nach oben

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Erschienen in:

19.11.2020

The Effect of a Pedagogical STEAM Model on Students’ Project Competence and Learning Motivation

verfasst von: Chien-Liang Lin, Chun-Yen Tsai

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The development of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Liberal Arts, and Mathematics) curricula has emerged in the past decade. A pedagogical STEAM (Scaffolding, Tutoring, Engaging, Argumentation, and Modeling) model was proposed in this study to implement interdisciplinary STEAM curricula. The effects of this model on students’ project competence and learning motivation were evaluated. A quasi-experimental design was adopted in the study. One hundred fourteen participants were recruited from a high school in southern Taiwan. There were 57 students in the experimental group (27 males; 30 females) and 57 in the comparison group (35 males; 22 females). The results revealed that the implementation of the pedagogical STEAM model was able to enhance the project competence and learning motivation of the students in the experimental group. Qualitative data from student interviews also revealed that the students had positive perceptions of the model. The main implication of this study is that the pedagogical STEAM model has the potential to be used as a teaching guide for the high school interdisciplinary curricula.

Vorheriger Artikel Comparing Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction of an Online Algebra-Based Physics Course with a Face-to-Face Course

Nächster Artikel Zooming in Time—Exploring Students’ Interpretations of a Dynamic Tree of Life

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Al Salami, M., Makela, C., & Miranda, M. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 27(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NewYork: Worth.

Chalmers, C., Carter, M., Cooper, T., & Nason, R. (2017). Implementing “big ideas” to advance the teaching and learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9799-1CrossRef

Chen, C. S., & Lin, J. W. (2019). A practical action research study of the impact of maker-centered STEM-PjBL on a rural middle school in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09961-8CrossRef

Chien, Y. H., & Chu, P. Y. (2018). The different learning outcomes of high school and college students on a 3D-Printing STEAM engineering design curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(6), 1047–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9832-4CrossRef

Chu, H. E., Martin, S. N., & Park, J. (2019). A theoretical framework for developing an intercultural STEAM program for Australian and Korean students to enhance science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 1251–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9922-yCrossRef

Cohen. J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.

Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M.-T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2018). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419CrossRef

Gardner, M., & Tillotson, J. W. (2019). Interpreting integrated STEM: Sustaining pedagogicalal innovation within a public middle school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1283–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9927-6CrossRef

Geitz, G., Brinke, D.J.-T., & Kirschner, P. A. (2016). Changing learning behaviour: Self-efficacy and goal orientation in PBL groups in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.001CrossRef

Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. J. (2017). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in engineering, science, and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9673-xCrossRef

Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affect high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0CrossRef

Hoeg, D. G., & Bencze, J. L. (2017). Values underpinning STEM education in the USA: An analysis of the Next Generation Science Standards. Science Education, 101(2), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21260CrossRef

Kim, P. W. (2016). The Wheel Model of STEAM education based on traditional Korean scientific contents. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2353–2371. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1263aCrossRef

Korner, M., & Hopf, M. (2015). Cross-age peer tutoring in physics: Tutors, tutees, and achievement in electricity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1039–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9539-8CrossRef

Kuo, H.-C., Tseng, Y.-C., & Yang, Y.-T.C. (2019). Promoting college student’s learning motivation and creativity through a STEM interdisciplinary PBL human-computer interaction system design and development course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.09.001CrossRef

Lee, C. B., Jonassen, D., & Teo, T. (2011). The role of model building in problem solving and conceptual change. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820902850158CrossRef

Lin, C. L. (2018). The development of an instrument to measure the project competences of college students in online project-based learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9708-yCrossRef

Lou, S.-J., Shih, R.-C., Diez, C., & Tseng, K.-H. (2011). The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: An exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9114-8CrossRef

Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441CrossRef

Manneh, I. A., Rundgren, C.-J., Hamza, K. M., & Eriksson, L. (2018). Tutor-student interaction in undergraduate chemistry: A case of learning to make relevant distinctions of molecular structures for determining oxidation states of atoms. International Journal of Science Education, 40(16), 2023–2043. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1517423CrossRef

Master, A., Cheryan, S., Moscatelli, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2017). Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013CrossRef

Meluso, A., Zheng, M., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. (2012). Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.019CrossRef

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine. (2016). Developing a National STEM Workforce Strategy: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Newhouse, C. P. (2017). STEM the boredom: Engage students in the Australian curriculum using ICT with problem-based learning and assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9650-4CrossRef

Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H.-H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.xCrossRef

Seman, L. O., Hausmann, R., & Bezerra, E. A. (2018). On the students’ perceptions of the knowledge formation when submitted to a project-based learning environment using web applications. Computers & Education, 117, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.001CrossRef

Sengupta, P., & Clark, D. (2016). Playing modeling games in the science classroom: The case for disciplinary integration. Educational Technology, 56(3), 16–22.

Smith, E., & White, P. (2019). Where do all the STEM graduates Go? Higher education, the labour market and career trajectories in the UK. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9741-5CrossRef

Shien, P. P., & Tsai, C. Y. (2015). Impact of a Scientist-Teacher Collaborative Model on students, teachers, and scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2147–2169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1068465CrossRef

So, W. W. M., Zhan, Y., Chow, S. C. F., & Leung, C. F. (2018). Analysis of STEM activities in primary students’ science projects in an informal learning environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(6), 1003–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9828-0CrossRef

Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003CrossRef

Tsai, C. Y. (2018). The effect of online argumentation of socio-scientific issues on students’ scientific competencies and sustainability attitudes. Computers & Education, 116, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.009CrossRef

Tuan, H.-L., Chin, C.-C., & Shieh, S.-H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737CrossRef

Vennix, J., den Brok, P., & Taconis, R. (2018). Do outreach activities in secondary STEM education motivate students and improve their attitudes towards STEM? International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1263–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1473659CrossRef

Wells, J. G. (2016). PIRPOSAL model of integrative STEM education: Conceptual and pedagogicalal framework for classroom implementation. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(6), 12–19.

Zhang, L., VanLehn, K., Girard, S., Burleson, W., Chavez-Echeagaray, M. E., Gonzalez-Sanchez, J., & Hidalgo-Pontet, Y. (2014). Evaluation of a meta-tutor for constructing models of dynamic systems. Computers & Education, 75, 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.015CrossRef

Titel: The Effect of a Pedagogical STEAM Model on Students’ Project Competence and Learning Motivation
verfasst von: Chien-Liang Lin
Chun-Yen Tsai
Publikationsdatum: 19.11.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09885-x

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Student Perceptions Using Augmented Reality and 3D Visualization Technologies in Chemistry Education

A Combined Strategy of Additive Manufacturing to Support Multidisciplinary Education in Arts, Biology, and Engineering

Virtual Laboratories in Undergraduate Science and Engineering Courses: a Systematic Review, 2009–2019

Zooming in Time—Exploring Students’ Interpretations of a Dynamic Tree of Life

Computer-Based Classification of Preservice Physics Teachers’ Written Reflections

Working Together: Integrating Computational Modeling Approaches to Investigate Complex Phenomena

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten