’s products (diversification) instead of switching toward competitors are two fundamental functions of brand-lines. Both rely on product variety, organized along breadth (complementary products) and depth (substitutes). We analyze the differing impacts that breadth and depth have on brand-line repurchasing behavior. Repurchasing is broken down into four components based on its motivation, intensification (repurchasing the same product) vs. diversification (cross-purchasing), and its temporal perspective, inter-trip (over shopping trips) vs. intra-trip (during purchasing trips). Whereas breadth demonstrates only positive effects on the repurchasing components, it has no protective effect against brand-switching. Conversely, depth has a negative impact on inter-trip product repurchasing, the most frequent repurchasing component, but offers a protective negative impact against brand-switching. We examine the moderating impacts of brand-line quality, brand-line alignability, and household size.

Vorheriger Artikel Correction to: Relating entertainment features in screenplays to movie performance: an empirical investigation

Nächster Artikel Correction to: Operationalizing salesperson performance with secondary data: aligning practice, scholarship, and theory

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

To avoid any confusion with brand loyalty, which is a broader and more complex concept, we will only use the term “repurchasing”.

Mattermark and RJMetrics, The Ecommerce Investor Report, 2016.

The service marketing literature uses the terms depth and breadth of the consumer–service provider relationship to refer respectively to intensification and diversification (Aurier & N’Goala, 2010; Bolton et al., 2004). To avoid confusion with brand-line depth and breadth, we use the terms intensification and diversification.

Other terms are used such as assortment choice (Kwak et al., 2015), within-trip variety-seeking (Kim et al., 2002), multiple discreteness (Dubé, 2004) or multiple item choice (Harlam & Lodish, 1995).

Strictly speaking, only purchasing another brand-line without the focal brand-line is brand-line switching.

We consider a “month” to be a 4-week period.

This includes duplications when several brand-lines are purchased in the same shopping trip.

We distinguish brand-line l from brand m because brands may own several brand-lines.

Not displayed here due to space limitations.

We used a nonalignability ratio calculated as the number of distinct levels for the nonalignable attribute (flavor) minus that for the alignable attribute (format), divided by the total sum of levels for the two attributes (Aurier & Mejía, 2020). This ratio varies between −1 (purely alignable) and 1 (purely nonalignable). A ratio greater (lower) than zero represents a predominantly nonalignable (alignable) assortment, and the brand-line was classified accordingly. A ratio close to zero represents an equally alignable and nonalignable assortment, and the brand-line was not considered. Because a line’s alignability depends on its store exposure, it was measured at the store level and then aggregated across stores, over a 4-week moving window.

Anand, B. N., & Shachar, R. (2004). Brands as beacons: A new source of loyalty to multiproduct firms. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.2.135.28670.CrossRef

Aribarg, A., & Arora, N. (2008). Research note--Interbrand variant overlap: Impact on brand preference and portfolio profit. Marketing Science, 27(3), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0262.CrossRef

Ataman, M. B., Mela, C. F., & van Heerde, H. J. (2008). Building brands. Marketing Science, 27(6), 1036–1054. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0358.CrossRef

Aurier, P., & Mejía, V. D. (2014). Multivariate Logit and Probit models for simultaneous purchases: Presentation, uses, appeal and limitations. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 29(2), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051570714535531.

Aurier, P., & Mejía, V. D. (2020). The interplay of brand-line assortment size and alignability in the sales of brand-lines and line-extensions of frequently purchased products. Journal of Business Research, 117(May), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.024.CrossRef

Aurier, P., & N’Goala, G. (2010). The differing and mediating roles of trust and relationship commitment in service relationship maintenance and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0163-z.CrossRef

Aurier, P., & Séré de Lanauze, G. (2012). Impacts of perceived brand relationship orientation on attitudinal loyalty: An application to strong brands in the packaged goods sector. European Journal of Marketing, 46(11), 1602–1627. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211260004.CrossRef

Barroso, A., & Giarratana, M. S. (2013). Product proliferation strategies and firm performance: The moderating role of product space complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1435–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2079.CrossRef

Berger, J., Draganska, M., & Simonson, I. (2007). The influence of product variety on brand perception and choice. Marketing Science, 26(4), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0253.CrossRef

Besag, J. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 192–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/2984812.

