nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

14.12.2018 | Original Paper

The Effects of Collaborative Video Production on Situational Interest of Elementary School Students

verfasst von: Joseph P. Gaston, Byron Havard

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine how Collaborative Video Production (CVP) influences students’ perceived learning, content interest, and school interest. The theoretical framework is based on the Four Phase Interest Model developed by Renninger and Hidi (2016). The sample consisted of 242 students and 13 teachers representing grades 2 through 5. Results of this convergent parallel mixed methods study (Creswell and Plano Clark 2011) suggest CVP had a positive influence on perceived learning, content interest, and school interest for second grade through fifth grade students. The presence of Phase 1: triggered situational interest, and Phase 2: maintained situational interest as described by Renninger and Hidi (2016) were evident in the results. Students and teachers also described CVP as having a positive influence on the learning environment.

Vorheriger Artikel GroupMe: Investigating Use of Mobile Instant Messaging in Higher Education Courses

Nächster Artikel Investigating the Impact of Augmented Reality on Elementary Students’ Mental Model of Scientists

Barron, B., Gomez, K., Pinkard, N., & Martin, C. (2014). The digitalyouth network: Cultivating digital media citizenship in urban communities. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Bazeli, M. J., & Heintz, J. L. (1997). Technology across the curriculum: Activities and ideas. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.

Beltramo, D. A. (2008). Digital video production: A case study on motivating at-risk middle school math students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Information and Learning Company. (UMI Number: 3297173).

Clark, R. E., & Sugrue, B. M. (1991). Research on instructional media, 1978–1988. In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 327–343). Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and efforts in education. Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin.CrossRef

Edelson, D. C., & Josephs, D. M. (2004). The interest driven learning design framework: motivating learning through usefulness. ICLS 2004: Embracing diversity in the learning sciences: Proceedings of the 6^th international conference on learning sciences: 166–173.

Gaston, J., & Havard, B. (2017). Collaborative video production in elementary school grades 2 through 5. Paper presented at the 2017 Association for Educational Communications and Technology annual meeting, Jacksonville, FL.

Gaston, J., & Havard, B. (2018). The effects of collaborative video production on situational interest of elementary students. Paper presented at the 2018 International Society for Technology in Education annual conference, Chicago, IL.

Henderson, M., Auld, G., Holkner, B., Russell, G., Seah, W. T., Fernando, A., & Romeo, G. (2010). Students creating digital video in the primary classroom: Student autonomy, learning outcomes, and professional learning communities. Australian Educational Computing, 24(2), 12–20.

Hobbs, R., Donnelly, K., Friesem, J., & Moen, M. (2013). Learning to engage: How positive attitudes about the news, media literacy, and video production contribute to adolescent civic engagement. Educational Media International, 50(4), 231–246.CrossRef

Illeris, K. (2007). How we learn. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Rose, M. M. (2003). Learning to solve problem with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Kang, H., Scharmann, L. C., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(4), 383–405.

Kearney, M., & Schuck, S. (2005). Students in the director’s seat: Teaching and learning with student-generated video. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2005 (pp. 2864–2871). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Messersmith, E. E. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 591–614.CrossRef

Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436.CrossRef

Ochsner, K. (2010). Lights, camera, action research: The effects of didactic digital movie making on students’ twenty-first century learning skills and science content in the middle school classroom (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Information and Learning Company. (UMI Number: 3407089).

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Ranker, J. (2007). A new perspective on inquiry: A case study of digital video production. English Journal, 97(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/30047212.CrossRef

Renninger, K. A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 361–395). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: Controversies and new directions (pp. 373–404). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRef

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173–195). New York: Academic Press.CrossRef

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York: Routledge.

Ross, D. L., Yerrick, R., & Molebash, P. (2003). Lights! Camera! Science?: Using digital video in the elementary science classrooms. Learning & Leading with Technology, 31(3), 18–21.

Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58–67.CrossRef

Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175–184.CrossRef

Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 299–323.CrossRef

Schlechty, P. C. (2011). Engaging students: The next level of working on the work. San Francisco: Wiley.

Spires, H. A., Hervey, L. G., Morris, G., & Stelpflug, C. (2012). Energizing project-based inquiry: Middle-grade students read, write, and create videos. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(6), 483–493.CrossRef

Stanwood, W. E. (2002). Evaluating subject matter learning in producing television programs (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Information and Learning Company. (UMI Number: 3043326).

Tapola, A., Veermans, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). Predictors and outcomes of situational interest during a science learning task. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 41(6), 1047–1064.CrossRef

Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37–54.CrossRef

Urbano, L. D., & Urbano, L. C. (2008). Learning through movie production with the movie classroom. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56(4), 334–341.CrossRef

Yerrick, R., Ross, D., & Molebash, P. (2003). Promoting equity with digital video. Learning & Leading with Technology, 31(4), 16–19.

Titel: The Effects of Collaborative Video Production on Situational Interest of Elementary School Students
verfasst von: Joseph P. Gaston
Byron Havard
Publikationsdatum: 14.12.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0363-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Correction to: Software Engineering Design Principles Applied to Instructional Design: What can we Learn from our Sister Discipline?

Investigating the Impact of Augmented Reality on Elementary Students’ Mental Model of Scientists

Review of Bower, M. (2017). Design of Technology-Enhanced Learning: Integrating Research and Practice. Bingly, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited

Build-A-Bug Workshop: Designing a Learning Experience with Emerging Technology to Foster Creativity

One-To-One Initiative Implementation from Insiders’ Perspectives

GroupMe: Investigating Use of Mobile Instant Messaging in Higher Education Courses