Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Received and reviewed by former editor, George Neuman.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between advertisement terminology and consumer product knowledge in the attitudes toward advertisements and brands.
One hundred and twenty undergraduates participated in a 2 × 2 (terminologies are used versus terminologies are not used × high consumer product knowledge versus low consumer product knowledge) between-subjects design.
Low consumer product knowledge individuals form significantly more favorable advertisement attitudes and brand attitudes toward advertisements with terminologies than toward advertisements without terminologies, but no differentially favorable advertisement attitudes and brand attitudes are formed for high consumer product knowledge individuals.
The interaction effects of message-level variables (such as terminology) and consumer-level variables (such as consumer product knowledge) are of importance. The effectiveness of advertisement terminologies depends on the levels of consumer product knowledge. Understanding the consumer-level variables of target markets before making advertisement decision is very critical. Techniques of data-mining and psychographics benefit advertisement managers to better realize the targeted consumers.
This is one of the pioneering studies to examine the relationship between advertisement terminology and consumer product knowledge in the attitudes toward advertisements and brands. Additionally, most of the prior studies on advertisement effects associated with the use of advertisement terminology ignored the influence of consumer product knowledge. The present study helps us to understand the influence of consumer product knowledge in advertisement effects and provides evidence for the relationship between advertisement terminology and consumer product knowledge in the attitudes toward advertisements and brands.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, W. (1987). Dimension of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454. CrossRef
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge, exposure, and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234–248. CrossRef
Bieha, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1983). Information accessibility as a moderator of consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 1–14. CrossRef
Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 1–16. CrossRef
Hong, C. (2002). The influence of the terminology to the customer’s attitude and purchase intension—The interfering effect of the product’s innovativeness. Master’s Thesis, Department of Business Administration, Fu-jun University, Taiwan.
Johnson, E. J., & Russo, J. E. (1980). Product familiarity and learning new information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 542–550. CrossRef
Lynch, J. G., Jr., Marmorstein, H., & Weigold, M. F. (1988). Choices from sets including remembered brands: Use of recall. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 169–184. CrossRef
MacInnis, D. J., & Jaworski, B. J. (1989). Marketing jobs and management controls: Toward a framework. Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 1–23.
Meeds, R. (1998). Technically speaking: A content analysis of technical language, explanatory content and information cues in magazine advertising. In D. D. Muehing (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1998 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (p. 87). Pullman, WA: Washington St. University.
Muehling, D. D., & Laczniak, R. N. (1988). Advertising’s immediate and delayed influence on brand attitude: Considerations across message-involvement levels. Journal of Advertising, 17, 23–34.
Mueller, B. (1992). Standardization vs. specialization: An examination of westernization in Japanese advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 32, 15–24.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 253–264. CrossRef
Rao, A. R., & Sieben, W. A. (1992). The effect of prior knowledge on price acceptability and the type of information examined. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 256–270. CrossRef
Shibata, S. (1983). Japan’s bilingualism and social issues. Journal of Popular Culture, 17, 111–119. CrossRef
Stewart, D. W., & Koslow, S. (1989). Executional factors and advertising effectiveness: A replication. Journal of Advertising, 18, 21–32.
Toncar, M. F., & Munch, W. A. (2001). Consumer responses to tropes in print advertising. Journal of Advertising, 30, 55–65.
- The Effect of Terminologies on Attitudes Toward Advertisements and Brands: Consumer Product Knowledge as a Moderator
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Voraussetzungen für wirtschaftliche additive Fertigung/© Marco2811 | Fotolia