Betancourt, R., & Gautschi, D. (1990). Demand complementarities, household production, and RETAIL assortments. Marketing Science, 9(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.9.2.146.CrossRef

Bolton, R. N., Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2004). The theoretical underpinnings of customer asset management: A framework and propositions for future research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304263341.CrossRef

Bordley, R. (2003). Determining the appropriate depth and breadth of a Firm’s product portfolio. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.1.39.19126.CrossRef

Brexendorf, T. O., Bayus, B., & Keller, K. L. (2015). Understanding the interplay between brand and innovation management: Findings and future research directions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(5), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0445-6.CrossRef

Bucklin, R. E., Gupta, S., & Siddarth, S. (1998). Modelling the effect of purchase quantity on consumer choice of product assortment. Journal of Forecasting, 17(3/4), 281. http://10.0.3.234/(SICI)1099-131X(199806/07)17:3/4%3C281::AID-FOR697%3E3.0.CO, 301.

Carter, R. E., & Curry, D. J. (2013). Perceptions versus performance when managing extensions: New evidence about the role of fit between a parent brand and an extension. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0292-z.CrossRef

Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255.CrossRef

Che, H., & Seetharaman, P. B. (2009). “Speed of replacement”: Modeling brand loyalty using last-move data. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.4.494.CrossRef

Chernev, A. (2011). Product assortment and consumer choice: An interdisciplinary review. Foundations & Trends in Marketing, 6(1), 2–61. https://doi.org/10.1561/1700000030.CrossRef

Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., & Goodman, J. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 333–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002.CrossRef

Chernev, A., & Hamilton, R. (2009). Assortment size and option attractiveness in consumer choice among retailers. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(3), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.3.410.CrossRef

Chintagunta, P. K. (1998). Inertia and variety seeking in a model of brand-purchase timing. Marketing Science, 17(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.3.253.CrossRef

Dawes, J. G. (2012). Brand-pack size cannibalization arising from temporary Price promotions. Journal of Retailing, 88(3), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.01.004.CrossRef

Dhar, S. K., Hoch, S. J., & Kumar, N. (2001). Effective category management depends on the role of the category. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00045-8.CrossRef

Dowell, G. (2006). Product line strategies of new entrants in an established industry: Evidence from the U.S. bicycle industry. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 959–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.552.CrossRef

Dubé, J.-P. (2004). Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Science, 23(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1030.0041.CrossRef

Dubé, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J., & Rossi, P. E. (2010). State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. The Rand Journal of Economics, 41(3), 417–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00106.x.CrossRef

Eggers, J. P. (2012). All experience is not created equal: Learning, adapting, and focusing in product portfolio management. Strategic Management Journal, 335(September 2011), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.CrossRef

Eisend, M. (2014). Shelf space elasticity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2013.03.003.CrossRef

Erdem, T. (1998). An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152032.CrossRef

Fasolo, B., Hertwig, R., Huber, M., &Ludwig, M. (2009). Size, entropy, and density: What is the difference that makes the difference between small and large real-world assortments? Psychology &Marketing, 26(3), 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20272.

Feinberg, F. M., Kahn, B. E., & McAlister, L. (1992). Market share response when consumers seek variety. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172572.CrossRef

Gielens, K., & Steenkamp, J. E. M. (2007). Drivers of consumer acceptance of new packaged goods: An investigation across products and countries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.12.003.CrossRef

Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (2005). Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24(3), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0109.CrossRef

Griffin, J. G., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2010). The slippery slope: The impact of feature Alignability on search and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.2.323.CrossRef

Guo, L. (2010). Capturing consumption flexibility in assortment choice from scanner panel data. Management Science, 56(10), 1815–1832. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1200.CrossRef

Gupta, S., Lehmann, D. R., & Stuart, J. A. (2004). Valuing customers. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.1.7.25084.CrossRef

Gupta, S., & Zeithaml, V. (2006). Customer metric and their impact on financial performance. Marketing Science, 25(6), 718–739. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.l060.0221.CrossRef

Hamilton, S. R. F. R. F., & Richards, T. J. (2009). Product differentiation, store differentiation, and assortment depth. Management Science, 55(8), 1368–1376. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1032.CrossRef

Hariharan, V. G., Bezawada, R., & Talukdar, D. (2015). Aggregate impact of different brand development strategies. Management Science, 61(5), 1164–1182. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1900.CrossRef

Harlam, B. A., & Lodish, L. M. (1995). Modeling consumers’ choices of multiple items. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152176.CrossRef

Hasegawa, S., Terui, N., & Allenby, G. M. (2012). Dynamic brand satiation. Journal of Marketing Research, 2437(21243030), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0036.CrossRef

Hui, K.-L. (2004). Product variety under brand influence: An empirical investigation of personal computer demand. Management Science, 50(5), 686–700. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0200.CrossRef

Jimenez-Martin, S., & Ladrón-de-Guevara, A. (2007). Modeling consumption patterns in the attribute space: Theory and evidence of hybrid behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.02.002.CrossRef

Jindal, P., Zhu, T., Chintagunta, P., & Dhar, S. (2020). Marketing-mix response across Retail formats: The role of shopping trip types. Journal of Marketing, 84(2), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919896337.CrossRef

Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Gutsche, J. (1995). A within-attribute model of variety-seeking behavior. Marketing Letters, 6(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995114.

Kahn, B. E. (1995). Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2(3), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-6989(95)00038-0.CrossRef

Kahn, B. E. (1998). Dynamic relationships with customers: High-variety strategies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398261005.CrossRef

Kahn, B. E., & Wansink, B. (2004). The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1086/380286.CrossRef

Kim, B.-D., & Sullivan, M. W. (1998). The effect of parent brand experience on line extension trial and repeat purchase. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007961016262.CrossRef

Kim, C., Jun, D. B., & Park, S. (2018). Capturing flexible correlations in multiple-discrete choice outcomes using copulas. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.12.001.CrossRef

Kim, J., Allenby, G. M., & Rossi, P. E. (2002). Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Science, 21(3), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.21.3.229.143.CrossRef

Kirca, A. H., Randhawa, P., Talay, M. B., & Akdeniz, M. B. (2020). The interactive effects of product and brand portfolio strategies on brand performance: Longitudinal evidence from the U.S. automotive industry. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(2), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.09.003.CrossRef

Koukova, N. T., Kannan, P. K., & Kirmani, A. (2012). Multiformat digital products: How design attributes interact with usage situations to determine choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0058.CrossRef

Kwak, K., Duvvuri, S. D., & Russell, G. J. (2015). An analysis of assortment choice in grocery retailing. Journal of Retailing, 91(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.10.004.CrossRef

Lamey, L., Deleersnyder, B., Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2018). New product success in the consumer packaged goods industry: A shopper marketing approach. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(3), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.03.001.CrossRef

Lattin, J. M., & McAlister, L. (1985). Using a variety-seeking model to identify substitute and complementary relationships among competing products. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(3), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151429.CrossRef

Liu-Thompkins, Y., & Tam, L. (2013). Not all repeat customers are the same: Designing effective cross-selling promotion on the basis of attitudinal loyalty and habit. Journal of Marketing, 77(5), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0508.CrossRef

Ma, Y., Seetharaman, P. B., & Narasimhan, C. (2012). Modeling dependencies in brand choice outcomes across complementary categories. Journal of Retailing, 88(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.04.003.CrossRef

Mejía, V. D., Aurier, P., & Huaman-Ramirez, R. (2021). Disentangling the respective impacts of assortment size and alignability on perceived assortment variety. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59 (March), 102386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102386.

Moreno, A., & Terwiesch, C. (2017). The effects of product line breadth: Evidence from the automotive industry. Marketing Science, 36(2), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2016.0979.CrossRef

Ngobo, P. V. (2017). The trajectory of customer loyalty: An empirical test of dick and Basu’s loyalty framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0493-6.CrossRef

Niraj, R., Padmanabhan, V., & Seetharaman, P. B. (2008). Research note--a cross-category model of households’ incidence and quantity decisions. Marketing Science, 27(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0299.CrossRef

Oppewal, H., & Koelemeijer, K. (2005). More choice is better: Effects of assortment size and composition on assortment evaluation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.03.002.CrossRef

Pick, D., & Eisend, M. (2014). Buyers’ perceived switching costs and switching: A meta-analytic assessment of their antecedents. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0349-2.CrossRef

Ratneshwar, S., & Shocker, A. D. (1991). Substitution in use and the role of usage context in product category structures. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172864.CrossRef

Read, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1995). Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.1.1.34.CrossRef

Reddy, S. K., Holak, S. L., & Bhat, S. (1994). To extend or not to extend : Line success determinants of extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100208.

Reinartz, W., Thomas, J. S., & Bascoul, G. (2008). Investigating cross-buying and customer loyalty. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20106.CrossRef

Rossi, P. E. (2014). Invited paper —Even the rich can make themselves poor: A critical examination of IV methods in marketing applications. Marketing Science, 33(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0860.CrossRef

Russell, G. J., & Petersen, A. (2000). Analysis of cross category dependence in market basket selection. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00030-0.CrossRef

Salisbury, L. C., & Feinberg, F. M. (2012). All things considered? The role of choice set formation in diversification. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0437.CrossRef

Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1086/651235.CrossRef

Schweidel, D. A., Bradlow, E. T., & Fader, P. S. (2011). Portfolio dynamics for customers of a multiservice provider. Management Science, 57(3), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1284.CrossRef

Schweidel, D. A., Fader, P. S., & Bradlow, E. T. (2008). A bivariate timing model of customer acquisition and retention. Marketing Science, 27(5), 829–843. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0328.CrossRef

Seetharaman, P. B. (2004). Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach. Marketing Science, 23(2), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1030.0024.CrossRef

Shah, D., Kumar, V., & Kim, K. H. (2014). Managing customer profits: The power of habits. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 726–741. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0423.CrossRef

Shah, D., Kumar, V., Qu, Y., & Chen, S. (2012). Unprofitable cross-buying : Evidence from consumer and business markets. Journal of Marketing, 76(May), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0445.

Siggelkow, N. (2003). Why focus? The Journal of Industrial Economics, 51(2), 121–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00195.

Simonson, I. (1990). The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, XXVII(may), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172842, 27, 150.

Simonson, I., & Winer, R. S. (1992). The influence of purchase quantity and display format on consumer preference for variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.1086/209292.CrossRef

Sinapuelas, I. C. S., Wang, H. M. D., & Bohlmann, J. D. (2015). The interplay of innovation, brand, and marketing mix variables in line extensions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(5), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0437-6.CrossRef

Sivakumar, K., & Raj, S. P. (1997). Quality tier competition: How price change influences brand choice and category choice. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251790.CrossRef

Sun, L., Rajiv, S., & Chu, J. (2016). Beyond the more the merrier: The variety effect and consumer heterogeneity in system markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.05.010.CrossRef

Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001). Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070301291002.CrossRef

Tanusondjaja, A., Nenycz-Thiel, M., Dawes, J., & Kennedy, R. (2018). Portfolios: Patterns in brand penetration, market share, and hero product variants. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41(December 2017), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.12.009.CrossRef

Thomadsen, R., & Seetharaman, P. B. (2018). The strategic effects of state-dependent consumer preferences: The roles of habits and variety seeking. The Psychology of Habit, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_8.

van der Lans, R. (2018). A simultaneous model of multiple-discrete choices of variety and quantity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(2), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.12.007.CrossRef

Van Trijp, H. C. M., Hoyer, W. D., & Inman, J. J. (1996). Why switch? Product category: Level explanations for true variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152125.CrossRef

Villas-Boas, J. M. (2009). Product variety and endogenous pricing with evaluation costs. Management Science, 55(8), 1338–1346. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1024.CrossRef

Walsh, J. W. (1995). Flexibility in consumer purchasing for uncertain future tastes. Marketing Science, 14(2), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.14.2.148.CrossRef

Walters, R. G. (1991). Assessing the impact of Retail Price promotions on product substitution, complementary purchase, and Interstore sales displacement. Journal of Marketing, 55(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252234.CrossRef

Wansink, B., Kent, R. J., & Hoch, S. J. (1998). An anchoring and adjustment model of purchase quantity decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151931.CrossRef

Watson, G. F., Beck, J. T., Henderson, C. M., & Palmatier, R. W. (2015). Building, measuring, and profiting from customer loyalty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(6), 790–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0439-4.CrossRef

Wernerfelt, B. (1988). Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: An example of signalling by posting a bond. The Rand Journal of Economics, 19(3), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555667.CrossRef

Wilkie, D. C. H., Johnson, L. W., & White, L. (2015). The line extension dilemma: Greater difference or similarity to existing products? Journal of Brand Management, 22(6), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2015.22.CrossRef

Titel: The differing impacts of brand-line breadth and depth on customers’ repurchasing behavior of frequently purchased packaged goods
verfasst von: Philippe Aurier
Victor D. Mejía
Publikationsdatum: 13.08.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Elektronische ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00797-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

The influence of the online community, professional critics, and location similarity on review ratings for niche and mainstream brands

Correction to: Relating entertainment features in screenplays to movie performance: an empirical investigation

Advertising, incentives, and the upsell: how advertising differentially moderates customer- vs. retailer-directed price incentives’ impact on consumers’ preferences for premium products

Correction to: Operationalizing salesperson performance with secondary data: aligning practice, scholarship, and theory

When drivers become inhibitors of organic consumption: the need for a multistage view

From franchisee experience to customer experience: their effects on franchisee performance